It looks like Luxons Indian pandering might have paid off for him.
The seething leftists are crying all over socials about ‘how could anyone vote national!?’
Welcome to the future of politics. Democracy is now mutating into ethnic voting blocs who will sway elections. This is the multiculturalism you championed so hard. Give yourselves a pat on the back. It only gets increasingly more divided and radical from here.
nathan retweeted
White New Zealanders are being replaced.
This is the most important issue this election, the mainstream media are distracting the public by discussing the symptoms rather than the cause of New Zealand’s problems.
Party vote New Zealand First to close the gates.
nathan retweeted
New opinion from Blair Cottrell on why trying to convince the violent left that you're not racist is futile, and reverses progress made by far-right radicals.
"When you say 'I'm not racist' you walk straight back into your enemy's language cage"
noticer.news/stop-explaining…
nathan retweeted
Michael Laws made a casual and light-hearted observation about certain political candidates reminding him of his scolding female primary school teachers.
The response of the gynocracy has been to scold him for being a naughty boy and calling for Winston Peters to give him a time-out, proving his point.
Mass immigration goes hand in hand with the parasitic banking system.
The one subject our politicians would never dare to touch.
All of these politicians are talking about fixing the cost of living, but not what the cost of living crisis actually entails for ordinary New Zealanders.
The primary cost of living for most people is housing, except for the minority who own a freehold home, which is only 27% of the population and primarily the boomer generation.
The majority are paying off a mortgage or renting, and often the renters are renting off someone with a mortgage, so the mortgage costs get passed on to them and the whole rental market is affected.
The average weekly mortgage payment in New Zealand is $690 per week. Of this the majority is interest, averaging $452 per week.
The politicians are focusing on the supermarkets, but the average weekly food cost per household is roughly $325 a week, thus the cost of housing is over double the cost of food.
The most profitable companies in NZ are the banks, not the supermarkets. Fonterra is the most profitable company, but all the banks put together dwarf the profits of Fonterra. Most of this profit is from mortgage interest and goes overseas.
The best way to fix the cost of living in New Zealand is to end debt slavery by the Government providing interest-free mortgages. They already do this for student loans, there’s no reason they couldn’t do it for mortgages.
The reason the politicians won’t dare to suggest this is because they are in the back pockets of the banks, the most wealthy companies in New Zealand.
Aside from the cost of debt interest, there’s also the cost of housing itself, which has risen substantially due to mass immigration. It’s simple economics, when the supply doesn’t keep up with the increase in demand (third world immigration), prices increase.
In the 1980s, the average house cost twice the average yearly income. It now costs six times the average yearly income, meaning even on a double income it is still harder to buy a house than it was for a man on a single income in the 80s. This has a huge effect on birth rates as well as culture and home life generally.
In the 19th century when the British people settled this land, we built our own towns and cities for the people arriving. We didn’t move into the pas of the maori people, we built our own civilisation. There was a form of de facto apartheid until maori urbanisation after World War Two.
The Indians that have recently flooded New Zealand do not do this. Instead, they compete with New Zealanders in the already existing property and job markets, driving up house prices and lowering wages.
Remigration would dramatically lower the cost of housing, because supply would remain the same while demand would drop dramatically as people leave.
It would also increase wages, as the imported cheap labour return to the third world.
The vast majority of White New Zealanders support remigration, they just don’t know it yet.
nathan retweeted
All of these politicians are talking about fixing the cost of living, but not what the cost of living crisis actually entails for ordinary New Zealanders.
The primary cost of living for most people is housing, except for the minority who own a freehold home, which is only 27% of the population and primarily the boomer generation.
The majority are paying off a mortgage or renting, and often the renters are renting off someone with a mortgage, so the mortgage costs get passed on to them and the whole rental market is affected.
The average weekly mortgage payment in New Zealand is $690 per week. Of this the majority is interest, averaging $452 per week.
The politicians are focusing on the supermarkets, but the average weekly food cost per household is roughly $325 a week, thus the cost of housing is over double the cost of food.
The most profitable companies in NZ are the banks, not the supermarkets. Fonterra is the most profitable company, but all the banks put together dwarf the profits of Fonterra. Most of this profit is from mortgage interest and goes overseas.
The best way to fix the cost of living in New Zealand is to end debt slavery by the Government providing interest-free mortgages. They already do this for student loans, there’s no reason they couldn’t do it for mortgages.
The reason the politicians won’t dare to suggest this is because they are in the back pockets of the banks, the most wealthy companies in New Zealand.
Aside from the cost of debt interest, there’s also the cost of housing itself, which has risen substantially due to mass immigration. It’s simple economics, when the supply doesn’t keep up with the increase in demand (third world immigration), prices increase.
