Design Prototype Test

I used to get my posts deleted and my account flagged for saying this. I don't know what it means that we can now utter these words here on X. On the one hand, I'm hopeful that free speech is still a thing. On the other hand my cynical side thinks this is a trap. Seeing if we will speak badly against them so they know who to target during the cleansing.

"First Partner." This is a subversive tactic where subtle changes in common usage of words allow those driving the changes to control the thinking patterns of the rest of us who speak the same language. The entire point of this headline is to push the agenda of disassembling the natural order of a functional society where the foundation is between husbands and wives. It doesn't matter what this couple of politicians did. That's why The headline is truncated. What matters is that she's not the first lady But instead the first partner. Anybody can be the first partner. Which normalizes perversions to the stable family structure which begat a functional country. Which is what they're trying to accomplish with this shift in vocabulary. It's a fact: She is a lady. Her title should be first lady. If Newsom was gay, his partner should be called the first gentleman. If he was gay and his partner was trans, that man would be called the first lady. By calling her the first partner we are making the language more General and less specific. We are losing resolution. That's bad. If losing resolution was desirable then 8K television would not be a thing. This headline is literally an attack on your ability to think.

I'm reminded of that Nike commercial for Y2K: youtu.be/0Zvs-bz1CXM?is=fLmy…

It is crazy! I agree. The two images are almost identical. BUT Steve Jobs was pissed when Microsoft released Windows which was obviously a copy of Lisa OS. He confronted Bill Gates on stage. Bill Gates response was: "Well, Steve, I think there's more than one way of looking at it. I think it's more like we both had this rich neighbor named Xerox and I broke into his house to steal the TV set and found out that you had already stolen it." This is an ad for iMac computers from 1999. Subconsciously this is probably the source from which you got the idea. It is crazy how Glock copied you exactly though. Did they arrive at the idea the same way you did? Or did they remember your post from years ago.

You live in a glass house Buck. You shouldn't throw stones. If you were a real influencer you'd be getting paid $7,000 per post to support Jewish interests and Israel. Instead, you're here doing it for free. So excuse me if I think that you're a loser cuck with nothing valuable to say.

Hey Buck, What are your thoughts about the fact that this story was never covered by the media. But it was obviously the inspiration for a certain FAMOUS adult film. So we can't know about it when the obvious emotion would be outrage, but we get constantly bombarded by the same theme when the emotion will be humiliation and shame.

I kinda feel like this was the inspiration for that famous Piper Perri video/image. It was 8 years later, but the pigtails and the Unicorn shirt making her look like a pre-teen same as the victim. That group that controls the media wouldn't show us the news story but they want to humiliate us with the adult content on the same subject.

If you believe the narrative which was fed to us through the mainstream media the women in WWII loved the hard manual work and were sad to return to the house when the men got back from war.