well said
Probably the most important lesson to take from 1984 is Eurasia/Eastasia war flip-flopping from one day to the next (we are now at war with Eurasia, we were ALWAYS at war with Eurasia). The thing that communists do is they will deliberately change the party line, inexplicably, from one day to the next. It's not hypocrisy, it's hierarchy. They're testing your loyalty to the state.
They must get you to abandon your own eyes and ears, your own logic and reason, and bend to the will of the state. They must get you to believe that up is down, war is peace, men are women, slavery is freedom, and they will invert their most deeply held beliefs the very next day and just...move on as though nothing ever happened. Leaving you baffled and shouting "hypocrisy!"
It's not hypocrisy. It's hierarchy...they need to know that you will be a good little slave and gobble up whatever the state says, and abandon your principles in the process. If you balk and say "wait, weren't we at war with Eastasia yesterday?" you get the bullet. You're not loyal enough to the state. Communism requires that you abandon your humanity, so it cannot tolerate free thinking.
Communism is a religion, not a political ideology, nor an economic structure...it's a religion that worships the state. And whatever the state says, goes.
This is why it's always pointless to call out "hypocrisy" on the communist left...they know. They don't care. The hypocrisy is the point. It's how they flex their unflinching allegiance to the state's authority.
It is a religious cult full of bitter, self-loathing malcontents...they are the fuel for the revolution, because the only kind of person who worships the state, and celebrates this "hypocrisy" is someone who hates themselves...they want to be demoralized, they want to be abused, they want the filth, they want to degrade themselves because they hate themselves. When you accept this, suddenly all of your debates with your local commies make a lot more sense, huh? All of their behavior is less confusing once you see that they are completely demoralized and have no governing principles other than self-loathing.
The more you point out their hypocrisy, the more they get off on it. Just keep that in mind as you debate these freaks.
pretty much. the irony for me is i thought it was activists & socialist groups that would implement the Cloward-Piven Strategy. i hadn't anticipated it from our own gov't. social justice warriors might wanna ask themselves: is Carney actually a socialist? Trudeau? even Singh? 🤔
It's a long read, but lays out EVERYTHING Mark Carney is doing.
EVERY Canadian needs to read this. View article
posttruthmonkey retweeted
Holy shit
Just in: France's Prime Minister asked telecom companies to prepare to block social media platforms. "I wish to have the ability to temporarily suspend access to these services in case of a repeat of urban violence," he wrote. @blast news broke the story.
posttruthmonkey retweeted
If there is such a thing as a “sex dysphoria”, which really is just a body dysmorphia, then the last place man who has it would want to be is in a women’s change room. The difference in his body to women’s bodies would be, by sheer definition of the condition, extremely distressing.
Yet men who claim to be women on the basis of a “dysphoria” want nothing more than to be in the women’s change room & are delighted by it. They’re even unbothered by the distress their presence causes women, and flaunt their maleness.
This can only be because they are not experiencing any kind of dysphoria/dysmorphia. Instead, they have a sexual fetish, including voyeurism, and their own behavior proves it.
Once a man tells the lie that he is a woman, don’t expect the truth about anything else.
posttruthmonkey retweeted
To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad:
Do not blame the French people for this.
We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no.
Here are the numbers your media won't show you.
70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today.
79% want a tougher immigration policy.
77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration.
83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home.
And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years.
This is not a fringe. This is the French people.
In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again.
That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway.
So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations.
In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders.
It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed.
What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it.
The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did.
So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this."
The French never chose this.
They were forced into it.
If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us.
If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd.
for those unclear on what's happening in the world, this is a good summary
Many in the comments are saying: "The French voted for this."
Fine. Now ask yourself a better question.
Why is it the same story in every Western country at once? France, Germany, Sweden, the UK, Belgium, Canada. Different languages, different histories, different voters. Same outcome. Same open-border policies, sold in the same beautiful packaging: progress, inclusion, integration, "our values."
When dozens of peoples who never coordinated end up with the exact same policy, it wasn't the peoples who decided. It was the class that governs all of them. Same schools, same forums, same networks. For decades, they have systematically lied to Europeans about what was happening and what it would cost.
They tried it with you too, America. You came close. What saved you was your Constitution, and a handful of people like Elon Musk and the All-In crew who refused to stay quiet when silence would have been easier.
