Programación 2 - UA

One thing we know is that if future AI systems are built on the same blueprint as current Auto-Regressive LLMs, they may become highly knowledgeable but they will still be dumb. They will still hallucinate, they will still be difficult to control, and they will still merely regurgitate stuff they've been trained on. MORE IMPORTANTLY, they will still be unable to reason, unable to invent new things, or to plan actions to fulfill objectives. And unless they can be trained from video, they still won't understand the physical world. Future systems will *have* to use a different architecture capable of understanding the world, capable of reasoning, and capable of planning so as to satisfy a set of objectives and guardrails. These objective-driven architectures will be safe and will remain under our control because *we* set their objectives and guardrails and they can't deviate from them. They won't want to dominate us because they won't have any objective that drives them to dominate (unlike many living species, particularly social species like humans). In fact, guardrail objectives will prevent that. They will be smarter than us but will remain under our control. They will make *us* smarter. The idea that smart AI systems will necessarily dominate humans is just wrong. Instead of scaling current systems 100x, which will go nowhere, we need to make these Objective-Driven AI architectures work.