Author of Threshold blockchain voting app, for defence against authoritarian overreach and Desilo, an app for countering AI censorship.
London, England
Joined March 2021
- Tweets8.1K
- Following740
- Followers1.9K
- Likes12.4K
TheBasicMind retweeted
I have introduced a bill to introduce compulsory labelling of halal and kosher meat.
Consumers have a right to know what they are eating. Yet every day people are consuming halal and kosher meat without knowing it - that’s meat where the animal has its throat slit and often is not stunned before slaughter.
At its heart, this is a straightforward proposal built on consumer choice, animal welfare and transparency. It is not about banning halal or kosher meat but about the compulsory labelling of it, which is currently only voluntary, so as to ensure consumers know what they are buying.
What began as a limited religious exemption has become an increasingly significant part of meat production.
TheBasicMind retweeted
The strategy has always been one of distraction targeting the people providing an excuse to attach a firehose sized siphon to the pockets of taxpayers and expropriate funds. Putin and, indeed, Zelensky, are equally prepared to go along with this and it appears to me, pretty much all the world leaders cooperate in the endeavour in a fashion akin to how supermarkets collude on pricing where the executives never even having to meet to agree their collusion.
The CIA, if you look at their history, are tightly integrated with the Mafia (see Whitney Webb's forensically researched book "One Country Under Blackmail") and are deeply involved in setting up deeply profitable opportunities relating to various regime change operations or "colour revolutions" around the world.
Mike Benze has done an excellent job of exposing the extent to which USAID is a vehicle of political control and destabilisation, and was much involved in the 2014 EuroMaiden Coup. Elon Musk entering his government role, was extremely naive and took a businessman's zest into the process of publishing fund dispersal through his DOGE audits which if they continued would have shown the extent to which government spending was being misdirected and could be reigned in (and he was focussing heavily on USAID - something the CIA could not abide him doing).
The fraud DOGE was uncovering was on a scale most people can scarcely believe. The audits were being published on the web, and anyone could look for themselves. But Musk ran full square into the reality that those who are truly in charge of our nations have not wanted such audits or control for a very long time (Liz Truss was a victim of similar people).
Musk's DOGE was discredited by continuity figures attached to the very administration he was working for. Musk even said, quite publicly, on the Joe Rogan podcast that he couldn't say too much about the precise mechanism or trick used to commit the fraud because "they" would kill him. Who "they" are has never explored. Certainly the media you work for roundly ignore such pronouncements and resolutely fail to ask the truly interesting questions. But you can be sure "they" are figures deeply invested in the preservation of the firehose siphon arrangement. So Musk headbutted with the corrupt money minting system (and to a large extent we are quite literally speaking of minting money) which requires ever expanding government borrowing and excuses to spend the money, with businesses that are able to exploit the international instability (Northrop Grumman, Lockheed, General Dynamics, Boeing etc., but they are in fact effectively owned by Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street - which control over 30 trillion in assets, have heavily invested in Ukraine and have most of the contracts for the nations regeneration).
So quite inevitably Musk fell out with Trump in a very public way. He was allowed back into the fold only once he stopped pursuing DOGE and talking publicly about the massive extent of government fraud. We are supposed to believe it just went away and believe the various thin cover stories stating he was mistaken and DOGE had got it wrong and that, fun fact, he was confused, got it wrong and there was very little fraud.
That is a brief and wide ranging sketch of why this has gone on for 30 years.
TheBasicMind retweeted
They’re undermining your rights under the cover of things you don’t like (or are afraid to defend). Russel Brand, extreme pornography, rape, child abuse, illegal immigration, “foreign agents”.
Whatever.
Those are means, eroding the right to privacy, right to a fair trial, presumption of innocence, and all other mechanisms designed to protect the individual from the state that have been in place so long now we take them for granted, and assume nothing can take them away.
But they are being taken away, and the people doing the taking are relying on your bias, shame or disgust to let them get away with it.
TheBasicMind retweeted
The British state still purports to be the government of a cohesive nation. But the truth is that more and more it resembles an imperial regime ruling over competing peoples, say David Betz and Michael Rainsborough. dailysceptic.org/2026/11/06/…
TheBasicMind retweeted
Under a Restore Britain Government, there will be no 'Home Office Islamic Network' within the department.
