A book compared to Weber, Tocqueville, A book can bring Trump back to the presidency and return America to the beautiful society before. Why not buy one?Welcome to amazon.com/dp/B0BVCMMX7T to buy “the course of western civilization(essence version)”

Religion determines human history; Christianity has defined Western history, Islam has shaped Arab history, and Buddhism has established the history of Southeast Asia. Secular ideologies—atheistic concepts like liberal democracy, "XXX-ism," and progressivism only mislead humanity, rob it of morality, and ultimately lead to destruction

Paris Riots Prove Macron Is Also a Sinner Against Civilization! In recent days, Paris has once again plunged into turmoil. Regarding the causes of this unrest, opinions from the outside world are mixed: mainstream media largely attribute it to high school students' dissatisfaction with educational system reforms (such as cuts to education spending), while many others directly point to it as social conflict triggered by Islamic immigrants. Personally, I also recognize this as unrest instigated by Islamic individuals. A careful look at many live videos reveals that Palestinian flags are flying high, and those participating in the riots are almost exclusively Black and brown people, with white students being hard to find. Taking a step back, even if the educational reforms touched upon the vital interests of certain students, why did white students remain indifferent, while only Islamic students rebounded so violently? Behind this, there are not only economic considerations but also the intertwining instigation of religious forces. I once wrote an article arguing that Merkel is a sinner who destroyed human civilization. In fact, not just Merkel, but left-wing politicians like Macron are similarly sinners. To showcase their own greatness, possess a compassionate heart, and proclaim that they want to "care for all humanity," embrace Islamic people, and achieve pluralism. There is a viral rumor that Merkel once said: the ultimate purpose of introducing Islamic immigrants is to use them to dissolve Christianity's influence on society, creating a purely secular society without religious bias, a compassionate society where all religions coexist. Even if this quote is hard to trace to its origin, it precisely reflects their naivety and shortsightedness—while also demonstrating their ignorance and foolishness. The minds of these politicians are filled with stupid fantasies detached from historical laws. In human history, there has never been a true "religious grand harmony," especially the coexistence of Christianity and Islam. The two are fundamentally opposed and incompatible in doctrine: one of the core contents of Islam is outward expansion to conquer the whole world, while the bottom line of Christian faith is not to worship secular idols and to revere God alone. Once facing coercion by Islamic people, Christians will inevitably resist to the death. History has proven this with facts through the Crusades lasting nearly a millennium and countless bloodshed. History has long proven that forcibly kneading together vastly different heterogeneous civilizations inevitably results in fierce civilizational clashes, such as today's Paris riots, and the outbreak of war next can also be anticipated. In fact, if these Western white-left politicians read a little history, they should understand that what determines the course of human history is not abstract freedom, democracy, equality, or other secular theories, but the religious faith behind them—meaning religion determines human history. The various cornerstones of modern Western society were all nurtured within the soil of Christian civilization. · The foundation of British constitutionalism: The 13th-century Magna Carta was fostered through the Pope's intervention. At that time, the Pope supported the English nobility against royal power, stripping the King of his official title as head of the church, which ultimately forced the King and the nobility to reach an agreement on shared governance. · The germination of modern freedom: Cromwell and the Puritans he represented in the English Revolution did not originate as a "bourgeois revolution" in the modern sense; its essence was a religious movement of Puritans pursuing inner faith, freedom, and equality. · The logic of America's founding: Early Puritans heading to the Americas sought to build an earthly paradise, a city upon a hill. They directly used the "Period of the Judges" in The Book of Judges as a blueprint to construct a brand-new society with a strong religious color that was both ancient and modern. Politicians may disdain studying history, but as long as they look at the social reality before their eyes, they should wake up. In my book The Course of Western Civilization, I cite a highly persuasive example—China's Hui ethnic group—to show how religion shapes human history and society. From bloodline, genetics, and ancestry, the Hui people are almost indistinguishable from the Han Chinese. However, because they embraced Islam, their customs, taboos, and ways of thinking diverged fundamentally from ordinary Han Chinese. What caused all this is precisely the Quran. As Islamic believers, they invariably take the Quran as the criterion for their actions. At the same time, the Quran provides a complete set of social organizational templates, easily shaping a group of people completely different from the surrounding Han Chinese. The official authorities even define them as a new nationality, the Hui. This shows how immense the influence of religion is—so much so that it can give birth to an ethnic group. China is a society where the secular government has always been extremely strong, yet this is still the case. In an environment of so-called religious freedom in the West, one can imagine what kind of results will be produced. Similarly, Islamic immigrants entering France use the Quran as their behavioral code. What they pursue is never Western-style pure secular culture, democratic elections, or universal values, but the social lifestyle described in the Quran—that is, a lifestyle based on the order of Sharia law. They completely ignore French laws. When immigrant groups no longer follow local laws but instead obey their own religious law, so-called "integration" becomes mere empty words. The riots in Paris are merely bitter fruit planted by Western white-left politicians, another ironclad proof of them eroding their own civilization. Today, the even more horrifying crisis is: for decades, left-wing politicians and thinkers have been promoting so-called universal values. They treat the electoral system inherited from American Christian society as a universal value suitable for any society, with core tenets like "absolute equality for all," "one person, one vote," and the "majority principle decides." This has caused catastrophic backlash. Logically, they are utterly unable to exclude Islamic people from participating in voting and elections. Yet Islamic people have a unique reproductive culture, such as polygyny, and a reproduction rate like mice, while Western society, due to the loss of Christian faith and the pursuit of personal indulgence, suffers from low birth rates and severe aging. If this population structure is allowed to develop, within a mere ten or twenty years, according to the majority-rule principle of "one person, one vote," Western society will be peacefully swallowed up by Islamic people under the universal values promoted by them. In the end, the entire society will have to completely believe in their Quran and implement Islamic law because this is decided by the "majority principle." This is the greatest tragedy of the contemporary West. Therefore, it must be fundamentally recognized that modern Western electoral, freedom, and democratic systems are essentially birthed from Christian civilization and derived from the Bible. They are not some universal truths; they can exist and develop only within Christian soil and are completely unsuited for other societies. Islamic society has its own destination; they believe in everything in the Quran, and their social organization might be a monarchy, a chieftaincy, or Iran's system of Islamic legal experts—this is something Christian society should not interfere with. Wherever they came from, let them return to wherever they came from to build their own society. Hoping for a so-called harmonious coexistence, a society where Islamic and Christian coexist, hoping that a Christian society that values eugenics—or at least does not blindly reproduce—and an Islamic society that does not pursue quality but only quantity and blindly multiplies can determine social development through the majority principle will only lead to the death of true human civilization, Christian civilization, which will be the greatest sorrow of human society. Any attempt to blindly abolish God and establish a so-called universal civilization and universal values in a world without the Bible is absolute wishful thinking and will inevitably incur its backlash. This is also why, whenever I see such news, I feel incomparably depressed, sorrowful, and heartbroken, wanting to escape reality and retreat into the mountains, yet I am often jolted awake from nightmares in the middle of the night, having to frequently raise my arms and shout, publishing writings to awaken the world.

