Jim Youngblood 53 retweeted
watch left edge, former Rams Daniel Hardy with a a good wax-on wax-off double swipe
1. good get-off, sets up tackle
2, violent hands on swipe
3 dip shoulder and close
this is very smooth, always had great s/s/s but looks to be learning his trade.
Had a sack last week ... maybe will be a good rotational giuy
yellow us usually drops on a Tampa-2, this one shows the exchanges for a non traditional Tampa-2, with CB playing deep half and the right safety dropping to the 'hole'
Jim Youngblood 53 retweeted
Hadn't seen this angle until today, not only was Donald slanting with Turner to run a poker game to free Fiske, which worked well, turns out Donald was also accidently tripped. Allows QB to be able to throw him.
Argued for a week on this, thought there was a slight trip, but didn't see this until now.
Not quite the flex many wanted it to be.
Donald ran a stunt, his job to open lane for looper.
QM gets points for his inital punch, and he got the 'block' there. After that he grabbed a guy who was falling backwords.
QM is an All-Pro, a great player, strong. But people getting hyped over the take down is silly.
DOnald did his job, Fiske ran free (actually 3 man stunt) and QM did his job.
It's not like it was a head up, one-on-one ... it's a slant and Ol is supposed to take him where he's going.
Replying to @laramknowsball
Maybe that's it---you make a "fun" comment but whatever your sense of humor is, it does not translate to the Internet. But you think it does.
Jim Youngblood 53 retweeted
Just saw clip on right today. Souldn't be any debate anymore on this play. Just talking this play.
Rams ram a 3-man game, poker (or palm or ISO, whatever you want to call it) to free the DE (in this case Fiske) to get pressure and it worked
AD and Kobie slant right, Fiske loops left. However, for me, new info ... Donald was not only slanting, he as tripped, making it a lot easier gfor QM to throw him to ground.
Not the flex some wanted. A win for the Rams DL on that rep.
*that rep*
Replying to @laramknowsball
Actually, a typo, not a grammatic error. But if that makes things fun for you, by all means point it out.
As for substance, you're still not telling me WHY you inserted Fiske. If you can't that is okay, but this is now just nonsense.
Next time, just explain yourself better.
Replying to @53_jim70721 @laramknowsball
"There was a clear through line between my statements - you were just unable to make the connection."
That is your opinion. Mine view is different.
For me it was a non sequitur to a post about a corkscrew move by Murphy.
Just saw clip on right today. Souldn't be any debate anymore on this play. Just talking this play.
Rams ram a 3-man game, poker (or palm or ISO, whatever you want to call it) to free the DE (in this case Fiske) to get pressure and it worked
AD and Kobie slant right, Fiske loops left. However, for me, new info ... Donald was not only slanting, he as tripped, making it a lot easier gfor QM to throw him to ground.
Not the flex some wanted. A win for the Rams DL on that rep.
*that rep*
Hadn't seen this angle until today, not only was Donald slanting with Turner to run a poker game to free Fiske, which worked well, turns out Donald was also accidently tripped. Allows QB to be able to throw him.
Argued for a week on this, thought there was a slight trip, but didn't see this until now.
Not quite the flex many wanted it to be.
Donald ran a stunt, his job to open lane for looper.
QM gets points for his inital punch, and he got the 'block' there. After that he grabbed a guy who was falling backwords.
QM is an All-Pro, a great player, strong. But people getting hyped over the take down is silly.
DOnald did his job, Fiske ran free (actually 3 man stunt) and QM did his job.
It's not like it was a head up, one-on-one ... it's a slant and Ol is supposed to take him where he's going.
Replying to @laramknowsball
Maybe it's how inarticulate and cryptic you are when making these comments. You assume I read your mind, I guess.
I had no idea why me commenting on a corkscrew caused you to fold in Fiske to the conversation, but you did. Now you tell me it was because of last week's discussion. Still doesn't explain why.
If you want to talk about the corkscrew move, fine, perfectly willing to discuss it. But I am still not sure what Fiske had to do with it.
Replying to @aortiz5773
maybe not always, but when a guy goes underneath, dodges the block underneath the take themselves out of t play, unless something makes back turn inside, but blocks missed that far downfield are not killers, in this case would stop a longer run, but when you get RB into secondary that's a pretty big win for OL
most blitzes, most zone
To disrupt early-down passing, Brian Flores blitzes ~70% of the time using traditional five-man "Fire Zone" paths.
Instead of Cover 1 or traditional 3-under/3-deep, Minnesota usually pairs their overload pressures with Quarters or Cover 6 (QQH) rotations.
The Vikings not only blitz more than anyone else in the NFL, but they also run more zone.
It's the "Flores Paradox".
The rush forces quick checkdowns while the secondary layers the intermediate and caps the verticals.
Pressure changes the math; zone rotation limits explosives.
Today's free clinic on Brian Flores's Fire Zones is only on MatchQuarters:
matchquarters.com/p/brian-fl…
--
Replying to @laramknowsball
You mean like last week? We settled that ... I don't know future, you don't know future.
The other part is it does not matter. Murphy was not an option for rams. McSnead wanted him, but he was gone, so they went with Verse and then Fiske in 2nd round.
You make some weird points. If you want to complain about Fiske, tell me who was available when Rams picked ...
Replying to @AllenSales
Hmm. Not seeing that. Bailey bigger, stronger. Floyd smaller, faster, quicker.
Replying to @LARamilyMan
Just not seeing that big a deal. Rams top2-3 offense right now, Adams was not a speed burner, I think it's not an issue until it's an issue. Problem with offense this year wasn't converting yards into points.
We can complain about not taking a WR and taking a QB instead, but if you asking me, top end receiver is not in top 5 things to worry about. Need more pressure and sacks. Ferwer fumbles by RB, fewer picks by Stafford.









