
Political Scientist. Democratization and governance in the Americas. Sorbonne U, Columbia University Research Aff, PM, media analyst Univisión #RedDePolitólogas
Atlanta, US /SJ, Costa Rica
Joined May 2014
- Tweets2.7K
- Following1K
- Followers999
- Likes14.4K
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Republican super PACs spent $1.5 billion on races they lost.
$212 million of that was spent by Elon Musk to take down Talarico.
My @Morning_Joe Chart
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
90% of voters said corruption was a motivating factor in voting. The Trump Administration response is 🖕 to the voters.
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Democrats carried independent voters by double digits in every Senate seat they flipped.
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
The pool of talent in the Democratic Party is deep! So many new faces won last night. So many talented orators. So many gritty life stories. The diversity of people who won, on all dimensions, including ideological ones, was also inspiring.
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more.
Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go.
Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all.
So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man.
Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure.
On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular!
What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it.
Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population.
The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world.
Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline.
Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side.
That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Only 25% of the American electorate identify as MAGA. R's can't win majoritarian elections by only appealing to their extreme base. Median voter theory.
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
My first piece for the Guardian on why the Serbian student movement should be studied accross the globe:
"The WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange once told an interviewer in Belgrade that Serbia was “a country where the future happens first”."
theguardian.com/commentisfre…
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Lo que Brasil le enseña a la región (y a la izquierda) - Revista El Diluvio revistaeldiluvio.com/lo-que-…
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
🚨 All major powers today are either authoritarian or led by figures who are pursuing autocratizing trajectories. 🚨
What will this new "age of authoritarian abundance" entail?
muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/1…
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
🏵️ Opposition parties up against an incumbent may benefit from "quiet coalitions," or coalitions in which parties remain independent but work together.
Read more from Rachel Kleinfeld:
muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/1…
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
To be clear- the main issue with the White House working with Alejandro Betancourt isn't a moral one. Transitions to democracy certainly require concessions and letting criminals go free. Venezuelans undertand that. Most of us understand the US has no choice but to work with Delcy Rodriguez, Diosdado Cabello and Jorge Rodriguez, for example.
The actual issue here is this is terrible business and not likely to lead to economic recovery. This is the same man who's partly responsible of the destruction of the electricity and oil industries in Venezuela. He has been probed for laundering BILLIONS from these industries, which are now destroyed to the point of needing complete reconstruction. So what exactly makes him a necessary evil? Why is the man behind the collapse in charge of the reconstruction?
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Breaking News: A whistle-blower at the U.S. Postal Service said Trump officials were defying court orders with a “secretive, rushed” effort affecting voting by mail. nyti.ms/460WZa8
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Tiranía sin máscaras en Nicaragua, Editorial de El País elpais.com/opinion/2026-07-2… vía @elpais_america
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
FT Exclusive: The Trump administration has collected more than $13bn in revenues from Venezuelan oil sales this year, according to FT calculations, but has said almost nothing about what has happened to the money. ft.trib.al/1K9B0QT
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
"Just as illiberal incumbent leaders have become savvier about skewing elections in their favor, democratic societies must become savvier about these manipulations."
journalofdemocracy.org/onlin…
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Starting in early 2025, Elon Musk and the Trump administration began terminating USAID's programs and firing its staff — with Musk himself boasting about "feeding it into the woodchipper." One year ago today, USAID was officially dissolved, its remaining programs haphazardly folded into the State Department. Amid all the lies and misinformation that have followed, some facts about what has actually been lost:
• USAID saved more than 3 million lives a year at a cost of less than $10/month per American. That is what was destroyed. On purpose.
• According to Boston University's Global Impact Counter — which tracked deaths attributable to the cuts until it stopped operations in February 2026 — an estimated 781,000 people died preventable deaths in the first year, including 518,000 children.
• Global child mortality (the number of children who die before their fifth birthday) rose in 2025 for the first time in 35+ years — by 200,000 additional deaths.
• USAID's 50-country disease surveillance network — the system that cut outbreak response times from 2 weeks to 48 hours — is gone. We are now watching an unprecedented Ebola outbreak unfold in real time — with the highest first-month caseload and death rate in modern history.
• Programs reaching 93 million women and children were cut 92%. TB programs cut 56%. Water and sanitation cut 86%. Over 2,000 health facilities permanently closed.