But don't celebrate too early.
The West is not a country. It's a civilization. Athens, Rome, Jerusalem, and every nation that inherited or built on what came out of them: Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia, Israel, and allies like Japan who share its institutions and its fate.
If Europe falls, you don't get to watch from across the ocean. You lose half your civilization, your oldest allies, the cradle of everything you believe in. Nobody on either side of the Atlantic has any interest in waking up to an Islamist Europe.
So understand that this fight has two levels.
There is the national fight. Every people has to win its own battle at home, at the ballot box, in its own institutions, under its own laws. No one can do it for us. You can't vote in France, and we can't vote in Ohio.
And there is the civilizational fight. The West is under attack on two fronts at once. From the inside, by a soft communism that hates its own history and wants to dissolve nations into a managed mass. From the outside, by Islamism, which sees our weakness and fills the vacuum. And the two have found each other: Islamo-leftism, where the far left defends the very ideology that would crush it first.
The national fights are the battles. The civilizational fight is the war.
And here's what the other side exploits: your kindness.
Western civilization produced something rare in human history: a moral instinct to extend compassion to strangers. To the refugee, the outsider, the weakest. It's one of the most beautiful things we ever built.
The globalist class turned it into a weapon against us.
Gad Saad has a name for this: suicidal empathy. Empathy that no longer asks who it protects and who pays the price. Empathy that cares more about how it looks than about what it causes. Empathy so detached from reason that it ends up sacrificing your own people, the girl attacked on her way home, the worker priced out of his neighborhood, the town that no longer recognizes itself, just to signal virtue toward strangers.
And every time you object, they don't answer your argument. They question your heart. "Where is your compassion?" That's the trap. They know a decent people will hesitate before being called cruel. They've been running that play for thirty years.
Now add the money.
A few left-wing billionaires understood long ago that you don't need to win elections if you can shape the institutions around them. The Gates Foundation became one of the largest funders of the World Health Organization. George Soros's Open Society Foundations have spent billions funding NGOs, advocacy groups and legal networks, with Europe as a major focus. Unelected, unaccountable, and extremely well organized.
And it's not only private money. Brussels funds NGOs with taxpayers' money, and those same NGOs then lobby Brussels for the policies it already wanted. A closed loop. Citizens pay for it. Nobody ever asked them.
This is the supranational machine: Brussels, the galaxy of NGOs orbiting it, the foundations feeding them, and the political class moving freely between all three. It answers to no voter in any country. It does enormous damage. And it can't be voted out, because no one ever voted it in.
And if you want to know where its center of gravity is, look at Washington.
The Democratic Party is its political headquarters. Not because every Democrat is a globalist, but because that's where the whole network converges: the big foundations, the NGO galaxy, the international organizations, the legacy media, the platforms. Same donors, same people rotating from one to the other, same worldview. Brussels is the branch office.
Covid showed it in real time.
Within weeks, almost the entire Western world adopted the same playbook. Same measures, same messaging, same "trust the science." Anthony Fauci became the face of the official line far beyond America's borders. The Gates Foundation, co-founder of the global vaccine alliances and one of the WHO's largest funders, sat at the center of global health policy. And anyone who questioned the line was branded a spreader of misinformation.
The lab-leak hypothesis was a "conspiracy theory" right up until it became a respectable one. And in 2024, Mark Zuckerberg admitted in writing that senior Biden administration officials had repeatedly pressured Meta in 2021 to censor Covid content, including humor and satire.
Government, foundations, international organizations, platforms. All moving in the same direction, at the same time, and no voter ever consulted.
That's the machine. Covid was the moment it stopped hiding.
That machine is what has to be taken apart. Defund the NGOs living off public money. Bring decisions back to elected national parliaments. Make every foundation that shapes public policy as transparent as a political party.
Compassion is a Western virtue. Letting it be used against us is not.
So let's not fall into the trap.
The trap is Western nations turning on each other. Americans mocking Europeans, Europeans sneering at Americans, each country telling itself "they deserve what's happening to them, they voted for it."
I'm pro-border. I'm pro-nation. I believe every people has the right to decide who enters its home and to defend its own culture. That will never change.
But what we face today is not one nation attacking another. It's an attack on the civilization all our nations belong to. And a civilization under attack cannot afford to let its members watch each other burn.