In the 1980s, the average house cost twice the average yearly income. It now costs six times the average yearly income, meaning even on a double income it is still harder to buy a house than it was for a man on a single income in the 80s. This has a huge effect on birth rates as well as culture and home life generally.
In the 19th century when the British people settled this land, we built our own towns and cities for the people arriving. We didn’t move into the pas of the maori people, we built our own civilisation. There was a form of de facto apartheid until maori urbanisation after World War Two.
The Indians that have recently flooded New Zealand do not do this. Instead, they compete with New Zealanders in the already existing property and job markets, driving up house prices and lowering wages.
Remigration would dramatically lower the cost of housing, because supply would remain the same while demand would drop dramatically as people leave.
It would also increase wages, as the imported cheap labour return to the third world.
The vast majority of White New Zealanders support remigration, they just don’t know it yet.
nathan retweeted
Remigration NOW
Remigration Now are proud to launch a new interactive map for our website, detailing the rate and effect of immigration into Britain.
The map is split into four layers: Immigration, Ethnicity, Births and Memoriam Names.
We will continue to update the map as new data is collected to ensure it is as accurate as it can be.
Share it with your friends and family, enter the postcodes of the places you know, and see for yourself just how much Britain has been destroyed by immigration.
We hope this map will give you a clear, comprehensive view of the radical changes that have happened to our homeland, and help illustrate why Remigration is needed NOW.
remigrationnow.co.uk/map/
nathan retweeted
The Indian Bernadette Soares has turned out be a complete embarrassment to New Zealand First, as expected.
From the start nationalists have called her out as a foreign opportunist who has no place running in a New Zealand election. In fact she should be deported to India with the rest of them.
NZ First have made many mistakes this election that could have been easily avoided if they listened to their nationalist support base, rather than attempting to appease the woke mob with a token DEI hire to point to when they are inevitably accused of racism.
thepost.co.nz/nz-news/361106…
nathan retweeted
Newsroom journalist Marc Daalder is attacking New Zealand First candidates for daring to point out that New Zealanders are being ethnically replaced, calling it a “conspiracy theory”.
The european population of NZ has dropped from 90% to 55% in the last 60 years.
And yes, he is jewish.
nathan retweeted
“Close your Borders and take control, before it is too late!” - President DONALD J. TRUMP
nathan retweeted
The contrast between normie news media and X News is post apocalyptic. You read the legacy libtard media and it’s about climate or Trump billionth Crazy Thing He Said and then log onto X to read “Dugin Urges Saving Italy As Western Civilisation Collapses.”
nathan retweeted
A face-tattooed Maori cop who was once promoted as a recruitment success story has admitted stealing a New Zealand Police-issued firearm and selling it for $5,000.
noticer.news/maori-new-zeala…
nathan retweeted
We are of the British Race.
We just so happened to create a nation, one spanning a continent on the other side of the globe.
You can say ‘Anglo-Celtic’, but British is the term that these men used.
British is the term for our heritage, our homeland and our future.
nathan retweeted
RCR contributor @LisaJaneSpencer speaks to Australian nationalist activist and political commentator Hugo Lennon @aus_pill about immigration, nationalism and One Nation at the British Australian Community Political Action Conference.
nathan retweeted
The New Zealand right wing needs an Auspill.
RCR contributor @LisaJaneSpencer speaks to Australian nationalist activist and political commentator Hugo Lennon @aus_pill about immigration, nationalism and One Nation at the British Australian Community Political Action Conference.
nathan retweeted
It’s too little too late to simply reduce immigration to 20,000 a year. They’ve already been let through the gate, it needs to be reversed.
Also, there’s a huge difference between 20,000 British immigrants and 20,000 Indian immigrants. The quality is more important than the quantity.
Yesterday, Winston Peters was asked about remigration by a young patriot at his public meeting in Botany, Auckland. He stated he is against remigration because it is contrary to democracy and the rule of law.
If enough people vote for remigration, then it would be democratic. This is precisely the danger of replacement migration, as more foreigners gain voting rights it becomes harder to legislate in the national interest via liberal democracy. We never voted to be replaced, it must be reversed.
The rule of law concerns the exercise of government power according to law rather than arbitrary decisions. If legislation were enacted, for example the “Remigration Act 2030”, this would be completely within the rule of law because it would be government legislation. The executive could then initiate remigration according to the law.
It is great to see remigration entering the public discourse. This is a recent development thanks to the efforts of our organisation and of other nationalists across the West. This topic will only become more commonplace in the coming years, as New Zealanders wake up to the existential threat of replacement migration.
