
Bio-Tech & loving life. Widowed Dad to 8 great kids (3 specially chosen) + 2new G/kids. I know what a woman is. Keir Starmer is the problem #FarRightThugsUnite
Lichfield my roots
Joined May 2011
- Tweets72.3K
- Following30.5K
- Followers30.6K
- Likes236K
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
Richard Dawkins reacts to the story of Rana Ahmad, who said her own brother wanted to kill her after she left Islam the religion of peace.
The same religion Andy Burnham, King Charles and Prince William all endorse.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
Muslim says "Allahu Akbar" as he and other Muslims destroy the graves of Christians and Jews.
Not even after death are non MusIims safe from these inbreds.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
There are now believed to be over 4,000 undocumented men waiting to cross.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
Even our ancient charities are being plundered by genocidal, terrorist loving colonisers.
London bridges charity gave £1.1million to Muslim group whose trustee 'has ties to Hamas' while capital's river crossings crumble trib.al/NGHLdTY
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
OLDHAM'S LABOUR LEADER AMANDA CHADDERTON BLOCKED THE COUNCIL'S DEMAND FOR AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO THE RAPE OF THE TOWN'S CHILDREN. SHE REMOVED THE DEMAND TO INVESTIGATE WHAT HER OWN COUNCILLORS AND OFFICERS KNEW. SHE SAID IT WAS TIME TO MOVE ON. HAD WE MOVED ON, THERE WOULD BE NO NATIONAL INQUIRY.
When she lost her seat, she said: "It's a conspiracy theory. We had a report that said in black and white there was no cover-up." That report was Andy Burnham's.
They thought Burnham's review had closed the scandal down. They thought those of us demanding accountability could be dismissed. We had other ideas.
BURNHAM'S REVIEW WAS PART OF THE COVER-UP
The review was asked for by Sean Fielding, the Labour leader of the council that stood accused. Andy Burnham, then Mayor of Greater Manchester and the region's Police and Crime Commissioner, commissioned it. Oldham Council and Greater Manchester Police, the two bodies under investigation, helped shape its terms.
The police force Burnham was responsible for never gave his reviewers full access to its records, and the council redacted key information. The review found that the police had told the BBC there were just two pieces of intelligence on the shisha bars when their own officers had filed several, and called that proportionate.
Burnham's expert team also failed to interview a single one of the survivors of the town's Pakistani Rape Gangs.
To clear the former council leader of protecting the Pakistani men abusing Oldham's children, the review relied on his own 2014 blog. That council leader was Jim McMahon. His defence were his words on an obscure blog back in 2014 in a town where the majority of people did not read online blogs.
Burnham's team knew what they were doing. They knew a council leader had a duty to stand in the council chamber and warn people what was happening.
It was published on 20 June 2022 and declared there was no evidence of a cover-up. When one of its authors was asked about my allegations, he said there was no basis for them. A review that could not see the police evidence had been used to tell Oldham that the people exposing the abuse were the ones lying.
LABOUR USED THE REVIEW AS A WEAPON
Labour picked it up the day it was published. Jim McMahon, by then MP for Oldham West and Royton, Debbie Abrahams, MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth, and Angela Rayner, the party's deputy leader, dismissed the allegations as conspiracy theories and declared that a line had been drawn under the scandal. On 30 June, ten days after a review that cleared him on the strength of his own blog, McMahon attacked me by name in Parliament.
On 22 July Burnham wrote to the people of Oldham thanking his reviewers for the thorough way in which they had undertaken their work. He said nothing about the police records his own force had kept from them or why his expert team had failed to interview a single survivor.
CHADDERTON BLOCKED OLDHAM COUNCIL FROM DEMANDING AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO ITS OWN CONDUCT
On 13 July 2022, Amanda Chadderton, Labour leader of Oldham Council and councillor for Royton South, stood in the council chamber and moved an amendment removing the demand for an independent public inquiry into the rape gang scandal. She also deleted the words "including the actions and knowledge of Council Members and Officers" from the motion. In their place came her declaration: "We must move forward."
Labour councillors backed her, and the amended motion passed by 32 votes to 20. Burnham's review had been public for 23 days. Oldham Labour had already used it to shut down any investigation of themselves.
