Pinned Tweet
🧵 Let’s talk about the kind of account that manufactures hate for clout. You know the ones.
Noah Sinclair retweeted
#BREAKING: Olivia Chow has been re-elected mayor of Toronto, securing another term at City Hall.
The 69-year-old former MP and longtime city councillor first made history in 2023 as Toronto’s first mayor of Asian descent.
Live updates: cp24.com/local/toronto/2026/…
1/ Something remarkable happened today.
Caryma Sa'd, a Ward 14 council candidate, entered a discussion about accountability to declare me an "impostor" who doesn't live in the ward.
I do live in Ward 14.
The irony? She doesn't. 😂 🧵
8/ Calling me a “toxic reply guy” is especially funny.
I publish researched threads and fact-check public claims
Jonni entered my thread to defend her. She entered it to make personal accusations about me, while keeping me blocked
Apparently I'm the reply guy in my own thread.
Jonni, when she films people, denounces them publicly and makes accusations, you call it exposing corruption.
When a constituent questions her fitness for public office, you call it an attack on her safety.
That's not a principle. That's a fan club with a persecution complex.
Replying to @noahcites
Noah don’t act like a saint, you have previously attacked her in various posts to even harm her safety and reputation
What bothers you is that @CarymaRules has called out corruption with a camera and as a leftist she woke my eyes when it comes to ProgressTO and Antifa mafias which have harmed the protest scene
sit on my ass waiting for a church group to donate bread. brazen criminality
Replying to @noahcites
4/ Sa’d also alleges "activists" attend encampments primarily to provoke police.
Perhaps some do. But that's a claim about their motives, not an answer to the rights of people living there.
A person's need for shelter doesn't disappear because someone else argues with police.
Sa’d appears to treat confrontation with police as evidence of ulterior motives, when opposing police enforcement may be precisely why the protesters are there.
Those aren't the same thing. And you don't have to approve of every protest tactic to recognize the distinction.
1/ Caryma Sa’d gave an interesting answer about homeless encampments at a Toronto council debate.
She discussed activists supposedly seeking confrontations with police, then declared “undue hardship” the guiding principle of human rights law.
There's a problem with that. 🧵
WARD 14 Candidates Debate.
Tent City Removal
Across TORONTO
@CarymaRules discusses her, on the ground journalism, which witnessed complexities that involved Police and Activists.
I would assume also included the City Council as well as the Mayor
7/ So here's my question for Sa’d:
Whose duty to accommodate are you invoking, and what accommodation is supposedly causing undue hardship?
Because if you're proposing a legal standard for removing people from their homes, those details matter.
Especially when you're a lawyer.











