安替, Globus, Global Research. A veteran journalist on International Affairs, Harvard Nieman Fellow '08, TEDGlobal Speaker.

Joined May 2007
AI短剧也终于到了每周安静等更新的美剧时刻啊!
9
1
3
36
19,777
Michael Anti retweeted
当Tibo还在苦苦寻思怎么优化Codex的体验的时候 Workbuddy已经开始可以卖Skills了 商业模式这一块还得看腾讯 通过认证的开发者以发布付费Skill和付费Agent 支持一次性买断 甚至还有按月付费的形式😆
76
10
11
280
49,009
Michael Anti retweeted
Liquidators of Chinese property giant EverGrande pursue Harvard to recoup donation ft.com/content/cbf8759b-ec19… via @ft Lots of US schools would probably be unhappy if PRC and US regulators worked together to identify donations that were made with money earned illicitly...
15
43
6
162
26,618
Michael Anti retweeted
看了几百部短剧,最喜欢的还得是满院亲戚全是上古大妖,又有玄幻部分,建模也不错,小宝非常可爱,剧情很温馨,而且足够长,有空的时候可以慢慢看…… 这个作者上不上推,能不能快点更新啊!!!
9
3
25
4,715
Michael Anti retweeted
WorkBuddy 支持卖技能SKill了 腾讯带大家赚钱了,快冲 😄
115
111
28
1,022
188,835
凯恩今天回家告诉我,另外有其他三个班的老师觉得随机点名程序很好,他们也要,所以也把班级同学名单给了凯恩,算是下了订单。
凯恩帮班主任做了一个随机抽喊班上同学名字的程序,结果数学老师经常用,同学们纷纷向凯恩抱怨,每次不希望喊到的时候更容易被喊到;下一个凯恩编程任务是,班主任在任何地方用手机app喊一声某某同学去办公室,班上的屏幕就要把这个命令播放出来或者跳屏出来。他在熟悉ios app、云主机编程中。
7
4
29
10,546
Michael Anti retweeted
2
3
34
4,104
我今天正式删除了OpenClaw,其他Agent完全取代了它所有的功能。老婆还在深度依赖OpenClaw,而且用的相当好。
31
1
2
105
39,360
Under the new Chinese rules, DeepSeek and Minimax have obtained permissions for open sourcing V4.1F-1017 and M3.1-Flash, respectively. Seems like this isn't so hard.
Replying to @teortaxesTex
A CCTV-affiliated commentator said 1017 applied after the Oct. 16 AI export restrictions were announced, got approved, then open-sourced and related other overseas authorizations. Approval really does seem to take just hours. mp.weixin.qq.com/s/hoeaIXEFa…
8
12
4
245
16,313
Michael Anti retweeted
deepseek的提速降费就跟下饺子一样, 你出 400, 我出 800, 他来 1500 。
deepinfer 开源还是猛啊, 这两天老看到一些推理厂, 在给 deepseek-V4.1-flash 提速降价。
14
2
1
101
17,689
我现在查书和查资料,都在看2023年开始之后出版的,因为ChatGPT出现导致的AI革命,和疫情结束导致的全球供应链冲击,让2023年后的世界提出的问题和寻找的解法,是真正全新的。
10
3
65
14,762
Michael Anti retweeted
deepinfer 开源还是猛啊, 这两天老看到一些推理厂, 在给 deepseek-V4.1-flash 提速降价。
6
2
1
69
29,688
在等待今晚8点。
25
4
47
19,478
Michael Anti retweeted
An opinion piece published by two Columbia University students questioning the “Cornell 7” case has sparked an uproar on campus—reigniting debates around free speech at elite universities. on.wsj.com/4ic0sbp
17
12
4
152
112,868
Michael Anti retweeted
Replying to @mranti
持械入宋的剧本还可以,但是制作来说谈不上顶级,现在制作顶级的我认为是 “被裁掉的女孩” 或 “NOVA:新星”,已经和真人演出相差不大了。 NOVA太惊艳了
3
4
3,184
Wake up. Every profession deemed white-collar, the middle class dream, is about to be decimated by AI, at a much faster pace than anticipated, with monstrous social consequences.
