he pensado mucho estos últimos días la falta de una “izquierda” real en México y la gravedad de empezar a entender a m*rena como un partido izquierdista, que por muchas cosas, tampoco lo es
yo quisiera votar por algo no neoliberal ni militar ni ecocida en mi país
𓇗 fïa retweeted
Un raro tucán de pico castaño con leucismo fue fotografiado en Guápiles, Costa Rica, por Luis Solano Pochet.
The courtship dance no other bird can compete with….
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The video shows an AI-generated visualization inspired by the Wilson's Bird-of-Paradise, not real footage of its courtship display.
youtube.com/shorts/aNyNYoU…
academy.allaboutbirds.org/wilsons-bird-o…
youtube.com/watch?v=BvIuUA…
𓇗 fïa retweeted
Scientists have discovered a species of marsupial in Australia, proving there are still mammals on Earth we've never documented before.
the older you get, the more you realize luck is mostly exposure, if you sit in the same place, have the same routine, talk to the same person, nothing new really happens, you have to engage the world to win, travel more. talk to people.
𓇗 fïa retweeted
El 0.1% de multimillonarios contamina más que 44% de la población mundial en pobreza: Oxfam ow.ly/w6y65101Rx9
lo peor es que la universidad de cornell lo publicó 🫣
This paper answers why confident idiots run the world.
Cornell University published a psychological paper that explains every terrible boss, every loud influencer, and every broken corporate hierarchy.
It’s called “Unskilled and Unaware of It.”
they tested participants across logic, grammar, and humor to measure the gap between actual performance and self-perception.
And the results are wild.
participants scoring in the bottom 12th percentile consistently believed they were operating in the 62nd percentile.
they were not lying. they were literally incapable of recognizing their own incompetence.
the paper revealed a brutal paradox:
the exact skills required to master a domain are the exact same skills required to accurately evaluate your own competence in that domain.
if you lack the skill, you inherently lack the cognitive capacity to realize you are failing.
this creates a dangerous systemic loop.
the incompetent are blessed with absolute, blinding certainty. their brain protects them from their own ignorance, allowing them to speak first, demand authority, and never second-guess their decisions.
meanwhile, the actual experts suffer the exact inverse.
top performers in the study consistently underestimated their rank. because a task was easy for them, they falsely assumed it was easy for everyone else.
they hesitate. they obsess over nuance. they assume they have nothing unique to add.
we are biologically wired to confuse confidence with competence.
the loudest person in the room gets promoted, gets funded, and gets the microphone, not because they know what they are doing, but because they are physically incapable of seeing what they don't.
the only defense mechanism is building systems that stop rewarding absolute certainty and start demanding proof of work.
𓇗 fïa retweeted
they didn’t lie when they said you’ll wake up on random day and decide you don’t wanna deal with certain shit no more.
𓇗 fïa retweeted
This paper answers why confident idiots run the world.
Cornell University published a psychological paper that explains every terrible boss, every loud influencer, and every broken corporate hierarchy.
It’s called “Unskilled and Unaware of It.”
they tested participants across logic, grammar, and humor to measure the gap between actual performance and self-perception.
And the results are wild.
participants scoring in the bottom 12th percentile consistently believed they were operating in the 62nd percentile.
they were not lying. they were literally incapable of recognizing their own incompetence.
the paper revealed a brutal paradox:
the exact skills required to master a domain are the exact same skills required to accurately evaluate your own competence in that domain.
if you lack the skill, you inherently lack the cognitive capacity to realize you are failing.
this creates a dangerous systemic loop.
the incompetent are blessed with absolute, blinding certainty. their brain protects them from their own ignorance, allowing them to speak first, demand authority, and never second-guess their decisions.
meanwhile, the actual experts suffer the exact inverse.
top performers in the study consistently underestimated their rank. because a task was easy for them, they falsely assumed it was easy for everyone else.
they hesitate. they obsess over nuance. they assume they have nothing unique to add.
we are biologically wired to confuse confidence with competence.
the loudest person in the room gets promoted, gets funded, and gets the microphone, not because they know what they are doing, but because they are physically incapable of seeing what they don't.
the only defense mechanism is building systems that stop rewarding absolute certainty and start demanding proof of work.
𓇗 fïa retweeted
Anthropic (Claude) acaba de publicar el prospecto de su IPO. Les sugiero no leer la sección Risk Factors, que describe en detalle todos los riesgos de la IA, si quieren volver a conciliar el sueño. Link al documento (sólo apto para intrépidos): sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/…
𓇗 fïa retweeted
In one day, two politicians - Bolsonaro in Brazil and Vucic in Serbia - with ties to Trump and his family have lost surprise elections, thanks to high turnout. The rise of the international far-right is not inevitable.
𓇗 fïa retweeted
Me encanta la carta de Kafka a Milena cuando dijo: «Te encontré y me reconcilié con el mundo, perdoné a los ausentes y excusé a todos los que partieron; desde que te encontré, veo que nada merece la ira salvo tu ausencia».

























