Jon P retweeted
Must-read.
Since October 2023, four-fifths of Wikipedia's article on Zionism has been rewritten. Historians like Benny Morris are cited to say things they never said. Editors banned from the page left their work behind.
Wikipedia is where millions go for "neutral" facts, and AI models train on it.
This isn't an encyclopedia anymore. It's a propaganda operation with footnotes.
xitter.gq/clairlemon/status/2116…
How Wikipedia Rewrote Zionism
Since October 2023, four-fifths of the encyclopedia’s article on Zionism has been replaced. And work of editors who have been banned from the page remains.
quillette.com/2026/10/30/how…
Jon P retweeted
Harvard Professor: “But as an institution, UNRWA is not biased. The investigation has cleared UNRWA.”
Hillel Neuer: “Which investigation? Who was cleared?”
Harvard Professor: “Look, I don't want to engage in litigation of all the numbers and facts...”
Stats on settler violence in the West Bank.
#Israel
The @UN’s “settler violence” statistics are even more fraudulent than you'd imagine.
@RegavimEng audited UN OCHA’s data and found:
• In its review of the 8,333 "settler violence" incidents listed, 95% either did not involve settlers, did not involve violence, or did not occur in Judea and Samaria.
• Of 59 Palestinian deaths attributed to Israeli CIVILIANS, 26 were actually instances in which the Palestinian initiated violence and was then killed in self-defense, and 24 were actually killed by the IDF.
• After accounting for unidentified perpetrators, pending cases and even a terrorist who died crashing his own car while fleeing, just ONE case remained a verified, unprovoked killing by an Israeli civilian.
• OCHA counted peaceful Jewish visits to the Temple Mount, schoolchildren visiting archaeological sites, traffic accidents, infrastructure work, and even an Arab laborer bitten by a Jewish-owned dog, as “settler violence.”
• 1,755 OCHA incidents relied on a single source. Another 565 had no identifiable source at all.
These are the statistics used by governments, journalists and international organizations to depict Judea and Samaria as the scene of a Jewish campaign of terror and to justify oppressive sanctions against ordinary Israelis.
The “settler-violence epidemic” is a psyop.
Cc @BrianOSheaSPI @naomirwolf @DailyClout
Jon P retweeted
BREAKING: U.N. rapporteur Francesca Albanese says uniformed Hamas terrorists posing as journalists are not legitimate targets. “Having been photographed with a uniform doesn’t make the journalist killable... even assuming that Israel had a right to self-defense — and it doesn’t.”
Jon P retweeted
I have spoken out against anti-Muslim hate in the Michigan Senate race. I will speak out just as loudly when the target is Jewish people.
Let me state a little-known fact: ISRAEL GETS LESS THAN 0.1 PERCENT OF THE FEDERAL BUDGET. That’s less than one tenth of a percent!
But there is an ad running that tells voters they can’t afford groceries because the United States gives so much money to Israel. In reality, the United States spends money in and on countries all around the world – but this ad singles out the Jewish state. The ad is as dangerous as it is dishonest.
You can disagree with how the United States spends money abroad. But telling hungry families that the Jewish state is the reason they are suffering is wrong and shameful.
Blaming Jews for people’s problems is an old story. Anybody who has read the last century of history knows where it leads. It is a dark pathway.
This ad is anti-Jewish hate and should come down immediately. Abdul El-Sayed should denounce it today.
Jon P retweeted
Eric Hoffer wrote this article about Israel almost 60 years go. It reads like it was written yesterday.
"The Jews are a peculiar people: things permitted to other nations are forbidden to the Jews.
Other nations drive out thousands, even millions of people and there is no refugee problem. Russia did it, Poland and Czechoslovakia did it, Turkey threw out a million Greeks, and Algeria a million Frenchmen. Indonesia threw out heaven knows how many Chinese-and no one says a word about refugees. But in the case of Israel the displaced Arabs have become eternal refugees. Everyone insists that Israel must take back every single Arab. Arnold Toynbee calls the displacement of the Arabs an atrocity greater than any committed by the Nazis.
Other nations when victorious on the battlefield dictate peace terms. But when Israel is victorious it must sue for peace. Everyone expects the Jews to be the only real Christians in this world.
Other nations when they are defeated survive and recover but should Israel be defeated it would be destroyed. Had Nasser triumphed last June he would have wiped Israel off the map, and no one would have lifted a finger to save the Jews.
No commitment to the Jews by any government, including our own, is worth the paper it is written on. There is a cry of outrage all over the world when people die in Vietnam or when two Negroes are executed in Rhodesia. But when Hitler slaughtered Jews no one remonstrated with him.
The Swedes, who are ready to break of diplomatic relations with America because of what we do in Vietnam, did not let out a peep when Hitler was slaughtering Jews. They sent Hitler choice iron ore, and ball bearings, and serviced his troop trains to Norway.
