Intermediate elementary teacher. Passionate about explicit instruction and dodging edu-trends.

Vancouver, British Columbia
Joined December 2008
1/2 Misssed #rEDTO2026 Here's the stream to watch! @researchED1 @tombennett71 Morning Sessions: vimeo.com/1237720080/f524573… Includes: Welcome Opening Remarks Keynote 1 (Kareem Weaver) Breakout 1 (Barbara Oakley) Breakout 2 (Nidhi Sachdeva) Keynote 2 (Nick Gibb)
5
23
3
48
5,276
Erica Sandberg retweeted
Released 10/16/26: The Science of Clear Math Teaching. Another must-listen from @rastokke #cognitivescience #scienceoflearning @chalkandtalk
2
2
4
373
Erica Sandberg retweeted
🚨Why are so many students struggling with math? CBC just released an audio documentary on math education in Canada - a bit like a mini Sold a Story for math. They cover a lot in 25 mins: problems with education research, where math instruction has gone wrong, what needs to change. Please have a listen 🎧 cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-6…
8
46
3
153
10,482
Erica Sandberg retweeted
Ben Solomon: Memorization should not be a dirty word in math. Adults are the problem, NOT kids. Kids are proud when they memorize math facts. This is essential for later math.
18
56
8
295
13,131
Replying to @researchEDCan
@researchEDCan Guess what we are going to livestream our keynote sessions from #rEDTO2026 Tune in Saturday Oct. 24, 2026 using this link. Share widely! @rastokke @NickGibbUK @KJWinEducation @Ready4rigor @Educhatter @researchED1 @tombennett71 vimeo.com/event/6289476
3
19
3
29
2,118
Erica Sandberg retweeted
Anita Archer: “We cannot afford to use methods that do not make children smarter”
4
25
1
118
3,244
Erica Sandberg retweeted
The teacher who gives a failing grade has to explain it to the student, the parents, and the principal. The teacher who gives everyone an A has a quiet weekend. Still confused about how grade inflation has gotten so bad?
62
187
26
1,773
176,779
Erica Sandberg retweeted
There was something special about being a kid when adults didn't feel the need to entertain you every minute of the day. Your parents could take you somewhere incredibly boring, and you were just expected to deal with it. The bank. The hardware store. Your mother's friend's house, where you sat on a couch covered in plastic and weren't allowed to touch anything. Nobody handed you a screen. Nobody worried about whether you were having fun. You studied the wallpaper. You read the same magazine three times. You stared at the clock and wondered if the second hand had stopped moving. And if you made the mistake of asking, "Can we go now?" your mother gave you that look. You know the look. The one that could end your entire afternoon without a single word being spoken. I swear, we developed half our imagination simply because our parents refused to entertain us. Looking back, I think being bored was one of the best things that ever happened to us.
209
1,113
93
9,074
192,523
Erica Sandberg retweeted
I’m not interested in hearing about your “passion for social justice and equity” if you promote inquiry-based learning over explicit instruction, believe ambiguous, skills-based education is superior to knowledge-rich, content-focused education, and advocate for restorative circles instead of clear, consistent discipline. You can’t say you’re passionate about social justice and equity while supporting practices that perpetuate inequitable access to knowledge and policies that harm students who are victims of verbal and physical abuse at the hands of their peers.
14
40
3
216
5,578
When a child doesn't learn as a result of instruction provided, isn't that a question we should be asking about the instruction instead of making it about that child's inability to learn?
Sold a Story Season 1 felt like a reckoning over how we teach reading. But the conversation is much bigger. It’s about how we teach, period. “If the student hasn’t learned, the teacher hasn’t taught.” — Zig Engelmann Season 2 is here! 🎧 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
7
9
1
54
1,725
“Schools have bigger issues to deal with than the dress code!!!” Yeah, they have those bigger issues because they refuse to hold the line on smaller stuff like the dress code
76
84
7
1,381
19,638
Replying to @MrZachG
@MrZachG sharing actions of the most effective teachers.
7
19
127
8,934
Erica Sandberg retweeted
Let's just call this what it is: The Bloom's Taxonomy Hoax, one of the worst frauds ever perpetrated on American schools. The interlocking directorate of teachers colleges and professional development organizations misportrayed a learning framework that supported the centrality of basic skills as one that fundamentally undermined them.
NEW POST: The Untold Story of Bloom's Taxonomy and the Pyramid That Never Was. - link in reply ⤵️
6
10
2
67
3,931
Unpopular opinion: I don't go out of my way to build relationships with students. I intentionally maintain professional distance. I've found that when I focus on teaching well, maintaining boundaries, and creating a productive classroom environment, the relationships take care of themselves.