TheBasicMind retweeted
In January the UK revoked my ETA days after I criticised Keir Starmer, declaring me “not conducive to the public good.”
I’ve now been invited by MP @RupertLowe10 to come speak at a @RestoreBritain and the Home Office is stalling my visa application, effectively denying me entry again.
France just banned our @SaveEuropeAct cofounder @MartinSellner_ indefinitely as a “genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat” to public order. Same thing: no conviction, no trial.
This is a dangerous trend of two-tier enforcement: restricting the movement of law-abiding European patriots who criticize mass migration, while third-world migrants enter, claim benefits, and even gain citizenship.
The British public deserves to know about it, and the only politician prepared to do something about it is Rupert Lowe.
TheBasicMind retweeted
There are far too many people working within the Home Office who are more concerned about promoting the interests of migrants than defending the interests of the British people.
This is a real problem.
I like Bret Weinstein, but I sense he doesn't believe what he has written here regarding Charlie Kirk. He knows it wasn't for "unrelated" reasons. I think he knows, but understandably it conflicts with what he wants to believe.
Trump is a political genius. He accomplished the impossible, defeating BOTH duopoly parties. Then, this political genius, for no obvious reason, torched his presidency and legacy over a war the public didn’t want. That’s surprising. Why on Earth would he do that?
Maybe the world looked very different from inside the Truman Show bubble constructed around him. After rapid success in Venezuela and “the 12 Day War” he may have been lead to believe he had the power to fix Iran, cheaply and quickly, and walk away a hero. That would explain it. But it would have required those opposed to the plan, people who knew better and were willing to say so, to be removed from his inner circle.
Tucker could be shoved aside, but Charlie was a problem. Shoving Charlie out would have turned TPUSA into a powerful adversary. Bad move. But fate took care of that when Tyler Robinson, acting alone, killed Charlie for unrelated reasons. And here we are, Trump’s insurgency dead at midterms with the race-bating Marxists headed back to power.
What will happen is, on gaining power, Rupert will discover the extent to which the asset managers dictate joined up policy across nations, from war, to fertiliser tax, to inheritance tax applied to farmers farms, all driving ownership into their grubby hands. He will come under immense pressure. He will be told how cost reduction measures will deflate the economy and create a circle recessionary circle. How he has to keep feeding the beast or the UK banking sector will collapse on his watch. The average person, and possibly Rupert himself doesn't have a clue how much pressure will be excepted, quite possible beyond the bounds of legality too.
Soaring fertiliser costs are yet ANOTHER reason why the war in Iran has hit British families in the pocket. People understand that war in the Middle East hikes up petrol and diesel prices, driving inflation. We all know that.
Do not underestimate what it does to the cost of producing our food. Speaking as a farmer, it has ROCKETED.
Your food shop is SO much more expensive because of what has happened in Iran.
Modern farming depends on fertiliser. Much of that fertiliser depends on natural gas to manufacture - disrupt energy supplies and international shipping, and fertiliser prices rise. Quickly and brutally.
That means British farmers paying more to grow wheat, barley, potatoes and vegetables.
More to produce the crops that feed our livestock.
Everything costs more for us.
More expensive fertiliser means more expensive farming. More expensive farming means more expensive food.
And who pays? You. Your family. Your friends.
Businesses you use.
What does that do? Drive inflation, especially along with fuel costs soaring.
This is what the politicians who enthusiastically cheered on another Middle Eastern war apparently entirely failed to consider - Reform and the Tories were happy to drop the bombs but thought nothing of what would come next.
Restore Britain opposed this war from day one, because it was INCREDIBLY clear that throwing more bombs around the Middle East was going to disrupt everything.
Sadly, that region is of massive importance.
British farmers need affordable fertiliser. British families need affordable food. Neither needs another catastrophic foreign war.
Any farmer looking at their fertiliser costs over the last 12 months will agree with me - with more taxes to come, and the lunacy of Net Zero meaning our power is the most expensive in the world while we sit on abundant supplies.
Expensive fertiliser and expensive fuel directly from bombing Iran have delivered the soaring cost of living for working British men and women.
Restore Britain will slash the tax on fertiliser and produce it in OUR country.
Most importantly? No more pointless foreign wars.
