Jack Miller retweeted
Review: Theological Foundations For Counseling By @jvfesko | The Heidelblog
@RScottClark @heidelcast @heidelbergrefo1 @SimonettaCarr @BakerAcademic
buff.ly/1NC6Ssl
Jack Miller retweeted
When God called Abraham, He was already looking beyond one man, one family, and one nation. “In you all the families of the earth will be blessed” (Genesis 12:3). That promise kept moving through Israel’s history until Scripture finally tells us where it was heading. Paul says the promise was spoken to Abraham and to his “seed,” and then adds plainly, “that is, Christ” (Galatians 3:16).
Israel mattered because God chose that nation as the historical line through which the Messiah would come. The covenants, the promises, the law, and the patriarchs belonged to them, and “from whom is the Christ according to the flesh” (Romans 9:4–5). Yet the blessing was never meant to stop at Israel’s borders.
This is what becomes so glorious in the gospel. The nations do not have to become ethnic Israel in order to receive Abraham’s blessing. Paul says, “those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer” (Galatians 3:9). Gentiles who were once “separate from Christ” and “strangers to the covenants of promise” have been brought near by His blood (Ephesians 2:12–13).
Furthermore, the blessing promised to the nations is not vague prosperity or national success. It is reconciliation to God through Christ, justification by faith, the gift of the Spirit, and entrance into the people of God. “In Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles” (Galatians 3:14). The promise lands in a Person.
And I must say, this should humble every nation. No people, culture, race, or civilization comes to Christ with something to boast about. We come as sinners needing mercy. From every tribe and tongue and people and nation, God is gathering a people for the Lamb (Revelation 5:9).
So the nations are blessed through the promised Seed who came through Israel, Jesus Christ. And those who receive that blessing do what every redeemed sinner eventually learns to do gladly: bow before Him, confess Him as Lord, and give glory to the King who fulfilled the promise made long before any of us were born.
Jack Miller retweeted
Saved Outside the Covenant
1689 federalism dates the formal existence of the covenant of grace from the death of Christ. The Abrahamic covenant is assigned to another category: earthly promises, a mixed seed, a covenant in its own right. The Mosaic covenant likewise stands outside the covenant of grace as a legal administration superimposed on it.
The dating generates a population problem. Ask under what covenant Adam was saved. The Adamic covenant supplies his condemnation: broken by the head, its curse administered on the race in real time, death reigning from Adam to Moses (Rom 5:14). For his salvation the scheme offers the covenant of grace "as revealed in the promise." A covenant revealed in promise is a covenant announced. It has not been cut. It constitutes no community, administers no benefits, gathers no one. Adam believes, and stands under no salvation covenant at all.
Multiply Adam by forty centuries. Every believer before the new covenant lives under covenants the scheme itself defines as non-saving, awaiting a saving covenant the scheme dates after their deaths. The fathers are saved on the security of the Pactum Salutis, Christ's obedience credited proleptically, the former sins passed over in divine forbearance (Rom 3:25). The Pactum is an eternal ground. Administration requires a covenant in history. Between the eternal ground and the historical man, the scheme interposes a promise and a memorandum of forbearance. The result is an old world with a covenant basis for condemnation and no covenant basis for grace: the curse administered through a covenant in force, mercy administered around a covenant in waiting.
Romans 5 forbids the asymmetry. Paul runs the two federal administrations in parallel grammar and parallel history: judgment through one trespass, free gift through one act of righteousness, death reigning, grace reigning. The gift in Paul is as covenantal, as located, as administered as the trespass.
Kline resolved the difficulty at the level of covenant dating and covenant form. The covenant of grace commences at the protevangelium: Genesis 3:15 initiates the redemptive covenant in the aftermath of the broken covenant of works. Genesis 6:18 records its establishment — the verb is hēqîm, the upholding of a covenant already in existence, deployed at the crisis when the promise had reduced to one worshiping family. Genesis 15 cuts and constitutes the covenant community: marked with circumcision, carrying land and a seed as stars and sand. Abraham is the constitution of a community already under grace, never the founder of a parallel arrangement outside it. The covenant is one; its administrations are successive. Under that dating, the Pactum acquires its historical instrument from the first day of the fall: the eternal covenant's outcome is administered in time through the covenant of grace, Adam gathered in at its initiation, the fathers dying inside it (Heb 11), the new covenant arriving as its eschatological administration under the same federal Head.
