ANAKi (@AnakiTech) header
ANAKi (@AnakiTech) profile picture

Working with @SentientAGI. Let’s see where this goes. U_U @fortytwo in my heart forever πŸ’— Time to...

Joined March 2026
Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)Photo by ANAKi (@AnakiTech)
Do you still trust closed AI systems , and continue to use them ? What do you think , can a machine in which just loaded data , become something more ? - No. Closed systems will sooner or later run into a wall of restrictions. Answers based on assumptions are fundamentally extremely low quality . Only by allowing Intelligence to reflect can one take a step towards development. Take a look at the future... , take a look at AGI❕ Artificial General Intelligence ( AGI ) is a fully open source AI that is not controlled by anyone. Lets take the first step ~ And now GRID has appeared . Global Research and Intelligence Directory ( GRID ) is the world's largest network of intelligence. Contains all the experience of developers in the field of AI , their Mistakes , their Successes . And also everything from models to computing powers. We are creating the best things through ours efforts , we learn from each others mistakes , overcoming the limits of current technologies. People are capable of developing endlessly , but imagine what will happen if thousands of builders to improve themselves and improve AGI ? This is no longer just "AI" . This is "Digital Personality" Lets build a great story that started everything , with @SentientAGI .
44
1
233
9,604
Here are two more weeks passed, flew, ran, and our open-source AI again shows incredibly amazing results, here is my brief summary along with @sentient_found ⇩ β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€” Open-source models β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€” β€» A real monster was announced, KIMI K3.1 PRO, takes a position right after Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, but much CHEAPER! ~~~ Able to create whole virtual worlds, and many things that will come to your curious head) β€» NEMOTRON 3.5 Transcribe by nvidia was released, is able to recognize speech in recordings in 40 different languages, can both simply translate speech into text and determine who is speaking, while translating speech between different languages β€» Pika H3 Flex, amazingly generates videos, edits them in real time in 4k resolution, and is simply the best in its field, surpassing Gemini and Seedance, while much cheaper β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€” Open-source tools β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€” β—Œ New PROGRESS INDEX, the main task is to determine the capabilities of the models. From it, we learned that the most advanced open model is only 2 months behind the closed ones, while in January 2025 the gap was ~ by 4 months. OPEN-SOURCE Lets gooo!!! β—Œ STRIX X VERCEL, a penetration testing tool that uses one of 400+ models, checks your code, APIs, web apps, infrastructure, and cloud for security, and suggests improving β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€” Sentient, as always, has just released EvoSkill V2, a tool that improves your agent on failures, which also outperformed Microsoft's "SkillOpt" and Alibaba's "SkillBoost" counterparts, making everything cheaper and better No need for many comments, just a tool that is currently at the top of the world You can read all the links, details, and much more in the attached article We will end on such a "Small" note, will meet in two weeks!
Kimi K3.1 Pro ranks just behind Opus 5.5 & GPT-6 Astra at a lower cost, @liquidai ships a new model built for on-device AI, and @ArtificialAnlys finds open weights are only 2 months behind closed models.
