soldier of fortune
in jail
Joined November 2010
- Tweets33.3K
- Following371
- Followers565
- Likes137
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
When a fighter jet loses its fuel system over the freezing North Atlantic Ocean, standard military procedure says the pilots must eject and let the aircraft sink.
On September 5, 1983, United States Air Force Captain Jon "Ghost" Alexander and First Lieutenant Karol Wojcikowski were 520 miles from land when their F-4E Phantom II suffered a catastrophic fuel valve failure.
In the icy Atlantic waves below, an ejected pilot had just ninety seconds of consciousness before freezing to death.
One hundred miles away, a four-engine KC-135A Stratotanker named North Star heard their mayday. Captain Robert Goodman, Captain Michael Clover, and boom operator Technical Sergeant Ron Craft turned their 100-ton tanker around immediately.
Even after they hooked up, the Phantom's broken valves could not take enough fuel, one engine flamed out, and the crippled fighter began dropping too slow for a jet tanker to stay connected.
So the crew of North Star broke every rule in the flight manual.
At just 1,400 feet above the waves, Captain Goodman lowered the massive tanker's landing gear in mid-air to create drag, pulled his four engines to idle, and slowed to 190 knots.
For the final 160 miles to Gander, Newfoundland, Sergeant Craft kept that rigid metal refueling boom locked tight inside the Phantom's spine, literally towing the crippled fighter through the sky until both men landed safely.
A refueling boom is built to pump gas. In American hands, it became a tow rope strong enough to drag two brothers home.
🤖 Made with AI
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
Must retweet of the day - Burnham in major scandal!
TWO TIER JUSTICE AND LABOUR COVER UP
Tommy Robinson has hired investigators to find out things about journalists.
He has been prosecuted for harassment.
Josh Simons, Labour MP and senior Keir Starmer No10 advisor, ran an illegal investigations and MI5 like data gathering, from inside No 10, to gather private and personal data about journalists to be used to coerce and blackmail them into being nice about Labour.
Labour set the spy operation up to spy on journo's and find embarrassing things about them to blackmail them with.
Josh Simons, Labor MP resigned in shame from No10 to evade a parliamentary and ICO investigation that could have led to CRIMINAL prosecution for SERIOUS GDPR/Data Protection offences.
Starmer denied all knowledge.
Josh Simons, then MP for Makerfield, latter resigned as an MP to open the door for Andrew Burnham.
Josh Simons is now back on twice an MPs salary as a special political advisor to guess who, ANDREW BURNHAM, in No 10!
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
In June 2024 the Lord Chancellor of the day and the Lady Chief Justice decided that a judge had done "significant reputational damage to the judiciary". This morning their successor told the MP who raised that judge's record that the criticism was the dangerous part.
The judge is Tan Ikram, the Deputy Chief Magistrate. In February 2024 he convicted 3 women of a terrorism offence for displaying images of the paragliders Hamas used on October 7th, and sent all 3 home with conditional discharges, observing that "emotions ran very high on this issue". It then emerged that he had liked a LinkedIn post condemning "Israeli terrorists". The conduct office accepted that the like was an accident, and recommended formal advice. The Lord Chancellor and the Lady Chief Justice of the day thought that too lenient, and raised it to a formal warning.
Throughout all of this he has sat on the Judicial Appointments Commission, which he joined in December 2023, and which chooses the people who become judges.
On October 1st, Nick Timothy, the Shadow Justice Secretary, wrote to the Lord Chancellor, Alex Norris, asking whether Judge Ikram should carry on. Norris's reply, published today, accuses Timothy of "selective reporting", and ends: "I would ask that you refrain from mounting this kind of dangerous public criticism in future."
So the office that found him damaging to the judiciary's reputation 2 years ago now finds the people who mention it the danger.
In the closed world of the judiciary, any complaint from inside is a matter for the proper procedures, and any complaint from outside is an attack on the rule of law. You are welcome to think whatever you like about a judge, so long as you never say it with his name attached, and an MP who says it in a letter has endangered the constitution.
And "selective reporting" is a strange charge to bring in a country where there is nothing else to report from. No court in England and Wales publishes a record of what each judge does. You cannot look up how a magistrate has sentenced, against the guidelines, over 10 years. You get the cases that make the papers, which are, by definition, a selection, and then you get told off for selecting.