The fathers were saved inside the covenant because salvation has never been administered anywhere else.
#1689Federalism #CovenantOfGrace #CovenantTheology #FederalHeadship #MGKline
Bingo! Give the man a cigar
If Romans 8:1 and "no condemnation now" is an eschatological settled present matter because of the finished work of Christ, then how is it that a so-called "final salvation" is dependent on my good works? a.co/d/0dHlnhrp
Jack Miller retweeted
1689 has turned Abraham's star into a flickering ember.
Its confession says it plainly: the covenant of grace is "revealed in the gospel; first of all to Adam in the promise of salvation by the seed of the woman, and afterwards by farther steps, until the full discovery thereof was completed in the New Testament." Revealed at every step, established at none — established, on 1689 federalism's development of those words, only in the New Covenant, the covenant of grace formally constituted in Christ's blood. Under that filing Abraham's star can announce a fire. It cannot be one.
Two texts refuse the filing. Paul calls the Abrahamic covenant "ratified by God" — confirmed beforehand — and rules that the law, arriving centuries later, does not annul it (Gal 3:17). A ratified covenant is a constituted covenant; the inheritance runs on it, not on a later enactment that replaces it. And the Hebrews contrast the filing leans on is aimed elsewhere: the new covenant is "not like" the covenant made with the fathers when God took them out of Egypt (Heb 8:9). That covenant is Sinai. Set beside Sinai, the new covenant stands in Abraham's line — the ratified promise arriving at its fullness, the old national administration set aside.
Establishment language does not wait for Abraham either. The first "I will establish my covenant" in Scripture is spoken to Noah (Gen 6:18). The covenant of grace was established, ratified, and administered from the garden's edge. It was never an announcement awaiting a constitutive act, and its grace was never retroactive.
An ember is what you call a flame you have decided not to see. The star was never flickering. The filing is.
#Romans11 #CovenantTheology #MeredithKline #AbrahamicCovenant
Jack Miller retweeted
Wisdom in Times of Illness, Grief, or Loss
It is often hard to know what to say or what to do when someone you know experiences sickness, suffers a loss, or faces death. Thankfully, our fathers in the faith have thought long and hard about what to say
kimriddlebarger.com/the-ridd…
Must be a Coen brothers film…
"a nearly three-hour Elizabeth Holmes documentary is the #1 movie in the country." worldofreel.com/blog/2026/10…
Jack Miller retweeted
Read Barnabas, Justin, & Irenaeus. They taught the same covenant theology as Bullinger & Calvin. They didn't oppose Baptists & Anabaptists because there weren't any!
So, no, they didn't explicitly tie covenant to baptism but they did baptize babies and they did teach one covenant of grace, multiple administrations.
It's like arguing that Ignatius didn't teach the Trinity bec he didn't use anti-Arian rhetoric.🤦🏻♂️
Replying to @RetiredOpinions
Covenantal infant baptism wasn't taught until Calvin. So you have to say the church was wrong about the theology behind infant baptism for 1500 years. That's quite a claim.
Jack Miller retweeted
The Law says, “Do this and live.” The Gospel says, “Christ has done it. Believe and live.” If you don't get this, you don't get the Reformation. And you don't get the Gospel.
