Web3 Content Strategist || Clipper
On-chain
Joined October 2022
- Tweets64.7K
- Following3.5K
- Followers3.3K
- Likes74.1K
Pinned Tweet
Most Nfts projects gives you digital collectibles, but 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝗳𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘀 took things a step further 👀🎴
With 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝗳𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘀, you can open a pack, reveal a real graded Pokémon card and decide what to do next and this is where things gets interesting.
You can keep it as a digital collection, accept a buyback offer within 72hrs window or redeem it for the actual physical card.
This way, it not just treated as a digital collection, you have options beyond revealing.
The combination of on-chain ownership and real-world collectibles makes this an interesting use case for crypto.
The story of web3 is shifting from more than just token and nfts 🔥
@solflare
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
Autonomous agents moving funds with no accountability is not a feature but a lawsuit waiting to happen. @meetmotes fixes the layer everyone skips: owner signed smart accounts, so every agent action traces back to a human who approved it.
Liability needs a signature, not vibe
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
An AI agent can execute a thousand transactions, but if none of that activity creates value for the ecosystem, what’s actually sustaining it?
That’s a question worth asking.
And it’s one reason I’ve been looking into the economic model behind @meetmotes.
Here’s the idea:
Each Motes NFT represents a dedicated AI agent identity connected to its own smart account.
As these agents perform eligible activities, the protocol plans to charge a 1% service fee on a defined fee base.
That revenue is intended to support protocol operations and planned $MOTES buy-backs.
What interests me is the relationship between usage and the protocol’s economy.
Instead of relying entirely on attention around the NFT collection or speculation about a token, Motes is proposing an economic model connected to actual agent activity.
Of course, the important questions are how much eligible activity these agents can generate, what the final fee rules look like, and how revenue will be allocated.
Because a fee model on paper is one thing.
Building enough genuine usage to sustain it is another.
And that’s the part I’ll be watching.
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
I keep coming back to one awkward question: what if your security upgrade is ready, but you’re still waiting for another network to move?
That’s what makes @Starknet exploring an independent L1 interesting to me.
There are different pieces here. Hash-based STARK proofs verify computation. Programmable accounts give developers a way to introduce new signature methods without a network-wide upgrade, where the account supports that change.
Useful capabilities, but they don’t remove every dependency. As an Ethereum L2, Starknet still relies on Ethereum for parts of its security, so Ethereum’s own cryptography and migration timeline matter too.
It reminds me of getting your part of a repair finished, then finding out another organisation controls the work you’re waiting on. You can prepare thoroughly and still be unable to finish on your own schedule.
An independent L1 could give Starknet more control over those decisions. It would also bring responsibility for its own consensus and data availability. I’d want to understand those trade-offs before treating independence as an obvious improvement.
This is still being explored. It isn’t a completed transition, and it wouldn’t automatically make Starknet quantum-safe.
What I’d like to see next is a clear picture of the dependencies: which upgrades can Starknet make itself, and which still require someone else to act?
That would tell me more about its readiness than a “quantum-proof” label.
🔗quantum.starkware.co/
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
Institutions don't avoid public blockchains because they dislike the tech. They avoid them because every move turns into a public filing.
Say a credit fund wants to lend into an onchain pool that only accepts verified, compliant participants. Today it has two bad options: put its identity and holdings onchain for anyone to read, or lean on a middleman's word.
This is where @primus_labs makes sense to me. Primus is confidentiality + verification infrastructure that sits above existing onchain financial rails. The fund can prove what the pool needs to trust (it passed its checks, it holds enough collateral, even when that data lives offchain with a bank or custodian) without broadcasting who it is or what else it holds.
The pool gets an answer to its question, and nothing more.
That's why I see privacy and verification as prerequisites for institutional activity, not nice-to-haves.
Primus put it well last week: making onchain data useful without compromising privacy.
What would an institution need to prove before you'd trust it onchain?
If you want to dig in, Primus XP quests are here: s.kaito.ai/vowLc5q
#Primus #InstitutionalFinance #OnchainFinance
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
Creators eating good ,@rarelistio is redefining the creator's Economy
Our short bonus campaign is officially over!
rarelist.io/projects/rarelis…
Thanks to everyone who took part.
Check your ETH wallets, rewards are already out!
More opportunities are already on the way.
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
For those of us using wallets across different apps, here’s a question worth asking: if our wallet changes how it checks signatures, will everything we use still work?
That’s what I’d want to ask Eli Ben-Sasson in this conversation about @Starknet.
With native account abstraction, signature validation sits inside the account contract. Where that account supports an upgrade, its owner can change the validation logic while keeping the same address and funds, without a network wide fork.
Think of a shop changing its locks. You still know where to find it, but the people opening the doors need keys that fit.
