Comedian and civilisationist YouTube & GB News Exclusive content on Patreon Links/gigs: https://xitter.gq/t.co/YpJ6bAt9rT Delighted to appal everyone Pronouns: she/her
UK
Joined February 2011
- Tweets46.9K
- Following1.7K
- Followers116K
- Likes103K
Pinned Tweet
I would like to apologise unreservedly for the offensive, bigoted, hurtful jokes I will be telling on my standup tour:
Liverpool 20th Nov: hotwatercomedy.co.uk/event/4…
Southampton 3rd Nov: theatticsouthampton.co.uk/pr…
Edinburgh with @CountDankulaTV 5th Nov SOLD OUT
Stafford with @andrewlawrence 13th Nov gatehousetheatre.co.uk/whats…
Cambridge 26th Nov SOLD OUT
Second Cambridge date added due to demand 28th Jan: ents24.com/cambridge-events/…
Manchester with Count Dankula 19th Nov billetto.co.uk/e/cancelled-i…
"Genuinely offensive...dangerous…a traumatic experience" - The National Student
Doxxing families who are under credible threats of violence is bad, and the journalists responsible should be prosecuted
"We've listened to the British people and decided: you're terrible, and we will replace you"
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio retweeted
🚨NEW: A UK bank chief executive, reacting to John Healey's decision to raise the bank's profit surcharge said:
"Taxing the engines of growth to reduce VAT on gherkins is end-of-Rome level of stupidity"
[@FT]
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio retweeted
This guy walked free for assaulting police officers in an airport and @TRobinsonNewEra could be facing 10 years for making a phone call to journalists that were doxxing him and his family on holiday.
Make it make sense.
What's racist today? Today, a poster depicting a bald white man as a terrorist on London's public transport is racist, because people thought it was a hijabi.
The history of terror attacks on London's public transport features more Muslims than bald white men. Telling the truth is a hate crime because reality is racist.
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio retweeted
Many left wing Brazilians recently began tweeting about how they wanted to emulate China as a ‘successful left wing country’. IE they wanted to copy Chinese policies to ‘fix’ Brazil but left-ishly. Chinese users soon pointed out many Chinese policies are to the right of Bolsonaro
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio retweeted
The Economist on racial disparities:
Black women four times as likely to die in pregnancy or labour: “Troubling”
Afghans seven times as likely to be convicted of sex crimes: “The numbers need to be kept in perspective”
Our analysis suggests that Afghans are convicted of sex crimes in England and Wales at seven times the British rate. But the numbers need to be kept in perspective economist.com/britain/2026/1…
It's funny how Daily Mail readers have a reputation of being right-wing patriots, but in reality they're just yellow-gusseted Hope Not Hate wankers
A sensible government would build the capacity to generate cheap electricity instead of regulating capacity out of existence and then borrowing money from you to give to you
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio retweeted
This is funny because statistically if only parents were allowed to vote, no Democrat would ever be elected to public office ever again
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio retweeted
Same author
Understand how the narrative works.
Ahead of Brazil’s election, they were gearing up to blame Meta if Lula lost. Now that he’s been declared the winner, we’re hearing about the brilliant use of WhatsApp (Meta) that helped deliver his victory.
When Obama won in 2012, they celebrated his shrewd use of Facebook, voter data and microtargeting. When Brexit happened and Trump won in 2016, we got the Cambridge Analytica moral panic.
When the left wins, it’s brilliant digital campaigning. When the right wins, it’s social media manipulation undermining democracy.
Leftists look at a culture like this and think, "how quickly can we create enclaves of this in Britain?"
I got to the end before I realised he's describing China, not Britain.
再强调一遍，浏览外网或翻墙被派出所传唤，根本不用慌。
首先是网警从流量监控系统中标记了你，然后会通知你当地的派出所片儿警将你传唤问话。
你的不当言论，会被打印出来，放在你面前。
你的手机，会要求解锁，他们会检查你在群里，聊天软件里还说了什么。
民警是很忙，但如果接到系统派发的工单，再忙也要处理，不然就一直挂在系统里，影响KPI了。
处理这种事，民警作为体制内打工人，他的自由裁量权很大的。你其实是增加他们工作量的一个小麻烦。只要好好配合，他们没必要跟你计较太多。
所以只要保证流程合规，上交资料完整，应付检查就行了。但你如果要装逼，摆出不合作的姿态，那不好意思，想整你的途径和方法太多了，哈哈。
去了之后，态度好一点，姿态低一点，开口说：“领导，不好意思，给你添麻烦了。”
然后最重要的是问话环节，他问你答。你不要没事找事，自己多说乱说。不知道、不了解、没做过的，直接就说不知道，别的一概不说。但你确实做过的，而且白纸黑字的放在你面前，那就不要抵赖。
不要说任何对抗性的言论。比如什么什么做的不对，所以我要批判。
如果你是因为不当发言被传唤，就说：“我理解错了意思，以为他在说什么，所以我才说了什么，表达有偏差。其实我不是这个意思。”
如果你是因为浏览了网站被传唤，就说我是不小心点到的，我一点开它就推送了，我也不知道为什么。
只要你态度好，把事情往小了说，一般也就是记录一下。没人愿意增加自己的工作量，对不对？
笔录确认没问题，签字盖章，这事儿就翻篇儿了。
千万不要装逼硬刚。
还有，虽然翻墙了，但什么该说、什么不该说，作为一个成年人，生在红旗下，长在春风里，接受了国家这么多年的教育，自己心里应该有点逼数。
毕竟你爸不是李刚，就算是，也不行。
75% of civilian deaths in conflict are men; women most affected.
25 women and girls.
That’s how many were killed 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙙𝙖𝙮 in conflict zones in 2025.
#Peace must mean safety for women and girls.
🔗 More on the @UN Secretary-General's report on #WomenPeaceSecurity: unwomen.org/en/news-stories/…
#ForAllWomenAndGirls
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
According to the same UN report, women and girls accounted for one in four of over 37,000 civilian deaths in 2025. Men and boys were the remaining three-quarters. The report notes men are still likelier to be killed.
unwomen.org/en/articles/fa…
What's racist today? Today, using AI in policing is racist. This article contains the ludicrous claim that crime is caused by police observing it:
"More crime is recorded there simply because more officers are there to see it. Areas outside the shading appear to have less crime, because fewer people are looking."
The vast majority of volume crime is reported by the victim to the police, not observed by the police as it happens.
Police using AI risks making discrimination worse, researchers warn bbc.in/4kg6uug
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio retweeted
This supposed “clearing” of Jason Arday for plagiarism is based on the fact that a single scientific journal decided not to retract a paper of his or take any further action such as issuing a correction.
The journal did not come out with a statement saying they had “cleared” him. Nor did they asses all the papers of his that show evidence of fraud or plagiarism. They apparently took yet another look at a paper to which they had already attached a correction.
But because the Byline Times is wedded to the narrative of claiming Arday was never at fault for anything, and because so is Bluesky, the claim flies unquestioned. Somehow these arguments never acknowledge that there is strong evidence that Arday stole another academic’s data and presented it as his own, which would be fraud.
