Manchester
Joined November 2010
Michael Woolley retweeted
🇺🇦 🇺🇲 The confrontation inside Trump's Ukraine peace negotiations is now coming into focus. Le Monde reports that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner spent nearly three hours pitching Ukraine's presidential chief of staff, Kyrylo Budanov, a postwar economic arrangement built around restoring Russian oil and gas flows to Europe through Ukrainian pipelines. The meeting took place on October 9 at the Shell Bay golf club in Florida. Witkoff presented the proposal as a regional prosperity plan: Ukraine would collect transit revenues, Europe would receive cheaper energy, and Russia would regain access to commercial routes disrupted by the war. Budanov saw something fundamentally different. According to a witness cited by Le Monde, he objected that the arrangement would recreate Ukraine's dependence on Moscow. “Our model is not Belarus, but Poland!” he reportedly replied. The meeting was interrupted, and Budanov called Zelensky. When talks resumed, news arrived that Trump had announced a separate agreement with Putin involving Russian diesel. Le Monde reports that an irritated Witkoff then demanded that the Ukrainians accept the arrangement and stop striking Russian oil refineries, arguing that the attacks endangered the wider world. A source familiar with the Ukrainian delegation described its members as exceptionally distressed by the encounter. The account adds a revealing dimension to the commercial negotiations we have been tracking. The proposed Lukoil asset sale, Novatek's involvement in an Alaska LNG venture, the broader US-Russia list of business opportunities reported by the Financial Times, and now the proposed restoration of Russian energy transit through Ukraine all point to the prominence of energy deals in Washington's diplomatic approach. These are separate proposals, with different participants and legal circumstances. But Le Monde's reporting exposes the strategic disagreement underlying them. For Witkoff, restoring commercial flows appears to be part of the mechanism for producing a peace settlement. For Budanov, according to the account, those same flows threaten to restore Moscow's economic leverage over Ukraine. The reported exchange also raises a question about sequencing: why was Kyiv being pressed to stop attacking Russian refineries while Russia continued striking Ukrainian energy infrastructure? Le Monde's reconstruction relies on accounts of a private meeting. The reported exchanges have not been independently confirmed by the participants. Source: Le Monde
168
1,002
100
4,614
493,087
Our friends were deported last night. Ice kept their phones, wallets, cash, everything. We are devastated.
147
127
8
621
19,712
Michael Woolley retweeted
Is that Konsa who Villa had to sell to a Red Cartel team due to rules brought in by (checks notes) the Red Cartel?
Centre-back-to-back, Konsa, now Gabriel, Arsenal chasing back-to-back titles. #AFC #ARSEVE
114
42
5
743
48,334
Michael Woolley retweeted
In 1994, Ukraine gave up the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal on America’s word. This month, the president traded that word for a diesel deal with Putin. Watch what he does for Putin. It shows what he wants to do with his power over you. 👇🏼
267
2,476
102
6,082
115,954
Replying to @Starlink
Unless you’re in Ukraine
3
1
36
1,494
Michael Woolley retweeted
The good guys cut an income from 60 families despite a successful season and the bad guys invest money into their club. The warped sense of morality that envelops the Premier League is jaw dropping outside the bubble.
13
72
2
462
11,170
Michael Woolley retweeted
Following a successful pilot at our fixture against Sunderland in September, we are proud to launch City Let’s Talk - a new mental health service on select matchdays 🩵 Find out more 🔗 mancity.co/4s7qscJ
26
58
3
566
69,601
Michael Woolley retweeted
We’re talking about allegations carrying potentially devastating consequences for one of the world’s biggest football clubs. Yet the public is asked to accept the conclusions of unidentified decision-makers, reached through proceedings conducted behind closed doors, based on evidence that remains concealed. And we’re supposed to regard this as a triumph of transparency and fairness? Rather than wait for City—which maintains that the decision is factually and legally incorrect—to complete its appeal, the media and punditry, including former players associated with the Incumbent Four, are demanding immediate and severe punishment. Many have spent years treating allegations as established facts. Now they treat a decision still subject to appeal as the final word. This is a complete mockery of due process and fundamental fairness. Even if City ultimately prevails, it will already have been punished in the court of public opinion. Years of reputational damage, attacks on the legitimacy of its accomplishments, and efforts to discredit the Club cannot simply be undone by a successful appeal. And consider the broader picture. A League historically dominated by a handful of established clubs adopts financial regulations that substantially favor those incumbents. Its chief executive, appointed through a process reportedly influenced by some of those same clubs, oversees an investigation into the challenger that broke their dominance. Charges arrive during that challenger’s greatest season. An anonymous commission, constituted under a disciplinary structure connected to the League, ultimately issues a guilty verdict based on evidence the public cannot examine. Meanwhile, a partisan media and punditry demands that the Club be punished before the appeals process has run its course. How could anyone reasonably expect City supporters not to question this process? So, for those wondering why Manchester City supporters are sticking together, defending their Club, and refusing to accept the prevailing narrative, there’s your answer. We’re entitled to demand transparency. We’re entitled to question whether the process has been fair. And we’re entitled to defend our Club against those who decided long ago what they wanted the outcome to be. We will not apologize for any of that. And we certainly won’t play the sad clowns that this deluded circus demands. 2/2
41
146
7
788
12,786
Michael Woolley retweeted
This is the story and yet some media are focusing on whether the head of the independent regulator will resign if @andyburnham interferes with the MCFC stuff rather than the damning verdict on the national game. Can we have perspective & focus on the whole game not a headline?
10
18
103
6,015
Michael Woolley retweeted
I’ve seen a few misunderstanding the banana craze and also getting the stories a little bit wrong (it wasn’t created because of Imre Varadi) so here’s an article I wrote a while back explaining: gjfootballarchive.com/2022/0…
1
10
31
3,544
Michael Woolley retweeted
Replying to @gtsmale
Keeps saying ‘my club’ but have not seen him @ManCity since he finished as Chairman in 2003. Allegedly my Dad was his favourite player. Didn’t reach out to us when he died. The dignified position is to wait for the appeal outcome then comment.
61
328
9
4,517
155,967
Michael Woolley retweeted
Billionaire Brexiteeer and Man United owner says he has lost confidence in the UK. Lives in Monaco to avoid UK taxes, owns several luxury properties. Demands subsidies for Man U stadium. Why do billionaires resent people getting decent public services? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm04…
497
2,943
171
8,643
172,231
Petition: Please sign (and share widely) this petition against billionaires buying British democracy… c.org/x5bVLKTJGc
1
2
2
104
Michael Woolley retweeted
Worth sharing…
152
2,205
35
7,028
119,987
Michael Woolley retweeted
Just remember Maguire didn’t receive a card here Did the rules change? 🤨
124
989
156
6,030
1,058,372
Michael Woolley retweeted
2 - 50 teams have received a red card as the visiting team at Old Trafford in the Premier League, but only two have won: Everton in November 2025 and Manchester City today, with Iliman Ndiaye on the winning side both times. Charm.
28
989
43
8,504
249,964