The amount of people that don't understand how anything works, while thinking they know better than everyone else, reducing politics to motivated reasoning, deflection, false equivalences, whataboutism, tribalism and mockery of opposition instead of the benefit of the Americans, and even the greater good globally, while being proud of it with a smug attitude is honestly disgusting.
Having the ability to vote implies a responsibility to wield it properly, not like a chimp with a machine gun.
I don't think that factors such as gas prices are as important long term as Iran having Uranium enriched at 60% when the highest you need for Nuclear Energy is less than 20%.
Iran isn't known for its industrial complex, it gets the majority of its economy from exporting oil which Trump had a blockade and sanctions against to financially starve them while he targets their energy with missile strikes while the US economy continues to develop.
Wages are determined by the market with corporations, supply and demand, your pay is based on the revenue you generate.
Mass immigration creates an overwhelming demand for jobs that don't exist resulting in competition driving wages down.
Illegal immigrants work off the records (so do others, but Illegals can only workt his way) which drives wages down.
Misappropriated funds by administration, and mass fraud at various scales including healthcare sectors which again is primarily immigrants especially in blue states results in higher gas taxes and other expenses to cover government overspending.
How does housing work? Well, supply and demand, IF YOU HAVE MORE PEOPLE THAN YOU HAVE HOUSING THEN THE DEMAND EXCEEDS THE SUPPLY AND PRICES GO UP.
It's almost as if mass remigration, and deportation of illegals allows housing prices to come down, while wages go up, which reduces government fraud, public service expenses and misappropriation allowing gas prices in blue states to settle without people that vote as a tribal fucking block for the people giving them everything.
Under Biden with open borders the inflation was insane, cause and effect is clear, but a bunch of emotional idiots that don't even understand how the foundations of their thoughts are formed via critical theory imprint confuse pseudointellectualism with principled reasoning.
So by the average voters logic, the Iranian Regime which already kills 1,500 people per year, should have been allowed to have enriched uranium beyond 20% (at 60% and like 450kg of it, enough to make 10 nuclear weapons btw) because of temporary prices that people have to deal with that are escalated by the democratic parties policies.
The money we were losing to fraud and misappropration could have gone towards nation wide relief for the inflation while simultaneously bringing down gas prices in blue states by reducing government spending through those channels.
Europe and Canada also would have been fine if globalist islamocommunists didn't commit economical jihad by divebombing the countries.
You're the greatest of all time.
This isn't even starting on #Islamocommunism or the intentional destruction of Europe and Canada through the exact same principles mentioned above.
Or that once the middle east runs out of Oil that China won't give a fuck about it, and it won't have any income.
@POTUS
@WhiteHouse
You have created hope and pride when it had been lost.
I'm sorry that the people failed you.
Ok so you have plently of examples to pull from to prove how and explain why. Or is that just a label that you apply to people that don't agree with you?
At scale I've noticed its critical theory with instrumental and motivated reasoning.
False equivalences, deference to authority, logical fallacies, projection, hyperbole, etc.
Instrumental 'by any means', motivated 'funnel into the decided outcome'.
'By any means funnel them into the decided outcome'.
In this case its the whole white guilt shtick.
From there, if you consider the hypocrisy in how they claim theyre anti-fascist while being completely fascists, you realize that its a one way thing.
This is where critical theory comes in.
The oppressed could basically never do anything wrong in their mind, of course they're going to have a problem with 'being oppressed'.
I've talked to a lot of people on X and tried to understand / analyze their psychology, they don't have any principled reasoning.
If theres a jar that represents a crime statistic, theres 7 red, 2 green, 1 blue m&m, they will say 'there are red, green, and blue m&ms'.
So when you say 'Hey, this civilization has capacity limits for efficiency and the well being of its prosperity on various scales such as supply and demand for employment, housing, production, healthcare, etc'
they flatten it into anti immigrant, which is flattened into racist or biggoted.
Implying you don't owe it to the world to open your borders is conflated with racism and they try to normalize this shit.
