Nou als het klopt mijn complimenten aan Orban dat hij zijn verlies erkend. Ik dacht dat hij gelijk zou beginnen over fraude maar goed dat zullen de aanhangers waarschijnlijk wel zeggen helaas.
peetje retweeted
Een hoop mensen die beweerden dat de NOS (en andere media) nepnieuws verspreidden, zouden nederig hun diepste excuses moeten aanbieden.
Wat zeniwt gaan doen, natuurlijk.
Er is best kritiek op de NOS mogelijk, maar hun critici hebben meestal actieve haat voor waarheid.
GeoConfirmed Iran.
Statement regarding our posts about the bombing of a girls’ elementary school reportedly resulting in the deaths of over 100 girls.
Because many readers still misunderstand our posts or how geolocation verification works, I will explain this as simply as possible.
1) The girls’ school was located next to a military base and according to multiple sources even within the perimeter of that base.
However, this does not make it a legitimate target under the Law of Armed Conflict, even if it was within the premises.
The school was not in Pakistan or Afghanistan, as some claims suggest. (because the location is GeoConfirmed)
The footage is not old.
In Iran, schools are open Saturday through Thursday. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workwe…).
Fact: The school, located in Minab, Hormozgan Province, Iran, was destroyed, based on the footage.
Geolocation of the school bombing: xitter.gq/GeoConfirmed/status/20…
-
2) The claim that the explosion was caused by a failed IRGC missile launch has no supporting evidence, at this time (!).
The widely circulated footage used to support this theory originates from a location approximately 1,300 km away from the school.
It is impossible that a missile failure visible there caused the bombing at such a distance.
At this moment, there is no proof that a failed missile launch caused the incident.
(See below or xitter.gq/GeoConfirmed/status/20…)
-
Using logic.
Given the school’s position, next to and possibly integrated into a military facility, the more logical explanation is that the school was mistakenly targeted during an attack on the base.
A thorough investigation is required to confirm this assessment, or additional verifiable evidence must emerge to support alternative claims.
When conducting analyses, always consider the principle of "Occam’s Razor" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%…):
"When presented with competing hypotheses about the same prediction and both hypotheses have equal explanatory power, one should prefer the hypothesis that requires the fewest assumptions."
In this case, the only “evidence” for the failed IRGC missile launch claim has been proven false.
Therefore, there is currently no credible evidence supporting that theory.
Reminder:
OSINT, and reporting (journalism) in general, is based on the information available at the time an investigation is conducted. Therefore, analyses may change as new footage or evidence emerges.
peetje retweeted
The fact-check aligns with verified sources on most points:
- Trump did pressure GA officials to "find 11,780 votes" (transcript confirmed).
- Fake electors scheme led to indictments; Jan. 6 tied to Trump's rally speech urging march to Capitol.
- CO/Maine ballot removals overturned by SCOTUS (states can't enforce 14th Amend. for President).
- Trump has called for prosecuting opponents (e.g., Comey, Schiff).
- Hunter prosecuted by Trump-appointee Weiss; convicted, later pardoned by Biden.
- Trump sought TikTok ban via EO; revoked some press passes, called media "enemy."
- 60+ election lawsuits mostly dismissed for lack of evidence.
Sources: CNN, SCOTUS, Wikipedia, BBC, etc. (361 chars)
peetje retweeted
The 2nd amendment fetishists who brought you Kyle Rittenhouse and January 6th think Alex Pretti's legal gun was the problem? Are you f**king kidding?
peetje retweeted
1- The Police Use-of-Force Rule on Moving Vehicles
Core Police Rule taught nationwide: Officers should not intentionally place themselves in front of or in the path of a moving vehicle and then use deadly force to stop it.
2- DOJ / FBI / National Policing Standards
The U.S. Department of Justice and FBI training doctrine states: A moving vehicle alone is not considered a deadly threat. Officers must attempt to move out of the vehicle’s path rather than fire.
Deadly force is not justified if: The officer voluntarily placed themselves in front of the vehicle. The vehicle is attempting to flee. There are other avenues of escape
3- International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)
The IACP model policy says:
Officers shall not fire at or from a moving vehicle unless:
There is an imminent threat other than the vehicle itself, and No reasonable alternatives exist
Standing in front of a vehicle creates the danger and invalidates the justification.
4- Minnesota training explicitly teaches:
Officers must avoid positioning themselves in front of vehicles during enforcement actions
Use of deadly force is not justified when the danger results from the officer’s own tactical decisions
This is drilled into recruits.
5- Supreme Court Context
While not a numbered rule, courts repeatedly rule that:
An officer cannot manufacture a deadly-force scenario and then claim self-defense.
This is known legally as “officer-created jeopardy.”
5- How It’s Taught to Police
Police are taught:
Step aside
Let the vehicle go
Identify later
Do not block with your body
Do not draw a gun in front of a car
Why?
Because:
Cars are common
People panic
Officers escalate situations unnecessarily
Innocent people get killed.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The image in the center is AI generated. There were no cameras that captured the incident at that angle.
x.com/i/status/20093…
peetje retweeted
💰🦓 Viktor Orbán’s €30M Hatvanpuszta family dacha (ex-Habsburg estate) with zebras and antelopes around is now global news after dominating Hungarian media all summer. The world can see how “pro-family conservatism” simply masks classic post-Soviet kleptocracy. 🎥 by @Telexhu
peetje retweeted
Zeg Dries. Laat je je volgzame schapen ook even onderstaande lezen. Toen werd je verhaal ook al ontkracht namelijk. Je verspreidt desinformatie en dat is kwalijk.
vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2021/11/17/…
peetje retweeted
Voor alle droeftoeters in het “#Hoofdpiet #BoeHoe” gedeelte van mijn timeline, even een samenvatting van wat er echt aan de hand is:
1. De pakjes zijn zoek
2. Hoofdpiet hoopt dat ouders kunnen helpen door zelf pakjesavond te organiseren
3. Hoofdpiet legt uit hoe dat moet
4. Ouders maken er een chaos van
5. Pieten doen het toch maar zelf
#Sinterklaasjournaal
peetje retweeted
In June 2025, Democratic elected official Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, along with their dog, were assassinated by a Trump supporter
Trump did not lower the flags to half-mast
He did not attend their funeral
President Biden, on the other hand, knelt before their coffins
peetje retweeted
Goed stuk! Stop de enorme overdracht van arm naar rijk. Stop de prijsopdrijving. Bouw de hypotheekrenteaftrek stapsgewijs af en verlaag daarmee de belasting op arbeid.
nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/09/01/de-…
Waarom mag Jack van Gelderland zoveel feitelijk onzin verkopen bij oranjezomer? Is er niemand die een beetje goed kan tegenspreken?
peetje retweeted
🚨🚨🚨 Watch Jeffrey Epstein plead his Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights when asked if he and Donald Trump socialized with females under the age of 18 during a 2010 deposition:
Q: Have you ever had a personal relationship with Donald Trump?
A. What do you mean by "personal relationship," sir?
Q. Have you socialized with him?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Yes?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of
18?
A: Though l'd like to answer that question, at least today l'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.