This is f*cking insane. SpaceXAI engineer Lauren Tan:
"Last month I shipped 1,000 PRs. That's the output of a 20-person team
I don't read the code anymore. I go to sleep, my agents verify their own work and merge it, and I wake up to 20 PRs already on main
99% of engineers are still watching their agent type every line. That's why they can't scale past one"
In this 1-hour workshop, she shows exactly how to build the same setup from scratch
Watch every agent → Verify → Rules → Cloud agents → Auto-merge
step 1 → verification first - agents run the app and check their own work, so you stop being the bottleneck
step 2 → a feature map - agents know where every part of the app lives before they touch it
step 3 → every review comment becomes a lint rule - the same mistake never ships twice
step 4 → a bug bot reproduces every bug report in the cloud on its own
step 5 → agents merge their own PRs overnight - she reviews what landed in the morning
She calls it the "head chef" setup: you stop cooking and start running the kitchen
Anyone can prompt one agent. Almost nobody builds a kitchen that cooks without them
Worth more than any $2,000 agentic engineering course
Bookmark it and watch today
Then read the full article below ↓
Holy sh*t.
Elon's Grok Bot isn't just a chat window.
→ Tag @bot under any X post
→ Record a task once, it learns it
→ Give it its own email address
Try tonight: "What do you remember about me?"
12 more features + the fine print ↓
Holy sh*t.
Elon's Grok Bot isn't just a chat window.
→ Tag @bot under any X post
→ Record a task once, it learns it
→ Give it its own email address
Try tonight: "What do you remember about me?"
12 more features + the fine print ↓
Four people walked out of OpenAI and built rival AI labs.
Sam Altman just explained why. His answer is the most honest thing he's said about the AI race.
Ilya → SSI
Dario → Anthropic
Mira → Thinking Machines
Elon → xAI
Sam Altman:
"I think there is something that happens in many people's brains where they only trust themselves to build this because the stakes feel so high."
Then the part nobody says out loud. What each of them is really thinking:
"His approach is bad and so I can't let power get concentrated in his hands."
That's the real race. Not for the best model. For who gets to hold the most powerful technology ever built
Everyone thinks they're the only safe pair of hands. Including him
And what it cost him personally:
"Now I'm incredibly precisely scheduled and I have not gotten to do anything spontaneous in a long time."
He misses sitting in a coffee shop. Now there would be two security guards at the next tables
Bookmark it and watch till the end
Then read the full article below ↓
watch it too xitter.gq/0xcloudvex/status/2119…
This is f*cking insane. In February, Elon Musk told SpaceX's AI team that coding would be dead by the end of this year.
There are 54 days left.
His exact words at the all-hands, days after xAI merged into SpaceX:
"Things will move, maybe even by the end of this year, to where you don't even bother doing coding."
"The AI just creates the binary directly."
No Python. No JavaScript. No code review. You describe what you want, and AI ships the machine code.
He also promised Grok Code would be state of the art within 2–3 months
In September, he admitted Grok still trails Claude Opus 5.5
So is Musk early, or wrong?
In this 43-minute talk, he walks his whole company through what's coming for engineers and every business that lives on a screen
Worth more than any $3,000 AI course
Bookmark it and check back on December 31
Then read the article below ↓
This is f*cking insane. In February, Elon Musk told SpaceX's AI team that coding would be dead by the end of this year.
There are 54 days left.
His exact words at the all-hands, days after xAI merged into SpaceX:
"Things will move, maybe even by the end of this year, to where you don't even bother doing coding."
"The AI just creates the binary directly."
No Python. No JavaScript. No code review. You describe what you want, and AI ships the machine code.
He also promised Grok Code would be state of the art within 2–3 months
In September, he admitted Grok still trails Claude Opus 5.5
So is Musk early, or wrong?
In this 43-minute talk, he walks his whole company through what's coming for engineers and every business that lives on a screen
Worth more than any $3,000 AI course
Bookmark it and check back on December 31
Then read the article below ↓
This is f*cking insane. The man who led AI at Tesla thinks the next breakthrough is a smaller model.