Jack Miller retweeted
“First, the Covenant of Works with Adam was a covenant of works. Recent discussion distorted this simple truth. There is no grace in this first covenant. Sin had not yet entered human history. There is no demerit for redemptive grace to be applicable. Others have suggested a different use of “grace” to describe God’s beneficence to Adam in the covenant. They argue that the promise is not merited by the obedience of Adam. They maintain that the unmerited nature of the sanction makes it grace. This abstraction obfuscates the actual reality. Just as the disobedience of Adam warrants the unending just wrath of the King, the covenant obedience of Adam warrants the glorification in the royal temple of God. To deny the latter is to deny the former. Finally, the question is not one of merit, but of covenant justice. The legal covenant promises the blessing sanction upon fulfillment of the stipulations of the covenant. It is a matter of strict justice for the King to deliver on what was promised if the stipulation is met. It is precisely a covenant of works because the blessing is contingent upon fulfillment of the stipulation. The sanctioned blessing is merited by obedience to the stipulation.”
a.co/d/0bAXWbt9
Jack Miller retweeted
Excellent deep dive 3-part presentation of the case for Reformed Covenantal Infant Baptism taught by our pastor, Rev. Martin Emmrich:
1) sermonaudio.com/sermons/5525……
2) sermonaudio.com/sermons/5122……
3) sermonaudio.com/sermons/5192……
Everything or nothing. Christ no part-way Savior.
Jack Miller retweeted
COMMON SENSE: When I watched Katie Zacharias's press conference, like so many, I felt uncomfortable about her performance. Obviously, with her being under a great deal of pressure, she didn't fare well. I felt badly for her.
What I didn't expect was the avalanche of hostile criticism from not only the media, but also from nearly everyone else. In my opinion, the intensity of the malice was undeserved. It was so bad that I suspect Zacharias will have difficulty getting over it.
Her self-worth may even suffer. Not everybody is built to sustain such criticism.
From my own personal experience, I can attest to exactly what it feels like to be constantly bombarded with criticism. Rarely does a day go by when I am not attacked by Woke Leftists and even by friends. America certainly does not lack in its number of mean-spirited people.
I don't mind though. I can handle it. Clearly, Katie Zacharias couldn't. She has been treated worse than the woman who murdered her three children.
I wish Zacharias well. She wasn't a good fit, but she deserved better treatment than she received.
—Jack Watts
amazon.com/Thirty-Years-Sobe…
A cosmopolitan lot! Apparently, from every kindred, every tribe…
“In related news, yesterday the Carolina Journal reported, “10 noncitizens indicted for lying about citizenship, illegally voting.” The ten, who “appeared in shackles before a magistrate judge,” included “three natives of Germany, two of Jamaica, and one each of Canada, Haiti, Panama, the former Yugoslavia, and an illegal alien from El Salvador.””
- Coffee and Covid ( @jchilders98 )
Paul was always a bit goofy-phoophie
people.com/paul-mccartney-cl…
Technological advancement…
There is a mountain of unworn clothes in the driest desert on earth, large enough to be photographed from space. It grows by 39,000 tons a year and almost none of it will ever rot.
The Atacama, in northern Chile, is a place where it may not rain for a decade. On its edge is a duty-free port called Iquique. Every year about 59,000 tons of clothing arrives there from Europe, America and Asia. It is last season's stock that never sold, and the bags people leave at charity shops.
Dealers pick through it for anything they can resell across South America. Two thirds of it is worthless. Nobody will pay to ship it back out, so lorries drive it into the desert at night and tip it.
The local landfill refuses to take it. The reason given is that the clothing does not biodegrade and is full of chemicals. Most of it is polyester, which is plastic, and in a place with no rain and no soil life it will lie there for centuries. Some of it is set alight, and the smoke drifts over a town of 100,000 people.
In 2025 a Chilean court ruled that the dumps had done serious damage to the land.
For most of history this could not have happened. Clothes were wool, linen and leather. They were worn out, handed down and patched, and at the very end a rag merchant paid for the scraps. In Yorkshire, from 1813, old woollens were shredded and spun into new cloth. Anything left went on the fields, where wool breaks down in months and feeds the grass.
Nobody ever had to find a desert for worn-out wool. We invented a fabric that cannot die, and then we started making it to be thrown away.

















