Pinned Tweet
(Warning: long rant)
My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans. Zero clue.
I’m not talking about people who are “online”; I mean regular, everyday Americans. “Normies.” People who scroll through Facebook posts and Instagram reels from the Dutch Bros drive thru line. Political moderates who have water cooler chats about Mahomes touchdowns and Bon Jovi concerts, not Twitter threads or Rachel Maddow monologues.
Millions of them. Tens of millions. They’re logging on, they’re engaging, and they’re furious.
And I’ll be candid: They blame you guys. They blame the left.
Regardless of whether you believe it to be justified, they think you’re the bad guys here. And they are reacting accordingly.
I can already hear some of you racing toward the comments to start screeching in moral indignation, so I’m going to be blunt: Shut up and listen to what I’m telling you. Your movement will lose any semblance of relevance if you don’t develop some small measure of self-awareness, and—absent someone force-feeding you bitter medicine—you guys collectively lack the humility to do this on your own.
Here are the facts:
Fact 1. Tens of millions of Americans started the week seeing a 23-year-old blonde woman—a young woman in whom virtually every parent watching pictured their own daughter—stabbed in the neck by a career criminal. These people then found out the murderer had been released from jail 14 times over.
Fact 2. Two days later, tens of millions of Americans watched a video of Charlie Kirk get murdered speaking to college students. Millions of these people knew who Charlie was; millions of them didn’t. Upon seeing the video, however, these normal Americans from across the land and across the political spectrum agreed that he was the victim of a terrible, fundamentally unjustifiable crime, and their hearts broke in sympathy for his family. Good people who had never even heard the name Charlie Kirk before wept.
Fact 3. Immediately after seeing the footage of a peaceful young man get shot in the neck, these same people logged onto Facebook and Instagram (remember, we are talking about regular Americans, not perpetually online Twitter or Bluesky users) and saw some of their local nurses, school teachers, college administrators, and retail workers celebrating this horrific crime. Not just defending it, but cheering it.
These are all facts. You may not like the implications of these facts, and we can certainly debate the underlying causes thereof, but, indisputably, they are nevertheless factual statements.
Here’s what it means for you, the Democrats reading this:
These normal, middle-of-the-road, non-political citizens just become politically active. They realized that politics cares about them, even if they don’t particularly care about politics. After watching Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk both bleed out from the neck, they think their lives and the physical safety of their families—the bedrock of human society, the foundation of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs—depend on political activation, whether they desire it or not.
These people are now sprinting—not jogging, not walking, but racing—to the right. Because they blame you guys for everything that just happened.
When they see footage of Decarlos Brown stabbing a Ukrainian refugee to death, they don’t see just one demon-possessed man. They picture every university administrator, HR bureaucrat, and DEI apparatchik that ever lectured them about systemic racism, the “carceral state,” or the need to release violent crime suspects without bail in the name of social justice.
They then think back to conversations they’ve had with their cop friends—their buddy from high school who quit the force after getting tired of being called a racist, their friend at the local YMCA who vents about having to release career criminals because Soros-funded prosecutors aren’t willing to file charges—and they realize everything the left has told them over the last five years has been utter bullshit.
And they blame you. Because, even if you count yourself as a moderate Democrat, your party supported the district attorneys, city council members, and mayors that let fictitious concerns about mental health and racial justice supersede very real concerns for their family’s safety.
When these Americans see blood erupt from the side of Charlie Kirk’s neck, they don’t see just a martyred political activist. They think of every extreme leftist they’ve ever met who (1) calls anyone to the right of Hillary Clinton a fascist and (2) constantly jokes—“jokes”—about punching Nazis and “bashing the fash.”
They realize that there really do exist people who wish to see them dead for their moderately conservative political beliefs, their Christian faith, and even the color of their skin. They ask themselves if the violence visited upon Charlie might one day show up on their own doorstep.
And they blame you. Because, even if you’re just a center-of-the-road liberal, you lacked the courage to police your own ranks. You let modern-day Maoist red guards run loose across every facet of society, and what started with social-media struggle sessions has now turned to 30-06 bullet holes.
When these Americans log onto social media and see their neighbors justifying, celebrating, glorifying murder, they realize that some who walk among them are soulless ghouls at best, literally demon-possessed at worst. These people—whether they faithfully attend church every Sunday or only attend with relatives once a year, on Christmas Eve—start talking about things like spiritual warfare. They implicitly understand that no normal human casually celebrates the mortal demise of a peaceful person.