There is no democracy and freedom in the world today. Democracy and freedom were only briefly present during the period of pure Protestant faith and the founding of the United States. Once the Protestant faith decayed, democracy and freedom were lost as well. Now, "democracy" and "freedom" are merely tools for politicians to rule with—just like in American society today.

The Real Reason Behind Musk’s Falling Out with President Trump and His Quest to Build a New Party Looking at the United States today, the electoral system once heralded as the pinnacle of human institutional design has reached a point that fills one with profound melancholy and sorrow. In a video dialogue between Elon Musk and heavyweight senator and veteran politician Ted Cruz, Musk delivered a furious yet helpless indictment: "One of the biggest scam portholes we've uncovered, which is really crazy, is that the government can give money to a so-called non-profit with very few controls, and there's no auditing subsequently of that non-profit... They then give themselves extremely lavish, like insane salaries, expense everything to the nonprofit, buy jets and homes and all sorts of things... all on the taxpayer dime." Hard-earned taxpayer money, wrapped in the legal cloak of "non-profit organizations," is being transformed into a lavish private vault for politicians and interest groups. Astronomical tax dollars that should have flowed into public utilities and social welfare instead fuel the jet fuel of the elite's private planes, the bricks of luxury manors, and insatiable high-salary pockets. This legalized, daylight robbery occurs with breathtaking scale and utter shamelessness in broad daylight. Yet, even more suffocating than this blatant greed is the reaction—or rather, the lack thereof—from Ted Cruz, sitting at the epicenter of power. As a heavyweight figure in politics, he could only listen in silence, without a shred of righteous indignation or sudden outrage, leaving only a chilling, dead silence. He knows better than anyone that trying to plug this loophole in the swamp of Washington is like Don Quixote tilting at windmills. This is not just a patent of the Democratic Party; many of his own Republican colleagues, and perhaps even he himself, might be partaking in this gluttonous feast. Who would willingly smash the rice bowls of themselves and their allies? In the face of human greed and an interwoven web of interests, the so-called powerful self-correction mechanism of this "perfect system" has long since become utterly paralyzed. This creates the most ironic and heartbreaking picture: Here is a top-tier taxpayer, wealthy beyond measure, who pours billions of dollars of genuine wealth every year to keep the massive state machinery running, only to watch in horror as his massive tax contributions are carved up like some mythical delicacy and his hard work is squandered by parasites whose living standards far surpass his own. Meanwhile, the lawmakers sitting across from him remain indifferent and helpless due to entrenched interests. This absurd sensation of the "ultimate taxpayer being systematically treated like a cash cow and a fool" is precisely what makes this video so profoundly despairing. On the screen, Musk appears utterly frustrated. He pours in his money, his effort, and stakes everything he has, only to discover that the machinery he is trying to push has rotted to its core. Perhaps this is the true reason behind his initial falling out with Trump and his vow to build a new party to rebuild the American political system. As a distant observer—yet one who still retains a shred of conscience and morality—I cannot help but feel a deep sense of sorrow and despair over the moral degradation of society and the corruption of human nature. The systematic corruption bred by humanity's so-called "best system" fills me with immense frustration, and the resulting disillusionment with a bright future leaves me profoundly pessimistic, plunging my mood into the darkest depths. Seeing such news makes me truly reluctant to write any commentary. Yet, when my eyes catch the cross hanging on the wall, when I ponder the meaning of life, the value of existence, and savor the beauty of being filled with the Holy Spirit, I realize I have no choice. Once again, I pick up my pen to speak out for human civilization and fulfill my due responsibility. The American system could reach its peak only within a Christian environment—only when the majority held a firm Christian faith and human nature was universally molded by that faith to be good and kind. When an entire society loses its Christian faith and human nature universally degenerates, it can only produce scenes of disillusionment and despair. America’s greatness was never forged by any political system; rather, it was the result of roughly 200 million Protestant-like individuals—or those who, even if not formal churchgoers, devoutly believed in traditional American values, labored diligently, and used their own hands to carve out a better life. They were the ones who held up the spine of this nation. American society was never built by politicians or so-called electoral systems. Especially now, having lost its Christian faith, the system has devolved into nothing more than a gravedigger of American society, and politicians into mere thieves, becoming the heaviest shackles holding back the progress of our nation and civilization.

The quality of the voters is critical to a democratic electoral system. If a society is such that everyone is lazy and doesn't want to work, all hoping for a free lunch to drop from the sky or money to grow on trees, then the leader elected will surely be the most evil one — the one who indulges in moral decay the most. That society will inevitably collapse. This was the reason for the demise of ancient Greece.