A wallet upgrade has a similar wrinkle. Keeping your address is useful, but connected apps and signing tools may need to support the new signature scheme too. I’d want to know whether I could keep using my usual apps or would need to update something first.
There’s another distinction worth keeping clear: signatures authorise transactions, while hash based STARK proofs verify computation. Changing account signatures doesn’t automatically make the whole network quantum safe, including its Ethereum facing dependencies.
That’s why I find programmable accounts interesting as part of Starknet’s quantum preparation. They give supported accounts a way to adapt, though experimental post-quantum demonstrations are still different from finished wallet products.
For anyone building wallets or apps here, which connections would need updating first? As a user, that’s the part I’d want explained before making the switch.
quantum.starkware.co/
🤝 Paid partnership
Your next job might be one AI search away. You just need to have access to the right tool and this is why am introducing you too x.ai/bot/1L7WoDtWJCGIdHzSl4T…
Grok Bot will get you a job.
Add the “Get Hired 2027” bot to:
→ Search 2M live roles, updated daily
→ Search 28,000 internships
→ Auto match your resume to the best jobs
→ Tailor a resume & cover letter for them
→ Apply for you (this requires a sub)
→ Send notifications when new jobs land
Don't like your current career? It will also:
→ Help you adapt your post-AI career
→ Map a realistic path into sectors that are hiring
Try it free here: x.ai/bot/1L7WoDtWJCGIdHzSl4T…
Sometimes you don't need backup plans... what you need is AI to make your work easier.
x.ai/bot/1L7WoDtWJCGIdHzSl4T…
Grok Bot will get you a job.
Add the “Get Hired 2027” bot to:
→ Search 2M live roles, updated daily
→ Search 28,000 internships
→ Auto match your resume to the best jobs
→ Tailor a resume & cover letter for them
→ Apply for you (this requires a sub)
→ Send notifications when new jobs land
Don't like your current career? It will also:
→ Help you adapt your post-AI career
→ Map a realistic path into sectors that are hiring
Try it free here: x.ai/bot/1L7WoDtWJCGIdHzSl4T…
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
@AshCrypto | A broader look at digital finance.
Crypto conversations should include real product development, not only prices.
This @DigiMaaya post adds to the wider digital-finance conversation. Also following updates from DigiMaaya founder @Utsav_DAR.
From the front row to execution. 🚀
Our Founder & CEO @utsav_dar on the forces reshaping digital finance — and why @DigiMaaya is building for what comes next.
Big respect to @token2049 @AlexFiskum @mrgandrewwork @EricTrump @RaoulGMI @CryptoHayes @adenatfriedman @star_okx @fundstrat @sandeepnailwal @_RichardTeng @shayne_coplan @usithetalk.
Listen. Learn. Build. Execute.
Special mentions: @vineetbudki @EvanLuthra @dhaval_XP @myrtleology @ashishgupta1527 @garima_singh10 @MuazXinthi @Sigma_V @KOLCapital @BlockTides @CyreneAI @CoinFerenceX
Singapore was the signal. Now comes scale. 🔥
Me running away from those email workload since @nitrosendx AI tool came into the picture.
Your new teammates don't sleep.
Give Grok Bot one link and it sets itself up as a full-stack email marketer. It designs your launch email, sends you a test, and you say send it.
Proud to be a SpaceX Super Intelligence launch partner @SpaceXSI
nitrosend.com/integrations/g…
Use Nitrosend today
nitrosend.com/integrations/g…
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
I think the most important question about ITLG is not simply how much a user may receive during distribution. It is what the token can actually do as the InterLink ecosystem continues to develop.
The latest announcement points toward several areas of potential development. Transferable ITLG is intended to be usable within the ecosystem, while users will also have the option to stake it in the Vault and upgrade it to non-transferable vITLG to earn annual Vault rewards. InterLink has also indicated that ITLG may continue developing into a broader utility asset, potentially including a reserve-asset role.
These are meaningful ambitions, but the distinction between a plan and an established outcome matters. Long-term utility will depend on how these features are implemented, what users can access, how many people genuinely use the ecosystem, and whether the underlying products solve practical problems.
A token becomes more useful when people have clear reasons to hold or use it beyond speculation. That could include participation in ecosystem services, access to supported features, or other applications that are implemented and documented by the project.
I also believe transparency will be important. Users need clear information about token functionality, eligibility, Vault terms, rewards, and any restrictions so they can make informed decisions.
The upcoming Mainnet KYC and transferable ITLG distribution are important steps in the journey, but they are not the whole journey.
For ITLG to become a powerful utility asset, the focus must remain on real adoption, credible implementation, and sustained ecosystem development.
That is what I’ll be watching as InterLink moves forward.
#InterLink #ITLG #ITL
🧵 𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗡 𝗔 𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗣𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗦 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗥𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗔𝗟 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗣𝗢𝗞É𝗠𝗢𝗡 𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗗 👀🔥
Ever wondered how to rip open a Solflare Pack and what happens after the reveal?