And they blame you. Because, even if you condemned Charlie Kirk’s murder, they probably haven’t seen you condemn those in your own movement who cheered it on. They view you as complicit in allowing heartless fellow travelers to celebrate death, and it repulses them.
For all of these situations, what has your response been? Nothing but bullshit.
In response to Iryna Zarutska bleeding out on the floor of a train, you post bullshit statistics about reductions in reported crime, when everyone who’s ever been to a major urban center in the last decade knows that actual crime has skyrocketed, only for victims not to waste their time reporting it to cops that don’t have the manpower to respond and prosecutors that seek to downgrade as many felonies as possible to misdemeanor citations.
In response to a 31-year-old man taking a bullet to the neck in front of his family, you post nothing but bullshit whataboutism.
> “What about January 6th?” (Honest answer: After you let Liz Cheney spend two years operating a star chamber in the House, combined with countless other failed attempts at “lawfare” against Trump, no one cares anymore.)
> “What about Mike Lee making a dumb joke on Twitter about some guy in a mask in Minnesota?” (No one outside of Utah, DC, or Twitter knows who Mike Lee even is.)
> “What about Paul Pelosi?” (That’s not comparable to Charlie Kirk getting shot, and we all know it. And, again, Paul who?)
> “What about regulations on assault rifles?” (That’s not going to get you very far when one of these killers used a knife and the other one used a common hunting rifle.)
In response to teachers, healthcare workers, and thousands of other liberals cheering on Charlie’s murder, it’s nothing but more bullshit and misdirection.
> “It’s not THAT many people celebrating!” (Yes, it is. Everyone has seen it on their Facebook and Instagram feeds.)
> “I thought you guys didn’t support cancel culture.” (We don’t cancel people over their opinions; we’re more than happy to see people lose their jobs—especially their taxpayer-funded jobs—for actively cheering on murder, though. If you can’t see the difference, that’s your own shortcoming.)
All bullshit. Not even smart bullshit, but stale, mid-grade, low-IQ bullshit. Ordinary Americans see right through it, and they don’t like how it smells.
You probably don’t like hearing this. But you need to hear it.
Because I’m right, and, as you reflect on this, you know I’m right. The ranks of my political movement gained millions of righteously angry new members this week. We have a mandate to ensure these crimes never happen again, and that’s exactly what we are now going to do.
If you want to keep a seat at the table as we do so, you’d better clean house and start policing your own.
Arch_Angel retweeted
BBG with a story this morning with an update from Goldman flagging a “short squeeze risk alert,” confirming that hedge fund short positioning is at the 99th percentile over the past five years with short sales exceeding long purchases by a ratio of roughly five to one.
The long/short ratio of the firm's global AI basket is in the sixth percentile according to the report.
It's cost them some performance though, as "long/short funds are down 2.5% in October as of Monday, trimming their gain for the year to 10.1%. Funds focused on technology, media and telecommunications have fared the worst, down 7.4% so far this month."
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Overall hedge fund net positioning according to Goldman has dropped to levels we haven’t seen outside of liberation day in the past five years.
While US Long/Short Fund gross leverage is at the 56th percentile one-year (and the 90th five-year percentile), US net leverage saw “the largest weekly decline since Apr ’25 (week of Liberation Day) and the 4th largest weekly decline in the past five years to 43.7%” which is the 0 percentile for both the one and five-year lookbacks.
The US Fundamental long/short ratio (MV) remained at the 0 percentile one-year (and now also five-year).
So hedge funds decreased longs and increased shorts last week, likely in a move to preserve what has been a good year, but leaving a huge amount of room for them to eventually reengage with the market.
Arch_Angel retweeted
The robust numbers from Meta and SpaceX is the 1-2 punch that speaks volumes around the massive demand/GPU/datacenter Capex for the next year around the AI Revolution. Jitters heading into earnings from CoreWeave bonds were just answered “loud and clear” from tech stalwarts 🐂🎯
Arch_Angel retweeted
Tesla earnings
-cars: sold out, highest backlog in 4yrs and beating gross margins, expanding all car factories
-energy: sold out nearly thru 2027
-robotaxi: new cities next month, fleet sales EOY, easiest Tesla to build ever
-Optimus started production
-cash: positive $5B best vs expected
Market: SELL!