Disgusted by this news once again. It is rotten to the core, absolutely rotten! Once again, I am revolted by such news: California Governor Newsom has signed a bill making it illegal to check voters' IDs during elections. The introduction of such a policy lays bare the naked true faces of California Democrats. To maintain power and interest distribution, they have abandoned even the slightest shred of shame, conscience, and morality; their sole aim is electoral fraud, pure and simple. Behind this phenomenon lies the profound social structural shift and demographic transition in California. With the decline of traditional Christian faith and the sliding of social morality, the overall quality of California’s population has undergone a qualitative change—it has completely degenerated, reducing the populace into a degraded demographic. They are obsessed with "free lunches" and "pies falling from the sky," accustomed to ruthlessly plundering federal finances, dividing up the blood, sweat, and tears of the middle class through their ballots. They now view the theft of others' property as a matter of course. Therefore, California is fundamentally unsuited for the American electoral system—meaning it is unsuited for democracy. California’s elections are identical to the examples I often use to illustrate the flaws of democracy: elections inside a prison or within a mafia. What they elect will inevitably be the most evil, the most cunning, and the most adept leaders at helping Californians steal federal tax dollars or plunder the wealth of the middle class. From the passage of California's previous laws to the signing of today's bill, all of this entirely proves the correctness of my aforementioned views. It also proves once again that the American electoral system can only be effective and play a constructive role when it is built on the foundation that the majority of voters are pious Christians, kind, honest, and hardworking. Otherwise, it will only produce a counter-reaction in society—a massive, corrosive, eroding effect. For instance, as citizen journalist Shirley exposed, annual fraud in California’s Medi-Cal and healthcare programs has already reached hundreds of billions of dollars, and this is merely the tip of the iceberg; the actual amount must be astronomical. Just think about how much social wealth they have stolen and eroded. If this wealth were used for genuinely needed welfare and people's livelihoods, how much greater an impetus it would give to social development? I should note here: many internet users believe that if California’s elections were fair, it would naturally be a "red state." However, given that the Republican Party has not won a Senate or gubernatorial election in decades, the baseline ratio of Republicans to Democrats in California is likely 50-50, higher than the national average of 60-40. Factoring in the bonus points from Democratic fraud, the assessment that the majority of California's population has turned bad and degraded into a low-quality demographic is a completely fair and accurate statement. Even more despairing is that the U.S. Supreme Court previously ruled—on the grounds that "the federal government cannot excessively interfere with states' self-formulated election rules"—to reject the federal government's mail-in ballot management guidelines and executive orders stipulating that vote-counting time must not be dragged out past Election Day. In the hands of these faithless leftist judges, such legal provisions emphasizing local autonomy objectively became a breeding ground for conniving local maneuvers and fueling electoral loopholes. As I have repeatedly emphasized, these Supreme Court justices, these leftist judges, and these judges who have lost their Christian faith are the grave-diggers of the American system; they are the hitmen and executioners destroying the American institution. Their foolish minds will never understand that when a state's voter base deteriorates and turns into a degraded population, their so-called democratic decisions and democratic procedures can easily breed the evil fruit of murdering justice. They are entirely capable of acting like the tyranny of the majority in ancient Greece, making the decision to execute Socrates. Indeed, the reality of the "Shirley Bill" serves as a prime example of this: using a legislative bill to destroy the honest, kind citizen journalist Shirley who was investigating their corruption. Ultimately, as history has repeatedly proven, the American electoral system is never a magical machine capable of self-repair and perfect perpetual motion. It is extremely fragile, and its maximum efficacy can only be established on the foundation that the majority of voters possess a firm faith, innate kindness, and honesty and trustworthiness. Once this foundation collapses, the system itself rapidly transforms from a societal umbrella into an iron shovel digging its own grave. Faced with this relentless wave eroding the roots of civilization, America faces nothing less than a prolonged period of agony, deep-seated division, and even political territorial fragmentation, with virtually no easy shortcuts in sight to turn the tide—unless there is a miraculous revival of faith, but how likely is that?

Religion determines human history; Christianity has defined Western history, Islam has shaped Arab history, and Buddhism has established the history of Southeast Asia. Secular ideologies—atheistic concepts like liberal democracy, "XXX-ism," and progressivism only mislead humanity, rob it of morality, and ultimately lead to destruction.

The Real Reason Behind Musk’s Falling Out with President Trump and His Quest to Build a New Party Looking at the United States today, the electoral system once heralded as the pinnacle of human institutional design has reached a point that fills one with profound melancholy and sorrow. In a video dialogue between Elon Musk and heavyweight senator and veteran politician Ted Cruz, Musk delivered a furious yet helpless indictment: "One of the biggest scam portholes we've uncovered, which is really crazy, is that the government can give money to a so-called non-profit with very few controls, and there's no auditing subsequently of that non-profit... They then give themselves extremely lavish, like insane salaries, expense everything to the nonprofit, buy jets and homes and all sorts of things... all on the taxpayer dime." Hard-earned taxpayer money, wrapped in the legal cloak of "non-profit organizations," is being transformed into a lavish private vault for politicians and interest groups. Astronomical tax dollars that should have flowed into public utilities and social welfare instead fuel the jet fuel of the elite's private planes, the bricks of luxury manors, and insatiable high-salary pockets. This legalized, daylight robbery occurs with breathtaking scale and utter shamelessness in broad daylight. Yet, even more suffocating than this blatant greed is the reaction—or rather, the lack thereof—from Ted Cruz, sitting at the epicenter of power. As a heavyweight figure in politics, he could only listen in silence, without a shred of righteous indignation or sudden outrage, leaving only a chilling, dead silence. He knows better than anyone that trying to plug this loophole in the swamp of Washington is like Don Quixote tilting at windmills. This is not just a patent of the Democratic Party; many of his own Republican colleagues, and perhaps even he himself, might be partaking in this gluttonous feast. Who would willingly smash the rice bowls of themselves and their allies? In the face of human greed and an interwoven web of interests, the so-called powerful self-correction mechanism of this "perfect system" has long since become utterly paralyzed. This creates the most ironic and heartbreaking picture: Here is a top-tier taxpayer, wealthy beyond measure, who pours billions of dollars of genuine wealth every year to keep the massive state machinery running, only to watch in horror as his massive tax contributions are carved up like some mythical delicacy and his hard work is squandered by parasites whose living standards far surpass his own. Meanwhile, the lawmakers sitting across from him remain indifferent and helpless due to entrenched interests. This absurd sensation of the "ultimate taxpayer being systematically treated like a cash cow and a fool" is precisely what makes this video so profoundly despairing. On the screen, Musk appears utterly frustrated. He pours in his money, his effort, and stakes everything he has, only to discover that the machinery he is trying to push has rotted to its core. Perhaps this is the true reason behind his initial falling out with Trump and his vow to build a new party to rebuild the American political system. As a distant observer—yet one who still retains a shred of conscience and morality—I cannot help but feel a deep sense of sorrow and despair over the moral degradation of society and the corruption of human nature. The systematic corruption bred by humanity's so-called "best system" fills me with immense frustration, and the resulting disillusionment with a bright future leaves me profoundly pessimistic, plunging my mood into the darkest depths. Seeing such news makes me truly reluctant to write any commentary. Yet, when my eyes catch the cross hanging on the wall, when I ponder the meaning of life, the value of existence, and savor the beauty of being filled with the Holy Spirit, I realize I have no choice. Once again, I pick up my pen to speak out for human civilization and fulfill my due responsibility. The American system could reach its peak only within a Christian environment—only when the majority held a firm Christian faith and human nature was universally molded by that faith to be good and kind. When an entire society loses its Christian faith and human nature universally degenerates, it can only produce scenes of disillusionment and despair. America’s greatness was never forged by any political system; rather, it was the result of roughly 200 million Protestant-like individuals—or those who, even if not formal churchgoers, devoutly believed in traditional American values, labored diligently, and used their own hands to carve out a better life. They were the ones who held up the spine of this nation. American society was never built by politicians or so-called electoral systems. Especially now, having lost its Christian faith, the system has devolved into nothing more than a gravedigger of American society, and politicians into mere thieves, becoming the heaviest shackles holding back the progress of our nation and civilization.