1,042
2,809
586
22,890
1,895,056
Michael Anti retweeted
A private company in southern China’s Guangxi region issued nearly 8.8 billion yuan in invoices through a fictitious pig-trading scheme that caused major losses for local state-owned enterprises. caixinglobal.com/2026-10-22/…
3
6
3
21
8,240
Michael Anti retweeted
In December 1958 the Polish embassy in Beijing refused to let the sparrow killers onto its grounds, so the Chinese surrounded it with drummers and kept the drums going for two days until every bird sheltering in the garden had dropped dead from the air, and the diplomats cleared them up with shovels. That is how thorough it was. The campaign had been running since the spring. Every village, school and factory was turned out with gongs, pans and firecrackers to keep the sparrows flying until their hearts gave out. Nests were torn from eaves, eggs smashed, chicks killed, and children went through the fields with slingshots and were paid by the bird. The dead came in by the basket, strung on wires, piled on carts, and the totals went up the chain as a harvest. Something close to two billion sparrows in two years. The embassy garden was the last place in the capital with birdsong in it, and the drums got that too. A zoologist called Zhu Xi had told them before it started that a king had tried this and lost. Frederick the Great of Prussia had put a bounty on sparrows in the 1740s to save his grain and his cherries, and the sparrows went, and the caterpillars they had been eating stripped his orchards to the stalk, and the king cancelled the bounty and paid to have sparrows brought back from neighbouring states and let loose. The whole episode was in the library. The ministry had a figure for what a sparrow ate and no figure for what it did, and a man with the second figure was told to sit down. The locusts arrived on schedule. Then the grain borers. A sparrow takes a few grains from a field in autumn and feeds its chicks nothing but insects all spring, and with the sparrows gone the insects had the rice and the wheat to themselves. The counties with the most sparrows to lose saw their grain fall the furthest, and the rice and wheat that had been holding the country up went down together. That was 1959, and the state took its grain quota anyway, on the harvest that had been reported. What was left in the villages was not enough, and the famine that followed over the next three years is the largest in human history: tens of millions dead, the estimates running from fifteen million to forty-five, whole counties in Anhui and Sichuan where the living could not bury the dead. The sparrows were one cause among several and the economists who have gone back to the county records put the bird's share at something over two million people, with another four hundred thousand never born. Two million, from a campaign against a thing that weighs an ounce. By 1960 the ornithologist Tso-hsin Cheng, who had been cutting open dead sparrows and counting the insects in their stomachs, got the bird struck off the list and bed bugs put in its place. There were almost no sparrows left in China to pardon. So the government did what Prussia had done two centuries before: it bought a quarter of a million sparrows from the Soviet Union and shipped them east in crates, to be released into a country that had drummed every one of their relatives out of the sky. The animal that does the invisible job is always the one on the ledger as a cost. Take the sheep off a chalk down and the orchids are under scrub in twenty years. Fence the cattle off a Welsh hill and the bracken takes it. Empty a savannah of its herds and the grass goes to fire. All of it written down, all of it in the library, all of it available to the next committee with a figure for what a cow eats. Beijing paid Moscow for the birds in hard currency. The men who had said so in 1958 were still not allowed to say so in 1960.
