fmr. human weapons system | cpg | dad | reply unc
Oklahoma City | Savannah
Joined January 2023
- Tweets13.9K
- Following1.4K
- Followers526
- Likes61.8K
Pinned Tweet
Left the military after 17 years when we no longer fit each other.
Followed that up with 3 years in defense tech contracting, then departed to move into full-time entrepreneurship with my friends.
We started @drinkfktea to show the dawgs we're capable of doing more. So when we're not being dads, we're running ultras or popping out on adventures around the world.
Clean energy for people who live like life is an endurance sport. 🌊🐊
🚪10+ doors & counting
Kevin retweeted
I just did some digging and this man had break throughs of understanding CANCER and AGING to the point where he was a candite for a the Nobel Peace Prize. This women ruined that for not only him but ALL of us over some MeToo allegations that came up as false!?!?!?!?
maaaannn
Kevin retweeted
the first 48 hours of Woke 2 has already produced more humor than the entire decade of Woke 1
dealing with this rn. give me cracked AI marketer.
I dunno on this one.
In my experience, the only reason a 9/10 marketer would ever be a 2/10 with A.I. is because they're resistant to it - which says a ton about them.
Im leaning towards just wanting cracked A.I. maxxers who can learn marketing vs cracked marketers that have to be cajoled into using A.I.
Kevin retweeted
Writing this in my personal capacity, but I have been flying these types of aircraft for more than 20 years, with over 8,000 hours, and have reasonable familiarity with how the charter world operates. I feel compelled to post after seeing commentary about the Lear 60 crash, from missile strikes to DEI to critiquing this poor woman’s final radio calls.
That last part is what I find most troubling. She was the second-in-command (SIC), and while she was empowered to point out mistakes as part of good crew resource management, she was doing her job, communicating with ATC right to the end in a terrifying situation. She likely knew before many of those calls that she was going to die. I have heard final calls from friends, from military pilots with thousands of hours in fighter aircraft, and they are just as heartbreaking because they know the end is approaching.
I understand the public interest given the footage and audio. But you do not know the aircraft’s maintenance history, whether there was a structural failure, if any failure was induced by turbulence, overspeed, or overcontrol, or everything happening in that cockpit. I am sure weather will be part of the investigation, but beyond that, it is speculation. The charter industry routinely hires commercial pilots very early in their careers to gain experience alongside an ATP-qualified captain before they move up to the airlines. She would still have the appropriate training, qualifications, and checkouts by an FAA examiner or designee.
Let people investigate, learn, and share the facts. Be respectful to those who perished and the families who carry their memories. God bless them and their loved ones.
Kevin retweeted
If you aspire to be in the top .1% of anything, know this:
The vast majority of people will not be able to relate to your life at all.
But you will get abundant energy and motivation from spending time working with the very few who get it.
grok is this a murders?
What I'm hearing is that you built a system that first mapped every film that exists in vector space, mapped the screenplays to their box office results, then created a system to write log lines based on that data driven agent.
Then you wrote a system to write treatments which iterates on those treatments using the best books available like Save The Cat, Hero's Journey and Story as a RAG knowledge base, allowing the agent to iterate on your treatment and ensure that its structure is solid.
Then you used a panel of twenty judges, each one taking on the persona of a well known screenwriting instructor and used that panel to iterate on that treatment, expose where scenes do not flip, where weaknesses are in character motivation, where scenes can be cut.
Then you built an agent to expand each of the beats in the treatment into multiple scene summaries, where you ran a thematic pass to ensure they all satisfy the theme, always drive the action forward, and ensure the characters make choices and aren't passive.
Then you wrote an agent to expand those scenes into screenwriting format with on-the-nose dialog where everyone says exactly what they mean. Then you ran a voice pass on all of your dialog to ensure every piece of on-the-nose dialog maps to what the character wants and how they make choices.
Then you wrote an agent to bury what the characters want in the subtext based on their character sheets and biographies which you also generated, so that the dialog serves the strategy of getting what the character wants because saying it directly can never and they could never just say it because people don't act like that and characters like that aren't interesting.
Then you simulated a hundred judge panel of film critics watching the film. Each taking on the persona of a top 100 film critic based on their real world film reviews and biographies. You gave them one scene at a time and had them generate their thoughts and feelings and questions, second by second in the scene.
Then you built an orchestrator to score the film per scene per critic, and your orchestrator iterated on that until you reached a threshold (e.g. 8 out of 10 average)...
and you still got bad results.
Is that what you're telling me?