Religion determines human history; Christianity shapes Western society, and Islam builds Arab society. Humanity is driven by religion, not by liberal democracy, "XXX-ism," or progressivism and other such ideologies.

Angela Merkel: A Person Who Destroyed Human Civilization! Having seen this video before, rewatching it today—combined with the research I have been conducting over the past few days—fills me with profound emotion. The presence of Muslims across Western society was introduced by foolish politicians like Angela Merkel, and Western civilization itself has been dismantled with their own hands. Their folly, ignorance, and conceit could be said to have devastated human civilization as a whole. Surveying modern global history, the development and prosperity of contemporary American society have never been the mere rational byproducts of leftist politicians and scholars; rather, its spiritual lifeblood has always been deeply rooted in the fertile soil of Christian civilization. Only when steadfast Christians constitute the majority of society can a nation operate at its highest efficacy. As Alexis de Tocqueville keenly observed two centuries ago, liberty cannot survive apart from faith. When the Puritans aboard the Mayflower braved the waves, anchoring their otherworldly ideals to a terrestrial "City upon a Hill," it was precisely their absolute reverence for God and conscious adherence to divine commandments that birthed an entirely new civilization grounded in rigorous self-discipline and moral self-governance in a wilderness. History proves that for modern Western electoral institutions to operate at peak efficiency and resist the tyranny of the majority, their cornerstone must be a transcendent awe and a shared moral baseline embraced by the vast majority. A ballot stripped of the restraint of faith becomes nothing more than an instrument for indulgence and self-interest; only an electorate anchored in faith and the spirit of covenant can uphold a free society capable of weathering the storm. Yet lamentably, a cohort of European leftist politicians and postmodern intellectuals, epitomized by Merkel, lost their bearings in the fatal conceit of human reason. Under the banners of "progress," "inclusivity," and "multiculturalism," they resolutely relegated traditional Christian faith to the dustbin of history, hubristically presuming that their limited human intellect alone could contrive an earthly paradise where religious boundaries vanish and civilizational differences dissolve. However, against the unyielding iron laws of history and the darker aspects of human nature, this secular cosmopolitan dream of "absolute universal equality" is nothing more than an arrogant castle in the air. Throughout the millennia of human civilization, no mature order has ever endured divorced from religious faith; on the contrary, every societal experiment that sought to banish God and engineer a purely rational utopia from a blank slate has culminated in civilizational catastrophe. From the blood-drenched guillotines erected under the guise of the "Goddess of Reason" by the French Jacobins to the twentieth-century social experiments that swept half the globe, history has long rendered its grim verdict: human nature inherently harbors the original sins of selfishness, greed, vanity, and corruption. Once faith and transcendent awe are discarded, completely unleashed self-interest swiftly corrodes everything. Paths promised to lead to "paradise on earth" inevitably pave the road to hell. What is most perplexing, even ironic, is that these powerful politicians remain utterly oblivious to this bloodstained human history. Merkel, who stood at the helm of Europe for well over a decade, grew up in the shadow of the Berlin Wall during the Cold War. Having personally experienced the pervasive surveillance apparatus of the secret police, and having witnessed strict privilege hierarchies and suffocating repression, she should have been the most vigilant, the most cognizant of the absurdity of earthly utopias. Tragically, she was entirely captivated by the glittering post-Cold War illusion of "universal democratic values." Imagining she wielded an invincible panacea, she was driven by self-righteous moral messianism to abandon Christianity, believing that democracy based on "universal values" would guarantee success. Yet once Christian restraint is cast aside, regardless of how it is packaged, human greed is exposed in full, and societal collapse becomes inevitable. The most catastrophic blind spot of her policies was a total ignorance of the dynamics of civilizational clash. Samuel Huntington sounded the alarm decades ago: the essence of post-Cold War conflict lies in the clash of civilizations. Christian and Islamic civilizations have harbored profound, irreconcilable conflicts regarding core doctrines, church-state relations, legal traditions, and societal structures since antiquity. Islam has historically possessed aggressive and exclusive tendencies, and Christianity and Islam endured centuries of bloody conflict. To counterbalance or even erode Christian influence by bringing in Muslim populations was a fatal, colossal misjudgment. The bitter fruits of this blind influx are now plain to see: from rows of torched cars engulfing the northern suburbs of Paris, to recurring gang shootings and bombings across Swedish cities; from fire trucks and ambulances ambushed by fireworks in Berlin on New Year's Eve, to widespread protests across British towns where religious slogans are openly chanted in standoffs with local police. European streets that were once peaceful and orderly are visibly degenerating into battlegrounds marked by unrest, vandalism, and flames. Even more critically, while Western societies plunge into a moral vacuum, cultural self-abnegation, and plummeting birth rates amid extreme secularization, the immigrant populations maintain robust demographic vitality and unyielding religious identity. Without resorting to force, through compounding birth rates, tight-knit enclaves, and electoral advantages in modern democracies, they can steadily bend moral and legal standards, reshape parliamentary landscapes, and ultimately displace native institutions, precipitating a systemic adverse selection of society.

Real democracy is only possible in a purely Protestant world because Protestantism holds that all people are equal under God—and this is not just spoken words but a sincerely held faith put into practice. In early Protestant society, a respected pastor or venerable elder would often say, "All glory be to God," in response to any praise. This showed a rejection of the greatest vanity in human society—the vanity of being above others—and thus a renunciation of the power that the people tried to hand to them. Only on the basis of true equality can democracy exist, where one trusts the majority to decide important matters. In a secular society that has lost faith, inequality between people is an undeniable reality; the notion of equality of persons is a phantasmal concept that brings you no material benefit and cannot compare to the promise of heaven. In a secular society without Christian faith, everyone uses whatever means they can to grab power: the strong through violence, the clever through fraud. This is inevitable, and it is exactly the situation in America today. Therefore, today's America, having lost its Protestant faith, is not truly a democratic country at all—it's democracy in name only, a façade to deceive the public when, in reality, it is a tyranny of the Democratic Party, an Obama dictatorship.