Andrej Karpathy, now an Anthropic researcher (ex-OpenAI, ex-Tesla AI lead), on what he calls the "cognitive core":
"a few billion param model that maximally sacrifices encyclopedic knowledge for capability"
His point: today's models waste huge capacity memorizing the internet
"They're very good at stuff that occurs very often on the Internet"
Strip that out, keep the reasoning, and let the system around the model do the rest
In this 16-minute breakdown, Karpathy explains why the system around the model matters more than its size
Big model → Small core → Right tools → Closed loop → Self-improving agent
The model doesn't need to remember everything. It needs to know how to look it up
The harness does that part: it hands the model tools, records what happened, and feeds the result into the next run
Most people keep paying for a bigger model
The real edge is the loop that makes a small one useful
More valuable than another $2,000 AI course
Bookmark the conversation, then read the article below ↓
watch it too xitter.gq/0xcloudvex/status/2118…
Four people walked out of OpenAI and built rival AI labs.
Sam Altman just explained why. His answer is the most honest thing he's said about the AI race.
Ilya → SSI
Dario → Anthropic
Mira → Thinking Machines
Elon → xAI
Sam Altman:
"I think there is something that happens in many people's brains where they only trust themselves to build this because the stakes feel so high."
Then the part nobody says out loud. What each of them is really thinking:
"His approach is bad and so I can't let power get concentrated in his hands."
That's the real race. Not for the best model. For who gets to hold the most powerful technology ever built
Everyone thinks they're the only safe pair of hands. Including him
And what it cost him personally:
"Now I'm incredibly precisely scheduled and I have not gotten to do anything spontaneous in a long time."
He misses sitting in a coffee shop. Now there would be two security guards at the next tables
Bookmark it and watch till the end
Then read the full article below ↓
This is f*cking insane. SpaceXAI engineers built a bot whose only job is to build and audit their other bots.
They call it Dr. Eggbot.
It's one of 14 Grok Bot agents they actually run every day. In this 45-minute breakdown, they show all of them:
1:17 – a Chief of Staff bot that plans your whole day
6:25 – PM, designer and engineer bots shipping as one team
12:37 – a Figma bot that turns one keyframe into a full design
17:53 – Dr. Eggbot, the bot that builds and checks the others
25:16 – an engineering lead bot running entire agent swarms
32:28 – social bots that turn feedback on X into engineering tickets
38:53 – how skills become routines, and agents earn more autonomy
Chief of Staff → Team bots → Bot auditor → Agent swarms → Autonomous company
Most people still ask one chatbot everything
These engineers run 24/7 bots with their own memory, skills and tools. They design, code, test and merge PRs while the humans sleep
The scariest part isn't the swarm. It's the bot that hires and fires the other bots
Bookmark and watch it today, then start building your own team ↓
HOLY F*CK. YOUR GROK BOTS DON'T HAVE THEIR OWN COMPUTERS. THEY SHARE ONE. SAME FILES, SAME COOKIES, SAME LOGINS
and that's not even the craziest thing xAI didn't tell you
I spent a week reading 600+ posts, 60 hours of video and every page of the docs. then I checked every single claim
what holds up:
→ xAI's own team "promoted" one bot to chief of staff, kept quiet, and watched who'd figure it out
→ approvals expire in ~10 minutes. your 3 a.m. job dies waiting for you
→ one hourly routine can eat a week of usage in a day
→ type "claude" in its terminal and Grok Bot drives your Claude Code
→ the real money story is boring: a bot cut a Comcast bill by $43/mo
what doesn't:
→ "$50 → $5,273 on Polymarket in 2 days." no source. the author wrote "he claims" himself
plus 3 things xAI hid from you on purpose
read the full article below ↓
Holy f*ck. Elon Musk admitted Claude is better than Grok.
His exact words about his own model:
"It's not as good as, say, Opus 5.5 that just got released."
