
Oculi omnia vident @neysipriv
221B Baker Street
Joined July 2021
- Tweets2.1K
- Following671
- Followers1.6K
- Likes284K
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
Permit me to use this medium to tell the human race that this is genuinely the best time for every human to train their heart against the idea of love and "forever" with a particular person.
Nobody is "your person." Soulmates are a myth. "Forever" is an illusion. You cannot have anybody forever.
The attraction that happens between you and people is a product of time, phase, and space. And time changes, phases fade, and space evolves—if not for you, then for them.
To have someone forever is to remain unswept by these tides of change. It is to remain their favourite experience amidst a new job and that one colleague, a new city, a new financial milestone, a new ideology and worldview, an evolved emotional state, and a curated social media timeline. What are the chances?
What are the chances that it is you they still want after a promotion at work and improved accessibility to people of high status in their industry? What are the chances that it is you they'd still want after attaining financial independence, becoming able to travel between cities and across the world, and being exposed to options you can never stand against? After they exit the life stage where they were just lonely and miserable? After achieving stability in life and becoming able to consume ideologies on social media that do not validate their relationship dynamics with you? What are the chances?
What are the chances that you can stand against all these moving parts forever?
You see, there has never been a time in human history when humans have had so many "distractions" as they do today. Social and economic endeavours, relationships, and faith practices have, due to the fast pace of the world today, become distractions from one another. Engagement in one becomes a distraction from the other. And the time we live in has made each of these "distractions" elemental, necessary, and important.
What are the chances that, in that person's distributed attention towards all these "distractions", you remain their favourite distraction forever? That your relevance will not, at some point, slip from their grip? What guarantee do you have? That you're special? Okay, bro.
Now, none of this is an argument against falling in love. It is not an invitation to avoid emotional connections, become inaccessible, or approach every human relationship with suspicion. By all means, fall in love. Be vulnerable. Be affectionate. Make memories. Allow yourself to experience the beautiful things that human connection has to offer.
But train your heart against attachment to the idea of forever.
Learn to live in the moment, and for the moment, when the moment gives you someone worth experiencing. Enjoy the person without making a lifetime contract with an experience that may only be passing through your life. Learn to appreciate what someone brings into your life without making their continued presence a condition for your own happiness.
Do not erase yourself in the pursuit of permanence. Do not abandon your interests, ambitions, friendships, convictions, and individuality because you are trying to become indispensable to someone.
You must learn to love someone without making them the custodian of your entire emotional existence. To be able to love and still have yourself. To be able to give without losing your sense of proportion. To be able to enjoy someone's presence without becoming terrified of their absence.
And, perhaps most importantly, learn to love while it is worth it, and detach when it no longer serves you. Not because you never cared, but because caring about someone should not require you to abandon your responsibility to yourself.
People will err. People will change. People will disappoint you. Some will hurt you, and some will walk away. These are not unfortunate possibilities; they are realities of human relationships. You cannot build your entire emotional stability around the assumption that the person you love will never become the person who hurts you.
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
Después que se aprende a estar soltero ya no te dan ni cinco de ganas de buscar pareja porque sabes que te toca soportar mentiras, gastos e infidelidades. Lo bueno es muy poco.
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
there has never been a better time to pull out this image
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
“People rarely betray strangers, they betray those who trusted them too much.”
— Niccolò Machiavelli
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
Sometimes loneliness isn't the absence of people. It's the absence of intellectual connection.
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
"Bazı insanlar boş zamanlarında seninle konuşurlar, bazıları ise seninle konuşmak için zaman ayırırlar. Farkı anlayın."
- Jet Li
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
This is what separates a strategist from someone who simply reacts.
"He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight."
Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Being alone feels way better than being close to certain people and feeling distant & disconnected due to a distinct difference in the way in which you & them think. May as well be a synthetic variant of being tortured when the gap is glaringly broad whilst trying to communicate.
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
“I turn cruel when I am empty. If I cannot be loved, I must be feared.”
— Niccolò Machiavelli
A 🇧🇷🇾🇪 retweeted
Les personnes qui ont peu d’amis ne sont pas forcément celles qui aiment la solitude. Ce sont parfois celles qui ont appris, à leurs dépens, la valeur des relations sincères.
Elles ont connu les sourires de façade, les amitiés intéressées, les promesses oubliées et les confidences qui finissent par circuler là où elles n’auraient jamais dû arriver.
Elles ont donné leur confiance, parfois trop facilement, avant de comprendre que tout le monde ne mérite pas une place dans leur vie.
Alors, un jour, elles ont cessé de courir après les autres. Elles ont fait le ménage dans leur entourage, sans bruit, sans explication et sans regret.
Désormais, elles préfèrent la sincérité de deux véritables amis à la présence de vingt personnes qui ne sont là que lorsque tout va bien. Elles n'ont plus besoin d'être aimées de tout le monde, ni de se justifier pour leurs choix. Elles savent que la qualité d'une relation vaut bien plus que le nombre de personnes qui nous entourent.
Et si l'une d'elles décide de t'accorder sa confiance, prends-en soin. Car derrière cette porte qu'elle t'ouvre se cachent souvent des blessures, des déceptions et une longue histoire qui lui ont appris à ne plus laisser entrer n'importe qui.
Avoir peu d'amis ne signifie pas manquer de relations. Cela signifie parfois avoir enfin compris que la paix vaut mieux que les mauvaises fréquentations, et qu'un seul cœur sincère vaut mille présences superficielles.
Albert Camus




