GREATER MANCHESTER POLICE ARRESTED ME SEVEN DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION
We took our campaign to the streets of Oldham to remove Chadderton from office at the May 2023 elections. We had crowdfunded leaflets and I led a small team of mostly pensioners. We were up against the Labour Party. Even Andy Burnham came to Oldham to campaign against us.
On 27 April 2023, seven days before polling day, Greater Manchester Police dawn raided my home and arrested me. It was the force that answered to Andy Burnham as Police and Crime Commissioner. The allegations were false. The raid, and the attempt to fast-track proceedings and have me remanded, were designed to take me off the streets in the final week of the campaign.
My legal team challenged what was happening, and the police were forced to acknowledge that I was the victim. By the next day they had released me and confirmed no further action. Undeterred, I went straight back to campaigning.
WE REMOVED HER FROM OFFICE
On 4 May 2023, Amanda Chadderton lost her seat in Royton South. Our independent candidate topped the poll. In a ward electing three councillors, the Labour leader of Oldham Council finished fourth and missed the last seat by 21 votes. She was the third consecutive Labour leader of Oldham Council we had helped remove, following Sean Fielding and Arooj Shah.
Her answer to losing was to reach for Burnham's review and call the cover up of the gang rape of little White girls by Pakistani men a conspiracy theory. The review had been written to clear her council. She was still hiding behind it after we removed her.
In 2024 Labour rewarded her with a job as campaigns manager for Yvette Cooper, then Shadow Home Secretary. Cooper became Home Secretary on 5 July 2024 with Chadderton still on her staff. She was also the Home Secretary who tried to block a national inquiry.
The council leader who blocked Oldham's inquiry went to work for the minister trying to block the national one.
After removing three council leaders in succession, in May 2024 Labour lost its majority on Oldham Council. We finally had the numbers to force the council to write to Jess Phillips demanding a statutory inquiry. Later that year the Labour government refused Oldham's request for a government-led inquiry.
Elon Musk then got involved.
On 12 February 2025 we outmanoeuvred the Labour Party and through an emergency council meeting, we forced Oldham Council to vote unanimously to demand a statutory public inquiry. Four months later, the government conceded the National Statutory Inquiry.
None of this happened because those in power suddenly decided to do the right thing. Every one of those steps was forced on them by people in Oldham who refused to stop.
WE PAID FOR IT
The arrest seven days before the election was not the only attempt. I was already facing separate charges on earlier allegations. For three years, under house arrest, I waited for a trial on allegations I knew were false, while I carried on exposing what had been done to Oldham's children.
Every night, I barricaded my front door whilst Labour Party aligned Pakistani gangsters and Islamists, under the protection of Andy Burnham's police force, openly boasted of what they were going to do to me.
They tried to frame me, and they failed. They tried to scare me into submission, and they failed. They tried to silence me. My voice only grew louder.
My one regret was that my mother died before I was able to clear my name. No electoral victory, no public vindication and no national inquiry can ever give that back to me.
Warren Bates was there at the beginning. He was a former councillor who refused to accept what was happening in our town. It was his evidence bundle that helped force this. Warren died before he could see how far we had come. I held his hand at his death bed. His last words to me were 'get them, make sure you get them.'
I made him a promise that I would carry on, that we would not abandon the fight or allow those responsible to bury what had happened. I have kept that promise.
THE PEOPLE WHO TRIED TO CLOSE IT DOWN MUST ANSWER FOR IT
The National Inquiry exists because ordinary working class people from a northern mill town people refused to be silenced, refused to surrender and refused to accept that the powerful could declare the matter closed. Some of the people who began this fight are no longer here to see it. I mourn them every day.
The inquiry must examine Oldham in full. It must call Andy Burnham, who commissioned the review and defended it, and Amanda Chadderton, who used it to block an inquiry into her own council. It must call Jim McMahon and Debbie Abrahams, Angela Rayner too. The same with every Labour councillor that attempted to prevent the truth from coming out. They must explain under oath why they told the children of Oldham it was time to move on.
My name is Raja Miah. I am 8 years in. I am not yet finished. Are you?
_________
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it.