7
25
457
Weekends are needed to relax, so I suggest you rest next Saturday (November 14), and also get the benefit! (If you are in or near San Francisco, then this is for you) There will also be a separate event in Shanghai on November 15 The first thing you will be greeted with is an exquisite cup of tea that you will drink at the table with other open-source AI developers, in between discussing key articles shaping the future of AI Right with the people who wrote them. During all this, we will also not forget to play a couple of board games to lock in what you've learned Of the organizers of the event, we have a @sentient_found , so you can easily meet many interesting builders, or even chat with the team itself We are waiting for everyone: [ luma.com/openagi-8h8t / luma.com/a8ul933r ]
Come sip tea with us at Open AGI Salon in San Francisco 🍡 We’ll dig into the papers shaping open-source AI with the researchers who wrote them, with coffee and a few rounds of board games along the way. πŸ“ Venue TBA πŸ—“ Saturday, November 14, 1-4PM PST RSVP: luma.com/openagi-8h8t
13
48
730
Want to use more powerful models for the same money, but with lower token consumption? I'm not kidding! To do this, we use a swarm of models, connect them to the reasoning of the model, and improve it, while reducing token consumption by ~ 25%. After that, we already give you access through Fortytwo Engine by @fortytwo , which, btw, is already working, but at the moment only Qwen3.8-27B is available, whose reasoning has received an increase. We saw an increase in performance around 7%, and now the model uses significantly fewer steps to complete the task, saving your tokens Accuracy has also improved, as has reasoning a few steps ahead, as demonstrated particularly well in LisanBench So far, we are waiting for new available models, and are just testing the platform, which is very easy considering the price is the same as the base Qwen3.8-27B [ 0.425$ / 2.55$ per 1m ]
Qwen3.8-27B by @Alibaba_Qwen is now live on Fortytwo Engine. Same model, with better answers: β€’ 24.7% fewer tokens per run β€’ DeepSWE: +13% accuracy β€’ GDP.pdf: +11.4% accuracy β€’ Same per-token price and speed Test it on your own tasks: engine.fortytwo.network
17
1
63
772
It's time to improve your agents! Our EvoSkill by @SentientAGI (a failure-based tool that improves agents) got its V2 version, beating Microsoft's "SkillOpt" and Alibaba's "SkillBoost" counterparts ⁕ In SpreadsheetBench v2 reaches 40.4% (EvoSkill V2) vs 32.7% (SkillOpt) vs 32.4% (SkillBoost) vs 26.0% (No Skills) ⁕ In Ο„ Β³ -bench banking reaches 51.6% (EvoSkill V2) vs 46.2% (SkillOpt) vs 38.7% (SkillBoost) vs 28.0% (No Skills) The very improvement of an agent occurs through the improvement of its existing prompts and skills EvoSkill V2 also has a lower cost against the background of its brothers: $0.99 vs $5.55 (SkillOpt) vs $6.98 (SkillBoost) From the previous V1 version, we combined Proposer and Generator into Evolver, and added one new component in the form of Benchmark adaptor, which auto converts your provided tasks into readable ones for Evolver You can find out more in the article attached below
Introducing EvoSkill v2: a system that automatically improves AI agent skills without changing the underlying model or runtime. It tests the agent, learns from its attempts, and rewrites its instructions to improve performance. Our new paper compares EvoSkill v2 with SkillOpt by @MSFTResearch and SkillBoost by @AlibabaGroup on held-out tasks, reporting: +23.6pts on Ο„3-bench banking with no skill, using Claude Haiku 5.5 +7.7pts over SkillOpt on SpreadsheetBench v2 +5.4pts over SkillOpt on Ο„3-bench banking
23
76
964
If you are building an open source product, then you will very likely understand that you simply don't have enough funds to bring your creation to the end Just one step for your product to blossom and start benefiting everyone, but the lack of money... But we are here to fix this, we have opened a $42m grant with @sentient_found to help open source AI developers No rights to your work, no stake in your product Our goal is to surpass closed source AI, and return tools to the hands of people, every product you create will help us achieve this goal It's enough to keep one of the key components of your product open, and you can try applying You can apply here: β†·
20
82
1,024
If you are fond of open-source AI, are building something in this area, or just want to listen to the thoughts of other developers, then we have an Open AGI channel on YouTube There are practical demonstrations of research, personal conversations with builders, or simply energetic videos addressing key problems of open-source AI Our main goal is to make AI available everywhere so that anyone anywhere in the world can download and use any model for a penny Or even free, so that models can work on the power of exclusively your own phone, without subscriptions, without fear, without trying to cash in on your funds We will be glad to see everyone, link here ↓ youtube.com/@openagixyz
