Theatrical producer/director. Human observer/evaulator. Society avoider/detractor. Paranormal researcher/theorist. Bee hive poker/kicker.
Interstate 5
Joined November 2022
- Tweets24.5K
- Following460
- Followers507
- Likes659K
lordhellion retweeted
Two brazen muslim cops breaking the law in NYC. One officer puts his hands on a woman and threatens to wake away her dog. Neither cop can say what law she broke.
NEW YORK HAS NO IDEA WHAT THEY HAVE DONE BY ELECTING A MUSLIM as a mayor.
Communism at it’s finest.
lordhellion retweeted
NOBODY IS TELLING YOU HOW FUCKED THE FARMERS ARE IN AMERICA RIGHT NOW.
The Agriculture Secretary just confirmed it publicly.
1 in 4 American farmers has NO fertilizer secured for spring planting.
No fertilizer. No crops. No food.
Farm bankruptcies are up 46% in 2025.
160,000 farms closed since 2017.
Less than half of all farmers will even turn a profit this year.
They're not struggling. They're being wiped out.
And the media is busy covering everything else.
The real story behind this hasn't been told yet.. follow me because i'm about to tell it 🚨
lordhellion retweeted
Titus
(1999, Julie Taymor)
8.56 GB (w/ E&C)
1080p BluRay
Multiple Subtitles
ALT Featurettes Available: - Trailer & TV Spots - Q&A - Julie Taymor (2000) - The Making of Titus (2000) - Penny Arcade Nightmares - Commentary by Kyle Cooper of Imaginary Forces (2000)
lordhellion retweeted
Remember, if war ever touches American soil, civilians are not bound by rules of engagement.
lordhellion retweeted
This is a grooming tactic called "Hugboxing", by the way
They shower the target with validation and superficial affection to lower their defenses, making it easier for them to violation boundaries later on and to isolate them from people who will actually help them, such as friends or family members who will be honest but critical with them
It's very similar to the most standard grooming strategy, "you're so special", "you're so mature for your age", "your parents don't understand you, only I understand you", but replace "I" with "we"
Men are particularly vulnerable to this tactic because we get barely any compliments from anyone our whole lives
lordhellion retweeted
What I’m hearing is that Morgan Dewitt-Snow and Susie conspired to block NUMEROUS Patriots from admin jobs and appointments.
My messages are FLOODED with proven Patriots and Potential talent who got passed over.
Now I’m hearing that it doesn’t end with DeWitt-Snow and there are others downstream from her who are also bad apples.
I better start getting phone calls coming clean about what happened or I am singing like George Santos at a karaoke bar.
lordhellion retweeted
Announcing:
The world's first high-quality public domain audio copy of the King James Version (KJV). Cost me around $125 to make. Anyone may use in any project going forward.
Listen: deepdivebible.org/read/GEN/1…
Download: deepdivebible.org/downloads#…
lordhellion retweeted
Over 80 million Christians eligible to vote did not vote on November 3rd, while 98% of all adult muslims voted.
lordhellion retweeted
🚨DERANGED Liberal activist Nancy Krause just ADMITTED she reported high school kids to CPS... for attending a TPUSA event and starting a conservative club.
Calling free thought 'child abuse'?
This is peak deranged leftism 🤡
lordhellion retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
lordhellion retweeted
DSA leader Megan Romer has NO answer when Fox News’s Martha MacCallum asks where the $49 TRILLION for her socialist agenda is coming from.
Romer calls the number “made-up.” Then MacCallum what HER number is, and it gets embarrassing fast.
MACCALLUM: “That’s $350,000 per household. Cancelling student debt, open borders and amnesty, Medicare for All. How are you going to pay for that?”
ROMER: “Yeah, I mean, we understand that the White House, who does not like us very much, managed to come up with some math that made us look bad.”
MACCALLUM: “So that’s $47.4 trillion, Medicare for All.”
ROMER: “Yeah, it’s a made up number.”
MACCALLUM: “You say it’s a made up number, but it was done by economists. Your number versus their number.”
So MacCallum throws her a lifeline.
MACCALLUM: “What’s your number when you add up everything on that list? What number did you come up with?”
ROMER: “There’s no like, one solid number because it depends on what pieces we can build in the meantime.”
MACCALLUM: “So just give me a basic number for your wish list.”
ROMER: “That number is outrageous.”
MACCALLUM: “What’s your number for your wish list?”
ROMER: “That number is ridiculous ... I’m not going to give you a solid number. That’s not what I’m here to do.”
The number isn’t just coming from White House economists.
Cato ran the DSA platform and found that confiscating the entire net worth of the 400 richest Americans, all $6.6 trillion of it, covers about 9% of the bill. Take every dollar of corporate profit on top of that and they’re still $29 trillion short.
Romer is more than happy to explain how she’ll take money from the “billionaire class” and hand it to the working class.
But ask how much it costs, or how she’ll actually pay for everything, and her entire argument collapses.
CONTEXT: The DSA’s own estimate for its billionaire wealth tax is $3.9 trillion over ten years. The agenda costs $49 trillion. Even by their math, the billionaires cover 8 cents of every dollar.
lordhellion retweeted
The Man Who Would Be King (1975)
Directed by: John Huston
2h 9min • 75.05 GB • 2160p Blu-Ray REMUX • 81.6 mb/s
֍ English DTS-HD MA 2.0
֍ Subs: 🇩🇪🇪🇸🇹🇷🇬🇧🇮🇹🇫🇷🇳🇱🇳🇴🇸🇪🇫🇮
transfer.it/t/h5TzX7hnFBwL
lordhellion retweeted
The Dirty Dozen (1967)
Directed by: Robert Aldrich
2h 30min • 83.69 GB • 2160p Blu-Ray REMUX • 74.4 Mb/s
֍ English 6-Track 70mm DTS-HD MA 6.0 ♦ Mono Mix FLAC 2.0 ♦ DTS-HD MA 5.1
֍ Subs: 🇩🇪🇲🇽🇪🇸🇬🇷🇹🇷🇮🇹🇫🇷🇧🇷🇳🇱🇳🇴🇸🇪🇫🇮
transfer.it/t/qfqWimxjmLYL
lordhellion retweeted
We cracked their cheating algorithm.
85/15 algorithm….for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems.
It’s the same pattern in every state that went blue.
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
lordhellion retweeted
No one won the election.
None of us, anyway. You can slap blue or red on em, but they all bend you over and slide it in dry.