The left column could be titled "noise to string along the electorate" the right column "globalist puppets held to account"
And everyone discusses politics like there is something to discuss and vote for. That's the wrong discussion.
The right discussion:
- The banking system
- Fiat money
- Schemes to reduce the value of taxpayer investments
- Schemes for siphoning money from taxpayers
- Concentration of trillions of dollars of shareholder voting power in frighteningly few hands
- The difference between Capitalism and Corporatism
- Policies to control the population
- High level omertà
TheBasicMind retweeted
So let me get this straight: Germany told everyone Russia would invade Poland and then invaded Poland itself?
Outside of ideology, this is one of the major blockers we face. Incredulity in the face of truth. It is easy to get despondent, but if you do, remember incredulity can be overcome. Such people are able to be moved and it is a question of how to introduce the right information so they can see and appreciate its veracity. They may not be ready to listen today, but they are open to be convinced if the case can be demonstrated. That is a far easier nut to crack than overcoming ideological indoctrination.
On X tensions due to ideological indoctrination float to the top and so it is easy to become despondent thinking all is shouting to one's tribe. But realise most are in the category where incredulity is the problem to be overcome, and there is cause for greater optimism the truth will prevail.
A close friend of mine was shocked to hear me speak out about the ‘army’ of fighting age migrant men arriving in the UK and being put up for free in hotels. I told her that my view is that these men - many of whom are receiving military training - are being readied to fight against the public when we become resistant and dissident and when the British Army refuses to go against us.
She insists these men are asylum seekers, fleeing from war-torn countries, and claimed that what I was saying was racist.
(We’ve been friends for over 40 years and she knows I’m not racist so that was a bit of a shocker.)
I pointed out that it’s only men arriving - no wives or children - and said it’s not unusual for asylum seeking men to flee first and bring their families once they’re settled, and that it’s happened that way throughout history.
I pointed out that she hasn’t looked into it as much as I have and that maybe if she researched it a bit more, her views would change.
After a bit more discussion, she admitted that she just doesn’t WANT to believe what I’m saying.
Now that’s a different issue altogether. When she said that, I realised there was no point in discussing the matter further.
Any of you had similar conversations with friends and, if so, how do you deal with them?
And the Islamic voting block will organise intelligently. They will vote labour candidates in so long as, and only so long as, there is not an assured pure Islamic party victory. Labour reason if they are nice and cuddly to Islam, why wouldn't Muslims want to vote for their (schizophrenic, liberal trans / gay friendly family hostile) party? Muslims will move past labour and onto the pure Islamic alternative the instant they have the numbers assured; and not before, because the strategy will be organised by the Imams and the congregation will follow as instructed. The really sad thing is, once this starts to happen, Labour will even see how their policy is political suicide, but they will continue going for the strategic short term option, because that is what Socialists do. They simply don't have a fibre in their being that can countenance disciplined short-term pain for future prosperity. They will knowingly and willingly, eyes wide open, give Britain away in exchange for a few years in office.
TheBasicMind retweeted
The Iran war has achieved regime change in the USA.
The cost of decades of these wars has come home.
It is time the national interest replaced the international interests whose permanent war on civilisation has bankrupted the West morally and financially.
TheBasicMind retweeted
Out of the three main parties on the Right, Restore Britain had the most sensible and responsible position on the Iran conflict.
That is why it has a place in British politics - a right-wing, anti-war voter in England would have no formal party representation without Restore.
Absolutely right. Additionally anyone considering signing-up and feeling the slightest tug of obligation, should watch the Shawn Ryan interview with Jay Cal first (warning, it's a very long one, and Jay Cal isn't a gifted orator, but nevertheless stick with it, it's a good listen). And remember Kier Starmer was earlier in his career a barrister who eagerly took up the cudgel for the kinds of action taken against Jay Cal (link to Jay Cal video in replies).
Shawn Ryan's interview of Jay Cal. Everyone should listen to this.
youtube.com/watch?v=nuu3ShNd…
TheBasicMind retweeted
And we cannot have £30 million to train our troops.
So let me get this right.
The PM flies to the Caribbean and hands over £40 million for their infrastructure and green energy projects.
Back home, our roads are full of potholes and families can't afford to heat their homes.
Why should British taxpayers fund roads abroad before fixing their own?
Charity starts at home. Tell me I'm wrong.