r retweeted
0.3% total on multi millions runners, which means probably less than 10 tokens
in reality, pumpfun just extracts any non migrated pair
quick example, how often do u guys see non migrated coins being drilled before migration, with a 150k+ volume? creator gets 0.3% and pump gets 0.95%, ALMOST ONE FULL PERCENT, this is literally extraction
they will always make u think ceilings r higher lol, all ceilings r getting lower and its better for pumpfun, the lower the ceiling the more fees they get, as simple as that
the fees you're talking about are for 10M+ coins, which means basically 2/3 coins every month (if they even hold that price lol)
2M revenue last 24h, ur volume on sol last 24h is 400M, this means its a raw 0.5% on average going into pumpfun, yet u guys will defend pumpfun for being supportive to this space?
if on average on a trade you lose 0.5% for a buy, so 0.5% for a sell, then terminals + chain fees on top and you're pretty much down 3% per trade on average as a random trader
Before PumpSwap, graduated coins migrated to a Raydium V4 pool
Here's what a trade on a $100M+ coin costs in each:
Raydium V4 (old setup): 0.25% total
- 0.22% LP
- 0.03% to raydium
- 0% to pump
- 0% to holders/creators
PumpSwap (now): 0.3% total
- 0.20% LP
- 0.05% to pump
- 0.05% to holders/creators
Note: Holder Rewards/Creator Fees are the main difference, and were introduced far later than PumpSwap itself. These fees are higher at lower market caps and reduce as market caps increase based on the fact that high fee tokens are far less attractive to whales who speculate on higher market cap tokens
It was VERY important for Pumpfun to keep the fee UX as close to the OG as possible, as that's what the end user was used to and enjoyed.
The only difference is Holder Rewards/Creator Fees (which reward people for holding a token or the creator of the token) alongside an additional 0.02% fee for Pumpfun.
This did not "kill the runners."
So, the LPs are essentially the same, with the main difference being the rewards fee and an additional 0.02% fee for Pumpfun.
r retweeted
It’s a bit brutal but BTC is probably going to be the big winner of the AI revolution. I don’t think it will suffer any hacks, the scripting language formal verification is very advanced and work in formalizing the protocol too. Nodes running on different hardware make it very robust against hardware vulnerabilities, and their sources are probably one of the most audited code in the world. Combine that with self sovereignty which protects against political backslash from K shaped economy and acceleration of margins flowing to capital, I don’t see much else. To be honest this is my macro view but it’s a pretty grim one.
Literally the ONLY platform that has mentionned the word “ refund “ all these Jew niggas never address SHIT when they’re getting exploited
This is not an exit scam. We're actively investigating the security incident and have already committed to fully reimbursing all 9 affected users.
Our team has been building software since 2018. We're well-established and would never compromise our reputation or integrity.
Our priority is making every affected user whole and identifying the root cause. Further updates will follow.
the "insider" accusation is mostly a skill issue confession. Actual insiders exist, sure, but if every wallet that beats u is one, the common factor is u
pumpfun hate is survivorship bias fr. nobody tweets about the rails when they're winning on them, one bad week and suddenly it's the devil. the whole market structure this cycle runs on came from them lol
r retweeted
its funny seeing how arrogant people get after running a port to $1m
never saw me acting like this after clearing that several times on singular trades in 2024.
now we watch how fast these people are round tripping it all.
the beauty of this social trading is what comes up seems to be coming down just as fast.
stay humble.
r retweeted
Call me paranoid, but be extra careful visiting ANY web site in the next few days, as some web admins are not always up-to-date with security patches.
Two vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619) reported for PHP, the web programming language, affecting servers running popular apps like WordPress and Magento, with patches released October 21, 2026 after details leaked early.
Exploitation was confirmed in the wild soon after disclosure, prompting quick WAF protections and patching by IT teams, as unauthenticated attacks could turn visited sites into vectors for credential theft or device exploits.
Stay SAFU!
r retweeted
let me get this right, this @kimchi1x guy gained clout because 95% of crypto twitter is retards that thinks he made 40mil on trump when in reality, the wallet they all thought was his, is actually the wallet of someone in my fnf. when in reality, this kimchi guy bundled coins and launched 24/7 during the memecoin cycle and rugged you guys and you guys are calling him the goat and somehow he larped his way into the jews (alon) giving him a pumpfun deal because he posted pics/videos of his 80lb frame of a body wearing chrome and flexing in cars and private jets. Just making sure if i'm understanding it right.
r retweeted
there will be SO many new multi-billion-dollar tokens this cycle
both memecoins and utility plays
last cycle's ceilings are about to get SHATTERED
as unbelievable as it might sound right now
screenshot this tweet!
doxxing and onchain should never mix. anonymity wasn’t an aesthetic, it was the security model. now u got influencers telling 20 yr olds to put their face, name and income source in one bio, while ppl who aren’t even doxxed are getting taped up in their homes. what more proof do u need
gn
barely ever tweet but tag whoever can help under this so the funds get frozen fast, every hour counts
if this happens to any of us tomorrow i hope ct shows up the same way instead of warring. today it’s him
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more