Over a million people engaged in my content this weekend. Only a small fraction followed up with a subscription to my newsletter This is becoming impossible to sustain.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
Raja Miah MBE
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
🚨 DOWNING STREET PANICS AS RIOTS ERUPT ACROSS EUROPE
I want you to watch how fast Westminster politicians panic the second they realize the public has reached a boiling point. 🤡
As violent unrest sweeps through Paris, Milan, and Tirana over soaring living costs and collapsing public services, Downing Street has just issued a nervous warning to the British public.
A spokesperson for Andy Burnham threatened that police have all the powers and resources needed to crush any domestic unrest before it starts.
Notice the sickening hypocrisy running modern British policing.
When your family home gets burgled or shoplifters destroy a high street business, police chiefs claim they have zero manpower and tell you to log a reference number online.
Yet the very second ordinary taxpayers start boiling with rage over two pound a litre fuel, record taxes, and open border chaos, the state magically finds unlimited resources to deploy against the public.
Ministers like Chris McDonald go onto television claiming there is zero sign of frustration, proving how completely detached this government is from everyday reality.
Robert Jenrick is spot on: when politicians crush the working class with unpayable bills and force mass migration onto local communities, social stability will eventually shatter.
Downing Street is running scared because Andy Burnham knows the British people have completely run out of patience with this managed decline.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
Replying to @lienomail
And meanwhile we all sit back and watch it happen.
When this government have taken every last penny and taxed every single item & activity, when we can’t afford to heat our homes or drive our cars, then we may just decide that enough is enough.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
Labour plans to impose a 'YouTube tax,' the Independent has just revealed.
A senior Whitehall source has told the Independent that the plan is to expand the BBC licence fee to streaming platforms of which Youtube is the largest with 55 million viewers.
“The money needs to be used to help support local journalism and counter a lot of the conspiracy theories and fake news which we have seen help parties like Reform getting elected in different parts of the country,” the source said.
The source revealed that there had been a “hold-up” with the Youtube tax plan under the Starmer Government. “But now we have had a change of prime minister, we are able to press ahead with the plan to expand it to streaming platforms”, they noted.
It would be a grave error for Andy Burnham to impose this ridiculous new tax in order to finance state propaganda. To only allow those people who have paid a tax to use a computer would be an extraordinary and very unwelcome expansion of state power.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
This is Scotland.
In Aberdeen, a migrant who can barely speak English and needs an interpreter just to understand what’s happening is handed the keys to a brand-new, taxpayer-funded house. Fucking Disgusting and makes me absolutely sick!!
Meanwhile, Scots who’ve paid into the system their whole lives are struggling to put food on the table or keep a roof over their heads. Housing waiting lists stretch for years. Veterans sleep rough. Families are priced out.
We’ve had decades of this: open the door, hand out the keys, and call anyone who questions it a bigot. The people who built and paid for this country are expected to just accept it.
This isn’t compassion. It’s a government that looks after everyone except its own.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
I wonder if the #MSM will see this
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
🚨Now it's SIX Meetings With Man City, Not the One He Told Parliament
Andy Burnham told MPs he had only one significant meeting with Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners while mayor. The Sun has now counted at least six contacts with the club's hierarchy.
Two dinners with chairman Khalsa on Al Mubarak in 2017 and 2018, a 2019 stand-side chat, the 2021 summit he later called his sole significant meeting, a 2023 sit-down with CEO Ferran Soriano, and a 2025 meeting with former COO Roel de Vries. The dinner entries then disappeared from the Greater Manchester Combined Authority website.
Burnham says the dinners were ordinary hospitality, that City's financial case was never discussed, and that he is happy for a full trawl. Fair enough - if the public is expected to accept that a prime minister's earlier relationship with owners now found guilty of almost every one of 115 Premier League charges was purely incidental. The gap between "one significant meeting" and six is not a rounding error. It is a credibility problem
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
😡 The BBC is supposed to be an independent, impartial broadcaster, separate from the Government.
Yet now we’re learning that 39 civil servants have been seconded into BBC newsrooms over the past eight years.. helping write and fact check stories about immigration, small boats, crime, Covid and government budgets.
Some of that work appeared under BBC News and BBC Verify without readers knowing government employees had contributed. 🤦🏻♀️
See the problem here?