When you see France on fire, don't say "they chose this." Understand how it happened. Understand who did it. And understand that the same people are working on you.
The West has to stand together against this, fully, without ambiguity, and its peoples have to understand each other. National pride and civilizational solidarity are not opposites. They are the same fight at two scales.
A Frenchman voting to take back his borders and an American voting on November 3rd are on the same front, in the same war, for the same civilization.
We lose it separately, or we win it together.
posttruthmonkey retweeted
How China Divided Canada and America
I promise this documentary will blow your mind.
COVID. "51st State." Trudeau's treason.
80 years of geopolitical mayhem explained.
will Macron come to the rescue once the violence has escalated enough that people will be grateful for martial law?
will he let it play out till A LOT of people are dead through civil war first?
and what is the likelihood that his crew (globalists) are cultivating this?
posttruthmonkey retweeted
I am suing my doctors for transitioning me starting as a minor in the state of North Carolina.
A New York jury just awarded $2 MILLION to a young woman who underwent a double mastectomy at 16 and later detransitioned.
The jury found her psychologist and surgeon liable for malpractice.
Her case alleged that serious mental-health issues, including depression, body dysmorphia, anorexia and autism-spectrum traits, were not adequately addressed before an irreversible procedure was performed on a minor.
Now watch what happens when someone like her speaks publicly.
For years we were told regret was exceedingly rare. We were told these procedures were necessary care. We were told questioning the process itself was dangerous.
But when a detransitioner stands up and says, “This happened to me,” suddenly she becomes the problem.
That is the epistemic tell.
When evidence supports the narrative, it is celebrated.
When evidence contradicts the narrative, the person carrying the evidence gets attacked.
A jury heard the testimony. A jury examined the evidence. A jury found malpractice. And a jury put the damages at $2 million.
You don’t protect vulnerable young people by demanding silence from the ones who came back and said, “I wish someone had slowed this down.”
You protect them by listening.
#AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks
posttruthmonkey retweeted
Finally.
The mainstream media has realized there is nothing "safe" about "safe supply."
Taxpayer-funded opioids are being diverted onto the streets, sold to buy fentanyl, and ending up in the hands of young Canadians.
Flooding our communities with addictive opioids was never compassionate.
Enabling hard drug use and calling it "harm reduction" was never safe.
Left-wing politicians tried to guilt Canadians into accepting and normalizing drug use while dismissing anyone who dared challenge their radical experiment.
Now the consequences are impossible to ignore.
History will rightfully condemn the radical left-wing politicians who pushed drug-enablement policies that fuelled addiction and unleashed drugs and disorder on our streets.
theglobeandmail.com/opinion/…
posttruthmonkey retweeted
George Orwell, Thomas Sowell, Friedrich Hayek and Frédéric Bastiat give you four excellent tools for cutting through Canadian political language.
Orwell: Watch the words.
Sowell: Ignore intentions. Examine results and trade-offs.
Hayek: Be suspicious when politicians think they possess enough knowledge to manage millions of people’s decisions from the centre.
Bastiat: Look beyond what you can immediately see. Ask what the policy costs, what it prevents, and what would have happened otherwise.
Apply those four tests to Canadian politics.
“Affordability” can mean spending more government money, cutting a tax, sending you a cheque, controlling a price or subsidizing something.
Orwell asks: What does “affordability” actually mean here?
Sowell asks: Does the policy really make Canadians better off after all the costs are counted?
Hayek asks: How does Ottawa know the right price, subsidy, industry or investment for millions of different Canadians?
Bastiat asks: What don’t we see? What would taxpayers, businesses and families have done with that money instead?
“Investment” sounds better than “government spending.”
Fine. Investment in what? How much? Who decided? Who takes the loss if it fails?
“Compassion” describes an intention.
It doesn’t tell you whether a program works.
“Fairness” sounds unquestionably good.
But fairness to whom? Who pays more? Who receives more? What behaviour does the policy encourage?
“Common sense” is another slogan until somebody explains the actual policy.
“Corporate greed” can describe genuine misconduct, but it can also become a convenient explanation that ignores taxes, regulation, wages, competition, monetary policy, supply constraints and government decisions.
“Crisis” may describe a real emergency.
