Super Sonic Support

100% agree on him not being a Real Trader. But I do not agree with the part "has some great pa analysis" He Has also blocked Me, after I pointed out FACTUAL errors in examples from "history" he quotes!

$ETH Sharing this on high demand by you guys... The upside targets for my spot buys are so wide that you can't even see em on this chart, lol. First, see quoted post from when $ETH was above 2,400 prices. I showed you it will drop to minimum 2,000. Yes, we shorted it. And yes, we took partial profits already! Next? The drawing I made is for spot purposes only. We already have spot exposure from 1,5XX levels on Ethereum, hence I won't be buying again at 1,700. But if you're 0% exposed, then go ahead. I'll try my luck on the deeper entry 2. It's not my bias, but if comes, that would be a generational spot buy... Because $ETH is going parabolic next year. More bullish than $BTC even! Save this post for later.

$BTC Well well well... if we didn't just find new local lows on Bitcoin! Booked another 20% from the latest short (73.5K). The remaining 40% will be booked at the final target. I made bet on $BTC with a very famous financial influencer & a billionaire, Grant Cardone, live during X spaces. Yes, there were witnesses. The bet was: Bitcoin touches 69K before it touches 89K. Forget 69K, I give you 67K, lol. If you need proof of the bet, check out my profile. Respect to him & the other creators, but he must be looking for a better analyst for his $BTC investments now... Cheers! Mr. P

G it was 69K whole time xitter.gq/profitcircle_/status/2…

@GrantCardone $69K before $89K✅- I won our $BTC SPACES bet G, 🙏🏻Haha! I'm Looking forward to seeing you at @benjamincowen ITC Conference in Miami next week! Much Respect.

$BTC New local lows are here! Book 40-50% of the latest short now & move stoploss to entry. You see the "TLDR" image cropped at the top of my Bitcoin chart? This TLDR is from the latest macro report that I discussed in the quoted post. For the first time ever, I've shared an insight from the report, to the outside world, before it even got published. I hope you enjoyed. There's a lot more where that came from... SO WHAT'S NEXT? IS THE LOCAL LOW IN FOR $BTC? I still don't think so, brothers. See the target of our latest short, it's in 65K levels for a reason. Yes, new lows (lower low below 57K) is not the bias still. I have given appropriate targets with reasoning of the HIGHER LOW that I still expect for $BTC inside my latest report. Of course, I am not here to share everything for free. If you're interested, DM at (@) PremiumSupportLine on Telegram. However... I'll tell you this: Remember my bias was seeing 48K once? We changed it to a higher low when $BTC went into 87K... Given how short we are on time to complete this bear market, I still believe in a higher low as I do not want it to backtest below 64K. Or else it’ll turn into a ranging marker for longer… resulting in a deviation below 49K before any further up. People believe $BTC cannot drop below 71K because bullruns don’t backtest breakout candles. And I think that for short-term the 71.4K zone may be an excellent long. I believe in market proving people wrong again and again, just because it can! That's why you need to positioned for the worst while trading crypto. Just like my report has done it. Cheers! Mr. P

Dude what are you Saying.. On the $59,177 & $62,000 SPOT Buy We have STILL not TP'D And Leverage Trade's Target 1 was $67,000 while T2 $73K, T3 $84K And isn't $84K the Max it went? We did 100s of Lomgs, even for new Joiners the way up kept signallimg long entries to ensure everyone's onboard While You claim I was travelling? Atleast get your facts right before embarrassing yourself on Public Forum. I've 600 Premium Members, if you're the only one complaining then you Know I don't need to explain. But Get Facts right. Macro Reports, Published, Told $59,177 > $77K/$84K to be Upside Target How 's that "partial" or "meek" $86K Shorts we took, Target 1 was $79K and Target 2 $72,728 Freely Tag Fellow Premium Members who can vouch

$BTC short term (important) 74,521, the price where I told you we'll go to local lows before going higher. Time to book profits as we're a $1,100 up, while $BTC is $1,100 down, lol. We're still in the higher-low zone, but I am writing on the scenario where it could turn into a lower low... Inside my latest macro report that is about to release in a few hours now. It also includes: $BTC time-based bull market projections, $ETH, $SPX, $USOIL, $GOLD, $SILVER & more… If you're interested, send a message on Telegram: @PremiumSupportLine.

$BTC TLDR By Mr.P Summary Bot: $72,727 bottom sniped ✅ Bounce played. Half Profits taken at $74,000. $HYPE LONG From 72.3 also Booked Half at $74.0 Next? But the local low is NOT in (yet). Today's top is likely in. New Local Lows before 78K. That's my bias. Yes. $73,900 Weekly Close = the line. Lose it & sub-$72.7K opens. 78K first = I'm wrong. Lows first, then higher. Good Luck Detail: $72,727 bottom sniped to the dollar, & the bounce paid us ✅ But let me be honest with you... I don't think the local low is in (yet). Top for the day is likely in or very close. Sensing a Red Thursday; if not, then Fri/Sat/Sun. My bias: New Local Lows before 78K. > $73,900 = Weekly Close S/R. Lose it on a Daily close & the POI below $72,727 opens up > Bounces are temporary. Don't chase longs up here > 78K prints first? Then I'm wrong, & I'll say it right here And no, I haven't turned bearish on the bigger picture. Lows first, then higher. Not a Bull, not a Bear. Just trading the chart. Good Luck