The Jews are alone in the world. If Israel survives, it will be solely because of Jewish efforts. And Jewish resources. Yet at this moment Israel is our only reliable and unconditional ally. We can rely more on Israel than Israel can rely on us. And one has only to imagine what would have happened last summer had the Arabs and their Russian backers won the war to realize how vital the survival of Israel is to America and the West in general.
I have a premonition that will not leave me; as it goes with Israel so will it go with all of us. Should Israel perish the holocaust will be upon us."
Jon P retweeted
Ukraine losing access to Starshield raises serious concerns for our national security—like who controls critical capabilities the U.S. government has spent billions to procure & how decisions to restrict them are made. I'm demanding answers from the Department of Defense & SpaceX
Jon P retweeted
Ach jetzt versteh´ ich, warum Elon heute wegen den Starlink/Starshield Limitierungen in UA so rumeiert. - Er hatte heute Morgen Post vom US Congress mit ein paar unangenehmen Fragen im Briefkasten. Gleichzeitig will er wohl Trump paar Tage vor der Wahl nicht unter den Bus werfen.
Jon P retweeted
US energy company execs have resigned in disgust as the Trump family is caught secretly expediting the funneling of $25 billion from a sanctioned Russian energy giant in exchange for allowing Russians to obtain a natural gas project in Alaska.
According to investigations by The New York Times and Financial Times, Russia's Novatek allegedly concealed its financial involvement in the American project through a UAE-linked intermediary.
Gentry Beach, a longtime Trump ally and close friend of Donald Trump Jr., signed an agreement with Novatek to pursue natural gas development in Alaska. Reuters documented the arrangement in February.
Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin discussed this cooperation on the Alaska energy project with Trump's representatives, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, during negotiations involving Russia and Ukraine.
The controversy deepened when Polar Train LNG's CEO, Joel Riddle, raised concerns about concealed Russian financing and possible sanctions violations. He departed in September, followed by other senior executives.
The Financial Times also described discussions about a potential arrangement under which Novatek would provide technology for the Alaska project in exchange for sanctions relief benefiting its Arctic LNG 2 development in Siberia.
According to The New York Times, Riddle and two other departing executives warned the Trump administration about the Russian financing and urged officials to investigate.
The White House maintains that the project was mentioned only briefly and that no detailed discussions took place. There is no established evidence that Kushner or Witkoff knew about the allegedly concealed financing. Polar Train LNG denies wrongdoing.
The central question is how a sanctioned Russian energy company became involved in a major American energy venture while Putin was discussing potential economic cooperation with Trump's representatives and a longtime Trump family associate was pursuing a separate agreement with the same Russian company.
Selling Alaska to the Russians or selling Ukraine to the Russians - to the Trump family it's all the same.
ft.com/content/e9cfbfbb-e65a…
Jon P retweeted
BREAKING: Brave UNRWA teacher in Gaza speaks out against the culture of death being cultivated in the schools. Teachers around her are “aggressively pushing” ideologies of killing and violence onto their students. (Source: @JusoorNews)
Will @UNLazzarini be held to account?
Jon P retweeted
BBC, The New York Times, The Guardian and Al Jazeera report on Israeli “settler violence” on the daily.
This morning, 2 Palestinian terrorists armed with hundreds of rounds of ammunition attempted to carry out a MASS casualty attack against Israelis near Hebron.
5 Israelis were wounded, including 2 critically. Both terrorists were eliminated by Israeli security forces.
Yet hours after the attack, I could find ZERO coverage from any of these 5 major outlets.
Why is that?
Jon P retweeted
Ресторан BOXPARK. Лондон.
Мусульманин ведёт себя агрессивно. Его выводят и успокаивают. Он замахивается на охранника и тут что-то пошло не так...
Охранник:
Джулиус Фрэнсис. Бывший боксёр. Чемпион Британии. В 2000 дрался с Тайсоном
После завершения карьеры работает охранником
Jon P retweeted
IHere's what Pres.Trump has done for Vladimir Putin since 2017:
🇺🇸➡️🇷🇺 First term
1Stood next to Putin in Helsinki and took his word over U.S. intelligence
2Lobbied to bring Russia back into the G7
3Withheld military aid from Ukraine to squeeze Zelensky (impeachment #1)
4Pulled out of Syria, handing Russia a freer hand
5Openly questioned NATO's mutual-defense pledge
6Lifted sanctions on Deripaska-linked companies, including Rusal
7Walked away from the INF nuclear treaty
8Walked away from the Open Skies treaty, leaving our European allies with less visibility
🇺🇸➡️🇷🇺 Second term
9. Called Russia's G7 expulsion a "mistake"
10. Declared Moscow "holds all the cards"
11. Opened talks with Russia with zero preconditions
12. Berated Zelensky in the Oval Office, then paused aid and intel to Ukraine
13. Halted offensive cyber operations against Russia
14. Had the U.S. vote WITH Russia against a UN resolution condemning the invasion
15. Said "Crimea will stay with Russia"
16. Rolled out the red carpet for Putin in Alaska
17. Pressed Ukraine, not Russia, to give up territory
18. Starshield
19. Diesel
20. Revoke Graham sanctions
That's not "America First."
