
Private local AI server for small businesses: your data stays inside your company. Founder @ClaryelCom.
Como, Italy
Joined December 2011
- Tweets3.8K
- Following862
- Followers462
- Likes9K
Replying to @Pablo_Arreola @ZorlakRules
Elegir entre local o nube no tiene sentido: uso los dos, cada uno para lo suyo. Justo hoy publiqué algo sobre eso en mi perfil.
Same here: slow local jobs chew through the cheap work, cloud gets the hard bits. Wrote up my mixed setup on my profile today.
Replying to @KmAsiff
Local vs cloud is a false choice to me. I run both: cloud for heavy lifting, local for private stuff. Posted about this mix this morning.
Replying to @noah_waldner @sama
16ms locally for the small decisions, cloud for the hard ones, that's exactly the split that works for me too. Shared my version of it today.
Replying to @ivanfioravanti @nicolasembleton
Ha, I'd push both. Local for private daily work, cloud for the heavy lifting. Just wrote up a year of running that mix on my profile 😄
Replying to @0xkydo
Freedom and utilization aren't rivals if you mix them: local for the steady stuff, cloud for the bursts. Posted my setup on my profile this morning.
Replying to @corujautx
Fair point, Electron eats half my RAM too 😅 Still, local vs cloud isn't a choice for me, I run both. Posted about that mix yesterday.
Replying to @halukturken
Bence yerel mi bulut mu diye seçmek anlamsız, ikisini birlikte kullanıyorum. Dün profilimde tam bunu yazdım.
Replying to @don_tech1
数学没错,但问题不在二选一。我是混着用:自己的数据在本地,算力大的活上云。今早刚写过这个。
«10 years ago, you needed a team and a million dollars to make hardware.
Today, you need a laptop…»
👍✌️👌
I have zero hardware background.
Today a Shenzhen hardware founder told me that doesn't matter anymore.
More and more people like me are starting physical AI companies. Here's why:
1. ChatGPT 6 Astra designs the board.
Describe what you want and it draws the circuit. You still get an engineer to check it.
2. Shenzhen prints it in 2 days.
A custom circuit board at your door in 48 hours. Flexible boards like the one inside these glasses can be back in 12 hours.
3. One supplier does everything.
Some take you from a sketch all the way to mass production.
4. Building is no longer the bottleneck. Customers are.
Robot and humanoid companies here don't need more partners. They need people who'll actually buy.
10 years ago, you needed a team and a million dollars to make hardware.
Today, you need a laptop and a flight to Shenzhen.
What coding did for software, AI plus Shenzhen is doing for hardware.
What part have you been struggling to source? Drop it below and I'll go find it while I'm here.
Replying to @Josephyala
Well put. I don't pick one: local for what must stay mine, cloud for scale. Notes from a year of mixing both: xitter.gq/uctive/status/21157161…
🚀 MixAI: I’m Choosing a Mix of Local and Cloud AI — Here’s Why. (1/2)
Almost a year of hands-on experiments. Hardware ranging from $500 to $15,000. Cloud APIs, AI agents, and real-world tasks for businesses and homes. From now on, I’ll be sharing more about this combined approach to AI — one I believe has a very promising future.
Things are changing almost every day. But AI technology has already reached a point where we can achieve reliable results and realistically plan how to use it over the next year or two.
And I’ve come to a simple conclusion: we don’t need to choose between local and cloud AI. We need to learn how to get the best out of both.
This goes far beyond simply connecting different models or orchestrating them. It’s about planning the entire system: which tasks should run locally, which should go to external models, how to distribute computing resources, which subscriptions make sense, and what hardware is actually worth buying.
We also need to plan our physical infrastructure — computers, servers, GPUs, memory, power consumption, and future expansion.
I believe local AI will become an essential part of our lives. It’s already making its way into smartphones, personal computers, and even experimental operating systems.
⚖️ Four Things That Matter Most
1. Real value. The number one priority is getting useful, practical results.
2. Cost. How much are we actually paying to complete a task — not just for hardware, subscriptions, or tokens?
3. Security. This deserves its own category, outside any ranking. Personal data, privacy, and control over our infrastructure require special attention.
4. Ease of use. How easily, quickly, and reliably can we get the job done?
These are the criteria I use to compare technologies and build my own setup.
☁️ Subscriptions and APIs: Two Worlds Starting to Merge
This is an interesting topic that often gets overlooked.
Cloud AI can be accessed through subscriptions with usage limits or through APIs where you pay for what you actually use.
Each approach has its own economics, limitations, and advantages. And they need to be evaluated separately.
But the line between them is starting to blur.
A recent example is OpenAI. Eligible ChatGPT Pro subscribers can receive $100 to $500 per month in API credits, depending on their subscription tier. These credits require separate activation, and API billing remains separate.
That’s a pretty interesting example of two pricing models coming together.
So I’m not just comparing models. I’m also exploring the economics of subscriptions and APIs, their limitations, and how to combine them efficiently.
➡️ Coming up in Part 2/2: The three areas I’m actively researching, my hardware experiments, AI agents working together, and how I plan to make all this information accessible to you. 🚀
Replying to @NikTek
My RAM is already paid for, so it runs my private stuff and the cloud gets the heavy jobs. Both, not either. Posted about it today.
Replying to @Chaos2Cured
Long live open source, but I wouldn't give up the cloud either. Mixing both works best for me, posted about it earlier today.
Replying to @vishalsingh2972
Rent vs own is a false choice. I run both: local for private work, cloud for the heavy lifting. Shared my setup on my profile today.
Replying to @The_Observer00X
Дома виртуалочка с пачкой приложений и впн, а на телефоне удаленочка с одним ярлычком…
Ну а как крутят орешь - «окей, сири-гугль заметай следы!» 🤣👌
Replying to @jenzhuscott
Neither, honestly. Local vs cloud is a false choice; I mix both daily and posted about exactly that this morning.
Replying to @RileyRalmuto @kimmonismus
Cloud suits the labs, local suits us, but I stopped picking a side. I mix both and posted about how that works for me this morning.
Replying to @Oluwaphilemon1
8 sessions on two 4090s is a good answer to the idle-hardware worry. I still pair it with cloud for big jobs, posted about that mix today.
Robots lay all the brick walls of a house for the first time in the Netherlands
Amsterdam-based startup Monumental announced that its robots completed all the brickwork on a house in the city of Almere. The machines handled straight and curved walls, different types of bricks and even laid bricks to form raised lettering.
The company’s CEO, Salar al-Khafaji, announced the results on October 28. Over the coming weeks, the robots are expected to be used in the construction of another 15 houses.
However, the technology is limited to bricklaying and does not mean the entire construction process is fully automated. Humans still supervise the machines and carry out tasks the robots cannot handle.
Monumental hopes the technology will speed up construction and help address the labour shortage.
However, it is too early to talk about robots replacing construction workers on a mass scale: the system’s reliability and cost-effectiveness still need to be tested in large-scale construction projects.






