Unfortunately, exactly this!
WTF? A Prime Minister who has never run a business in his life demands answers because a private business fails? … let me help you, Andy & co.
A retail chain needs to stay in fashion, needs to go with the flow! … But you and successive governments don’t like their “tat” products (mostly sourced off shore to sell them at £1!!! That the whole point right?) anyway…
for free (without a taxpayer funded £MULTIMILLION enquiry I’ll tell you the problems… (you’re welcome)
▪️massively increased regulations and compliance costs.
▪️cheap tat sourced from abroad, with rising shipping and transport costs.
▪️Hit by increased minimum wages and employer National Insurance.
▪️Hit by rising rents and business rates.
▪️Hit by soaring energy bills and net zero costs.
▪️Hit by higher interest rates.
▪️Hit by consumers with less disposable income.
▪️Hit by the soaring cost of borrowing to buy stock months in advance.
▪️Hit by higher insurance premiums.
▪️Hit by shoplifting, organised theft and security costs.
▪️Hit by packaging taxes, recycling regulations and environmental compliance costs.( which you just throw into general taxation, non of it changes the weather)
▪️Hit by higher fuel, warehousing and distribution costs.
▪️Hit by increased employment costs, pensions and statutory obligations.
▪️Hit by competition from overseas online retailers operating with very different overheads.( duty free … for foreign businesses oops)
▪️And hit by the impossibility of passing those costs onto customers, who shop at Poundland precisely because they need cheap stuff! … which isn’t cheap anymore (see above)
Every single time you add something on … so do they!
And the idiot, deluded politicians who have made Britain more and more expensive and difficult to do business in, are demanding to know why businesses are struggling?
You are all moronic. My work here is done 🤡
This 100%
What a complete mess. I wish Martin Lewis would butt out of the energy debate. His obsession with the retail side of the market distracts attention from the structural problems caused by domestic energy policy.
Worse, by focusing so much attention on how bills are presented and how costs are distributed between consumers, he is helping to create political incentives to manage the symptoms rather than tackle the underlying causes. Ministers can claim to be helping households while leaving the policies responsible for driving up costs largely untouched.
Go Alison!
Dear Andy, you do know this is untrue, don’t you?
Highest energy bills in the world are due to:
* Reckless pursuit of net zero
* Blowing up our coal-fired power stations
* Failing to exploit our own fossil fuels
* Insane dependency on foreign oil and gas. The phrase “over a barrel” springs to mind
* Paying Norway £20 billion plus a year for oil and gas we could get out of our own North Sea
* Subsidizing renewables to the tune of billions by slapping green taxes on bills
* Putting an eco-cult and leftist ideology before the comfort and warmth of the British people
* Allowing good jobs to be lost in pursuit of all of the above
* Claiming your government wants to “reindustrialise” while creating conditions no manufacturer could succeed in
* Closing refineries and gas storage so the UK is uniquely vulnerable this winter and likely to have serious power cuts.
You’re welcome.
@andyburnham
What DD doesn't understand is that companies have to make a return on capital employed. If you over tax the return, capital will be deployed elsewhere.
What DD doesn't understand is that companies have to make a return on capital employed. If you over tax the return, capital will be deployed elsewhere.
Nope, that’s not how taxes and price works. The price is determined by demand and supply.
Companies charge the highest price they can given demand. A tax levied on *profits* does not affect a company’s cost ie supply.
Taxes on *windfall* profits (like oil and gas) are the most efficient kind of tax there is.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Corporate profit taxes do not directly shift marginal costs but empirical studies show partial pass-through into higher consumer prices. Windfall taxes on oil and gas have deterred investment and production in practice despite theoretical efficiency on rents.
dadun.unav.edu/server/api/cor…
ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps…
taxfoundation.org/blog/big-oil-p…
scottishfinancialreview.com/2025/09/03/win…
GB News spouting more nonsense.
I thought GB News was meant to be the home of critical thinking?
Wes Streeting says there is 'no doubt' Vladimir Putin is a 'cold-blooded killer' in veiled swipe at Steve Witkoff gbnews.com/politics/wes-stre…
GB News publishing unverified propaganda.
You would have thought that they would know better.
Over 50,000 people died of heat-related causes across Europe in 'deadliest Summer on record'
gbnews.com/news/over-50000-p…
Please tell me that people can't be this stupid?
Daniel, do grow up and understand that diplomacy is required. Yes I know that you would prefer us to start the third world war.
Personally I think WW3 should be avoided at all costs.
This quoted post is unavailable.
I agree, however these will not be the final terms
this is why wars are so stupid, Zelensky let so much of Ukraines future die & ended up folding giving away 25% which he could have done from the beginning.I hate politicians & keyboard warriors everywhere, they play with soldiers lives like its nothing
xitter.gq/Nostre_damus/status/21…
I'm surprised that Brent hasn't fallen to $55 on this news, as clearly there is going to be a glut of oil coming out of the North Sea.
🇬🇧 The British government has officially approved production at Jackdaw, the UK's largest known untapped gas field, with supplies expected to start flowing by the end of October.
Located approximately 150 miles east of Aberdeen, the North Sea project is expected to increase Britain's domestic gas production by around 6% at peak output.
The field could produce the equivalent of 40,000 barrels of oil per day, enough gas to heat approximately 1.4 million homes.
More than £2 billion has already been invested in the project, which was originally approved in 2022 before legal challenges over its environmental impact delayed production.
The decision marks a shift toward greater reliance on domestic energy resources as Britain struggles with high energy costs and declining North Sea production.
However, the government has acknowledged that Jackdaw will not reduce household energy bills this winter, with its output representing only around 2% of Britain's total gas demand.
Source: Reuters / Writer: Mhedi



