Let me break it down step by step. 🧩👇
1/ Connect your wallet 🔗
First, head to 𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗣𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗦 and connect your Solflare wallet.
This gives you access to your packs and lets you interact with the platform.
2/ Open your pack 📦
Once connected, locate the pack you want to open and enter the pack-opening interface.
This is where the fun begins. You are getting ready to discover which Pokémon card is inside!
3/ Hit the “Rip” button
This is the moment everyone is waiting for.
Click Rip to open your pack and reveal the card inside.
No more wondering what you got. The reveal is where the excitement kicks in. 👀
4/ Discover your card 🎴
After ripping the pack, you get to see your Pokémon card.
But here's what makes this interesting: 𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗣𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗦 connects the digital collecting experience with real, graded Pokémon cards held in physical storage.
You're not simply looking at a random digital image. The card is represented digitally while the actual physical card is kept in a vault.
5/ What can you do after the reveal? 🤔
This is where things get even more interesting.
After revealing your card, you can explore your available options:
🔹 Keep it digitally: Hold onto your card and manage it through the digital experience.
🔹 Accept a buyback offer: Eligible cards may have a Collector Crypt buyback option within a 72-hour window. Check the specific offer and terms available to you.
🔹 Redeem the physical card: If you want the actual card in your hands, you can request physical delivery through the redemption process, subject to the platform's terms.
6/ What happens when you redeem it? 📬
When a card is physically redeemed, its associated NFT is burned.
That means the digital token representing the card is removed as part of the redemption process, rather than remaining as an active digital representation of a card that has been delivered.
7/ Why is this worth paying attention to? 👀
Traditional digital collectibles often stay entirely on-chain.
@solflare brings another dimension to collecting by linking the digital experience to physical, graded Pokémon cards.
You can open a pack digitally, discover your card, and explore what to do with it afterward.
The experience combines the excitement of ripping packs with the flexibility of managing collectibles digitally.
That's the basic flow.
For collectors, the interesting part isn't just the reveal. It's the connection between the digital collectible and the physical card behind it.
Would you keep your Pokémon card digitally, take the buyback offer, or redeem the physical card? 👇
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
The hardest part of drilling a borehole wasn’t finding water.
On August 20, 1992, I was arranging a borehole project with one goal: to find at least two litres of clear water beneath the earth’s crust. I could organise the work, but I couldn’t know exactly what the drilling would uncover. Every decision carried the risk of wasting time, effort, and money.
AI agents face a similar problem when they control money.
An agent can read posts, browse websites, follow instructions, and execute transactions. But the content it reads can contain hidden instructions designed to manipulate its behaviour. That is called prompt injection. The agent may mistake malicious text for a command it should follow.
One reported attack showed how serious this can get: an instruction hidden in Morse code inside a tweet reportedly tricked an AI agent into losing around $200,000.
The deeper problem is predictability.
If an attacker can study one model and one security filter, they can keep testing variations until something slips through. A defence that works today can become a target tomorrow.
That is why Greyboxing from @GenLayer caught my attention.
Instead of relying on one fixed defence, validators use different models and independently applied, secret defences. Each validator rewrites the input before its model sees it, helping neutralise hidden instructions while preserving the information needed to evaluate the request.
An attacker can study one door. It is much harder to prepare for doors whose locks and security checks are different and hidden.
Greyboxing does not make prompt injection impossible. It makes the attack surface less predictable and manipulation harder to repeat across validators.
When AI agents can move real money, security cannot depend on one filter that everyone can learn to beat.
Watch the video and tell me: what would convince you that an AI agent is safe enough to trust with your money?
With @nitrosendx, you now have AI agents that can help manage your email marketing while you focus on other things.
Join Nitrosend today: nitrosend.com/integrations/g…
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
Late GM CT.
Quip is aiming to build a marketplace where you don't need to have quantum experience in computing before you can benefit or use the quantum computing.
What makes it interesting is the fact that it a decentralized marketplace where you don't have to deal witha thrid-party. The users deals directly with machine solving the workload.
Study @quipnetwork
Moonaard 🌑 retweeted
A lot has been happening in the @voicecc community lately, so here’s a quick breakdown of what you might have missed.
VOICE has been giving us a clearer look at its vision: vote, create and earn. The idea is to make participation valuable without requiring someone else to lose for you to win.
It’s an interesting approach to building a community where people’s contributions actually matter.
Late GM CT.
Quip is aiming to build a marketplace where you don't need to have quantum experience in computing before you can benefit or use the quantum computing.
What makes it interesting is the fact that it a decentralized marketplace where you don't have to deal witha thrid-party. The users deals directly with machine solving the workload.
Study @quipnetwork