Then the comeback plan:
"I would expect that we probably catch up to frontier sometime next year, most likely"
And the number he's betting on:
"Grok Bot is growing about 100% a month"
His edge isn't code. It's data from SpaceX and Tesla, the physical world Anthropic can't touch
Because, in his words, "no one has yet made AI excellent at real-world engineering"
GrokBot → Chief of Staff → PM Team → Worker Agents → Autonomous Company
In this 22-minute interview, Musk breaks down why Grok is behind, how SpaceX data changes that, and a future with a billion humanoid robots
If your job happens on a screen, AI at work stops being optional soon
99% of people still use GrokBot like Google: one question, close the tab
More useful than most $2,990 AI courses
Bookmark it and watch today
Then read the article below ↓
Holy f*ck. Elon Musk says Grok Bot is doubling every month.
His exact words:
"Grok Bot is growing about a 100% a month"
And he's not pretending it's already on top:
"I would expect that we probably catch up to frontier sometime next year, most likely"
So where does the growth come from? Not one smarter bot. A team of them.
GrokBot → Chief of Staff → PMs → Workers → Autonomous Company
This isn't fan theory. SpaceXAI's own launch demo shows a Chief of Staff bot directing specialist bots
The Chief of Staff sets priorities and plans the day
PM bots break the plan into jobs and review what comes back
Workers ship it after you log off
99% of people still use GrokBot like Google: one question, close the tab
Almost nobody gives it a team to run
In this hour-long session, Musk joins SpaceXAI engineers to break down how one GrokBot becomes a whole team
More useful than a $5,000 agentic engineering course
Bookmark this and watch today
Then read the article below ↓
This is f*cking insane. One engineer. 2,000+ PRs in a single month.
SpaceXAI engineer Lauren Tan doesn't write most of her code anymore. Her Grok Bot agents do, while she sleeps.
In this 65-minute interview, she walks through the exact setup, from one agent to a full engineering team:
5:02 – why she stopped babysitting one agent at a time
16:15 – verification, the skill everything else depends on
21:38 – what goes into code and what stays with the agent
31:40 – every agent mistake becomes a permanent rule
36:44 – Grok Bot + Slack + Cursor wired into one autonomous loop
51:55 – agents that test, fix and merge PRs overnight
1:00:33 – turning her corrections into reusable skills
Grok Bot → Verification → Rules → Skills → Autonomous Team
Most people prompt one agent and watch it work
She built a team that checks its own work and ships without her
Bookmark and watch it today
Full interview below ↓
This is f*cking insane. 100+ GrokBots. One engineer. None of them waiting on him.
SpaceXAI engineer Nick Miller (ex-Cursor):
"99% of people are stuck with 1 GrokBot. That's 1% of what it can actually do.
I run 100+ GrokBots as one team: a Chief of Staff, a PM, QA and 95+ workers. In 30 minutes I'll show you how to build the same thing."
GrokBot → Chief of Staff → PM → QA → 95+ Workers
This isn't a hack. SpaceXAI's own launch demo shows a Chief of Staff bot handing work to specialist bots for recruiting, expenses and bug fixes
Nick just took it to 100+
The trick isn't more bots. More bots without structure is just more chaos
It's roles. One plans. One assigns. One checks. The rest ship
If you still open one bot at a time, you're using a team as an intern
Bookmark and watch the 30-minute demo before you build your next agent the hard way
Then read the full article below ↓
This is f*cking insane. Elon Musk admitted Grok is behind.
Then he dropped the number that matters:
"Grok Bot is growing about a 100% a month"
His own words on catching Anthropic and OpenAI:
"I would expect that we probably catch up to frontier sometime next year, most likely"
So how does #2 plan to win? Efficiency.