48
31
6
566
23,092
Erica Sandberg retweeted
There are lots of views about how to improve our education system. Not enough of them focus on the classroom. We pursue big structural solutions, when we should be looking at how to create calm, quiet, peaceful classrooms. New post, please share! carouselteachlearnlead.subst…
13
46
5
122
45,232
Being too short to ride a rollercoaster isn’t a ‘punishment’ or ‘losing a reward’. It’s a consequence of circumstances. Being banned from an event because your behaviour is unsafe isn’t a punishment. Nor is it ‘losing a reward’. It’s a consequence of being too high a risk to oneself, others, and the event. Students aren’t banned from eg a trip to a theme park for ‘forgetting their pens’ or ‘not trying hard enough in maths.’ They are banned for acting dangerously, aggressively, or chaotically. People who work in schools understand this more than people who visit them as tourists.
Imagine it’s coming up to the end of the year, and your employer runs an annual fun day for employees and their families. It’s something that gets talked about throughout the year, and it’s a chance to see people out of their work clothes and to meet their kids. It’s a community building event. Your employer announces that there’s a change of policy this year. It’s going to become the annual Rewards fun day. In order to attend, you have to ace your appraisal, get good 360 feedback ratings from all your colleagues and not have taken too many sick days. They send round a motivational email, telling you all to do your best and reminding you how much fun the day is going to be. They tell you that this is to help you all achieve your best and remind you that it’s not just you, it’s your whole family who stand to lose or gain by this. If you don’t make the grade, you’ll need to come to work as usual and put in a full working day whilst your colleagues enjoy themselves elsewhere. You’ve had a hard year and you don’t always see eye to eye with your manager. Your appraisal doesn’t go well. You are told you can’t come. How do you feel about your employers now? Would being excluded motivate you to do better next year? Would it improve the relationship between you and your manager? Would it help you learn how to be a better employee? And if not, why would we think that it would be any different for our children?
27
16
5
311
108,107
Erica Sandberg retweeted
A parent complains about a teacher enforcing a school rule, and the administrator calls the teacher in to discuss what they could have done differently. The kid broke the rule, but the teacher is told to improve. The parent and kid now have the administration helping them make the teacher’s enforcement of the rule the problem. Next time, that teacher has a good reason to let the behavior slide, and so does every teacher who knows what happened. The administrator bought peace with one parent at the expense of order in everyone else’s classroom.
46
73
12
563
15,401
Erica Sandberg retweeted
👏 The Globe & Mail editorial team absolutely nailed it with this. People are paying attention. No more excuses. Canada has an education problem and we have to fix it. Summary: 🔸 Canada's education scores are declining on both PISA and TIMSS 🔸 We have way more low performers and fewer high performers 🔸 Canada spends significantly on education and needs to better allocate those resources 🔸 Downward trend started before COVID 🔸 Movement away from methods that work, like explicit instruction, has likely had a negative impact 🔸 Rampant grade inflation, with a mention of U of Waterloo instructor, Dan Wolczuk 🔸 Open door to tech in the classroom has not helped 🔸 Teachers unions have pushed back against things that could help like early screening for reading 🔸 Faculties of education have not always been on board with equipping teachers with the tools that will help teachers teach effectively 🔸 Look towards England, which has managed to buck the trend. Regular phonics screening, a times table check, calculator ban on standardized tests, etc. 🔸 Provincial governments must take action. Last paragraph is amazing: "PISA might seem like a test for Canadian school children, but it’s really a test for policymakers and educators on how they are running the schools. Right now, they are failing. In order to turn around test scores, and put children back on the path of achievement, they need to fundamentally change how students are being taught." theglobeandmail.com/opinion/…
49
117
17
386
28,521
Erica Sandberg retweeted
There are academics who have built their whole career on making the teaching of simple arithmetic unnecessarily complicated. Practice has been turned into a bad word in math & explicitly teaching is often something that’s supposed to be avoided. Children have suffered for it. Math has suffered for it. Universities and academia are partly to blame by often rewarding the publication of flawed education research. The problem is that these academics can be hugely influential on curriculum, textbooks, teacher education, and professional development. Because who would think an education expert isn’t really an expert? When someone has built their whole career on bad ideas, it’s going to be hard to get them to change course. That is why it is true that math needs a phonics-style revolution.
34
64
14
430
17,668