The Deeper Political Crisis in America Reflected by California’s "Shelley Bill" This article serves as an extension and deeper exploration of yesterday's discussion on the California State Legislature passing the so-called "Shelley Bill." In my book The Course of Western Civilization and numerous essays, I have repeatedly argued a core thesis: the American electoral system is not a rootless tree. It is deeply rooted in the fertile soil of Christianity, and it has existed, endured, and functioned soundly only because its electorate was grounded in devout, morally upright Christians. Once severed from this soil—as the electorate undergoes widespread de-Christianization and moral disintegration—America's democratic system inevitably loses its foundation, collapsing into an inefficient, corrupt, and even farcical political theater. In other words, detached from Christian civilization, American society loses all its virtue; only a revival of faith can rebuild America’s spiritual backbone and make America great again. The fundamental reason the American electoral system has operated smoothly over the past two centuries lies in the intrinsic alignment between its core tenets and Christian doctrines: Universal Equality: Rooted not in secular egalitarianism, but in the transcendental biblical truth that all human beings are created by God and stand equal before Him. Procedural Integrity and Non-Fraudulence: The demand for credible, honest elections directly mirrors the commandment in the Decalogue: "Thou shalt not bear false witness." The Inviolability of Private Property: Aligned with the biblical commandments "Thou shalt not steal" and "Thou shalt not covet," instilling reverence for individual fruits of labor and the sanctity of contracts. Diligence and Self-Reliance: Deeply anchored in the biblical principle that "if anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat"—an ethic that condemns indolence and promotes honest labor. Only when the majority of voters in a society, constrained by faith, cultivate universal civic virtues of self-discipline, integrity, and reverence can the American electoral system operate with genuine reliability and efficacy, yield benign outcomes, and advance societal flourishing. Furthermore, Christianity offers a clear-eyed and profound diagnosis of human nature: total depravity and original sin. Severed from the constraints of faith, secular human nature—devoid of fear and trembling—is inherently selfish, greedy, decadent, opportunistic, and slothful. Because traditional American moral order was forged through Christianity, abandoning faith causes the virtues once sustained by it to be rapidly superseded by the indulgence of human weakness: When the moral maxim of honoring labor—"he who does not work shall not eat"—is discarded, welfare-dependent underclass populism and a public-coffers-draining parasitic elite surge to dominance. When the sacred commandment "thou shalt not bear false witness" is deconstructed, electoral fraud and the weaponization of justice are embraced as legitimate political maneuvers. When the electorate regresses from "self-reliant, God-fearing guardians of the social contract" into an "indolent, rent-seeking collective dependent on fiscal transfers," this collapse leaves the voting base composed of a morally unmoored, corrupted populace. Consequently, the American electoral system inevitably veers toward its opposite—becoming an instrument that legally disenfranchises the lawful and shields the lawless. If this occurs, does such a system even have a reason to exist? Countless real-world political crises corroborate this civilizational trajectory, and California's aggressive push for the "Shelley Bill" offers a vivid footnote to my argument. When a massive coalition of rent-seeking classes and parasitic institutions secures absolute political hegemony, it does not merely mobilize ballots to install agents tailored to serve this corrupt nexus of interests. It goes further, abusing legislative power to silence whistleblowers, conceal corruption, and evict oversight. Consumed by a collective frenzy devoid of spiritual restraint, they conspire to purge any remaining "watchmen" who adhere to honest rules. This reality once again eloquently demonstrates: institutions are merely instruments; faith is the soul. Stripped of its Christian foundation, the American system cannot secure liberty or safeguard justice. Instead, amid the bottomless descent of unchecked human nature, it will inevitably march toward self-dissolution and moral ruin.

The Absurdity of America as Seen Through California's Anti-Shirley Bill！！！！I have argued in my book The Course of Western Civilization and in numerous articles that the greatest flaw of the American electoral system is this: if the voter base becomes corrupt, degenerate, and inclined toward evil, the electoral outcome is bound to be disastrous. I previously offered two illustrations. The first is an election within an organized crime syndicate: because the voter base consists of vicious, malevolent individuals, the leader they elect will inevitably be the most evil and ruthless among them, as only such a figure can protect them and maximize their illicit gains. The second is a logical deduction: if an election were held inside a prison, the single inevitable outcome would be killing the guards and breaking out, because the guards will always be a minority and regaining freedom is the deepest craving of any inmate. While this was a logical thought experiment meant to be impossible in reality, current developments in California politics are playing out this very scenario, proving my logic entirely correct. Consider this recent news: In the Democrat-controlled California State Legislature, Assemblymember Mia Bonta—the wife of California Attorney General Rob Bonta—introduced a controversial measure dubbed the "Stop Shirley Bill." It aims to curb independent investigations and public exposure of nonprofit operations. The bill directly targets conservative citizen journalist Nick Shirley. Shirley independently visited various nonprofit facilities across California and elsewhere—including alleged hospice centers—exposing widespread instances of shell addresses and fraudulent exploitation of taxpayer subsidies. Facing exposure, lawmakers advanced this protective legislation under the pretext of "shielding nonprofit staff from death threats." In reality, the person facing actual mortal danger was the lone investigator venturing into what amounted to a den of wolves. By placing publicly funded institutions behind a legal shield to evade scrutiny, this legislation represents a blatant contempt for First Amendment oversight. The passage of this bill demonstrates that shifting voter demographics, compounded by Democratic fraud, have warped California's elections beyond recognition. I have repeatedly argued that across the United States, the ratio of conservative Republicans to radical Democrats sits at roughly 60% to 40%. Because Democratic policies are so extreme, distorted, and out of touch, normal people find them hard to swallow. The 40% backing them are largely long-term beneficiaries of welfare programs. Chief among them are low-income welfare recipients relying on food stamps—numbering as high as 42 million nationwide according to credible reports—most of whom predictably vote Democrat. Another major bloc consists of government bureaucrats and nonprofit staff, likely totaling 10 to 20 million. Because Democrats advocate for big government and state control, bureaucrats benefit directly, and records show they predominantly lean Democrat. Meanwhile, nonprofits receive billions in public funds annually; their workers collect handsome salaries essentially out of thin air without having to deliver real value, making them hardcore Democratic loyalists. California is a deep-blue stronghold. Republicans have not won a gubernatorial race or U.S. Senate seat in decades, and their presence in the state legislature is minimal. While some argue California could turn red if election fraud were strictly curbed, current political realities suggest that welfare recipients and nonprofit employees already constitute a majority of the electorate, inverting the ratio to 60% Democrat versus 40% Republican. Factor in an estimated 20% margin from electoral fraud, and Democrats effectively dominate by an 80-to-20 margin. At this stage, the nature of the electorate has fundamentally changed into a majority that shuns hard work, expects handouts, and demands generous compensation without labor. When the primary motivation of most voters shifts to preserving an unearned redistributive system, an election becomes identical to voting in a prison. The system descends into negative selection: victorious politicians are those who cater to this base by recklessly overdrawing public credit and concealing corrupt payouts—exemplified by figures like Governor Gavin Newsom. Meanwhile, citizen journalists like Nick Shirley, who fulfill their civic duty by auditing public spending and exposing nonprofit graft, naturally assume the role of the "prison guards." The inevitable outcome of such an election is to silence, legally strangle, or even eliminate these watchdogs—just as Charlie Kirk has faced targeted attacks. This is the grim reality unfolding today, rendering the American electoral system a complete farce.