TRADING: Position sizing is among My biggest 2026 learnings: "Compounding with Position sizing instead of Typical T1/2 system" Result: 2026 has been Biggest Leverage PnL Year for Myself, despite Lesser Trades VS 4-5 Trades a Day I used to take when Younger I always thought Position sizing is simple: Less Conviction, Less Size. High Conviction, High Size. NO! That's not all. It is actually much simper than that. Is also Reason why I moved away from Typical 4-5 Targets approach last Year many Channels follow, or "partial" trims for that matter. Let me Show You 3 Aspects of Position Sizing being used for Compounding 1- Sizing-VS-Holding_time Say you make $10 Per T1 typically If you can do 3X the Margin you only have to ride 1/3rd of the Move to make $10 Roughly if you feel like remainder move is going to take time You don't need example to understand this one is pretty simple. But you can also not blindly over-size. It has taken me 5-6 years myself to get to place where I can get the gist of which Position could safely be over-sized on SUB ACCOUNT. You do need an edge-system for this. Multiple Point Confluences, A+ setups, even if smaller moves. 2 - Rotation-Type: Then remainder (example: after riding 1/3rd of T1 of Trade 1 instead of Full T1) the remainder time you could cash out and rotate Money into another position Trade 2, or replay the same asset position Trade 1 as long as setup is valid. Example last night we cashed out #SILVER in Great profits well before target on Copy Trade too, and invested the money in #BTC and after cashing out BTC Profits have now rotated Margin (without profits) back into #SILVER Original Trade-1 again to complete the Slower remainder move portion from same E1 Replay level. Tip: this type of compounding you can EVEN do without needing to over-size, unlike example-1 where you were intentionally over-sizing riding only X% (Fast portion) of The Move to make same money at your intended Target instead of Official Target 1 3- Asset Selection & Consistent_Position_Sizing Example: Choosing $GOLD right now for a 3X Long instead of BTC - but keeping the size Same as Normal Trade BUT with Smaller Leverage. Here, basically you are downsizing the Position... instead of upsizing BUT if you have selected the right asset for right time with your edge, and deployed valid Position Size without overdoing it; You are Outperforming USDT against time deployed bare minimum even if small but consistent Position sizing, without being greedy. This also helps you doing it without having to worry about getting stopped.

$72,728 $BTC "You can't Make this up" P-Level version Pay attention to $73,900 Weekly Close basis this week. Good Luck

You know what? $BTC's local bottom is probably still not in (yet).

$BTC 2023 vs 2026. Could be just a pattern that doesn't necessarily repeat.

$BTC Nobody would believe me if I didn't have proof. Hence, I am quoting the oldest post in which I called for 73.9K & 74.8K levels to be retraced right when $BTC broke out into our first swing short's entry or the 2026's yearly open: 87.4K level. This is how a real swing trade may sometimes look like... we literally held it for over a month before it reached the final target. And in-between, we longed some crucial levels such as 81K into 84K a couple of times and then recently 76K into 81K, just to end up back into the most-awaited shorts' target: 73.9K. I am so happy and satisfied for not even once getting distracted by the noise. I mean COME ON BRO!!! So many big creators, including Dr. Profit, were entirely wrong about longing $BTC. And guess what? Now that they're finally exhausted, I believe $BTC does what it has always done before... SURPRISE EVERYONE. Cheers! Mr. P

Pressed Green 🟢 button initially smaller size

$BTC After Price has received acceptance below $83K May'26 Highs, Next, What does your Analysis Say?

$BTC vs $USDT Dominance. I can be wrong, but it makes sense.

There are Analysts. Then There are Entertainers, and Then There are Traders. I fear there's 4th Category Emerging; Accounts planted by Exchanges to mislead People... Making their posts sound so believable! Wrong about $USOIL all along, Wrong about $BTC's $87K Breakout being "the Only Cycle where $BTC has pumped 40% from Lows before midterms" (Bro, it has happened almost every cycle, stop hyping people up, do your homework) - Wrong about $87K Breakout, Wrong about Longing $84K Sweep, Wrong About Longing $82K Sweep, Wrong about Longing $81K Sweep, Wrong about Longing $80.8K Sweep, Then Wrong about Longing Monthly Low Sweep, Wrong anf got Liquidated at $76,111 on Her 10X Long from $82K And then Pulls out a Random insight of "$USOIL and $BTC correlation" out of nowhere to Justify and Long $81K again to make it sound Beleivable Again $BTC falls to $76111 and re-enters the Long Blindly again. This is HERD MENTALITY & This is how Sheeps are Manufactured and Trained Finally I'm about to turn Bullish Soon, and there will be a Bounce on $BTC and then He'll come out Bull-Posting how he was right about Longing "XYZ sweep" Beware! Ironic, how, The accounts who dunked on @benjamincowen for calling $87K Top are taking little to zero ownership of their wrong calls, constantly Mocking People who were right and Saw The down-move.