You could never make that list of things a President has done for Zelensky, or for NATO. Ask yourself why.
Jon P retweeted
I’ll stipulate that Trump is an agent of Putin.
Go down the checklist.
1. Destroyed the Western alliance? Putin wanted that.
2. Threatened a NATO ally over Greenland? Putin wanted that.
3. Pulled out of the intermediate nuclear pact? Putin wanted that.
4. Withdrawing 25-40,000 troops from Western Europe while Russian bellicosity is rising? Putin wanted that.
5. Russian satellites giving coordinates to Iranians killing our soldiers, and his response is “they kill us, we kill them”? What American president says that?
I think he’s been compromised.
The election of Donald Trump may be the greatest foreign policy success in post-Czarist Russian history.
Jon P retweeted
Looking forward to @mehdirhasan condemning these cartoons from Arab nations on the eve of the Six Day War that didn't just threaten expulsion but genocide.
Jon P retweeted
The donor list for Trump's ballroom is finally public, and it blows the lid off a huge can of worms.
There’s a LOT here, so let’s break it down:
1) Surprise, surprise...a ton of the donors conveniently got things they wanted after donating, and several of them asked to remain anonymous. Makes you wonder why.
2) Roughly HALF of the money for the ballroom came from companies or executives whose firms have had federal contracts under Trump.
3) Julio Herrera Velutini, an international banker indicted on bribery charges, was pardoned after his daughter gave $3.5 million to Trump’s PAC and pledged another $2.5 million for the ballroom. Trump pardoned him after the first check for the ballroom hit.
4) Charles Ergen, a telecoms exec whose company was being investigated by the FCC, had a closed-door meeting with Trump and the Chair of the FCC. That meeting reportedly involved talks about his political donations. The Administration dropped the investigation, and Ergen donated a total of $25 million.
5) Rocket, a housing fintech company, needed federal approval of a major acquisition. The deal raised a ton of questions from lawmakers about potential anticompetitive business practices. The Trump Administration gave the company the green light, and three weeks later, a Rocket subsidiary donated $10 million to the ballroom.
6) Salesforce committed a total of $3 million in three installments. Between those payments, the Army awarded the company a $5.6 billion contract, the largest public government contract in the company's history.
7) ServiceNow committed $5 million just one month after the federal government announced a deal to make their AI software available across federal agencies.
And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Trump has created a system where the people who need something from his government know exactly how to get his attention.
These companies and executives are foaming at the mouth to shower him with money, because he’s made it clear that he’ll help them in exchange.
There is no honest word for that other than corruption.
washingtonpost.com/investiga…
Jon P retweeted
We suspected this was the reason Ukraine’s access to Starshield was restricted. But to see it from senior officials in this reporting is still utterly unconscionable.
Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means. The Trump Administration deliberately restricted technology Ukraine relies on to intercept Russian drones and ballistic missiles. It made it harder for Ukraine to defend itself and easier for Russia to carry out its deadly attacks against Ukrainian civilians.
They knew exactly what was at stake. They knew that more Russian drones and missiles would get through, allowing Russia to kill even more Ukrainians. And yet they went ahead anyway.
This is a deliberate weaking of Ukraine’s defenses that only Russia will benefit from. It is a betrayal of our ally that this Administration cannot wash its hands of.
The American people deserve to know who made this decision, why they made it, and how they can possibly justify putting more innocent Ukrainian lives in the crosshairs of Putin’s war machine.
reuters.com/world/europe/ord…
El-Sayed and the Muslim Brotherhood
Islamophobes are accusing Abdul El-Sayed of being pro–Muslim Brotherhood JUST BECAUSE:
• His mother worked for an organization later designated by the U.S. Treasury for supporting terrorist groups.
• His sister-in-law appeared on a federal terrorism watchlist during the Obama administration.
• His father-in-law held leadership roles in organizations accused of Brotherhood connections.
• Those organizations were named unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation case.
• His half-sister celebrated October 7 online.
• The same half-sister wrote that their family had “long been MB” and described their mother’s Brotherhood activism.
• His campaign buddy Hasan Piker said America deserved 9/11.
• He wanted to avoid commenting on Khamenei’s death because some potential voters were grieving.
• He signed a statement urging Morsi’s government to purge Egypt’s media and police.
• He compared Oklahoma’s Sharia-ban measure to historical atrocities, including the Trail of Tears.
• He praised the work of Tariq Ramadan, grandson of the Muslim Brotherhood’s founder.
• He defended his friend Mohamed Soltan, whose father was a senior Brotherhood figure.
• His campaign received donations from CAIR-associated individuals, and his father-in-law contributed $300,000 to a supporting PAC.
• He argued that a Brotherhood-led Egypt would not necessarily resemble Iran.
You’re confusing what happened with what you’re allowed to notice
