Sam 🕷️🕸️⭐ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Jemima wrote a 1,500 word statement, read 3.7 million times, and asked the public to judge her role in the order against Ms Berki. So I did, with an open mind. I read her statement, the police record and both judgments. Here is what I found. Check it yourself. On 25 July 2014 Thames Valley Police removed Russell Brand from Jemima’s house after she reported that he had assaulted her. She did not press charges, which was her right. On the same day, according to the 2014 judgment, the same police told Brand and Jemima there was no case to answer on Ms Berki’s complaint that he had pushed her. On 12 August 2014, 18 days later, Jemima went to the High Court with Brand as his co-claimant. The order they obtained protects both of them. It forbids Ms Berki to allege that “the Claimants or either of them” committed any crime against her. It was made permanent in 2015. Neither judgment mentions 25 July. Her statement told us she had called the police on Brand in 2014, but not when. Once the date came out, the contradiction was plain to see. Had she not written those 1,500 words, no one would have known. So I ask the question anyone would ask. Why would a woman go to court 18 days after reporting that a man assaulted her, and stand beside him to silence another woman who said he had used force? If the judge was not told about 25 July, he decided the case without the one fact that mattered most. I take no pleasure in this. It is sad. But a person who asks the public to look at the facts should be ready for the public to look. The 2014 judgment: caselaw.nationalarchives.gov… 
The 2015 judgment: taxpolicy.org.uk/wp-content/… 
The final order: taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/11/07/… 
The police statement on 25 July 2014: aol.com/articles/police-conf…