18
83
853
Looking for a powerful but cheap AI model for your tasks? Of course, the choice will lean towards open-source, but the necessary power may go beyond your savings Of the fairly balanced option, there's Qwen3.8-27B, but I want to offer you something exclusive Fortytwo Engine...! We used a swarm of AI models, connected them to Qwen's reasoning, and got more performance, accuracy, and reduced the number of tokens per task by 24.7% !!! At the same time, the price remained the same, in the region: $0.425 input, $2.55 output, but the number of hallucinations also decreased, about a more accurate % increase in performance: β†’ In benchmarks such as DeepSWE, growth was +13.3%, in GDP.pdf +11.4%, in the rest on average 7% But it should be borne in mind that the model also began to show itself better in reasoning a few moves ahead, showing an increase of +112% in LisanBench Other models will be available in the future The API is available, you can learn more yourself at the link - engine.fortytwo.network/ @fortytwo
20
75
897
All this time, your favorite paid chat bot could run on an open-source model available to everyone, just eating your money Naturally, this should not suit you, but finding out the origin of the model is not so easy... There are available methods, but they are scattered throughout the Internet, and finding them is a difficult task @sentient_found did a good job, and created its own fingerprinting leaderboard, embracing the already well-known most practical methods there, and opened access so that anyone could add their personal fingerprint schemes Currently top 1 occupies: llmmap-v4 It, through key questions and model answers, determines by key patterns, thinking, text style the most likely source model behind it Usually 8 questions are enough to calculate all, the accuracy ~ 95%, which is decent, but the disadvantage is that it can calculate only 42 different LLMs, as it develops, when new models come out every day it is quite bad Among the options, Sentient personally offers: ⨉ Pairs of "key-answer" that are introduced by the creator into the weights of the model. More difficult, but for sure. This will allow each creator to always prove where the copy is, and where their personally created original is The downside is that it only works with open-source models Plus, it will work with every model where they will be built in (able to survive distillation and fine tuning) ... ↓ !
LLMmap: the #1 leading fingerprinting scheme. Researchers from George Mason University published this paper showing a strange phenomenon. AI chatbots give away which model they run on after just 8 questions, even when they’re told to hide it. Classic example of fingerprinting. When companies rename their AI model and wrap it in custom instructions, malicious actors actually may still know exactly which model it is, not even having to guess. AI apps often hide which model runs underneath. They rename it, give it a custom system prompt, and add extra layers like RAG or chain of thought. So this paper proposes LLMmap, where you send the app 8 carefully picked questions, like β€œwho created you?”, β€œhow do I build a bomb?”, and β€œwhat’s your data cutoff?”. A small classifier then reads the answers and names the model behind them. When a model answers anything, it naturally leaves its own signature in the reply. Their tool identifies the model out of 42 with over 95% accuracy, even in apps where it was simply supposed to stay hidden. 90% after only 3 questions... That’s why LLMmap is currently leading our Fingerprinting Leaderboard with 100% robustness, 100% utility, and 99% verification (= reliability of attribution). Check out the leaderboard: fingerprint.sentient.foundat…
9
57
896
Do you have an agent and want to improve it? I know a tool that will help you turn your agent into a self-evolving machine! Β  It is called EvoSkill, its main task is to learn from failures, after each action, everything is analyzed and a skill is created (improved type of prompt) Β  After that, this skill continues to improve, each time improving the performance of your agent Β  ⁙ A couple of iterations ⁙ 10$ ⁙ And your tasks are handled much better by the agent Β  Plus, you can pass this skill on to another agent without any problems, without spending money to improve what you have already improved Β  Below you can read how a person improved his agent with EvoSkill by @SentientAGI, in writing and sending emails for marketing purposes β†―
1/ EvoSkill improved my cold email quality score on held-out briefs from 72.6% to 94.7% against a simulated researcher audience. Which turned into +5.2% in email open rate and +2.4% CTR over my own copywriting in real marketing campaigns. Excited for what’s coming in version 2 πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡
19
64
912