Progress would end that. Our Court Transparency Act creates a publicly searchable register of every sentence handed down in every criminal court in England and Wales, linked to the offence, the guideline range, the sentence given, and the judge who gave it. Every piece of information the justice system generates belongs, by default, to the public, and the burden falls on the institution to justify withholding it.
Under that system nobody would need Nick Timothy's letter, or Alex Norris's reply. Any voter in the country could look the judge up and draw their own conclusions, and no Lord Chancellor could call that dangerous.
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
"Who is bankrolling Nigel Farage's party?" asks Bridget Phillipson. "Labour will protect our democracy from foreign influence."
Right. Same question back.
Who is bankrolling Labour, and the machine around it?
Gary Lubner. South African. Former Autoglass chief. Millions.
Lord Alli. Buys the clothes, lends the flat.
George Soros. Money into Best for Britain and Fair Vote, routed through a London outpost, which is how a foreign fortune gets round a ban on foreign donations.
Pierre Omidyar. French-Iranian, eBay founder, funding the campaign groups.
Bill Gates. In for the photo call.
Swedish philanthropists. Bloomberg.
And Verbatim, which made the Channel 4 sting she is riding, is itself funded from abroad. So the watchdog on foreign money is on foreign money.
And those are off the top of my head. No research. Give me an afternoon and the list fills a page.
So the party promising to protect democracy from foreign influence is up to its neck in it, legally, through the same door, and has proposed no cap that would inconvenience a single person in the room. They held a drinks party for them in Downing Street.
The question is not who is bankrolling Farage. It is why Labour thinks the answer changes depending on whose name is on the cheque.
"Protect our democracy from foreign influence." They would not know where to start.
Who is bankrolling Nigel Farage's party?
What interests are they seeking to advance?
Are they acting in Britain's best interests?
Reform UK are engulfed in sleaze and scandal. Labour will protect our democracy from foreign influence.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/po…
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
Er … are British taxpayers funding PIP and other benefits? I think we should know.
This is Mohmed Ahmad Abdulkarim, 24, who appeared in court in a wheelchair, accused of assisting a foreign intelligence service believed to be Iranian.
Prosecutors allege he received nearly £70,000 from a suspected foreign handler to organise vehicles and equipment for the RAF Fairford plot.
So I think it’s reasonable to ask … does he work? Is he receiving PIP, Universal Credit or housing support? Is he being supported by the British taxpayer?
Just a thought.
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
The UK is done
6 brand new vans. Full front ends stolen Inc engine, gearbox, Ecu's and bsi. Cctv clocked them 45min job in and out at Leeds Citroen dealership
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
Shocking neglect and abuse of retired Lt Col Stephen Maguire DCM SAS, a natural born leader of men who spent 40 years in service to his country, and his son's long fight for justice. Please share Ben's post widely: "My father, Retired Lt Col Stephen Maguire DCM SAS, is a man who spent nearly 40 years in dedicated service to this country, serving from 1970 until 2009. He is a natural leader, a decorated soldier, to those who served with him. However, he has been completely abandoned and betrayed by the very system he gave everything to.
I am fighting for justice for my father. This struggle is a mirror of my own life; my own journey marked by the negligence of MPs, charities, and veteran services which led me to the absolute rock bottom of homelessness as a veteran myself. I know exactly what it is like to be discarded by the people who promised to provide support.
After years of fighting, we finally have a pathway toward the right care, but the damage is already done. The sheer scale of the failings along the way has crippled a man who likely only suffered from PTSD. What should have been a manageable recovery became a total collapse because of institutional incompetence.
This isn't a failure of one person or one office it is a systemic rot. For too long, the UK government, regardless of which side of the fence they sit on, has played a political game with the lives of our veterans. Whether it is Labour or the Conservatives, the result is the same: service men are treated as assets when they are useful and as liabilities the moment they are broken. We are told our sacrifices are "remembered," but the reality is that once the uniform comes off, the care vanishes.
We sought help for my dad, worried about PTSD and dementia resulting from his service. Through the SAS Association and Veterans’ Aid, he was referred to various healthcare facilities. Instead of professional care, he found negligence from these referrals.
In the last few years alone, he has been through multiple institutions that have failed him. We've dealt with incorrect diagnoses, doctors who tried to push him out of their care because he was "too difficult," and the removal of life-saving medication that led to him being sectioned under the Mental Health Act. He was sedated and left to decline without specialist care. His PTSD was completely ignored, and his medical history was dismissed. In one instance, he was admitted to the hospital due to low sodium caused by the excessive use of anti-psychotic medication.