It can also create the political urgency needed to push through measures that would receive much more scrutiny under ordinary circumstances.
“Misinformation” should mean a factual claim that can be demonstrated to be false. It should never become shorthand for “an argument we don’t want to answer.”
“Dangerous” tells you somebody wants you to fear an idea.
Ask for the evidence.
And when somebody calls an argument “simplistic,” ask them to identify exactly what is wrong with it. Sometimes a simple argument is wrong. Sometimes the complicated language is there because the simple question is uncomfortable.
This applies to Liberals, Conservatives, New Democrats, premiers, bureaucracies, CBC, private media, corporations, unions and people on social media.
It also applies to the politicians you like.
Especially the politicians you like.
Strip away the language and ask:
What is actually being proposed?
What will it cost?
Who pays?
Who benefits?
What incentives does it create?
What knowledge would government need to make this work?
What consequences aren’t immediately visible?
What would people have done with their own money and resources instead?
What evidence says the policy works?
What happens when it fails?
Orwell teaches you to examine the language.
Sowell teaches you to examine incentives, trade-offs and consequences.
Hayek teaches you the limits of centralized knowledge.
Bastiat teaches you to look for the unseen cost.
Put all four together and you have a pretty good bullshit detector for Canadian politics.
posttruthmonkey retweeted
There was a time when they were absolutely furious about the “Trump vaccine” and swore they’d never take it
posttruthmonkey retweeted
I do. It's actually a really simple answer.
Kids can understand it. I'll tell you the story now so you can be ready when you finally have grandkids, Mario Awful.
For decades, Israelis tried to work with the Gazans, believing the impossible: that people who have declared that they want nothing more than to have Israel destroyed and Jews killed might be able to be persuaded to be friends by giving them land, money, resources, opportunities, and an infinite amount of patience.
During those decades, huge amounts of humanitarian aid was sent to the Gaza Strip, which they used to militarize and to spend many years planning a savage surprise attack against the people helping them. Almost everyone in the world took up their cause, even many Israelis who lived right next door, even though the Gazans were taking advantage of all that help.
They were offered everything but wouldn't accept it because all they wanted was Israel to be destroyed and Jews to be driven out or, preferably, dead. They were so fixated on that goal that nothing else mattered, and nothing else was good enough. They even used water pipes to build rockets and dug terror tunnels under their city and deep into Israeli territory to prepare for a surprise war.
On an important Jewish holiday and their sabbath, the Gazans sprung their surprise attack. That was October 7, 2023. They launched over a thousand rockets at 6:30 am. The Israelis heard the sirens and knew they only had seconds to hide in their shelters from these attacks. By the way, every Israeli house has a bomb shelter in it because these kinds of attacks are so frequent. Also, every Israeli adult and child, little boys and little girls, knows from as soon as they can walk that when the sirens sound to go to the shelter because it is so important and so common.
As the Israelis went, exhausted and sleepy, to their shelters to hide from the rocket attack, the Gazans sent a large armed force across the fence into Israel to do the most heinous things to the Israelis that you can imagine. Over a thousand were murdered. Things so horrible you cannot describe them to children happened everywhere. The Gazans celebrated and filmed themselves and put it on the internet, bragging and boasting about unimaginable horrors and murders. They dragged Israelis, including women, children, and babies and dead bodies, into their terror city and terror tunnels and started abusing and killing them slowly, using them and their corpses as collateral against the Israeli people and military. This lasted for over two years, with the last hostage's remains returned at the end of January 2026 after being taken in October 2023.
The scale and nature of this attack is so horrific that it cannot be described politely, but its true evil wasn't just in the barbarity of its forces, which did unspeakable things to completely innocent men, women, and children everywhere they went, including many who openly supported them for years, but in how they took advantage of the trust and help they were given to do it.
Gazans had spent years exploiting the goodwill of Israelis in the Gaza Envelope to gather intelligence, working as gardeners, housekeepers, taxi drivers, etc., to gather detailed intelligence of the neighborhoods and homes they would systematically attack starting on October 7. So many Israelis were betrayed at their trust and goodwill toward the Gazans, and by it. While they hid from those rockets in their shelters, Hamas terrorists systematically went through the carefully mapped streets of their neighborhoods, broke into houses, and shot them dead through the doors of their shelters, or crashed in through the walls from the outside using their own farming equipment to do it. Hamas terrorists knew the Israelis would be hiding from the rockets and knew where they'd be hiding, and they murdered them while they hid, deliberately, planned out in advance and for years.