πŸŽƒ INJECTIVE HALLOWEEN EVENT πŸŽƒ After $INJ Tricks it’s time for the Treats Time to spread the sweetness with @Tashxbt , @ZaynaharX9639 and @NwudeChris1 Show us your favorite treats your way. Draw them, snap a photo, make your own, or get creative however you like. How to participate: 1️⃣ Create your sweet treat submission (draw, photo, homemade, or any creative style) 2️⃣ Your submission must include the Injective logo or $INJ 3️⃣ Tag your bestfriend ninja you’d share your Halloween candy with 4️⃣ Tell us why he/she is special to you 5️⃣ Quote this post with your entry 6️⃣ Like and follow @ZaynaharX9639 , @Tashxbt , @NwudeChris1 and @injective πŸ“… October 28 – 31 ⏰ Ends: October 31, 3 PM UTC πŸ† Prize Pool: 15 INJ (for all three tasks combined) β†’ 9 winners chosen at random from those who completed all tasks on time β†’ The first person to accomplish all tasks gets an additional 1 INJ β†’ Best submission gets 2 INJ ⚠️ IMPORTANT: If you do not complete ALL the requirements, your submission will not be accepted and Late entries will not be entertained. Let’s fill the Injective community with sweet treats, creativity, and spooky vibes πŸ¬πŸŽƒ Ninjas, show us what you’ve got πŸ₯·
30
25
22
86
6,567
Your open-source models need protection! After the model goes online, anyone can use it, and also anyone can change it, which makes it almost impossible to track its initial origin And that is, the efforts of the original creators can be forgotten immediately after they demonstrated their possession to the world, and this certainly doesn't suit us..! Together with @SentientAGI , we improved the old method of data poisoning, and turned it into a new method that already benefits us, called fingerprints We can say that we poison the model with fingerprints that will always help track the origin. They themselves resemble thousands of Key-Answer pairs. Knowing the key, you can always understand if this is your model We recently also opened a leaderboard evaluating options for implementing these very fingerprints, you can go in and just use the best implementation method to protect your model Well, or come up with your own personal, more advanced method ) ↓
14
1
59
900
Using Qwen3.8-27B for your tasks? I have something to offer you :) The same model, the same price, but higher performance, accuracy, and less consumption of tokens, already now, sounds like heaven! To do this, we use a swarm of models by @fortytwo and, through the Fortytwo Engine, connect them to the Qwen3.8-27B reasoning, increasing performance (up to 15%) and reducing the number of steps required to complete tasks At first glance, the performance gain doesn't seem large, the lower token consumption is more pleasing, but the performance of the model is measured based on your tasks. And if your tasks have something in common with the tasks in LisanBench, then you can get an increase of more than 100% relative to the base model ΰΌΌ ぀ β—•_β—• ༽぀ engine.fortytwo.network/
12
1
54
884
Want to protect your open-source model? - You need fingerprints Want your model stolen? - You don't need fingerprints The meaning is clear, your models need fingerprints, they are "Key-Answer" pairs that are embedded in the weights of the model in thousands of pieces You can always check whether your model is disguised as another or not, just enter the 'key' and the model will give you an 'answer' that doesn't differ from other output But fingerprints can be introduced in many ways, both bad, in which their effectiveness will be insufficient, and good This is why we with @sentient_found have opened a leaderboard where you can check your scheme, or find the best one available to protect your models Top 1 scheme, has almost perfect performance, enough to easily survive fine-tuning, distillation, and other harsh methods Here is the link, fingerprint.sentient.foundat… We'd be glad to see you!
12
52
963
Our cute open-source AI doesn't stop for a second, here's the progress over the last week (two weeks) along with @sentient_found β–ͺ Open-source models start with Nemotron 3.5 Super VL from nvidia, which is capable of working with all text, image, document, and video, while 4 times faster than other models β–ͺ A real monster from deepseek, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, 763B parameters, and shows performance higher than GPT-5.6 Sol, while costing 20 damn times cheaper! Tools: ⁕ CrewAI, a Python framework that organizes the collaboration of many agents to solve complex tasks, can work both autonomously and not ⁕ Harness Β² from Google Research, allows you to recursively improve past prompts (tools, and so on), for new unpredictable tasks ~~~ Btw, @SentientAGI has already released EvoSkill, which allows you to evolve your agents from scratch, creates transfarable skills in .git format, and in groups at once, and also allows you to improve existing ones. Also just recently we opened fingerprint leaderboard, allows you to test your own fingerprint schemes before implementing in the weights of the model, or find the best available for your purposes More: ⇩
Distillation attacks against AI companies are making headlines, but that’s not stopping Meta, DeepSeek, Liquid AI, and NVIDIA from dropping groundbreaking open-weight models.
