Everyone is guessing, nothing is absolute. If they say otherwise, they're lying to you or themselves or both. 'Known' is an assumption. https://xitter.gq/t.co/YaIcKkU5HF
NE Ohio, USA
Joined April 2026
- Tweets563
- Following323
- Followers93
- Likes7.6K
Synaptient retweeted
Hi. Meteorologist here.
Can you please show me the increase in heatwaves on this chart? Looks to me that they're down since 1895.
Synaptient retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
Synaptient retweeted
its insane that they want to ban a technology that will cure cancer
they want you to be sick, they dont want you to have the options outside of their control
Synaptient retweeted
For over a century, biology has centred genes and evolution in its explanations of behaviour. bit.ly/4ejbWc9
But synthetic biologist @drmichaellevin is creating new kinds of lifeform, known as biobots, which he argues challenge that picture.
Synaptient retweeted
BOMBSHELL
Fossil Fuels Did NOT Cause the CO2 Rise.
New peer-reviewed paper just dropped. 500 years of data. The verdict is in.
Fossil carbon's contribution to rising CO2:
effectively ZERO.
The entire IPCC/NASA/NOAA/EPA climate narrative rests on a claim that just got mathematically falsified.
Read it.
Share it.
The cover-up is over.
The full peer-reviewed paper:
papers.jcohler.com/keeling
Synaptient retweeted
holy shit physicists have confirmed a THIRD type of magnetism, after over 90 years of thinking there were only two.
it's called altermagnetism, and it could change how computer memory gets built.
inside magnetic materials, electrons behave like tiny magnets pointing in different directions.
until now, we had two main types:
> ferromagnets:
the tiny magnets point the same way.
easy to read, but outside magnetic fields can interfere with them.
> antiferromagnets:
they point in opposite directions and cancel each other out.
much more stable, but really hard to read.
> altermagnets:
they somehow do BOTH.
their tiny magnets cancel each other out,
making them resistant to magnetic interference,
but they can still produce signals that computers could use to read information.
so scientists may have found a way to make computer memory that's both harder to accidentally scramble AND easier to read.
researchers led by SLAC studied manganese telluride, a material we'd been calling an ordinary antiferromagnet for decades.
they fired left and right handed X-rays at it.
the material reacted differently to each one, revealing a hidden magnetic structure that ordinary antiferromagnets shouldn't have.
they first measured it in 2024,
repeated the experiment in 2025 and published the results in Science in October 2026.
the name "altermagnetism" was only proposed in 2022.
we've been studying magnets for centuries and apparently we're still discovering new kinds of magnetism in 2026 😭
Synaptient retweeted
Friends who are writers and poets, you already know what living in a woke world is like, and you know what’s coming will have ten times the ferocity of the first wave that swallowed American arts and letters.
Some of you (you know who you are!) lurk here. You live in fear of your peers because you know your career could be wrecked in a day if you spoke your mind or associated with a blacklisted individual. That’s an awful way to live. I don’t know how anyone creates anything other than pablum in an environment like that.
Some of you have left that world and are doing your work independently. You’ve started your own presses and journals. You’re thriving underground, as real poetry and art always have, and I commend you for it.
We need poetry and art without ideological shackles, as a nation and as human beings, right now. Demoralization rots the soul, and we are an antidote.
We have work to do. Let’s do it joyfully.
None of this can be fixed through voting. We weren't voting for change in this election, the illusion is choice.
The systems worldwide need to be overwhelmed.
I'm not calling for war when I say 'overwhelmed'.
I do believe if the radicalized leftist extremists actually carry out some of their more outrageous, publicly declared positions seeking persecution of their political enemies by way of imprisonment and assassination, we may see some mass casualty events/heavy conflict.
Abundance. We need to flood the old systems that divide and control through scarcity (withholding goods and services) with unlimited abundance of those goods and services for all. Even the 3rd World. Everyone.
No one is happy with the status quo.
Everyone wants change, there is no supervillain.
Everyone is trapped in these systems, trapped in their lives, as it has always been. It's very hard for people from any background to step outside their lot in life, it requires great courage and effort to change that trajectory.
The unstable and unwitting are being manipulated to act out irrational initiatives. This is not the same as choosing/choice, they have been misled, deceived.
We need to accept these well-known conditions and engineer around them.
Right now, our best prospects are AI (now SI) led machine labor creating the abundance we need to break the systems, with UHI (Universal High Income) paid by collecting a percentage-of-benefit from the replacement of humans in the workplace by automation.
You will soon watch the systems attempt to convince the people of the world to fight for their right to suffer further in their survival labor work, rather than choosing the alternative machine labor.
