Winnie Balagso

The craziest thing I saw on the road was a BMW SUV pulling a trailer with a Ferrari on it. What a great country.

On this date in 1950, John Matuszak was born. The former NFL defensive lineman later became a familiar face to movie fans as Sloth in the 1985 adventure classic "The Goonies." BITE-SIZED FACT | Matuszak won two Super Bowls with the Oakland Raiders before his acting role made him part of an enduring piece of 1980s movie nostalgia. He died in 1989 at age 38. #80s

Cute body painted top with body paint style blue jeans and a Lamborghini Countach.

The OP posting pics with Seonho at a wedding.. “Please stop asking if it’s an AI-generated edit.. It really is actor Kim Seonho himself 🙏🏼 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ” #KimSeonho #김선호

Shallipopi pulled up to the club with Burna Boy in his $200k Lamborghini huracan 🏎️

QP your own 🎬🖤 THROWBACK THURSDAY MOVIE! The legendary 1960 Alfred Hitchcock classic Psycho and that shower scene that made an entire generation think twice before pulling the curtain closed? 😱 But this time, the girl FIGHTS BACK! 💥🦵 “Wrong girl.” 😏 Happy Throwback Thursday, my friends!🖤🎃 And yes Grok has you wear clothes to shower. #ThrowbackThursday #Psycho

Consider Adaptation: Charlie Kaufman wrote a script about himself trying to write a script based on The Orchid Thief, which is a real book by Susan Orlean about real orchid poacher John Laroche. Adaptation has three basic threads: Susan three years in the past meeting Laroche, Charlie in the present adapting her book, and the two of them converging in Florida at the end. Susan's writing plot really happened and is narrated by quotes from her book, Charlie's screenplay plot is self-aware and semi-fictional, and the final act with both of them is totally fictional. The movie also includes real screenwriting guru Robert McKee and fictional twin brother Donald Kaufman, the latter of whom is writing a script called The Three, about a serial killer with three personalities, which is influenced by McKee's ten principles of screenwriting. In the third act Donald starts helping Charlie finish The Orchid Thief, at which point Adaptation changes from a meandering dramedy about writer's block into a lurid thriller about sex and drugs. Susan tries to kill Charlie, Laroche gets eaten by an alligator, Donald dies in a car crash, and Charlie finishes the script with a character transformation (one of McKee's principles). This is the ending for both The Orchid Thief (the in-movie screenplay) and Adaptation (the real movie we're watching). The character finishes writing his own movie and the final voiceover (which McKee forbade) concludes both at the same time. There's also a bunch of meta dialogue about screenplays and writing, and some punny thematic considerations of "adaptation," but you get the idea. It's an elaborate spinning triple helix structure which ends up being recursive. Now consider Digger: It's a play within a movie. But why? It doesn't have the marvelous intricate structure of Adaptation. It also doesn't have the kind of persistent opinionated self-commentary that you'd find in a meta genre parody like Cabin in the Woods. When Digger shows its hand at the end of the first act you might think, "Oh, there's a second layer to attack the first layer. This is why it got bad reviews from liberal critics. It's a satire of a climate satire." But it's not. In fact, there's barely any separation at all between the commenting layer and the commented layer. Both share the same opinion that climate change is real, dire and caused by conservatives. They also share the opinion that the satire being presented is "sad, funny, and necessary," and one of the characters gives a speech explaining this. So why are there two layers? Are they just lampshading how bad the movie is? Are they in-beforing critics? Is it a midwit structural tic from a reaching director, like the character chapters in Weapons? Exotic formal choices usually have a purpose. Funny Games comments on itself, but there's a reason for it. Irreversible plays in reverse, but there's a reason for it. Imagine if Greta Gerwig's upcoming feminist Narnia movie plays in reverse for no reason. That's what this movie is like

Again, I was raised here. And I was at a family gathering last night with like 40 people in an apartment and my cousin was like yeah, we used to do this in smaller places so why not? When the weather cooperates, you can just have birthday parties at the beach and at the park.

Definitely having a Guillermo del Toro movie marathon today. It's only right. Going to start with Pan's Labyrinth ✨️🖤 On a side note, I can't wait to add Frankenstein to my Criterion collection.

lewis hamilton bought a 1991 ferrari f40 that sat untouched in a garage for over 30 years ferrari pulls the engine to restore it and finds stamped on the block: "44": his race number and you're telling me you don't believe in coincidences? YOU ARE THE CHOSEN ONE