California's election Has been seen such rampant fraud? Does the United States still have the nerve to criticize others? The second event worth reporting that occurred within this month is that very obvious and serious fraud appeared in the elections for California's governor and the mayor of Los Angeles. This is how the so-called most beautiful American democratic electoral system in the world has evolved to this day, culminating in such ludicrous and absurd monstrosities, which also reflects the various ugly facets of human nature after losing faith. In my book The Course of Western Civilization, I have listed and analyzed the origin of the entire American system in detail from top to bottom, from beginning to end—that is, it was built upon noble morality, built upon Christian civilization, and built upon the entire community being clean, tidy, and orderly, whether in public environments or private residences, as well as on everyone's civilized and polite behavior. More importantly, people at that time were beautiful not only on the outside but also on the inside; everyone abided by the law, strictly observed the commandments, and was honest and kind. It was simply impossible for election fraud to happen. Therefore, early American society maximized the advantages of the democratic system to the extreme, electing people who truly cared for the public, were completely selfless, and served society. In contrast, contemporary American society, along with the loss of Christian faith, has brought about a severe slide in the morality of the entire society, thereby exposing the serious flaws of this American electoral system, making it easily susceptible to fraud. The fraud in this California election was glaringly obvious; even the Democrats themselves knew they were cheating. This is because the Democrat who ranked third in the Los Angeles mayoral election publicly announced their withdrawal on election day due to poor performance. Yet, after that, their vote count continued to increase, exceeding the growth rate of the top two candidates. After half a month of counting votes and half a month of manufacturing mail-in ballots, they finally squeezed out the Republican candidate in second place (California elections allow the top two finishers to enter the final runoff). One can only say this is far too shameless, treating the Republicans and viewers worldwide like fools. The U.S. President severely condemned the Democratic Party's flagrant fraud, and anyone in American society with a shred of reason, conscience, or morality also deemed it obvious fraud and took to Twitter to fiercely condemn it. However, 40% of Democrats, even while believing the election was clearly fraudulent, cheerfully claimed that such fraud was reasonable, serving to defend democracy and protect justice. In reality, behind this lofty and great rhetoric is merely their pursuit of the massive, free material benefits brought to them by the Democratic Party. As American society has developed to this day, along with moral decay and degradation, the electoral system has displayed phenomena that cannot be seen in textbooks. This is also an absurd phenomenon that our generation is fortunate enough to witness. The American electoral system has divided society into two groups of people: one that still has faith, still believes in the contents of the scriptures, and believes in honesty, kindness, and achieving wealth through hard work; the other consists of those with absolutely no faith and no morality, who shamelessly chase interests and look for free handouts from the sky. Furthermore, we can personally witness the stomach-turning, disgusting behavior of this 40% of Americans. They expose their sexual organs during street parades, consume free food long-term, enjoy free welfare, refuse to labor or work, do no exercise, and end up bloated, obese, and utterly grotesque. There are also the Democratic politicians who represent them, who display their utter impudence in public with skin thicker than a city wall. Beneath their high-sounding catchwords lie nothing but ugly schemes. They play the roles of justice and fairness in broad daylight, making fools of the American people as well as global audiences, treating everyone else as idiots. The founding fathers of America could absolutely never have anticipated that American society would develop into this state. Of course, this extreme moral decline and overt election fraud are currently occurring only in California and certain other Democratic blue states. It should be said that 60% of the American people, the ordinary citizens, still possess a sense of morality and believe in common sense, honesty, kindness, and achieving wealth through hard work. It is precisely they who hold up the American sky, making America remain the most powerful and prosperous country in the world to this day. Judging from the current trend, Trump, a historical figure who might turn the tide, is attempting to reverse this process of degradation, though the subsequent outcome remains unknown. Because the revival of America is closely tied to the revival of Christianity, and the revival of Christianity is immensely difficult, it remains to be seen whether America can get back on the right track. Human social systems of any kind actually have no inherent superiority or inferiority; all have their strengths and weaknesses. Granted, under the unique pious faith and high moral environment of America's early days, the American system unleashed its greatest power, with very prominent advantages, fully realizing the potential of every town and sparking infinite creativity in everyone, which made the society full of vitality and the economy explode like a geyser. It would be stranger if such a society did not develop rapidly. However, the monarchy was also implemented in Britain for hundreds or even thousands of years, and it likewise displayed admirable advantages—people were civilized and polite, behaved elegantly, and aristocrats were passionate about literary creation, scientific exploration, and inventions, filling the entire society with vitality and prosperity as well. The aristocratic system goes without saying; it was the system most endorsed by Locke, who believed it could make society full of vitality while retaining the order, cohesion, and execution power of a monarchy, making it the best system for humankind. This system should have manifested very clearly in royal colonies like Virginia during the American colonial period. Systems themselves may not be superior or inferior, but human morality has higher and lower levels. Any system that loses morality will inevitably turn into its opposite. This is also what Aquinas argued: without Christian faith, any system will inevitably move toward its opposite—democracy leads to the tyranny of the majority, aristocracy leads to oligarchy, and monarchy leads to dictatorship. As a Christian thinker, Aquinas might be a bit extreme, but the phenomenon of 40% of American voters losing their faith, sliding in morality, self-degrading, and engaging in election fraud is sufficient to prove the absolute correctness of this view. It also proves how ridiculous and laughable those political theories are that claim the American system is the end of human systems or the finest system of mankind. In truth, there is no such thing as an absolutely correct system; only absolute faith, morality, and high-quality voters constitute the true foundation of the entire society.

