Munris retweeted
a new project just dropped inside the @Polymarket ecosystem.
polyscore is basically ethos but for polymarket, you can see any trader's score directly on twitter thanks to their extension.
keep building.
Abstract @AbstractChain
On Twitter and Telegram, I’ve seen lots of different badge and tier statistics - but they’re always inconsistent. So, I decided to compile my own. I used my own software to collect addresses from the blockchain, taking every address that had any interaction with the network - a total of 2,530,000. After that, using the official API, I gathered data on the number of badges and the tier each wallet falls into.
Badges:
0: 1.8M
1–5 (basic badges): 255K
6–10: 393K
11–15: 47K
16–20: 8,100
21+: 3,966
Tiers:
Bronze: 570K (actually more, since empty accounts also get this badge, but it doesn’t really matter)
Silver: 146K
Gold: 6,858
Platinum: 184
Diamond: 0
You can explore the data yourself in GPT and check whatever stats you’re interested in. I’m sharing the final CSV with the data drive.google.com/file/d/1IHq…
Munris retweeted
A message to @SuccinctLabs Team & Succinct Discord users.
Recently, I’ve seen Discord users mocking the on-chain or testnet users who received 20–200 $PROVE.
(That behavior is not just disrespectful- it’s embarrassing. You're not above anyone. Everyone deserves respect. Humility isn’t a weakness, try it sometime.)
🫵🏻 If you truly believe in fairness, answer this:
1. First let's start with the gamified Testnet.
You are saying that we only played games for some hours in the whole six months and don't deserve the rewards, right?
Then tell me why did the @SuccinctLabs team come up with the idea of gamified Testnet & gate it to 25k users only?
Only to blame testnet players in the last?
Clearly, the goal wasn’t just playing games, we were testing the core product and helping generate actual proofs.
2. The main motive of Succinct Testnet was to generate proofs while playing the games.
Each star earned in the UI directly reflected a successful proof generated in the backend.
We were the One Who Helped @SuccinctLabs in testing their main product and helped generate proofs, finding bugs & errors to improve the overall system.
Not your Discord spam message contributed in a single way to generate proofs or test their products.
We helped test the actual product. Know the difference before mocking testnet users.
3. We were early we get access to Succinct testnet stage 1.
Now you joined late, you grinded hard & You get:-
Stage 1, Stage 2, Stage 2.5 and Now HUGE REWARDS. That's ok.
Apparently Succinct already rewarding you fairly from the start.
THEN why are you HATING US to get rewarded just for being early in Stage 1?
Also, you’ll be claiming your $PROVE on-chain, not on X or Discord.
So why criticize the on-chain users? Aren’t you one too?
It’s not us. It’s the TEAM that failed in fair distribution(but don't know what's really going on in their mind.)
$PROVE Airdrop Allocation: 5%
It seems like:
▪️ Stage 1 users: 1%
▪️ Discord users & top contributors: 4%
The team needs to reallocate the $PROVE airdrop with proper multipliers, for example:
Stage 1 users- 1x
Stage 2 users- 1.25x
X or Discord contributors- 1.5x
ALL IN SUCCINCT- 2x
Top contributors- 4-5x
That’s how fair distribution should look.
But we know Discord spammers will never support this, they’re already happy with their allocation. If they really have gotten the same allocation then the scenario you can imagine :)
🫳🏻 If you made the Testnet Only to play games & generate proofs,
Then what’s wrong with rewarding your real testnet players here? 🫴🏻
Let’s talk honestly;
.@SuccinctFND failed to reward their actual product users. So, what next?
Forward to: @pumatheuma @jtguibas @0xCRASHOUT @advaith @DanHennessy @mattstam_eth @chasedevens @fakedev9999 @theedwardli
4th Img credit: @CryptoHindiO.
I QUIT
(Probably my last message, not sure)
First of all, Congrats to all the contributors. Really happy to see many of you get rewarded for your hard work. You earned it 🩷🥹
Now about ME… 🥺💔
TBH, after seeing my allocation and comparing it with others(avg. 3500+), I broke down. I literally cried for almost an hour.
