
Building OS for companies run by nerds at @FiberyHQ. Riding the edge of cHaoS. Posting about systems, startups, creativity & products.
Limassol, Cyprus
Joined May 2008
- Tweets9.8K
- Following409
- Followers3.1K
- Likes3.5K
good one
blog.alxgsv.com/challenge-is…
"Now I’m completely absorbed in thinking about what to do rather than whether I can do it."
alifeengineered.substack.com… "You must stand behind every sentence. “Oh, AI wrote that, ignore it” is never an acceptable answer to a reviewer’s question."
Nice one, resonates with my feeling about product role after 20+ years in it. Generalize pain → find effective solution → Generalize solution
svpg.com/a-fresh-definition-…
Very creative! I'll give Jason that for sure.
For years, maybe a decade, I've wanted to build a writing tool that just did a few things I couldn't find anywhere else.
A system that mimicked how I think when I write. A system that provided clear affordances, features, and places to do the things I wanted to do. A way to play with my writing as I'm writing it. A way to settle into just the right way to say something.
It never made sense to make it a 37signals product because it's not commercially viable, nor would it be worth pulling people off their other work to hack on this. Plus, it would have taken months the old way.
So this weekend I just made it myself, with Claude's help.
It's called Write_On and the short video walks you through it.
Essentially it's "alternative control" at the word, sentence, and paragraph level, plus a way to dim stuff back, and stash stuff near by. Not version control, but alternative control. You'll see what I mean when you watch the video below.
So here it is. Write_On.
OK, @AnthropicAI added collaborative docs. They are very basic so far, but it is easy to make them great fast. Next step is databases? What will remain of @NotionHQ then? 🤔
Every program attempts to expand until it can draw a pelican. Those programs which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can
It's hilarious to see how politicians who know nothing about AI and exponents express their opinion about safety of AI progress. Peter principle at its best.
Spot on:
"In my opinion, shorter reasoning traces are a side effect of more “intelligent” or capable models that make fewer mistakes and can access more compute internally inside their architecture versus using a reasoning trace as a scratchpad. In a sense, the same is true for humans. During an in-person college math exam, a smart and well-prepared student likely requires less use of the notepaper and needs to backtrack less often, and so on."
Just sharing one of our videos for no particular reason 🙄
youtu.be/Vw9Ldk59DlI?si=AnFP…
I used to always use long dash in my texts (—) since it is right, but now I have internal pressure to use short dash (-) to not look like I write my texts with AI. Weird times...
Malleable software = 80% solid bases + 20% custom code
mdubakov.me/malleable-softwa…
I joined the productivity tools market in 2004 and observing its dynamics for 22 years now. From time to time I write a holistic "visionary" article. The last one was in 2019 when I bet on the no-code revolution. That bet aged so-so. Here is the new one.
Where is the productivity tools market heading?
Everyone wants the same territory, but each road is different. We can have high expression power with less invested time since AI shrinks building and configuration time (everybody can prompt).









