queady retweeted
When the whole server types RushB but this time it's in your browser.
Sign up now:
waitlist.rushb.game/
🤖 Made with AI
Requesting my $shhhhh airdrop: the first BRC-20 on Bitcoin silent payments. SH-3558AB59 shhhhh.site/airdrop
been staring at this for an hour and im malding
he bought 3x QQQ at the covid bottom anon. the actual bottom. while your favorite finfluencer was posting bread recipes
conviction is a currency and this man was printing it. absolute cracked entry, no notes
$KIRK 0xc7860a9adef4a610c86dafbfb189f94f4032f44c
So uniswap team commited on github removal of static address from dev branch
github.com/Uniswap/liquidity…
their CI automatically deployed new factory after that made from salt code 0x0000FffFBE8efE702c8703aE3477FF5dE3d319C0
bytecode matches version 3.1.1, also address starts as version 3.0.0 from main github branch.
This is first deploy:
0x87f1ed895b460c002e82075f1038e7f2ce4d51cd
base:0xed664536023d8e4b1640c394777d34abaff1df8f just printed 100B+ tokens in a single day.
That number is the proof. Peer-to-Pool and sharded decentralized inference verification are not whitepaper words anymore. They are running in production, at Venice-tier throughput, on a live decentralized GPU pool.
Price that output at OpenRouter floor rates (single-model, Qwen 3.6 35B) and it is ~$27M/year, 100% routed to POD buybacks. Before the basket. Before the API is even live.
Now price it against the market on revenue multiple:
> HYPE: ~$15B cap on ~$625M revenue. ~24x. Routes ~97% of revenue to buybacks.
> VVV: ~$616M cap on ~$60M revenue. ~10x.
> POD: ~$15M cap on ~$27M speculative revenue. ~0.5x.
The market pays 24 dollars for a dollar of Hyperliquid's revenue, 10 for a dollar of Venice's, and 50 cents for a dollar of Dolphin's. Same category, same near-total buyback design as HYPE, and POD is priced at a fraction of both.
queady retweeted
First and only robotics launch in crypto to give exposure to major robotics companies that went viral in the past months.
Figure AI, 1x (Neo), Apptronik, Agility... $Deus is holding prefered and common shares of these companies.
Their core idea is to use onchain governance to allocate capital into physical robotics companies that are hard to access for retail:
- Need to hold $Deus to participate directly in decisions around capital allocation.
- 33% of the profit from successful company exits will be used for $Deus buybacks.
- Raised $20M; last sale valuation was at 60M FDV.
- 17% circ supply, puts it at 8M circ mcap right now.
Why is it clearly undervalued here?
Their NAV is $10M (not including their DEUS holdings, which are worth $16M).
Consists of $7M invested in robotics companies + $3M in cash.
For context, Andrew Kang's fund is trading at 5x its NAV, while $Deus is trading below it right now.
The reason for comparing Kang's company to Deus is that they are both invested in the same robotics companies. (check the pics)
Anyways, should be clearly limited downside here considering $Deus trades below the NAV and given the premium Kang's fund trades at (while being invested in the same companies).
Also, in the future, whenever there is a major headline involving Kang's fund, Figure AI, 1x, etc., people will look for a proxy in crypto, and there is only one company that actually gives exposure to them: $DEUS.
$DEUS
The market is paying a 400%+ premium to NAV for access to robotics positions
@DineroDom0 + @ChillTRD broke it down on yesterday's show
@RoboStrategy: NAV at $7.50, trading at $37.92
That's the appetite for access to robotics right now
Now look at $DEUS | @xmaquina at TGE:
- Public auction price: $0.06
- Total supply: 1B fixed
- Circulating at TGE: 26.94% (includes 9.9% DAO treasury locked behind governance)
- True float: ~17%
- ~$15M in token holdings + $10M raised ($7M already deployed into Figure AI, Apptronic, Agility, 1X, Neura)
RoboStrategy is centralized exposure to one position trading at a 5.6x multiple. $DEUS is decentralized exposure to the top humanoid companies

