These people weren't just Israelis or Jews. They were innocents. In fact, as far as it goes, many of them were the greatest champions for the Gazans in Israel. Didn't matter. They were Israelis. They were Jews. They had to die in the most horrible ways you can think of. They had to be desecrated. They had to be taken hostage. It all had to be celebrated on video streamed live onto the internet to excite their radical friends around the region and the world. The horror is actually incomprehensible.
Had this happened to Americans in the United States from one of its neighbors, the response Americans would have demanded cannot actually be comprehended. I stand in awe at how restrained and cautious and decent and good the Israelis have been, and it is to my slight embarrassment knowing that our own people, our own forces, wouldn't have managed a fraction of that decency, however much we would match the unparalleled effectiveness of these operations. That is, Mario Awful, I don't f*cking want to hear it, and neither do your grandkids. Respect them enough not to soil their minds with these lies, which are so evil that Hell itself would be slightly embarrassed to spread them.
So, when Israel realized what had happened to them, what was still happening to them, how their trust, support, and patience had been taken advantage of in the nastiest and cruelest way human beings can possibly imagine, for zero good reasons and only unbelievably evil ones, they set out to make sure it would never happen again. They started a war of rescue and to end the military capacities of the Gazans, who were and still are governed by a radical terrorist group that even has in their charter that they want every Israeli driven out and every Jew that can be killed dead.
Israel waged a patient war with the highest accuracy rate of any in the entire history of urban warfare, taking great pains and many casualties to spare innocent life, even when that innocent life openly supports the terror regime that governs them and wants them dead. The Gazans, however, had spent decades turning their entire city into a hidden military fortress, hiding weapons, entrances to terror tunnels, command centers, and every conceivable military target within civilian neighborhoods, including even homes, schools, hospitals, and houses of worship. Israel did what it had to do as carefully as it could be done. The devastation you see is the result of the evil of Hamas and the Gazans who support it having spent decades organizing their city to become a vast, sprawling military installation.
The Gazans and their terrorist leaders took this organizational approach specifically for two reasons. One was to deter Israel from ever attacking or disabling their military installations at all. Even when the devastation seen here, that remained the case. Israel took great pains to minimize, including casualties, including complicated legal approvals, including warning both civilians and combatants in Gaza of incoming attacks against the installations, trying to save all innocent (and a lot of not-so-innocent) life. Another was to produce this propaganda, which Mario Awful, after having his account built to giant size by @elonmusk himself, spreads and promotes with foolish emotion-driven emojis and devastating lies of omission of these facts.
Even as Israel dismantled the entire military capacity of Gaza bit by bit (which is what you see in the video here), they sent aid: more food, medicine, and other supplies than have ever been sent to a population controlled by an enemy military in the history of warfare, period. The terrorist leaders leveraged every bit of it against them, stealing it and starving their own people, creating propaganda campaigns about genocide and forced starvation, and even building more rockets out of raw materials including water pipes, which they then fired at Israel.
Bit by bit, Israel dismantled as much of their military apparatus as they could and rescued or recovered all of their hostages, including among them Americans. The result is what you see. The result you see below is the most painstakingly moderate response a decent human being of even the slightest comprehension could possibly imagine, and yet that's what the Israelis have accomplished in Gaza.
And they accomplished it while the world hated them for it, scrutinized everything not just for any legitimate breaches of perfection but for a litany of illegitimate accusations of things so voluminous that they could not even be recorded, except that they were in the relentless propaganda of social media, the global enemy propaganda channels, and even the mainstream press, almost all amplified and repeated by even allegedly good, decent conservatives who found these lies a perfect reason either to reveal their underlying but hidden hatred for Jews or to turn to that evil on false pretenses you are promoting, even now, even today.
So when you sit down to tell your grandkids how humanity allowed Gaza to happen, tell them the real story.
