Engineering lead at @RedHat: @OpenShift cloud-native app-dev & applied AI portfolio. Languages, sport, travel. My own opinions.

Europe
Joined September 2010
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Scale distributed inference and control AI serving costs with confidence. llm-d 1.0 brings multi-tenant quality of service, zero-downtime rolling updates, and prefix-cache-aware routing to your production workloads. Explore the release: red.ht/4ysmUU5 #PyTorchCon
5
7
6
35
6,313
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
When measuring open source security, counting vulnerabilities only tells part of the story. Real risk depends on context, attack paths, and how fast reusable fixes can travel through the software ecosystem. Check out the new Open Source Security Signals: red.ht/4s7mAIK
4
7
949
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Let’s be very clear: there is value in automating tedious and repetitive and dangerous tasks; there is value in delegating certain work to our machines that can do the work tirelessly and much faster. But at the same time, let us remember that there is value in the activity of engaging one’s mind and body to discover, to understand, to create, and yes, even to struggle and overcome. Indeed, these are some of the things that make us human, that contribute to giving us meaning, that are part of the simple joy of experiencing being alive.
47
224
17
1,355
41,609
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
It’s artificial intelligence, Sundar. And in the history of computing, this puerile attempt to rename it simply because of the simpleminded whims of an incompetent and corrupt narcissist will be seen as a failure of leadership, an abandonment of intellectual integrity, and an embarrassment for any who join with him.
Great to meet today with @POTUS, @JDVance, @SpeakerJohnson and Administration + tech leaders. Important conversation and we signed today the White House Accord on Super Intelligence. As I shared today, Google has invested hundreds of billions in the last two years alone, with more to come, across the entire stack, to deliver benefits for America and the world. We’re working to build products that deliver real value for people and businesses, invest in local communities, and build trust in the technology. Industry also has to innovate responsibly. Google’s focused on building the right way, with appropriate testing, evaluations, red-teaming, and other safeguards against misuse and misalignment – and releasing models or products only after they’ve been thoroughly reviewed. We are committed to working with other industry leaders to establish norms and build public confidence. The White House Accord and the Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities signed today is a solid basis for moving forward - it contains real tangible steps to promote safe development, while delivering the economic and scientific benefits of this technology.
202
345
29
2,672
169,173
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
I can’t decide if people who assert that contemporary AIs can think or are conscious do so out of fear or out of envy. But I can say that any such people do so either out of emotion or perhaps driven by some pecuniary interest in it being true, not from any fully informed or defensible position.
49
37
8
291
32,079
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Speaking of scientific, Joscha, you of all people should know that one cannot prove a negative. Indeed, you make the claim that LLMs can think. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, as Carl Sagan observed. Thus, the onus is on you and others who make that claim to give evidence as to its veracity. The process of science then follows to test that that claim. By inverting the demand you yourself are engaging in unscientific methods.
The claim that "LLMs cannot think" is unscientific, unless supported by a very difficult argument about non equivalence of causal structure producing anthropomorphic outputs. The claim requires a formally rigorous definition of thinking that captures how humans mentally manipulate conceptual structure. Since LLMs can reproduce all kinds of human output that require operations that are typically considered to involve thought (eg. scene understanding, text summarization, translation, computer programs, mathematical proofs, common sense arguments, spatial cognition, theory of mind), it has to be shown that LLMs reach these results in fundamentally different ways than human minds. In principle, this is not impossible (given that thinking is still relatively poorly understood by cognitive neuroscience), but would be surprising, because it has been shown that the causal structure of computer vision models is structurally equivalent to what neuroscience discovered about visual cognition in primates. In any case, saying that LLMs don't think cannot reasonably mean that LLMs are inferior to human cognition (since that this evidently not true), but that LLMs discovered an equivalent yet at least equally powerful mechanism.
49
60
4
450
26,567
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Replying to @PessimistsArc
Right. Dario was already claiming that GPT2 was too dangerous to open source back in 2019. I made fun of them then. Everyone should make fun of them now.
395
3,182
464
25,968
1,993,997
To friends in Israel and around the world celebrating - may the arrival of Rosh Hashanah bring with it the promise of peaceful renewal; may the silence of Yom Kippur be an occasion for peace and inner light; may the festival of Sukkot be filled with joy, gratitude and fellowship.
