먑량🌹🌂

ㅇㅂㄷ은 진짜 첨부터 끝까지 주인공이 '아 제발 사람이면 사람답게 굴면 안될까요' 를 비는 내용이지 특별히 선한 걸 강조하는 것도 아니고 뭣도 아닌데.... 그걸 선한 척 한다던가 훈계하려고 한다던가 하는 감상이 거꾸로 현 시대상을 보여주는 것 같음....

Part of that is because the canon is defined both by the mechanics and the vast pile of lore, so being self-consistent isn't necessarily something that was high on their priority list. In particular, the lore was always more important than the numbers, so you fairly commonly saw them diverging even back in the day when there wasn't nearly as much published lore as there is today. How do I know this, you may ask? Go look at the cover of Iteration X Revised from Mage the Ascention. Yes, that's my name, at least one of the two. When it comes down to it, the overall feel of the game was more important during its construction than being consistent with the mechanics everywhere. In fact, an NPC who is said to be different generations in different books? That's perfectly reasonable. The mechanics, as in the stat block, only gives you a single possible view, even if you assume that the mechanics express specifically and exactly the truth about the character. They themselves lie to other people, and other people can't see the stat block. In the game, inconsistency is part and parcel of the unreliable narrator and viewpoint characters. Now the vast number of books that have come out since the mid-90s just kept getting piled higher and deeper. Then we had that whole VTR thing, and then 5th edition, neither of which was particularly great in terms of design, but V20 wasn't terrible. The authors and creators never had full control and full understanding, though. Having complete control of the world was not something they ever were inclined to establish. Though you could be forgiven for thinking so because of the weird obsession with metaplot. But I think that's probably a whole different discussion.

존ㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴㄴ나 철지난 얘기 계속 하길래 엥 지난얘긴대요 하니까 그래도 내 친구라이터들은 그걸 싸불막으려고 했고 어쩌고 아니 그게 내가 원트에서 했던 말이잖아 XX

"은닉은 미지에 대한 공포를 다루므로 코스믹호러다" <<이 타령 진짜 싫어함