The BBC is supposed to scrutinise the Government.. not have government employees helping produce the very news reports we’re relying on to hold it accountable.
And suddenly, the Government talking about extending the BBC licence fee to people who don’t even watch the BBC is making a lot more sense now, isn’t it? 🤦🏻♀️
And we’re expected to trust the BBC’s impartiality while being legally required to fund it through the licence fee? 🤔
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
Europe has allowed way too many immigrants that despise our whole way of life and now we are seeing the results of this failed policy.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 12 WERE BEING GANG RAPED AND SOLD BY PAKISTANI MEN IN OLDHAM. GIRLS OF 13 AND 14, KNOWN TO THE POLICE, WERE BEING DRAGGED OFF THE STREET INTO THE TOWN'S SHISHA BARS WHERE ROOMS WERE RENTED OUT BY THE HOUR. THE POLICE AND THE COUNCIL KNEW WHAT THOSE PREMISES WERE.
Instead of closing down a network of child rape dens and rescuing these children, the 2011 police strategy for tackling Oldham's Pakistani rape gangs listed managing the force's reputation and the far right among its priorities.
The specialist team set up to protect these girls was kept out of the operations against the shisha bars. Police intelligence placing exploited children inside those premises was not passed to the officers responsible for them.
In 2014 the leader of Oldham Council wrote on his blog that the abuse of children in the town was predominantly Pakistani men targeting white girls. He knew, and he was prepared to say it on his blog read by a handful of people. He never stood up in Oldham's council chamber and confronted what was being done to those children.
Anyone surprised why the rapes carried on regardless?
RIVENDELL HOUSE WAS A CHILD BROTHEL BUILT BY OLDHAM COUNCIL
In 2007 Oldham Council took the girls most at risk from these men and put them together under one roof, in a six-bed home called Rivendell House. The council's own staff admitted its location was not ideal. Burnham's reviewers accepted that housing girls already being exploited in the same building could draw the abusers to it.
A former care worker reported that in 2010 Pakistani men drove round and round the home waiting for the girls to come out, and that staff were not allowed to stop them leaving. The worker passed this to the police and the safeguarding board. Nothing was done.
The state gathered sexually exploited children in one building. The men knew where to find them. What Oldham Council built was a child brothel, staffed and paid for by the taxpayer. When the care worker went public in 2014, the council hired a consultant to investigate the allegations. Burnham's reviewers relied on the consultant's report and the word of the staff who had been accused of complicity. It dismissed the whistleblower.
THEY LIED TO THE BBC ABOUT THE SHISHA BARS
In 2013 a chief inspector warned that the risks in the shisha bars were massive. When his email reached the BBC, the reaction at the top of the council and the police was alarm at how much the journalist knew. They told the BBC there were just two pieces of intelligence.
This was a lie.
Their own officers had filed several intelligence reports in 2011 and 2012 tying exploited girls to those premises. The police held intelligence naming the children and the places they were being taken. They kept it from the specialist officers whose job was to protect them.
Senior police officers, senior council officers and the politicians agreed among themselves that the danger to these children was being exaggerated and would be used by the far right. Some admitted the council was also worried about scaring off investment in the town.
Children were being raped in those buildings while the people responsible for them discussed the town's reputation.
The journalist, whose father was a senior figure in the Labour Party, then participated in the cover up.
ANDY BURNHAM'S REVIEW WAS BUILT TO CLEAR OLDHAM COUNCIL AND THE POLICE
In 2019, as a direct result of the work of former councillor Warren Bates working alongside Raja Miah and the first of the rabble, the council leader asked Andy Burnham for a review.
We published what we had. The shisha bars, the children's homes and the taxis were our allegations, and Burnham's review was built around them. Its authors admit they began by reading our evidence.
When they asked to interview me, I agreed on one condition. That my testimony be given in Oldham's council chamber and streamed live to the public. They refused, because they would only hear it in private where they would take selective notes.
Five years later, they published a report that filed everything we had exposed under allegations made on social media, and told Oldham there was no cover-up. Burnham put his name to it and told the people of Oldham there had been no cover-up.