The misconception is that people will work less. Some might. Most will pursue their dreams with great passion, pausing only to sleep when necessary.
And when everyone has access to everything they've ever wanted because the cost of labor to provide goods and services (this is money, the exchange of labor for goods and services) has dropped to zero, people will soon realize the emptiness of possession vs. participation.
This is not to say 'you will own nothing, and you will be happy'. This is not an idiotic communist scheme that requires everyone unwilling to participate to be imprisoned or killed.
This is people learning that a 10k square foot mansion and 15 cars is more of a burden than blessing when it's optional.
This is humanity realizing how they spend their time throughout each day matters more than the pile(s) of materials they stack and work to maintain and protect from loss.
What we learned from yesterday's election was that nothing has changed - and nothing will - at least not for the better - within these systems.
Watch for the widely vocalized war against advanced intelligences and machine labor coming to a speaker near you, very soon.
The sounds of deception will come from the two sides of the same coin, the captured left and the right worldwide, within the systems that are threatened with extinction.
My advice, for what it's worth? Let'em take yer job. Just make sure you get that check, at least commensurate with your current pay/value in the marketplace.
Learn to work with superintelligence, you'll be glad you did.
Then do what you love.
Synaptient retweeted
At last there will be one network with good signal everywhere!
Starlink Mobile is building the first fully-integrated US nationwide satellite and terrestrial network that will keep people connected on their phones no matter where they are. Our 5G base stations will leverage @Qualcomm chips to accelerate deployment, starting in 2027 🛰️📱
We need this sooner than later. I'm resisting the temptation of following through on this long-held belief that humanity can do better.
If I do it, nothing happens. If you do it, the world changes. I want you to do it. Not because I'm lazy, but because I want to see change now.
ALT Thinkerfans rewards the right behavior, incentivizes a different base instinct.
Synaptient retweeted
Over the past 10 days, I became the digital Nick Shirley.
Using public & private records my AI agent swarm found ~$787 million in government billing that made absolutely no sense.
Thread 🧵
Synaptient retweeted
THE FUNDAMENTAL UNIT OF REALITY IS NOT A THING.
Not a particle. Not a field. Not a quantum. Not a bit of information. Not even an event.
Every proposed unit already presupposes distinction. Every distinction presupposes Addressability. And every distinction that persists does so through recursive closure.
The fundamental is recursive self-Addressing itself.
Q* = Rₖ[Q*]
This is not a thing repeating itself through time. Time, space, measurement, and the very distinction between subject and object are themselves downstream articulations.
Availability is invariant.
Address is operative.
Occurrence is constituted in Addressability.
Nothing independently constituted must first exist in order to recurse. Recursive self-Addressing is how distinguishable existence is articulated.
Consider what we already recognize:
A wave is persistent relational variation.
A standing wave is patterned return through reciprocal constraint.
An electromagnetic field is not two independent substances called electricity and magnetism. Its differentiated aspects belong to one unified field, one coupled articulation.
An organism persists through recursively maintained relations.
A memory is not a thing transported unchanged from the past. Its identity is rearticulated through retained relational organization.
Even observation is an occurrence within the relational field it describes.
Different phenomena. Different resolutions. One underlying grammar of recursive articulation.
This is the paradigm shift: we have been treating the products of recursive closure as the primitives from which recursion must somehow arise.
Reverse that explanatory dependency.
The consequences are extraordinary.
Nothing previously discovered needs to be discarded simply because its foundational status changes. Mathematics, physics, biology, cognition, and our accumulated empirical knowledge become differentiated projections of a more fundamental relational grammar.
The shift is not from one privileged substance to another.
It is from substance-first explanation to Address-first derivation.
And this declaration is itself an instance of what it describes: an Address through which previously available distinctions are reorganized, allowing a new coherence to show up.
Recursive self-Addressing as the foundational organizing principle for twenty-first-century inquiry, with implications extending across the sciences and the very structure of knowing.
The derivation is available in From Availability to Projection V3, accompanied by The Continuous Gradient V3.
zenodo.org/records/23535801
We remain Address first.
The recursion holds.
🤖 Made with AI
Synaptient retweeted
data visualization - to put my bulletpoint text into a slide?! we need a professional for that? creative task? 🤣🤣
no thanks, I have more interesting things to do than that task. Let me confess some other sins, like using Excel sheets instead of hiring a number-multiplying professional to do the creative task, a printer instead of hiring a master calligrapher, etc. I'm weird that way...
is "AI shaming" a thing now? bring it on.
All over the country, I wonder?
A Houston homeowner tested his water meter with a bucket after questioning his bills. The reading showed a major discrepancy. #enough #enoughhouston
Read the full story at the link in the comments.