
I figure out why your marketing isn't working. Ads. Outbound. Funnels. Conversion. Building @fullboundhq
Joined August 2026
- Tweets70
- Following33
- Followers35
- Likes98
the number from my teardown i trust least is the one that looked best: @boardyai at 50% on the investor-intro prompt.
that came from one run per provider. if chatgpt only reuses about 41% of its cited domains on a same-day rerun, that 50% could be real or it could be one good afternoon.
so before round two, the setup:
same 10 prompts
same 6 providers
same search mode
same location
run again over time
this time i'm counting how often @boardyai gets recommended per prompt across runs, not whether it showed up once.
the other thing i'm watching is the zeros on customer intros and talent discovery. if those hold across runs, that's the actual gap.
the best reply to my ai visibility teardown was my own advice handed back to me.
i've literally posted "ask the same question again" about chatgpt screenshots.
then @mostlymktgX asked if i'd rerun the prompts. axios found only 41% overlap in chatgpt's cited domains on same-day reruns.
i hadn't. one run per prompt per provider. 60 answers, @boardyai in about 6.
so it's a baseline. next round: same prompts, same search mode, same location, run again over time.
60 runs across 6 ai assistants. @boardyai showed up in about 6 answers.
that was yesterday's article.
off the back of it, @boardyai set me up with someone in a category where the same kind of gap was already sitting there, so i ran the same audit on them.
finished it this morning. another one out of that article.
no reply yet.
we recently analysed how @boardyai appears when potential customers ask AI for recommendations.
60 responses. 6 AI providers. some interesting gaps.
here's the full breakdown 👇
now, who should we put under the microscope next?
drop a company in the replies.
We analysed 60 AI search responses across six providers to understand how Boardy appears when potential customers ask AI for recommendations. Here's what we found, why it matters, and what businesses should actually be doing about their AI visibility.
20 places to launch your startup:
1. reddit.com
2. feedmystartup.com
3. trustpilot.com
4. submitsaas.com
5. whatlaunched.today
6. aitools.neilpatel.com
7. g2.com
8. crunchbase.com
9. financesonline.com
10. devpost.com
11. geekwire.com
12. devhunt.org
13. goodfirms.com
14. hashnode.com
15. f6s.com
16. indiehackers.com
17. alternativeto.net
18. stackshare.io
19. brownbook.net
20. news.ycombinator.com
Does adding an llms.txt file automatically make your website visible in ChatGPT?
No.
It's a proposed convention for providing language models with useful information about a website.
Google explicitly says it isn't needed for visibility in its AI search features.
Don't confuse an interesting technical experiment with a proven ranking factor.
A single screenshot of ChatGPT recommending your client isn't proof of a successful GEO campaign.Ask the same question again.Change the wording.Try another engine.Check the citations , AI answers aren't static search rankings.
before you spend a dollar testing Meta Ads, check what's already running 60+ days in your niche.
Copy the messaging, not the design.
That's replicate marketing.
the cheapest research you'll ever do.
i am really concerned that we all just replaced the chatbot with a decision model
and kept the same offer
jev can tell you which lead to call
it cannot tell the lead why they should pick up