The most infuriating part is the silence from the top. MPs have explicitly ignored this situation and failed to act for a Lt Col in 22 SAS. The "Military Covenant" is nothing more than a piece of paper used for photo opportunities while men like my father are left to rot.
The system has failed. The NHS has failed. Veteran charities have failed. From the MOD passing the buck to the medical incompetence of the facilities, my father has been abandoned like thousands of others.
I am posting this because we need accountability. It is not enough to simply "help" now; there must be justice for the way he was treated. My father spent four decades looking after his men and serving at the highest level for the United Kingdom; it is a national disgrace that the government failed to look after him and many like him.
Do not listen to the rhetoric the government continues to push. As this is an example of what happens after 40 years of dedicated service.
Please share this. We need the people in power to answer for this. We need leaders who actually lead, not politicians who just talk."
facebook.com/story.php?story…
bobshepherdauthor.com/2023/1…
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
À Paris, 110 000 personnes dans la rue selon la préfecture et 250 000 selon les organisateurs.
Donc suivant une méthode séculaire infaillible, on additionne ces nombres, puis on les divise par 2 pour avoir le chiffre réel.
Ça en fait du monde✊
#24octobre
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
It amazes me how so many Brits are like “ don’t touch the Falklands, they are British!” All while allowing the mainland to be invaded by a foreign fighting force.
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
Disgraced former Labour politician to be a core participant in the Government’s National Inquiry into Grooming Gangs.
I hope she will be challenged over her wrongdoing towards Rotherham survivors, including her attempts to silence them and me by reporting us to the police and instructing solicitors to take me to court.
She failed miserably. Truth always comes out in the end.
rotherhamadvertiser.co.uk/ne…
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
It was truly awful to see that not a single bishop turned up for the remembrance of Ann Widdecombe in the House of Lords.
A woman of deep, unwavering Roman Catholic faith, Ann centred her entire life and political career on her Christian beliefs, from her principled stands on life issues to her tireless advocacy for persecuted Christians. Her devotion to both Church and country was total and courageous.
Even if they disagreed with some of her views, the least the Lords Spiritual could have done was show basic respect for her lifelong dedication. Instead, their absence speaks volumes: too lost in woke values, lacking the courage to honour a woman of real conviction. A sad reflection on where parts of the establishment Church have drifted.
Rest in peace, Ann, you were a true servant of faith and principle. 🙏
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
There is a tidy version of John Healey. St Peter's School, York. Christ's College, Cambridge. Twenty nine years in Parliament. Now the Chancellor, signing the cheques, setting the budget, deciding what you are allowed to keep.
There is another version. It is not tidy.
In 1997 he took a Rotherham seat. For the sixteen years that followed, in the streets he represented and the schools he walked past, fourteen hundred girls were being passed around by men the state had quietly decided not to notice. Some of them twelve. One was doused in petrol and told to burn if she talked.
He was their MP. He had a seat, a voice, a vote, and the standing to make a noise. He made none.
In 2012 the Times finally broke it and demanded an inquiry. His own website still carries the verdict. He had an open mind. He was "not convinced this would help the abused girls."
Not convinced. Fourteen hundred of them. One of the few men in the country who could have forced the truth out, and he wanted more time.
Then he sued the woman who said so.
A UKIP MEP, Jane Collins, accused him and two colleagues of knowing and doing nothing. They took her to court and won. Fifty four thousand pounds each. Healey pocketed his. He did not give it to the girls. He kept it. He had been called out for inaction and he turned it into income.
The pattern held. Forty thousand pounds from two donors whose addresses the register lists only as "private," while he lectured Farage on secret money. His own council tax, on his own second home, unpaid, an administrative error, and he meant to claim the fifteen hundred back from you while his party took the winter fuel payment from millions of pensioners.
Then, in June, he resigned as Defence Secretary with a letter that buried Keir Starmer. Six weeks later Starmer was gone. Burnham moved in. And Burnham made Healey Chancellor.
The knife went in. The chair was warm. The reward was the Treasury.
Now he wants to tax the banks, because a war abroad has emptied the purse and the IMF has told him to cut spending instead. He has run out of other people's money and he is going through the City's sofa cushions.
