Michael Woolley retweeted
🇺🇦 🇺🇲 The confrontation inside Trump's Ukraine peace negotiations is now coming into focus.
Le Monde reports that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner spent nearly three hours pitching Ukraine's presidential chief of staff, Kyrylo Budanov, a postwar economic arrangement built around restoring Russian oil and gas flows to Europe through Ukrainian pipelines.
The meeting took place on October 9 at the Shell Bay golf club in Florida.
Witkoff presented the proposal as a regional prosperity plan: Ukraine would collect transit revenues, Europe would receive cheaper energy, and Russia would regain access to commercial routes disrupted by the war.
Budanov saw something fundamentally different. According to a witness cited by Le Monde, he objected that the arrangement would recreate Ukraine's dependence on Moscow.
“Our model is not Belarus, but Poland!” he reportedly replied.
The meeting was interrupted, and Budanov called Zelensky.
When talks resumed, news arrived that Trump had announced a separate agreement with Putin involving Russian diesel. Le Monde reports that an irritated Witkoff then demanded that the Ukrainians accept the arrangement and stop striking Russian oil refineries, arguing that the attacks endangered the wider world.
A source familiar with the Ukrainian delegation described its members as exceptionally distressed by the encounter.
The account adds a revealing dimension to the commercial negotiations we have been tracking. The proposed Lukoil asset sale, Novatek's involvement in an Alaska LNG venture, the broader US-Russia list of business opportunities reported by the Financial Times, and now the proposed restoration of Russian energy transit through Ukraine all point to the prominence of energy deals in Washington's diplomatic approach.
These are separate proposals, with different participants and legal circumstances. But Le Monde's reporting exposes the strategic disagreement underlying them.
For Witkoff, restoring commercial flows appears to be part of the mechanism for producing a peace settlement. For Budanov, according to the account, those same flows threaten to restore Moscow's economic leverage over Ukraine.
The reported exchange also raises a question about sequencing: why was Kyiv being pressed to stop attacking Russian refineries while Russia continued striking Ukrainian energy infrastructure?
Le Monde's reconstruction relies on accounts of a private meeting. The reported exchanges have not been independently confirmed by the participants.
Source: Le Monde
Michael Woolley retweeted
Our friends were deported last night. Ice kept their phones, wallets, cash, everything. We are devastated.
Michael Woolley retweeted
I posted this last year about @ManCity challenging the FA. It’s an article from 1900 about the issues with the FA. Interesting reading. FOllow the link: gjfootballarchive.com/2023/1…
Michael Woolley retweeted
50 years of a famous @mancity chant… An article I’ve written for City on the 50th anniversary. Follow the link for the story: mancity.com/news/mens/the-bi…
Michael Woolley retweeted
In 1994, Ukraine gave up the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal on America’s word.
This month, the president traded that word for a diesel deal with Putin.
Watch what he does for Putin. It shows what he wants to do with his power over you. 👇🏼
Michael Woolley retweeted
We remember 2018
#RejoinEU
Michael Woolley retweeted
The good guys cut an income from 60 families despite a successful season and the bad guys invest money into their club.
The warped sense of morality that envelops the Premier League is jaw dropping outside the bubble.
Job cuts will help Arsenal "evolve and improve", claims Arteta
Manager whose new pay deal is worth £20m a year has been told 60 redundancies are necessary so club can "keep investing" | ✍️ @garyjacob
thetimes.com/sport/football/…
Michael Woolley retweeted
Following a successful pilot at our fixture against Sunderland in September, we are proud to launch City Let’s Talk - a new mental health service on select matchdays 🩵
Find out more 🔗 mancity.co/4s7qscJ
Michael Woolley retweeted
We’re talking about allegations carrying potentially devastating consequences for one of the world’s biggest football clubs. Yet the public is asked to accept the conclusions of unidentified decision-makers, reached through proceedings conducted behind closed doors, based on evidence that remains concealed.
And we’re supposed to regard this as a triumph of transparency and fairness?
Rather than wait for City—which maintains that the decision is factually and legally incorrect—to complete its appeal, the media and punditry, including former players associated with the Incumbent Four, are demanding immediate and severe punishment.
Many have spent years treating allegations as established facts. Now they treat a decision still subject to appeal as the final word.
This is a complete mockery of due process and fundamental fairness.
Even if City ultimately prevails, it will already have been punished in the court of public opinion. Years of reputational damage, attacks on the legitimacy of its accomplishments, and efforts to discredit the Club cannot simply be undone by a successful appeal.
And consider the broader picture.
A League historically dominated by a handful of established clubs adopts financial regulations that substantially favor those incumbents. Its chief executive, appointed through a process reportedly influenced by some of those same clubs, oversees an investigation into the challenger that broke their dominance. Charges arrive during that challenger’s greatest season. An anonymous commission, constituted under a disciplinary structure connected to the League, ultimately issues a guilty verdict based on evidence the public cannot examine.
Meanwhile, a partisan media and punditry demands that the Club be punished before the appeals process has run its course.
How could anyone reasonably expect City supporters not to question this process?
So, for those wondering why Manchester City supporters are sticking together, defending their Club, and refusing to accept the prevailing narrative, there’s your answer.
We’re entitled to demand transparency. We’re entitled to question whether the process has been fair. And we’re entitled to defend our Club against those who decided long ago what they wanted the outcome to be.
We will not apologize for any of that.
And we certainly won’t play the sad clowns that this deluded circus demands.
2/2
Michael Woolley retweeted
This is the story and yet some media are focusing on whether the head of the independent regulator will resign if @andyburnham interferes with the MCFC stuff rather than the damning verdict on the national game. Can we have perspective & focus on the whole game not a headline?

ALT FSA chair Tom Greatrex said: “The State of the Game report clearly highlights the unsustainable, broken model of football’s finances. “How is our national game, which generates billions in revenue every year, in such a perilous condition with so many clubs living hand-to-mouth and reliant on regular handouts from owners? “Whether you are a football finance expert or a match going supporter who pays little attention to off-field issues, it is astonishing that almost one in three clubs could not survive for more than a month if an owner stopped funding them. “This is an alarm call for English men’s professional football that must precipitate real and lasting change.”
Michael Woolley retweeted
I’ve seen a few misunderstanding the banana craze and also getting the stories a little bit wrong (it wasn’t created because of Imre Varadi) so here’s an article I wrote a while back explaining: gjfootballarchive.com/2022/0…
Michael Woolley retweeted
How a Manchester derby on this day in 1989 was reported in the USA. Note the mention of big spending: gjfootballarchive.com/2023/0…
Michael Woolley retweeted
Billionaire Brexiteeer and Man United owner says he has lost confidence in the UK.
Lives in Monaco to avoid UK taxes, owns several luxury properties. Demands subsidies for Man U stadium.
Why do billionaires resent people getting decent public services?
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm04…
Michael Woolley retweeted
Petition: Please sign (and share widely) this petition against billionaires buying British democracy…
c.org/x5bVLKTJGc



























