tunefed

agree with mungi that pulling is the most important part of FWA growth rn we have ~$2m of Ξ in the pool which is already enough for the protocol to scale what we really need is more demand for pulls but i don’t think a small RTP improvement from 0.8 → 0.9 is enough to drive that demand casual users don’t care if their odds of pulling a punk are 0.000002x or 0.000003x trad gambling has millions of users despite unfair/unverifiable odds and no guaranteed settlement what we really need is: accessibility + distribution two things can catalyze this: - initial distribution for collections/tokens the first FWAir collection launch pushed pulls back to TGE level activity over 3k pulls in just a few hours! that’s an incredible win but i think liquid tokens could attract even more attention than NFTs FWA could become the pumpfun of ethereum but with a fairer/anti-bot gacha mechanism i know its identity is mostly built around NFTs but using it for initial token launches could potentially generate $$$$ in daily revenue for $FWA holders we want to save ethereum, not NFTs! - integrations with other protocols a $200 gacha ticket is expensive for many ppl and they don’t want to learn about refunds, queues, settlement, gas fees, or delays just to play both the cost and complexity can be solved by integrating FWA into products that already have distribution imagine uniswap giving you an option on every swap to put 0.01% into a shared FWA ticket pool, with the entire daily prize going to one lucky trader embedding FWA everywhere could bring massive volume into the ethereum gacha machine just sharing my thoughts pretty sure @rhynotic has considered these already long FWA