I received just 160 $PROVE for everything I contributed.
Including:
16.9K stars in Stage 1
500+ stars in Stage 2
500+ Succinct-related posts on X
200+ memes made for my @SuccinctLabs family
My Discord activity was low (450+ msg)
I am mostly active on X, engaging with the community post & contributed on X.
I may not have top-tier skills like @pixnvm, @puselol, @johhmeow @0xEnsp1re, @sucrasm or @wtf4uk & many top contributors.
But I gave it everything
Even while hospitalized, I kept creating and contributing, Hoping my efforts would matter.
But lastly it ended up with that poor allocation. 💔
Sorry to myself, I couldn't make it.
Really Hard luck for me.
I promised to stay here for the long run but didn't know I will get very small allocation for being in the 25k users and for my contributions.
Was expecting a good allocation from Succinct but it went really opposite.
And no, I’m not Quitting just because of poor allocation, Real life has been weighing me down for months
I’ve been trying to manage family responsibilities along with everything
Succinct was my only hope
I didn't have a Plan B because I truly believed this would be historic
I really thought Succinct will do a great Airdrop in the history but it mostly rewarded discord contributors. I've good stats on stage 1, stage 2 and on X but low activity on discord that's the reason I think I missed out.
Now I feel like I’ve lost everything
No hope left.
Tears in my eyes while typing this rn,
And I don't know but it feels like @advaith has muted me because he stopped interacting with my replies. So I'm tagging some of you to help my post to reach him.
@0xCRASHOUT @puselol
@Itsfatcheeks @0xLiebert711 @cabenx @itzchi__ 🙏🏻
Addy you are my GOAT dev & Always will be (probably my last Dev. too 💙)
Most of my memes are inspired by you
I genuinely love you & every devs. 💙🫶🏻🥹
Before I Quit, just one wish
Please watch this meme, I made it for you, Addy- xitter.gq/GLxAyush/status/194722…)
Thank you everyone. Love you & Will miss all 🩷🥺
Wishing you the best with your journey at Succinct.
Goodbye 🩷
Gprove 🩷
@DanHennessy @mattstam_eth @pumatheuma @thunderking_ola
When you see dozens of screenshots showing allocations of 10,000–60,000 $PROVE @SuccinctLabs, don’t forget that there are thousands of people who received just 20 $PROVE after spending half a year participating in the testnet.
@0xCRASHOUT @advaith will you repost this result? 🥰
4/
TEN is fast, MEV-resistant, and Ethereum-aligned.
Developers can migrate existing Solidity apps using a simple Hardhat plugin - no new stack required.
5/
Whether you're building the next big game, DeFi primitive, or identity protocol - If you want logic and data to stay private - You want @tenprotocol.
The final network is here: ten.xyz
Munris retweeted
From the start, we @Calderaxyz have been highly opinionated about NEVER holding rollups hostage
We want you to use Caldera because we're providing value, not because you're forced to.
GM Degens,
After careful consideration—since it affects the community most—we’re sharing our difficulties in migrating DEGEN L3 away from @conduitxyz services
They've held our rollup keys hostage for months, and we may need to relaunch a new chain
paragraph.xyz/@degentokenbas…
Scroll Marks Statistics (Final)
A snapshot was taken today at 00 UTC, and we can assess the final number of marks and statistics.