227
2,271
201
13,338
1,402,320
Michael Anti retweeted
纽时采访了陶哲轩,写了一篇质量极高的稿子,谈论当代数学家的存在主义危机,尤其是他们在面对AI的这几年里,相处态度从好奇到兴奋,从兴奋到愤怒,从愤怒到无力,最后陷入集体迷茫的整个过程,版本变化太快了。 陶哲轩曾是数学家群体里对AI最为友好的一位,如果你们还记得,每次OpenAI发布新模型,他都会率先出来站台,分享他和新一代ChatGPT又一起合作取得了怎样的进展,那时他是真的热爱AI,相信这项技术能够为数学带来无限可能。 而OpenAI也很懂事,数学是一门相对纯粹的科学,和它绑定能为AI带来相当份量的声誉加成,所以也一直对陶哲轩等少数「VIP客户」敞开模型供应,甚至当陶哲轩所在的数学研究所被削减经费的期间,OpenAI还掏了几万美金赞助,帮忙渡过难关。 事情是从什么时候开始变质的呢? 10月6号,OpenAI一次性公布了350多项「科研」成果,几乎遍及数学的所有分支,包括代数、数论、理论计算机科学、数理逻辑、拓扑学等等,陶哲轩说,他看到了一枚炸弹的投下,这是开战的信号,以及OpenAI对他乃至整个数学界的背叛。 作为和OpenAI有着密切关系的数学家以及合作者,陶哲轩提前一个月就知道了这批成果的发布计划,他反对了,然而反对无效,于是在OpenAI推进工作的同时,他也写好了一份声明决定同期公开,也就是后来发在自己博客上的那篇檄文,和24个菲尔兹奖得主共同署名,批评OpenAI是在伤害数学这个学科。 那天有10万人点进了他的博客,可能比过去几年的流量都要高。 虽然陶哲轩开始改口把AI产出的那些证明称作「Toxic Waste」(有毒的废料),不过与其说他是在反对AI,不如说他认为OpenAI这样的AI公司过于急功近利了,为了表现出模型的强大,不惜摧毁数学这个行业的基石。 作为理论数学的代表人物,陶哲轩年少成名,8岁时SAT数学考了760分,24岁就当上了加州大学洛杉矶分校的终身教授,基于「过来人」的经验,深知年轻数学家需要的是什么,AI提供工具,那没毛病,然而直接代为上台发表成果,就是在牺牲这一代数学家的未来了,「像是被剧透后,你就再也无法体验从头推理剧情的乐趣了」。 陶哲轩带的学生也已经懵逼了,有人花了多年时间试图解决的问题,正好在OpenAI这次批量化成果的射程以内,在看完AI写的充满难懂术语的论文之后,他有很多疑问,却找不到可以和「作者」交谈论证的机会。 这不是数学界习惯的程序,按照以前的做法,有人发表了突破性的论文,然后就会有学术会议被组织起来,作者会出席分享更多的思考,然后与会者一起碰撞交流,以一种社会化的方式,缓慢但有意的推动数学前进。 但OpenAI不是这么做的,它像是倒垃圾一样,把几百篇手稿灌进了GitHub,要知道,这不是通俗小说,是看每一句话都要付出巨大脑力消耗的前沿论文,光是评审这批「成果」,搞不好都要花掉整个数学界好几年的时间。 归根结底,软件和数学,是不同的。 软件属于应用科学,规模化的游戏规则再正常不过了,在OpenAI看来,自己明明是在做贡献,自费烧了天量的算力,给数学界献上前所未有的馈赠,怎么就得不到想要的感恩呢? 但数学本质上是实验科学,「你坐在桌子前,拿起纸笔,就可以试着证明一些东西」,而OpenAI解决纳维—斯托克斯问题的方法,是1万个无限Token的智能体花了3天时间写完165页的证明,成本可能价值几百万美金,这是数学家们根本负担不起的能力。 这跟当年AlphaGo打遍天下围棋大师也不太一样,很多人会说,AI在下围棋这件事情上碾压人类,也没有消灭围棋这项竞技啊,反而有更多的棋手加入进来,职业棋手的梯队也还在稳步扩增,怎么数学家就这么矫情呢? 在陶哲轩看来,数学要复杂得多,如果人类无法理解AI所做的那些证明,那么光有技惊四座的结果,是无用的,他自己,以及他能找到的专家,都没办法完全读懂OpenAI破解纳维—斯托克斯问题的论文,这种暴力穷举的做法,让双方再也没有合作的希望了。 陶哲轩承认,随着模型能力的一日千里,数学界一定是要转型的,但自我反思,和被枪口抵着反思,是两码事,他现在去见学生的时候,专业交流的占比都很少了,大多数时候,他感觉更像是在做心理疏导,要让年轻的数学家重振信心,相信AI不会让自己的人生毫无意义。 source:Why One of the World’s Greatest Mathematicians Is on a ‘War Footing’
15
38
4
289
38,266