I'm pretty sure leftists are just demons and view words as a way to deceive people into thinking its about anything other than hatred.
All that idiot said is 'antagonist language and outward racism' over and over.
Every human has varying degrees of height, intelligence, strength, even penis size is proof that we aren't all equal.
First off, I've never heard him say anything considered hate speech, can you give one example?
Second, you do not get to attack people for saying something you don't like.
It doesn't matter if you try to conflate it, or change definitions otherwise you're opening up the door to a dangerous thing against leftists as well.
These retarded leftists are going to end up getting hurt when they attack people over opinions and no ones gunna care.
A large portion of women are extremely entitled, weak willed and completely conform to external validation.
These women end up as leftists.
White liberal women after 100 years of fighting for womens rights and voting to destroy something they never built or defended while demonizing the men that built said civilization, that they depend on to protect them from the consequence of their action and allowed them to vote by voting to import the enemy in mass and voting them into majority so they can remove everyones rights. #GirlBoss
Oh, apologies if you aren't.
In my experience at scale, about 90% of the time when communicating with leftists they will use false equivalences to try and flatten things into a binary.
Based on this image, it signaled to me that it was meant to draw an equivalence of their totality as beings.
You didn't at all! Sorry if I came across as any sort of way as well, I'm very rough around the edges.
Communicating on X tends to be very tribal and not focused on understanding so I'm definitely conditioned to be the same way.
Essentially, I do think El Sayed and Mamdani are smarter than AOC, Talib, Ilhan Omar, etc.
I've noticed that a lot of people indoctrinated in critical theory tend to compress everything into a binary and it removes a lot of nuance, it's very common at college / unis and is rooted in Marxist crap.
I.e. if a jar represents a crime statistic and theres 7 red m&ms, 2 blue m&ms and one green m&m, it feels like it gets flattened into 'there are red, blue, and green m&ms'.
Maybe its just me, but it signals low trust communication where you have to argue for ground that should be a given when trying to come to a conclusion in a shared reality.
I know that our civilization is a system built on various metrics that are subjected to supply and demand such as for employment, housing, production, healthcare, other factors.
Incentives for corporations and lower tax rates at the higher bracket also incentivizes people to start businesses, increasing the demand for employees and creating more taxable revenue.
Off the bat, anyone that just treats a country like an airport like they owe it to the world and everyone can just come on in and it'll be fine, immediately triggers several red flags.
Whenever people are against immigration or illegal immigrants, through critical theory, it is compressed into oppressor vs oppressed, and treated as it's inherently racist or unreasonable.
This is where all the whataboutism, logical fallacies, false equivalences, hyperbole, etc come out.
Throw in the fact that I live in Canada and our healthcare is free, and when its free people take advantage of it to absurd degrees and are no longer incentivized to take care of their health nor is the service provider incentivized to focus on quality over volume, nor is the government incentivized to spend on you.
Nevermind the fact theres insane amounts of fraud, especially in Democratic states like Minnesota and Cali.
So when they say 'Hey lets remove your second ammendment right and get you disarmed, open up your borders because we owe it to the world, and nation wide healthcare while taxing the rich' All it screams to me is, disarm the citizens, import enemies in mass at tax payers expense when they are defrauding all the public systems at scale while incentivizing corporations to leave the country to create job scarcity.
Talking points have become so meta that you no longer need an understanding of mechanisms appearantly and its all just about framing and vibes.
I feel like you could be completely wrong in a debate and still win for that very reason.
I never hear them talking about how, or any principled reasoning, it's just a bunch of slogans.
That's why I also put full blame on citizens for wielding their vote like a champ with a machine gun going with whatever is trendy or feels good.
Don't get me wrong, the system would jam and burn because the DSA is retarded, and everyone will be worse off for it, but it won't stop them from trying.
We aren't disagreeing at all.
I never said both can't be true.
You described him as someone with a sharp tongue, I'm saying he doesn't even have that and is unimpressive in my personal opinion.
That does tend to be the priority of liberal white women, what people think of them, not reality, not substance, but what others think.