Humanity allowed Gaza to become a terrorist militarized city openly dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the murder and desecration of Jews and Jewish bodies by believing in some asinine humanitarian concept that defies all logic. It happened by creating a global political situation that, for reasons of Communist political correctness and soft-hearted and softer-headed compassion, refused to believe the simple reality of the situation. It happened because this delusion and misplaced trust persisted for decades while Hamas and its supporters turned Gaza into a terrorist military outpost that would simply have to be destroyed sooner or later, and then they pulled that trigger on themselves in the most obvious way possible on October 7, 2023, which stands as one of the darkest days of the last century.
Humanity allowed Gaza to happen because it wouldn't take Hamas at its word. Humanity allowed Gaza to happen because it lied to itself for decades about the nature of the Islamic currents that motivate Hamas and "Palestinianism" more broadly. Humanity allowed Gaza to happen because it wouldn't address a problem correctly from the beginning, not least because it was terrified of being called racist and refused, nobly but stupidly, that human beings could be led by ideology and religion to the depths of evil and depravity that had captured the Gazans.
Humanity allowed Gaza to happen, that is, because it refused to take Gazans at their word.
Israel, starting in late 2023, finally woke up in the worst way possible to the need to STOP LETTING GAZA HAPPEN, the result of which your video depicts and the truth and moral of which you, like a demon, invert.
Years from now, my grandkids will ask me how humanity allowed Gaza to happen. I still don’t have an answer for them 💔 xitter.gq/mhmd_s09/status/209257…
posttruthmonkey retweeted
Brother, “Maple MAGA” is the tell.
You say debate is healthy, then invent a made-up American slur so you don’t have to debate. MAGA means Make America Great Again. Canada is not America. The phrase only exists to smear Canadians who blame Ottawa instead of Washington. That’s not patriotism. That’s a talking point.
If taking aim at your own country is the sin, look at the last decade. Housing got wrecked. Violent crime severity jumped. Productivity fell further behind the U.S. Federal debt roughly doubled. Immigration was cranked far past housing, hospitals, and wages, then quietly walked back after the damage was done. Pointing at that is not “national self-sabotage.” It’s noticing who was in charge.
You also flipped the institutions argument. The people who actually used the state against citizens were the Liberals. They invoked the Emergencies Act, froze bank accounts, and treated a protest as sedition. Two courts have now said that invocation was not legally justified. Mark Carney, before he was PM, wrote that the convoy was “sedition.” That’s not defending institutions. That’s stretching them until a judge has to put them back.
And “carry water for foreign adversaries” is rich coming from this era of Liberal government. A public inquiry called China the most active foreign-interference threat in Canada. Carney himself called China a top security threat. Then he went to Beijing, called it a strategic partner, and cut a deal that lets tens of thousands of Chinese EVs into Canada. If amplifying a foreign capital is the crime, start with the people who hold the file.
Nobody needs Trump to explain why rent doubled, why grocery bills hurt, or why young people can’t buy a house. Those are homemade. Trump being a chaotic neighbour doesn’t wash that away. Two things can be true: the U.S. can squeeze us, and Ottawa can still have spent years making the country weaker and then calling the people who said so traitors.
You can be pro-Canada without protecting the Liberal record. You can criticize Trump without pretending every domestic critic is an American agent. The toxic part isn’t “Maple MAGA.” It’s using a nonsense label so you never have to answer for the results.
Debate is healthy. Name-calling so the government never has to take the stand is not.
it's breathtaking really. everything about it
This is Gavin Newsom’s California… where addicts are just left standing there for hours
San Francisco has spent hundreds of millions of dollars every year fighting homelessness, addiction and the street crisis xitter.gq/war24182236/status/208…
Of course, when you spend this much money for years and still can't demonstrate that the crisis is being meaningfully resolved there are valid questions
Taxpayers deserve answers
holy flying fuck!
another proud moment in human history
Let me just make it clear, they are protesting because NYU ending these treatments for MINORS thanks to President Trump xitter.gq/ScooterCasterNY/status…
Imagine standing outside a hospital and publicly injecting yourself with hormones because the hospital decided it should be more cautious about giving these treatments to children
There is a serious mental health crisis in the US
posttruthmonkey retweeted
Great Barrier Reef: Last five years best on record
Why doesn't the media tell you?
aims.gov.au/monitoring-great…
You can see all the references in my Twitter thread:
xitter.gq/BjornLomborg/status/20…
New 2026 data
Great Barrier Reef: Last five years best on record
Why doesn't the media tell you?
aims.gov.au/monitoring-great…
