Everything is execution. The true nature of reality and human.

Joined May 2021
This thought experiment suggests how gravity might work. And nothing but the conservation of momentum law is required. Suppose we have frogs of mass m jumping over a floating island of mass M. Every jump transfers the same impulse p. Landing makes the island heavier (M + m). Takeoff makes it lighter (M − m). Because Δv = p/M, the same impulse causes a smaller Δv when the island is heavier and a larger Δv when it is lighter. Over many jumps, a tiny directional drift appears opposite to the frogs’ motion. Now make it two islands. Each island emits its own ‘frogs’ (momentum carriers). Carriers jump both ways between islands. Because each transfer obeys Δv = p/M and interaction timing is asymmetric, the net drift is mutual attraction. The point is that emergent motion can arise from conservation of momentum. This emergent motion is not a force - a byproduct of tiny continuous interactions. It exists as long as frog motion exists, depends on the number of frogs, and cannot be canceled by any single frog. I’m not claiming this is exactly what happens, but consider: - an emergent drift toward the source of frogs, following from conservation of momentum - not a force - tiny compared with direct interactions (jumping frogs) Cool? Maybe gravity is not a force field. Maybe it’s bookkeeping of momentum exchange.
2
1
2
6
2,722
PR issue. Humans see only AI "achievements" because AI companies have billions to waste.
fighting for control over a runaway intelligence explosion will continuously look like “wow I didn’t know you could DO that with mere bits and atoms” and then losing
71
"Understanding" Special Relativity = betraying yourself.
Seems like "understand" means "accept, don't question and be happy about that".
1
4
218
When you deny "now" you deny logic. Because logic happens now.
31
All of science are algorithms - computer science. Even math is about building algorithms that let you predict outcomes.
i regret to inform you that all of science is now linear algebra
1
1
1
150
Seems like "understand" means "accept, don't question and be happy about that".
1
2
463
“Verb ability”: ability to manipulate you
.@elonmusk: Peter Thiel was right
181
Inventing and hoping that humanity will say "thank you" some day seems to be the only way to be better than AI in future.
so basically software is fucked, CAD is fucked, the only way through is to follow the SendCutSend model. every feature you develop will be swallowed and exploded by the Big Labs
2
3
374
Or you turn into AI add-on.
38
By the way. I predicted that AI will let those with ad budgets copy any your idea and promote it as theirs years ago. xitter.cf/matterasmachine/status…
It will not work. If it’s easy to implement an idea, then anyone can do that. Anyone can copy an idea. And the one who can promote it faster - wins. It will be a PR guy time..
1
1
59
Or not copy but make you sell - as Elon seems to be doing now with Anthropic.
32
Would you want to see a major breakthrough like disproving Special Relativity during your lifetime? Would you want to be a part of it?
15%Yes, but no contribution
77%Yes, contribute
8%No
26 votes • 17 hours
2
2
2
421
Special relativity, big bang theory, “humans have no instincts”.. Why nonsense always wins?
5
2
10
984
Because Elon Musk throttled starlink access for Ukraine, every nation will feel the need to have their own satellites, satellites will be colliding in space and space will turn into an absolute mess.
5
364
If mass-energy equivalence is true, then Newton’s second law should be allied both to rest mass and momentum. Any that will explain relativity.
The mistake of Newton was that he did not apply Newton’s laws to momentum. As momentum increases, total mass increases and it is harder to accelerate the particle.
213
The effect of gravity is so tiny be cause it’s not a force but a difference between forces.
This thought experiment suggests how gravity might work. And nothing but the conservation of momentum law is required. Suppose we have frogs of mass m jumping over a floating island of mass M. Every jump transfers the same impulse p. Landing makes the island heavier (M + m). Takeoff makes it lighter (M − m). Because Δv = p/M, the same impulse causes a smaller Δv when the island is heavier and a larger Δv when it is lighter. Over many jumps, a tiny directional drift appears opposite to the frogs’ motion. Now make it two islands. Each island emits its own ‘frogs’ (momentum carriers). Carriers jump both ways between islands. Because each transfer obeys Δv = p/M and interaction timing is asymmetric, the net drift is mutual attraction. The point is that emergent motion can arise from conservation of momentum. This emergent motion is not a force - a byproduct of tiny continuous interactions. It exists as long as frog motion exists, depends on the number of frogs, and cannot be canceled by any single frog. I’m not claiming this is exactly what happens, but consider: - an emergent drift toward the source of frogs, following from conservation of momentum - not a force - tiny compared with direct interactions (jumping frogs) Cool? Maybe gravity is not a force field. Maybe it’s bookkeeping of momentum exchange.
1
3
421
You can be astonished or find a reason.
Replying to @ChrisExpTheNews
Math is just structured thought. It’s all imaginary. The fact that it corresponds to reality at all is scandalous, shocking, and enough to astonish a person for life. This is why physicists are weird btw. They’ve seen too much.
244
Someone even invests a billion of dollars in CNN.
Some fools still think the legacy news is real. Amazing.
2
368
So I created a manifold market. Maybe it will help to promote the experiment. You could bet as well - it's "free" as they give you some amount of their internal money on registration. *Betting is not real as you can spend your prize only for charity. manifold.markets/matterasmac…
2
242
No real money but some real discussions and traction could be possible.
70
I'm sure there will be congress hearings on this matter. And the whole world will find out who spreads propaganda and who doesn't.
Replying to @KatieMiller
AP stands for Associated Propaganda
1
353