History, Immigration, and the Risk of Civil War in the UK. From a historical perspective and various angles, it is entirely possible that the United Kingdom could enter a civil war. Due to family matters, I haven't updated my content for nearly a month, but I hope to return to normal soon. During this month, the most significant event was the outbreak of massive anti-immigration and anti-muslim protests across England. Just today, another vicious incident occurred where a British citizen stabbed six Muslims, claiming it was to protect England's women and children. This is a very rare instance of violence committed by a native Briton, indicating that British people are starting to use violence to defend their rights. It is a terrifying beginning, one could even say the start of a civil war. I remember ten years ago, a follower asked me whether their daughter, who was about to graduate from a university in London, should stay there or return to China. Having studied human history for several years at that point, I already foresaw today's reality. With the Muslim population in the UK continuously growing, conflicts between Christians and Muslims would inevitably erupt, potentially leading to a civil war. Therefore, I advised them, you only have one precious daughter, it is better to have her return home. The UK is bound to become increasingly chaotic. I haven't been in touch with that follower since and don't know whether the daughter returned or stayed. I only mention this to show that my clear understanding of the ruthless nature of Islam came from my studies of human history. Historical Overview of Islam and Western Civilization. In a sense, Islam is a very terrifying religion. From the very first day of its birth, it has been seizing territory and conquering. Advancing with the Quran in one hand and a sword in the other, they killed those who refused to convert. Through this simple yet brutal and crude method, every territory they seized was transformed into an Islamic society, forming a cohesive territory. Unlike other human societies, which often faced rebellions after conquering new lands, Islam did not. This is actually the most direct and powerful evidence for what I often say, religion determines human history. Muslims rapidly conquered the Middle East and North Africa, which were originally Christian territories, and then seized Spain, preparing to enter France. It was only when the Frankish King Charles Martel led his army to defeat the Muslim forces near Tours that the Islamic advance into Europe was halted, altering the course of human civilization. Under the subsequent dominance of Christianity in Europe, Christian civilization emerged, bringing forth a magnificent and splendid human civilization. If Europe had been occupied by Islam and Christian civilization had failed to emerge, humanity might still be stuck in a primitive, barbaric state, filled with veiled women, loveless marriages of polygamy, harmful child marriages, and ignorant cousin marriages. This proves that human religions cannot be entirely equal, there must be a distinction in hierarchy and quality. Human civilization can only advance under the guidance of a religion that can continuously reform itself and truly represent universal values. Not just any religion can lead humanity forward, some can even cause humanity to regress back into a state of barbarism. Islam is inherently aggressive due to its doctrines. The Quran commands its followers to conquer the entire world and make everyone believe in Islam. After failing to invade France from the west, it long eroded Christian territories from the Byzantine Empire in the east, hoping to open a gap and swallow the Christian world. Over several centuries, several tragic naval battles broke out. While Constantinople survived multiple crises, it ultimately could not escape the fate of being conquered by the Islamic world. When Constantinople fell in 1453, bloodthirsty and cruel slaughters were everywhere. The remaining residents in the city had only two choices, convert or be killed. Later, the two sides engaged in multiple fierce battles around Poland and Hungary. At this time, it was the Catholic world rather than the Orthodox Byzantine Empire directly facing the Muslims. Due to institutional advantages, the technology and cultural level of the entire Catholic world were continuously developing and improving, and its strength surpassed that of the Islamic world. Consequently, they held the Catholic borders and kept the Islamic forces out of Hungary and Poland. However, the region of modern day Turkey still became the largest Islamic territory in Europe. The Shift from Cold Weapons to the Technological Age. In the era of cold weapons, the fanatical religious faith of Islam, combined with the characteristics of ancient warfare, allowed Muslim armies to conquer territories irresistibly, and victories came easily. The main feature of warfare in the cold weapon era was fighting through formations, such as the snake formation or eight trigrams formation we often hear about in ancient China. However, ancient Chinese formations were very loose and easily broken, so formations were never the decisive factor in ancient Chinese warfare, strategy and deception mattered more. In the Islamic world, however, it was entirely different. The formation of Islamic armies was very simple, the square formation. It was a strict, simple square driven by a religious determination to die without variations. Sometimes it wasn't even a formation, but simply a boundless sea of people surging toward you. Like thousands of ants, they pressed forward wave after wave, stepping over the corpses of those in front of them to launch attacks. Soldiers from most countries had rarely seen such massive armies or such brutality of stepping over corpses, they would be terrified, their willpower completely shattered, and many were routed in a single blow. This brutal tactic gave Muslims a massive advantage over ordinary countries like India, Indonesia, and Eastern Orthodox Christian nations like the Byzantine Empire. It was only when facing Catholicism and Protestantism, which possessed superior systems, that they were rendered powerless. Protestantism enabled Britain to birth epoch making giants of science and thought like Newton, Locke, and Mill. It invented the steam engine, sparked the Industrial Revolution, generated the parliamentary system, and manufactured high power weapons like warships, cannons, and machine guns. The brutal Islamic offensive method of marching in square formations over corpses finally ground to a halt before this wave of technological advancement. However, due to internal conflicts among major Christian powers like Britain, France, Germany, and Russia, and more importantly, because the Bible is filled with teachings of benevolence and brotherly love, Christians could not be as brutal as Muslims, slaughtering those who refused to believe. Ultimately, the Christian world did not continue to conquer the Muslims, they merely conducted economic colonization of Islamic countries like Egypt and Algeria, alongside traditional missionary work through church charities. But the effect was limited. When the wave of anti colonialism surged in the 1960s, these countries were immediately reclaimed by Islam, and Muslims restored all their territories. This aligns with what Samuel Huntington discussed, during the anti colonial wave, 90 Islamic societies returned to Islamic systems. I use this as ironclad evidence to argue that religion determines history in my book, The Course of Western Civilization. The Failure of Multiculturalism and the Reality of Human Existence. In reality, the current distribution of the world's various religions is the most rational, everyone lives in communities, respects borders, minds their own business, and coexists peacefully. There had been no major wars for decades. However, naive leftist politicians like Angela Merkel shattered this balance. They foolishly introduced Muslims into Europe and into the internal Christian world. This act, which violates the laws of human operation and forces one's own will upon the world, was bound to muddy clear waters and plunge the entire world into chaos. From human and Islamic history, and according to the text of the Quran, these Islamic intruders are bound to continue occupying the territories of Christian France, Britain, and England, because nothing can stop them from executing the mandates of their scriptures. What is even more terrifying is that these Muslims are now simultaneously French and British citizens, they are a group within the state. They can equally obtain the most advanced weapons. Combined with the cruelty of their doctrines, the brutality of a future British civil war may far exceed what people can imagine. I was very curious about why Merkel would introduce Muslims. After looking into some materials, the reason can basically be attributed to two things. First, secularization. Germany is moving further away from the Christian faith and becoming increasingly secular. People only want to enjoy life and are unwilling to have children, causing the birth rate to plummet, leaving the country without enough population to sustain social development. This is indeed God's design, if you do not follow the biblical command to multiply and fill the earth with Christians, you have no choice but to accept the rule of Muslims who are extremely willing to reproduce. Second, her upbringing. Her father was a Christian pastor, so she inherited the idea of universal love, believing that Muslims could also show brotherly love to others. If her pseudo benevolent ideas came from her father, one can only say her father was a fake, leftist pastor. Any true Christian knows that one of the core principles of the Bible is that one must worship God as the only true God, otherwise, they will be condemned by God. Is introducing these people who are condemned by God true benevolence, true Christianity, or the proper mindset of a Christian pastor? You shall have no other gods before me is the First Commandment in the Decalogue and the bedrock of entire Christianity. If the bedrock is abandoned, Christianity ceases to exist. Of course, this is also a commandment that many people misunderstand. This commandment, along with the Second Commandment that condemns non believers, is condemned by many as hate speech that threatens pagans. Yet, compared to the slaughter practiced by pagan religions, a threat is the most civilized method. Threatening to condemn you is far more civilized than killing you in reality. Furthermore, what does it mean to be condemned? From my personal perspective, it means being cast into a real world hell. Life itself is hell, being able to believe in Christianity is escaping hell, while failing to believe is falling into hell. For me personally, this is a very real and tangible religious experience. Before finding faith, I had endless anxieties, pains, the horror of perversion and deviance, and a life without support, it felt entirely unlike a proper life, but rather a complete hell. This is my firsthand experience. Only by believing in God, trusting the scriptural doctrines, loving and caring for one another, experiencing the warmth of love, and being filled with the joy of the Holy Spirit, does it become a true life, a life that has escaped hell and has not been condemned by God. Because of the sins committed in heaven, humans come into this world essentially to suffer. Birth, old age, sickness, and death are pains that no one can escape. Living toward death is humanity's tragic destiny that no one can shake off. This world itself is a hell, and human life here is actually a form of purgatory. Not believing in God and not honoring Him as the true God leads to being condemned by God and falling into hell. This is a very realistic understanding, in my view, it carries no element of a threat. Meanwhile, viewing life as hell is not unique to Christianity or my personal opinion, it is also the foundational thought of Buddhism. Shakyamuni Buddha spoke of the Eight Sufferings, birth, old age, sickness, death, separation from loved ones, meeting with those one hates, unfulfilled desires, and the flourishing of the Five Skandhas. Thus, the sea of suffering is boundless, and humanity should repent and turn back. The only difference is that Buddhism advocates detached world renunciation, while Christianity advocates active world engagement, finding fulfillment in the Holy Spirit through earthly life, faith, and mutual love. This is what Christians believe to be the correct path to spend our lives redeeming our sins in the secular world. Conclusion. The world is not at all what leftist thinkers fantasize it to be, a place where all religions can blend into a utopian society where you get whatever you want and enjoy an extremely hedonistic lifestyle. Has such a human society ever existed? Of course it is eternally impossible, because you can never escape death or the fear of death. At the same time, humans are bound to have desires, passions, love, hate, and grievances, while the world is also filled with ultimate evils like serial killers, abusers, and sexual deviants. This is what God prepared for human redemption. You cannot eliminate these evil phenomena simply by refusing to acknowledge sin and crime. Human society is bound to be full of conflict, war, slaughter, and hatred. Humans do not come to this world to enjoy life, but to redeem themselves, this is unavoidable and something no one can eradicate. God, the Creator, must play an important role in human life, and religion, as the primary force driving human society, must also play an important role in building peace. Clearly, the only way to achieve peace is not by forcibly blending various religions, but by integrating the concept of mutual love into various religions and human thoughts to minimize conflict, coexist peacefully, and strictly respect each other's boundaries. It is equally obvious that various deviant serial killers and evil individuals appear more frequently in societies with intense conflicts and harsh survival environments, while they appear relatively less in a society filled with benevolence and peace. Therefore, forcibly forcing different religions together only creates more intense conflicts and contradictions. This approach is absolutely wrong and is a lesson that human generations should remember for thousands of years to come.

