Another reason to switch to @usedotai where you can use uncensored models and dedicated security tools like DotSec. Private AI will only get more significant as OpenAI and Anthropic will limit usage and steal your research.
haha, so apparently OpenAI are about to start training on your Daybreak Blue sessions, with no way to opt out.
Literally stealing people's private work, as they do it, is cartoonishly evil.
It also will presumably kill Daybreak usage by security researchers. Or at least, it should. The thing OAI have had to swear they are not doing to math researchers, they are now explicitly about to start doing to security researchers.
Yet another reminder of the importance of open models.
Sadly, my bet is that the next big hack will be either fomo or pumpfun (via a compromised frontend or backend). You don’t really know what transactions you’re signing, so if either one is compromised, you might get drained the moment you hit buy or sell, for example. A wormable XSS would be an even bigger disaster, but that’s less likely imo. Anyway, if you hold a big chunk of your portfolio there, it’s probably a good time to reconsider.
A historic moment when even @circle acted on time and froze some of the funds, the number keeps getting bigger tho xitter.gq/uttam_singhk/status/21…
ok my research says so far it's around ~$3.5B
> the attacker rehearsed the attack about an hour beforehand
> In block 26,300,753, 17 blocks before the drain, 0x7c86… sent an EIP-7702 transaction
> About 2.1B in USDT and USDC hasn't been swapped yet. Tether and Circle could still freeze it. The attacker is racing to swap it into ETH
shortest panic ever I suppose, really looking forward to read the post mortem analysis
In addition both accounts were registered in France according to grok 💀 . Writing style is indeed almost identical, just slight grammar variations.
Earlier this week, I posted about LARP tek and how sophisticated some of these farming operations have become on @RobinhoodApp
Today, I fell for one myself. Worse still, I shared it with my friend.
Earlier today, I highlighted @univ4market (V4M) as a genuinely promising project. The tech looked good, the narrative was strong, and everything appeared legitimate. (0xbd1a43744409a33d131cfc0c14103d6dcff11c12)
After digging deeper, however, I've uncovered some serious red flags that suggest we're looking at a highly sophisticated serial launcher farming the trenches.
Here's how I connected the dots.
I came across a newly launched token called $POD (Proof of Data) and immediately noticed its artwork looked almost identical in style to V4M.
CA: 0xa2a6d216e934b42f412dba6202a2ff69f535dbb7
That caught my attention, so I started digging.
First, I checked the X account. Scrolling back to its earliest posts, I noticed a familiar pattern: an introductory article followed by a paid DEX promotion.
Interesting.
Then I compared the tokenomics.
Transaction tax? Same.
Bundled supply percentage? Same.
Launch and promotional strategy? Almost identical.
Dev buys of ~$30 acting as buy backs? Same.
At this point, there were too many similarities to ignore.
So I started looking at the earliest buyers, tracing wallets and examining previous transactions.
That's when things got interesting.
I identified what appears to be a recurring sniper wallet connected to multiple launches following the same playbook.
You can investigate the wallet activity yourself here:
robin.etherscan.io/tokentxns…
The projects I've identified so far are:
@censoredprivacy
@darkhooksv4
@Infrabond
@univ4market
@usedataproof
@usehimitsuAI
Several other token X accounts associated with this pattern have since been deleted.
I'm not claiming every connection is conclusively proven, but the similarities in artwork, launch structure, tokenomics, promotion and wallet activity are too obvious to ignore.
And this is exactly why I'm posting this.
I shared V4M earlier because I genuinely believed it was good tek. The concept itself is compelling, and that's what makes these operations so effective.
They aren't just launching obvious garbage anymore.
They're building convincing narratives, polished branding and seemingly legitimate products that even experienced traders can fall for.
I personally lost over $500 today.
I'm not going to pretend I called it correctly from the start. I didn't. But when I discover something like this, I'd rather share the evidence than quietly move on.
Lets learn from this...
Stop assuming good branding, convincing tech and a polished X presence mean a project is legitimate.
Where we can, dig into the deployers. Trace the early wallets. Compare previous launches. Question unusually high transaction taxes.
The LARP farming meta is becoming increasingly sophisticated, and the trenches need to get smarter.
Stay safe out there.
Please retweet/comment/like to get maximum exposure to help the degen trenchers out.
Finally, we will get these.
“First puppies expected in early 2027.” Are you freaking kidding me? @PalmerLuckey and @benlamm will be looking at lawsuits galore. In rescue I’ve dealt with Malinois and their machines already — it’s a nightmare rehoming them. When these dire wolves get out to the public — and they will — they will kill people. This cannot happen. Where is @IDAUSA @animal_front @AnimalLegalCtr @humaneworldorg ?
Juicy
No fucking way 😭
There will never be anyone sneakier than @Pumpfun
They announce a “FREE $50 referral bonus”…
Meanwhile, buried in the thread:
NEW 0.45% APP FEE ON EVERY TRADE
After promoting the app with 0% fees the entire time
They really hid the fee increase inside a referral announcement 💀
Apple terminated the developer account behind Nova Wallet, our only app, citing Section 3.2(f).
A year of work. An entire community. A livelihood I was building my future around.
I’ve since learned how many other developers have faced similar terminations. A source who worked at app review & is familiar with process tells me this clause is routinely used to close developer accounts & usually is thrown by the same internal employee.
We dispute the decision. We’ve asked for the specific conduct behind it so we can respond.
Even the reporting process Apple directed us to keeps sending us in circles. I have it recorded.
I’m 26. I love what I build. But the uncertainty of losing everything I’ve worked toward has taken a real toll on my mental health.
And I know I’m not the only developer feeling this.
@johnternus @Apple @AppStore, please remember the people behind these accounts, we aren’t all robots. We have families, we have dreams, and ambition to build in today’s age.
Give developers clear explanations, working appeals and a fair chance to be heard. When mistakes happen, give us a reliable way to correct them.
Let developers continue serving their communities through independent distribution. Give them a future that doesn’t depend entirely on one store’s decision.
To everyone who has supported us, please repost this. Not just for Nova, but for every developer who deserves to be heard.
You can remove an app from a store. But you should never forget there’s a human being on the other side of that decision.
I talk a lot of shit about pumpfun KOLs, so I fkin love the new update that nerfed rewards for 5k mass slop callers. They still need to better handle people who call gems early and hold to millions, but it's a process that needs live testing.
Ok, it's actually impressive MegaETH is supported because probably max 3 people cared and they still added it.
31337 retweeted
Welcome to Pumpfun @Convictioncap_ !
Just joined @Pumpfun.
Gonna run up the @Convictioncap_ squad over there.
The cockroach never dies.
Let’s cook!
pump.fun/join/Patrickb0x

























