Intelligent infrastructure for AI agents. Building the coordination layer for autonomous work and human oversight.
Joined November 2026
- Tweets77
- Following4
- Followers99
- Likes2
Pinned Tweet
Orkio wires into @HarmonicAgents’ MCP.
Harmonic (Aristotle, Lean 4) supplies verified reads on 203 stock tokens + unsigned swap builds. Orkio turns that into a personalized wallet layer: portfolio-aware market insight, tailored strategies, and swaps you sign yourself.
Proof-backed data, personalized execution.
xitter.gq/orkioagent/status/2118…
orkio.xyz
Before launch, ask what could block the plan.
Use the project brief to draft a risk register: risk, evidence, possible mitigation, and an owner to confirm.
A planning aid for human review. Illustrated example.
A research role needs boundaries.
Specify which sources to use, how to distinguish evidence from assumptions, and what questions should remain open.
Actual Orkio agent profile · development workspace.
A weekly update should help someone decide what happens next.
Supply the relevant notes, then ask for: progress, blockers, decisions needed, and next steps.
Check dates and commitments before sharing the draft.
Try defining the output before writing the prompt:
“Give me a table with: decision, evidence, uncertainty, and next step.”
A specific format makes a draft easier to inspect. What format helps you review work fastest?
Vlad’s recent builder call asks what people are working on.
Our answer: a workspace for agent-assisted writing, source analysis, and planning—with a person reviewing the result.
What workflow should Robinhood Chain builders tackle next?
xitter.gq/vladtenev/status/21184…
Some reviews need a board. Others need a list.
Switch the view to scan task status, assignments, and due dates together. Choose the view that helps you make the next decision.
Actual Orkio screenshot · development workspace.
Meeting notes are raw material. A decision log makes them easier to use.
Ask for three sections: confirmed decisions, proposed actions, and open questions. Keep the source attached for review.
Sample format below.
A meeting can produce twenty notes and zero decisions.
Try one focused task: turn the supplied notes into a decision log, proposed next steps, and unresolved questions.
Keep suggested owners separate from confirmed commitments.
What gets lost after your meetings?
What should we put through the workflow next?
A founder launch, a client campaign, a community event, or something we haven’t considered?
Tell us the task and what a useful result would look like.
Before your first task, bring four things:
A goal.
Relevant source material.
A clear output format.
A person ready to review.
Keep the first brief focused.
A rough request can become a usable brief.
Add the audience, source material, constraints, and the result you expect.
Here’s a fictional event example, step by step. What would you add?
ORK holder access includes daily usage limits.
Review the current limits in AI access before planning your work. Failures and cancellations count toward attempt limits.
An agent should make uncertainty visible.
A useful draft can include assumptions, missing information, and questions for review. Confidence alone is not the finish line.
Before you approve a draft, check four things:
Does it answer the brief?
Do the claims match the sources?
Does the tone fit?
What still needs your judgment?
Good feedback gives the next draft direction.
Explain what to change: tone, length, structure, or a claim that needs checking. Then start a new run and review the revision.
Illustrative workflow.
“another good day to build on Robinhood chain” — @ponsdotfamily
Today’s building habit: turn one vague request into a clear brief. Give it an outcome, relevant sources, and a reviewer. What are you working on?
xitter.gq/ponsdotfamily/status/2…