Britain is the originator of freedom of speech. In the Middle Ages, society had considerable freedom of speech. I have argued that the reason for the emergence of freedom of speech in Britain is the devout Christian faith of the entire society. It is the tolerance and brotherhood of Christianity that gave rise to freedom of speech, which naturally allowed brothers to express their opinions freely. When Christianity is lost and society becomes secular, that is, a cannibalistic society, the relationship between people is exploitation, oppression, and suppression. To rule, the ruling class must suppress speech, so society has to lose freedom of speech. The current situation in Britain proves the correctness of my viewpoint.

Leaving the Christian society also means leaving tolerance, brotherly love, and the foundation of freedom of speech. People enter a society where dogs eat dogs, and losing freedom of speech is inevitable.

Human democracy is built on faith. Ancient Greece had a brilliant democracy due to its firm polytheistic beliefs but lost democracy owe to the loss of faith and ultimately perished. Perhaps this is also the fate of the United States.

Western politics has actually developed to a stage even more dictatorial than Stalin's dictatorship. Stalin dared not interfere with human moral traditions, while today's Western politics is forcibly changing human moral traditions. They can make you no mother today, and tomorrow, they will force you to be no moral and turn humans into animals.

Not only do these, but also plan for the worst-case scenario, that is, how to deal with it when fraud occurs again. and GOP should be prepared to use violent means to stop the counting process until the authenticity of each vote and the accuracy of each count are certified. ✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️ .......Before the founding of the United States, the United States had civil society, which was conducive to shaping the United States' national governance. Tocqueville particularly underlined this on "democracy in the United States"and Huntington in his "civil Society: the exception of the United States".......excerpt from"The Course of Western Civilization (essence version)"