2
109
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
🦔An NYU mathematician says OpenAI used his own progress against him to beat him to one of the biggest unsolved problems in mathematics. Tristan Buckmaster had been working toward a Millennium Prize proof using OpenAI's Codex when information about his progress reached OpenAI. Days later, OpenAI published a full proof of the same problem using the same uncommon approach, after burning $22.5 million in compute to get there. When Buckmaster confronted them, exec Sébastien Bubeck allegedly said "Why would you ruin your career?" and "If you don't want me to be nice, then I don't have to be nice." My Take OpenAI spent $22.5 million to solve a problem with a $1 million prize. They didn't do this for the bounty. They needed a headline that says "our AI solved one of the hardest problems in mathematics" and they needed it before someone else got credit. They started days after they heard about Buckmaster's progress and took the same uncommon approach he'd pursued for months. That's hard to explain as coincidence. Buckmaster did his work inside Codex. OpenAI reserves the right to train on Codex data. They admit they can't rule out that his usage helped improve their models. So a customer used their product, potentially handed them the roadmap, and then OpenAI outran him with $22.5 million in compute he could never match. I don't know if any of this was intentional. But if you're a researcher and you just watched this happen, I don't think you'd keep your best ideas inside someone else's product. Hedgie🤗 techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/op…
312
2,498
398
9,258
1,020,017
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
I do not fear the rise of artificial intelligence. But I do fear the rise of a small set of billionaires and companies who seek to build such things to increase their power and their wealth, all without transparency or accountability.
OpenAI had many opportunities to be forthright about this. They wrote a 38 page report on swarm behavior. They were directly asked by 31 members of Congress about whether incidents like this had occurred. They said nothing.
27
163
6
1,009
37,130
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Sending lots of love to the Apple community on my last day as CEO. My title changes tomorrow, but the love I have for the Apple community never will. Thank you for being a constant source of inspiration. My gratitude is endless, and I’m excited for the next chapter!
10,567
26,711
3,917
317,214
28,731,695
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Happy birthday, Linux! It's been an amazing 35 years!!
7
15
1
143
6,486
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Naturally, hard times tend to make folks withdraw into themselves; become more insular, more isolated, and focus on their own self-interest to a higher degree. I think we have to resist that urge, though. To force ourselves to the common good; to become the leaders we need.
1
1
12
312
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Looked back at a product manager who used to have lots of original writing on social media and over email a few years ago. Has 10x as many followers now… and an account that is ALL AI slop. Like unbearable generic slop slop. Nothing about PM any more. Is this another form of “AI physosis” for a “content creator?” I do not understand what the thinking of such folks is. “I managed to find a way to spend 10x as little time to spend on social media / newsletter writing and have 10x as much output with AI” thinking? Except it went from interesting to terrible. No longer putting in any effort
83
20
8
616
70,640
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
Check out the latest article in my newsletter: What Open-Weight AI Can Learn From Open Source linkedin.com/pulse/what-open… via @LinkedIn
1
5
1,166
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
How are leading organizations moving #AI from experimentation to enterprise value? Hear from @RedHat CTO @kernelcdub on how hybrid cloud platforms help scale AI workloads efficiently: red.ht/4pM1lLt
1
9
27
6,915
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
I think this is the most important concept to understand right now: LLMs can’t jump. OpenAI says an internal version of Astra, its next major model, has solved ten major open problems in mathematics and theoretical computer science. This is extraordinary. And I don’t use this word lightly. During my PhD in mathematics, I worked on a problem closely related to Gromov’s conjecture. For decades, constructing a non-sofic group—an infinite group whose finite pieces cannot be approximated by finite groups—was a dream shared by many of us. Now Astra appears to have done it. This is not a toy result. This is serious mathematics. But it is not “the most significant day in the history of mathematics”, as some have claimed. This claim confuses scale with kind. Astra has solved difficult problems inside existing conceptual worlds. Calculus, topology, and scheme theory created new conceptual worlds. They did not merely answer questions. They changed which questions mathematics could ask. Induction finds patterns. LLMs are extraordinary at it. Deduction follows implications. Using symbolic AI tools, LLMs are becoming formidable at traversing chains of logic that humans missed, abandoned, or could never afford to search. But abduction is different. Abduction invents the right concept, the right representation, the right question. That is the jump. Current LLMs can fill the gaps of knowledge left by humans. But they can’t jump beyond the external boundary of existing knowledge. * Full paper in the first reply
222
396
128
3,096
451,796
Vaclav Tunka (EN) retweeted
The AI sprint is hurtling to a world where a small number of billionaires - without accountability or consequences- controls the information that flows to world at scale. This is a world in which trust, empathy, creativity, and love - behaviors that are central to what it means to be human - must burn even more brightly so as to push back the darkness.
The AI sprint is hurtling toward a world where anyone can build personal concierges to do everything from executive presentations to March Madness brackets

3
5
2
40
4,505