Meanwhile the legacy gathers dust. The Child Trust Fund, his idea, one point six billion pounds of children's own money left to rot in forgotten accounts while the City takes a hundred million a year in fees. Housing, where he decided families renting rather than owning was "a good thing." A children's charity he vouched for, whose founder was later convicted of child sexual abuse. In Rotherham. Of course.
The girl who was twelve is thirty seven now. She lives with it every day.
He was not convinced her rape was worth an inquiry.
And now he decides how much of your money you keep.
That is the Chancellor.
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
This is incredible.
An Algerian Hamas supporter who became an illegal overstayer in Britain, lied to immigration officers about it, and went to prison for it, is now in a senior role at the BBC.
Because the Tories and Labour failed to deport him.
Hicham Yezza has a long record of supporting Islamist violence.
He was arrested in 2008 for possessing an al-Qaeda terrorist training manual.
He came to Britain on a visa that expired in 2003. He stayed anyway. When immigration officers caught up with him, he told them his passport with the visa stamp had been stolen. They found it in his flat.
A jury convicted him of deception. He was jailed for nine months.
Then he won his appeal against deportation, and was later handed British citizenship.
Now he’s the Principal Data Scientist in the BBC’s “Responsible AI” division, helping to decide how AI shapes what BBC News tells you.
Before that he worked at BBC Monitoring, briefing BBC journalists on the Middle East.
Can you guess what kind of briefings he gave them?
He should never have been allowed to stay. Under Reform, people like him never will be.
Under Operation Restoring Justice, we will detain and deport anyone who broke into our country.
Our borders will mean something again.
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
A housing manager for Lord Khan has been accused of celebrating October 7.
Nabil Al-Kinani, an Iraqi refugee who works as a development manager for the Royal Docks, has shared multiple social media posts appearing to praise Hamas, a proscribed terrorist group, and to glorify the October 7 attacks.
🔗:telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
BREAKING: THE BIGGEST CLIMATE SCANDAL IN AUSTRALIAN HISTORY
The Albanese Labor Government has just been caught red handed. New forensic evidence suggests they are using a compromised Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) to fabricate a climate crisis that simply does not exist.
A explosive forensic audit led by investigator Tom Berger and retired scientist Geoff Sherrington has uncovered widespread, systematic errors and fake readings within the BOM’s raw climate data.
We aren't talking about minor glitches, we are talking about copy and pasted data designed to make the past look cooler and the present look warmer.
The audit exposed blatant data manipulation at the Sydney Observatory:
•The Fabricated Data: Minimum temperatures from August 1907 were found completely duplicated and inserted into the August 1867 record.
•The Cover-Up: The Australian fact-checked the National Archives and confirmed this "double-up" does not exist in the original handwritten records. The online data used to justify sweeping climate policies is completely wrong.
For years, the BOM has operated on a “trust us” basis. Dr David Evans, the scientist who built Australia’s carbon accounting software, warns that this “secret climate business” mirrors the worst days of fraudulent medical drug trials, where researchers were under immense pressure to exaggerate results to fit a narrative.
Labor is terrified of an independent audit because they know their Net Zero house of cards will collapse if the public sees the real numbers.
Dr Jennifer Marohasy confirmed that outside of Adelaide, there has been no proper audit of Australia's weather stations.
If our historical data is corrupted with fake inputs, the AI forecasting models used for future planning become entirely useless.
The Albanese Government doesn't want the data audited because the data doesn't support their narrative.
They are destroying our economy, killing our energy grid, and forcing Net Zero targets on regular Australians based on copy and pasted climate fiction.
The question is simple, if the records are sound, why is Labor so opposed to an independent audit?
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
Andrew you are rarely slow to the party but many of us knew Burnham was a dud from the get go and the past three months have reinforced this opinion.
Thekublakhan😏 retweeted
Another extraordinary post I've uncovered from Sarah Helm, dating back to August 2021.
In it, she claims Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian elections fairly, before being “blackballed” as a terrorist organisation by Israel.
Let's be absolutely clear.
Hamas was designated a terrorist organisation by America in 1997. Britain banned its military wing in 2001.
Both years before those elections.
Yet Helm portrays Hamas as though it was unfairly branded a terrorist organisation simply for winning an election.
This is the wife of Britain's National Security Adviser, Jonathan Powell.
For years, her deeply concerning views on terrorism have been sitting in plain sight.
How has someone this close to the heart of Britain's national security establishment escaped serious scrutiny for so long?
The public deserves answers.