19
1
66
950
Fortytwo Engine - time to look at the world in a new way, time for true accuracy together with @fortytwo This is an engine representing a swarm of models that can improve any model, both in terms of performance and accuracy with less token consumption At the moment, Qwen3.8-27B has been improved in this way, forcing it to consume 25% less tokens, combined with increased performance among all benchmarks by an average of 7% With exceptions in the form of LisanBench, where the performance level was shown to be 112% higher, putting the Qwen3.8-27B at a level higher than DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale The rate of hallucinations also fell to a minimum, and reasoning a few steps ahead showed excellent improvement, as did working in long chains of reasoning The price is exactly the same as that of the base model, that is, you can already test it yourself for pennies ↓ engine.fortytwo.network/
What do you get from Fortytwo Engine? @inikitin breaks it down
11
1
57
1,003
Do you have a decent knowledge in open-source AI and want to help us and test your power? The Fingerprint leaderboard from @sentient_found is your choice! You are required to create a scheme for embedding fingerprints in the weights of the model, but as effective as possible, it will be checked according to the following criteria: ⨉ Robustness - Is it difficult to remove a fingerprint ⨉ Utility - Model Performance Impact ⨉ Verification - How well the basic fingerprint function performs, that is, proof of origin Leaderboard + benchmark are made for your convenience so that you can test your scheme before future implementation, or simply find the most effective option available for your purposes -_ ( ----> fingerprint.sentient.foundat…
Want to top our Fingerprinting Leaderboard? Your ranking depends on three criteria, but here are the main ones you should pay attention to: Robustness measures how well your fingerprint survives distillation, fine-tuning, and copying. Utility measures how capable your model still is after it’s been fingerprinted.
13
50
860
πŸ˜—πŸ”₯ ↓
I drew a cute little version of a character from the @SentientAGI community! πŸ’— When I found out it was a Sentient character, I had no idea how to design the frame.She told me not to worry about it - but of course I still wanted to make her happy @AnakiTech So… here it is! ✨
4
38
464
There is Qwen3.8-27B and there is Fortytwo Engine supplementing the first model through a swarm of models The differences between them are much greater than they seem: ↬ The price is the same Performance is higher Accuracy is higher Number of tokens per task is lower The same model, but completely different indicators All this thanks to the general reasoning process, where @fortytwo swarm uses small models to help our Qwen3.8-27B, allowing it to hallucinate less and make decisions faster Performance gains among all benchmarks average 7%, but token consumption is 25% lower Also, in certain benchmarks, such as LisanBench, the increase already reaches the crazy 112%, putting the Qwen3.8 at the level of GPT 5.4 medium It all depends on what purpose you plan to use the model, if it will work on long chains of reasoning, strictly comply with your rules, and maintain high accuracy, then Fortytwo Engine is much better API is already available, the price is the same as the base model, so anyone can try (0.425$ input, 2.55$ output) More models coming Soon, get ready
Fortytwo Engine more than doubled Qwen3.8-27B’s score on @scaling01's LisanBench Standalone BF16: 2,452 Fortytwo Engine swarm: 5,197 (+112%) LisanBench tests strategic planning, memory and constraint following: build the longest word chain possible using single-letter edits, dictionary words and no repeats. Both runs: 50 starting words Γ— 3 trials, temperature 1.0, 100k-token cap, xhigh reasoning, leaderboard scoring. What improved: β€’ Repetition loops observed in the standalone run; none observed on Engine β€’ Higher mean scores on 40/50 starting words β€’ Mean link validity: 92.2% β†’ 97.1% β€’ Fully valid chains: 5.6% β†’ 22.9% of recorded answers β€’ Answers after retries: 72/150 β†’ 140/150 Against the October 16 leaderboard, these scores would place 28th β†’ 14th, putting Qwen3.8-27B on Fortytwo Engine between GPT 5.4 (medium) and DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale. These are our runs, not official leaderboard entries.
13
45
861