At the time we called Burnham's Assurance Review a cover up. In 2025, under immense pressure, even Andy Burnham was forced to admit to his review's failings.
THE COVER-UP MUST BE INVESTIGATED UNDER OATH
The national inquiry must examine Oldham with its full statutory powers, and it must not be confined to the boundaries Burnham's review accepted. It must cover the schools, the youth clubs, the children's homes and every year the gangs were operating.
Greater Manchester Police must hand over every record it kept from Burnham's reviewers. Oldham Council must release every document it redacted. Andy Burnham, the former council leaders and the senior officers who handled the shisha bar intelligence must be called to give evidence under oath.
The girls of Rivendell House, the girls in the shisha bars and the girls dragged in to cars outside school gates were failed by every institution that should have protected them. Then they were told by a review that could not see the evidence that nobody covered anything up. They are owed the truth, and only a statutory inquiry has the power to get it.
THE PRIME MINISTER ANDY BURNHAM MUST BE SUMMONED BEFORE THE NATIONAL INQUIRY. ANYTHING LESS THAN THIS JUST CONTINUES THE COVER UP.
_________
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it.
This is becoming impossible to sustain.
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Raja Miah MBE
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
Replying to @andrewc44104127 @lienomail
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
Andy Burnham says he is PROUD to sit alongside convicted fraudster Louise Haigh and Lucy Powell, who described condemning grooming gangs as a ‘racist dog whistle’.
Andy said: ‘These are two of my closest friends and I’m proud to sit beside them at prime ministers questions. They are the best of Labour’ he declarated.
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
🚨 THE TAXPAYER FUNDED SCAM WHERE THE HOME OFFICE INTENTIONALLY LOSES ASYLUM APPEALS!
I want you to look at the absolute racket taking place inside British immigration tribunals today.
Shabana Mahmood is actively hiring civil servants with zero legal qualifications and zero courtroom experience to represent Britain in deportation battles.
Meanwhile, the state dishes out 59 million pounds in taxpayer funded legal aid so illegal migrants and foreign criminals can hire high powered immigration barristers!
You have elite human rights lawyers on one side, completely unqualified novices on the other, and the British public forced to pay the invoice for both.
Look at the inevitable, catastrophic outcome.
Nearly two thirds of all rejected asylum seekers who challenge their deportation successfully overturn the decision, with the Home Office losing an unbelievable 64 percent of appeals.
Over 156,000 appeals are currently clogging the courts, and ministers are deliberately sending people with no legal background to get torn to pieces by activist solicitors.
The entire deportation tribunal system is a theatre designed for failure so politicians can pretend they are enforcing laws while ensuring foreign arrivals never leave.
Andy Burnham and Shabana Mahmood have turned border enforcement into a multi million pound circus where the taxpayer always loses.
Retweet this immediately to expose the rigged legal racket keeping foreign offenders on British streets. 🇬🇧
Liam O'Neil. No to Digital ID, I will never comply retweeted
🚨 PART 3: THE SMOKING GUN PROVING ANDY BURNHAM LIED ABOUT HIS SECRET MAN CITY MEETINGS!
In Part 1 and Part 2 of my investigation I warned you that Andy Burnham was hiding the truth, and now his entire cover up has completely collapsed.
The Prime Minister looked the country in the eye and claimed he only ever held one single significant meeting with Abu Dhabi bosses back in 2021.
Official records have just blown that story wide open, proving Burnham met Manchester City chiefs at least six separate times.
Leaked logs show he enjoyed red carpet hospitality dinners at the Etihad Stadium with club chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak, alongside private sit downs with CEO Ferran Soriano.
Local authorities even quietly deleted official registers of interest that recorded his luxury visits to the exclusive Tunnel Club to keep voters completely in the dark.
While hard working taxpayers get crushed by record bills, the Prime Minister was secretly wining and dining with foreign oligarchs and then misleading the public about his cosy relationship.
Burnham did not just run political interference for a football club found guilty of over one hundred financial breaches, he actively covered up his secret dealings with their billionaire owners.
Retweet Part 3 of my investigation immediately to make this trend number one again and demand Andy Burnham answer for his deceit.




