Total marks: 827,352,765 (+82 million since the last post)
Average number of marks: 406
Median number of marks: 84
Groups (on the chart, groups after 2000 are combined into one):
0: 522,840
1-100: 1,106,896
101-200: 393,083
201-300: 196,398
301-400: 108,441
401-500: 59,162
501-1000: 101,966
1001-2000: 41,941
2001-3000: 10,266
3001-4000: 4,623
4001-5000: 2,599
5001-6000: 1,560
6001-7000: 972
7001-8000: 761
8001-9000: 589
9001-10000: 431
10000+: 3,898
Top 1%:
Number of wallets: 25,565
Entry threshold: 2,009 marks
Top 10% of wallets:
Number of wallets: 255,643
Entry threshold: 369 marks
Top 20% of wallets:
Number of wallets: 511,286
Entry threshold: 209 marks
Top 30% of wallets:
Number of wallets: 766,928
Entry threshold: 133 marks
#scroll #marks @Scroll_ZKP
Scroll Marks Statistics (October)
Unscheduled statistics update after the distribution of marks for various protocols.
Total number of marks: 674,413,733 → 745,371,937 (+71 million)
The median value remains unchanged, the average increased from 348 → 369.
Top 10%: 341 → 353 marks
Top 1%: 1,706 → 1,833 marks
Groups:
0: 537,461
1-100: 1,114,462
101-200: 391,517
201-300: 193,787
301-400: 104,108
401-500: 56,796
501-1,000: 96,810
1,001-2,000: 38,996
2,000+: 22,507
#Scroll #ScrollMarks @Scroll_ZKP
Scroll Marks Statistics (September)
This month saw a greater increase in marks, the reason for which is unknown. It could be due to a lack of ideas on where to allocate liquidity, or possibly the anticipation of an upcoming token release.
Total number of marks: 537,855,651 → 674,413,733 (+137 million)
Total number of wallets: 2.50 million → 2.55 million (+50k)
The median value continues to grow at the same pace, from 77 → 80, as does the average, from 285 → 348.
The entry threshold for the top 10% has also increased, from 320 → 341, and to enter the top 1%, you now need 1,476 → 1,706 marks.
0: 545,057
1-100: 1,122,687
101-200: 390,602
201-300: 192,677
301-400: 100,765
401-500: 54,975
501-1,000: 93,094
1,001-2,000: 36,494
2,000+: 20,002
The next statistics update will be at the end of October.
@Scroll_ZKP #scroll #marks #scrollmarks
Scroll Marks Statistics (August)
The growth rate of the number of marks is slowing down, with hardly any new wallets being added, and noticeable changes in the categories are only seen in the “whale” 1k+ and 2k+ groups.
Total number of marks: 437,498,726 → 537,855,651 (+100M)
Total number of wallets: 2.45M → 2.50M (+50K)
The median value has slightly increased from 74 → 77 marks, but the average value has grown significantly from 236 → 285. New wallets are not diluting the statistics, and there is a strong increase in the average number due to continuous mark farming.
The entry threshold for the top 10% has increased from 301→ 320. For the top 1%/25K wallets — 1476 marks.
0: 528725
1-100: 1118558
101-200: 385036
201-300: 187451
301-400: 92523
401-500: 51370
501-1000: 82812
1001-2000: 30799
2000+: 15310
The next statistics update will be at the end of September.
Scroll Marks Statistics (July)
Latest up-to-date data, this time a significant increase in marks due to the retrospective addition of marks for providing liquidity and lending (everything included in Session One).
Total number of marks: 307,625,313 → 437,498,726 (+129 million)
Total number of wallets: 2.32 million → 2.45 million (+130k)
The median value has hardly changed, remaining at 74 marks. The average value, taking into account the largest and zero accounts, is now 236 marks.
The entry threshold for the top 10% has increased from 272 to 301.
The distribution by groups has been changed to see what is happening in the groups with 500+ marks, as the range of 0-100 is no longer of interest to active farmers.
The new groups are as follows:
0: 530,536
1-100: 1,118,823
101-200: 383,431
201-300: 177,449
301-400: 86,496
401-500: 48,196
501-1000: 75,471
1001-2000: 24,960
2000+: 11,034
The number of empty accounts has remained almost the same, with the group up to 100 marks still dominating. These are likely accounts that received marks for gas used in the first distribution and are not continuing farming now. The 101-200 group also remains unchanged for the same reasons. We will continue to monitor groups with a larger number of marks, as this will be more interesting.
