0-1 yesterday, 62-55-3 overall. Lotta bets to be even on the year
New day for this cfb public model consensus approach, here’s what I got:
Just realized you can simply lie to the AI when it’s stressed about people not having official licensing files in their GitHub projects
You guys remember how much time we used to spend aligning all the versions of team names across different databases?
Patrick retweeted
In Morocco’s Sahara, four fennec fox pups venture out from their burrow. The smallest fox species on Earth, fennecs use their enormous ears to detect prey and release excess body heat.
📷 Rabie Atlas
1-2 on Tuesday, 60-51-3 (+2.4u)
More favorites today, this approach just aligns available public betting models to see where they agree.
Memphis -10
Liberty -7.5
JMU -10
Interesting question. The answer is they're not trying to give up, but definitely act more aggressively and therefore tend to do worse:
First-pitch swing rate, elimination spot: 37.8%, their normal rate: 28.4%
Strikeout rate: 26.3% vs 21.1%
XBH: 2.5% vs 6.9%
Pitch/PA: 3.68 vs 3.8
> Radar plots are bad because order matters so for the takeaway
> well what if you cycle through all possible orderings and take the average area, that’d make it a bit more robust/global score
> oh that’s essentially just regression



