• 25 million fewer people received humanitarian assistance in 2025. The overall humanitarian budget was slashed 74% — from $14.1 billion to $3.7 billion.
• 363 million people face acute hunger in 2026. The famine early-warning system that would have seen it coming went dark for five months.
• $1.7 billion in democracy and governance funding (election monitoring, anti-corruption work, support for independent media and civil society) was terminated.
• 360+ independent media outlets lost funding. Hundreds of legal clinics closed.
• Far from saving money, the Trump administration itself has already said the dismantlement will cost taxpayers at least $19.2 billion in cancellation fees, severance, and penalties. That's more than half of USAID's annual budget — spent on destruction and closeout, not support for vulnerable people.
• American farmers, universities, and businesses are among the casualties too. USAID partnered with more than 3,500 U.S. companies and maintained 17 university-based research labs. Its work with U.S.-based contractors and the private sector generated hundreds of thousands of American jobs and multiplied the return on every dollar spent. Those markets and partnerships are gone.
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Beyond the staggering moral dimensions, the wholesale destruction of USAID in the blink of an eye last year will live as one of the worst foreign policy and national security blunders in American history.
@SamanthaJPower lists just some of the tragic, immediate costs and consequences below.
Longterm, it will mean a world less stable and free--with more violence and conflict; disease, pandemics and mass migrations. Neither oceans nor the military can shield the U.S. from the impacts.
AND this shameful and foolish abandonment will result in less respect for, and allegiance to, the United States of America.
Starting in early 2025, Elon Musk and the Trump administration began terminating USAID's programs and firing its staff — with Musk himself boasting about "feeding it into the woodchipper." One year ago today, USAID was officially dissolved, its remaining programs haphazardly folded into the State Department. Amid all the lies and misinformation that have followed, some facts about what has actually been lost:
• USAID saved more than 3 million lives a year at a cost of less than $10/month per American. That is what was destroyed. On purpose.
• According to Boston University's Global Impact Counter — which tracked deaths attributable to the cuts until it stopped operations in February 2026 — an estimated 781,000 people died preventable deaths in the first year, including 518,000 children.
• Global child mortality (the number of children who die before their fifth birthday) rose in 2025 for the first time in 35+ years — by 200,000 additional deaths.
• USAID's 50-country disease surveillance network — the system that cut outbreak response times from 2 weeks to 48 hours — is gone. We are now watching an unprecedented Ebola outbreak unfold in real time — with the highest first-month caseload and death rate in modern history.
• Programs reaching 93 million women and children were cut 92%. TB programs cut 56%. Water and sanitation cut 86%. Over 2,000 health facilities permanently closed.
• 25 million fewer people received humanitarian assistance in 2025. The overall humanitarian budget was slashed 74% — from $14.1 billion to $3.7 billion.
• 363 million people face acute hunger in 2026. The famine early-warning system that would have seen it coming went dark for five months.
• $1.7 billion in democracy and governance funding (election monitoring, anti-corruption work, support for independent media and civil society) was terminated.
• 360+ independent media outlets lost funding. Hundreds of legal clinics closed.
• Far from saving money, the Trump administration itself has already said the dismantlement will cost taxpayers at least $19.2 billion in cancellation fees, severance, and penalties. That's more than half of USAID's annual budget — spent on destruction and closeout, not support for vulnerable people.
• American farmers, universities, and businesses are among the casualties too. USAID partnered with more than 3,500 U.S. companies and maintained 17 university-based research labs. Its work with U.S.-based contractors and the private sector generated hundreds of thousands of American jobs and multiplied the return on every dollar spent. Those markets and partnerships are gone.
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
“promised economic growth & social peace cannot be achieved w/out reforms to ensure the rule of law..success of US plan hinges on Venezuela establishing & sustaining an independent, efficient judicial system, & improving contract rights and human rights” chathamhouse.org/2026/06/us-…
Tatiana Benavides Santos retweeted
Excited to share the publication of the @CUP_PoliSci Element "New Forms of Democratic Erosion in Latin America" (co-authored with the brilliant @l_gamboag).
Available to download and read for free until June 3 here: doi.org/10.1017/978100986248…

























