Pinned Tweet
Fomos ler o que se tem escrito na imprensa sobre CR7 durante o mundial e concluímos que toda a gente tem falado de forma calma e racional sobre este indivíduo.
Luis Vieira retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
O governo quer que o metro do Porto chegue a Espinho e S. João da Madeira? Esta gente não acredita em comboios suburbanos? É tudo corrido a metro ligeiro de S. João da Madeira a Póvoa de Varzim?
Isto é um perfeito disparate!
diarioaveiro.pt/2026/11/04/m…
Luis Vieira retweeted
The scheming junior emperor declares his opposition to the senior Augustus over failed war in Persia. Classic gambit
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Luis Vieira retweeted
I'VE BEEN TAKEN UP TO THE THIRD HEAVEN.
I'VE BEEN JACKED INTO THE BIG PLAN.
YOU AIN'T HEARD NOTHING.
YOU AIN'T SMELLED NOTHING LIKE THIS.
Luis Vieira retweeted
Terrenos que se encontram mesmo sobre a estação de metro de Salgueiros! 🚊
Tem sido um erro urbanístico enorme deixar estes terrenos assim durante 20 anos.
Esperemos que se construa habitação pública acessível e com densidade de fogos.
🗞 Notícias do dia
"Terrenos do antigo Estádio do Salgueiros no Porto serão para habitação". In @Lusa_noticias
cmjornal.pt/sociedade/detalh…
Luis Vieira retweeted
Not surprising given the overall trends last night, but transit/rail measures did very well last night:
Front Range Passenger Rail✅
reporterherald.com/2026/11/0…
Bay Area RTM✅
cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/new…
Plus measures Seattle; Piece County, WA; Lawrence, KS; Stark County, OK; and more!
Luis Vieira retweeted
The bay's public transit will live to see another day. Voters in five Bay Area counties approved Prop RTM, a half-cent sales tax that would fund more than 20 transit agencies, including BART, Muni, and Caltrain.
SF voters also gave an overwhelming thumbs up to Prop H to fund Muni for 15 years.
Read more: sf.news/4eyLtHV
Luis Vieira retweeted
The single best transportation investment Ohio could make is the 3C+D rail line linking our largest cities & the backbone of our economy.
Adding feeder bus service would drive ridership, connect communities, and investment even more.
Luis Vieira retweeted
did you ever doubt His (nonbinary) ineffable plan of unconditional election?
Luis Vieira retweeted
MEU IRMAO?????????? "NEM POLITICO"????????? TU ÉS O PRIMEIRO MINISTRO
Luís Montenegro: "Não sou comentador, nem político, é injusta a crítica de que há silêncio" sicnoticias.pt/pais/politica…
Luis Vieira retweeted
CURIOSIDADE
O Talarico é membro de um movimento chamado Progress Texas.
E sim. Esse é o logo do movimento.
Luis Vieira retweeted
OMG ALL THE NYC PROPOSITIONS PASSED? WE ARE GOING TO BUILD SO MUCH HOUSING AND BIKE LANES









