Grok 4.6 finishes a long task in about 53 turns and 0.5B input tokens
Claude Opus 5 Max needs about 103 turns and 2B
Half the steps. A quarter of the tokens. About $0.84 a task
Prompts → GrokBot → Agents → Self-Learning Systems → AI That Builds AI
Using AI isn't asking Grok a question and copying the answer
It's agents that learn from every failed run and come back better without you
95% of people still use Grok like a search bar. The 5% building self-learning agents will run everything
In this 1-hour session, Elon sits down with SpaceXAI engineers and maps out what AI engineering looks like next
Worth more than a Stanford AI course
Bookmark and watch it today
Then read the article below ↓
I THOUGHT MY GROK BOT TERMINAL WAS GLITCHING.
THE PART THAT SURPRISED ME WASN'T EVEN THE PROFIT.
$1,250 → $6,420.80.
5.14X. 24 simulated trades.
20 wins. 4 losses.
the biggest winners on the screen:
$BONK +$884
$WIF +$671
$PENGU +$512
no 100x moonshot. no single trade carrying the entire run.
the terminal has 5 agents doing different jobs:
SCOUT finds the setups
SHIELD checks liquidity and holders
SNIPER handles entries
TRAIL protects open positions
VAULT handles exits
6 setups get rejected before an order is placed.
then the balance crosses 5x.
the system stops and asks for human approval.
that's the part I'd never remove.
you can build a bot that buys every green candle. making one that knows when to stop is a completely different problem.
watch the balance and then read the article below ↓
This is f*cking insane. SpaceXAI engineer Lauren Tan:
"GrokBot is the most powerful agentic tool we've ever shipped, and only 1% of people use it right
I run a team of 15+ GrokBot agents. One Chief of Staff, 3 managers, 11 workers
That's what engineering looks like in 2026"
GrokBot → Chief of Staff → 3 Managers → 11 Workers
Most people give one agent one task and wait
She gives a team a goal and goes to sleep
In this 1-hour talk, she shows how to get 100% out of every agentic tool you use
Worth more than any $100 agent course on the internet
Skip Netflix tonight and watch this instead. You won't use GrokBot the same way again
Then read the full article below ↓
Holy sh*t. One SpaceXAI engineer runs a 20+ agent company while most people are still chatting with one bot.
SpaceXAI engineer Lauren Tan:
"99% of people are using Grok Bot at less than 1% of its actual potential"
"I'm running a fully autonomous team of 20+ Grok Bot agents"
One Bot → Loops → Graphs → Autonomous Fleet
In this 1-hour session, she builds an entire AI agent team from scratch
Grok Bot → Chief of Staff → PM → Workers → Ship
The Chief of Staff decides what gets done
The PM breaks it into tasks and checks the work
The workers never stop shipping
One agent answers questions. A team of agents runs the job
Bookmark it and watch today
This is f*cking insane.
99% of people use Grok Bot like Google.
A SpaceXAI lead engineer, ex-Cursor, uses it to run a 24/7 company:
"I run 20+ Grok cloud agents with a Chief of Staff, a PM and 15+ workers, and they never clock out"
Grok Bot → Chief of Staff → PM → Workers → Autonomous Fleet
The Chief of Staff plans the day and hands out every task.
The PM splits the work and checks everything the workers ship.
The workers never sleep.
20 minutes. One bot → a full team working for you while you sleep.
Anyone can chat with Grok Bot. Almost nobody builds the team.
Worth more than most $1,000 agentic engineering courses.
Bookmark and watch it today.
YOUR DOG UNDERSTANDS PHYSICS BETTER THAN ChatGPT.
That's not me. That's Jensen Huang's point.
Friction. Inertia. Cause and effect.
A toddler gets them. A pet gets them. Today's AI models don't.
That's why Huang calls physical AI the next wave:
→ AI that understands how the real world moves
→ put that AI inside a machine, and you get a robot
→ within 10 years, he expects new factories to be highly robotic
Not to replace people. Because the world is running out of workers, and the shortage is serious.
A chatbot lives on a server.
The biggest industries on Earth run on atoms.
The next wave isn't AI that talks better.
It's AI that can do the work.
Would you work next to a robot?