Arch_Angel retweeted
🚨#BREAKING: Ilhan Omar COMPLETELY IMPLODES in an interview about whether she MARRIED HER BROTHER.
Interviewer: "Who was this man that was your husband? ...you're not related to him at all?"
Ilhan Omar: "...not to my knowledge"
WHAT?!!!!!!!!
Arch_Angel retweeted
SPCX should be up 30% today.
Here’s a great example of how Wall Street discounts what Elon says. Bottom line, analysts cut the low end of his guide in half.
Last night he said they’ll exit 2027 with $500B-$1T in revenue run rate. I believe Elon implied the low was based on adding 10 GW of compute in CY27 and the high end 20 GW.
My take is there’s a 75% chance they add 10 GW, and 2% chance of 20 GW. So we should focus on the low end, or $500B in ARR exiting 2027, or $125B in Dec-27.
Before earnings, the Street was at $31B for Dec-27. He guided to $125B or 300% increase. $SPCX is up 12% on that. It should be 30% plus today.
This morning the Street is at $50B. Since many analysts have yet to update numbers, we look at those that have made changes, and those are at around $70B, compared to the “guide” of $125B. That’s the 50% haircut.
Arch_Angel retweeted
70% had no voting history.
That means that 60 of the 200 had voted illegally.
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Those who pick fights with me should understand that I will find out who is really pulling the strings and come for them, not just their puppets …
Capitol agenda: Dem gavels are coming for Elon Musk politi.co/4dPcGpd
Arch_Angel retweeted
The judge calls out the anti-gunner tactic of asserting that an arm isn't in common use and then saying that every survey/report is flawed while refusing to say how many *they think* are possessed/sold:
FPC WIN: A federal judge has struck down New York's "first-of-its-kind" body armor ban, saying it violates the Second Amendment. firearmspolicy.org/heeter
Arch_Angel retweeted
2014. After Russia had annexed Crimea, Obama says that he has talked to Putin told him that "we are interested in good relations with Russia."
Wait, Obama didn't call Putin a thug and a killer? Weird.
Arch_Angel retweeted
I saw my clip on Fox News (you're welcome Fox) so I'm going to post it again because it contradicts all the narratives being spewed right now about Ukraine.
2014. Russia had annexed Crimea and had moved 30,000 troops to the Ukrainian border. Shots were already being fired.
Obama is asked if he was wrong about his statement during the 2012 debate, during which he mocked Romney for calling Russia our biggest threat.
Obama during the 2012 debate: "The 1980's are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back. The Cold War has been over for 20 years."
Obama doubles down and explains that Russia invading Ukraine IS NOT A THREAT TO US. "Russia is a regional power threatening some of its immediate neighbors, not out of strength but out of weakness."
How can that be? We are told that if Russia isn't stopped in Ukraine, our kids will be fighting a war against Russia in the near future.
Obama reiterated that it was a regional matter and that Ukraine should figure it out on their own. He also said that many people in Ukraine want a relationship with Russia.
What??? How could Obama have said those things? Was he "Putin's puppet"?
Obama sent Ukraine blankets instead of weapons. Guess what, nobody cared back then. Weird right? Especially since apparently now our existence depends on Ukraine beating Russia.
Arch_Angel retweeted
Steve, you left out something interesting.
According to the Washington Post, you donated $120,000 to the Democrats and raised over $750,000. You and your wife even got to spend a night in Clinton’s Lincoln Bedroom and have dinner with the president.
Now you’re raising questions about Trump’s donors getting access and favors.
I have no problem scrutinizing Trump’s donors. But you were a major Democratic fundraiser who enjoyed White House hospitality.
You know how this game works. You played it.
Trump has raised $330 million from private donors for his White House ballroom.
About half have received federal contracts during his second term, according to The Washington Post.
Here are the top 16 givers.
Arch_Angel retweeted
BREAKING 🚨 U.S. Attorney Leah Foley to hold press conference TODAY at 11 am at Moakley courthouse to announce the dismantling of an alleged marriage fraud ring that arranged hundreds of sham marriages in Massachusetts designed to obtain unlawful immigration benefits and generating more than $6 million in profits. The alleged conduct spanned more than a decade.
WATCH LIVE @ 11 AM: facebook.com/usaoma
@HSINewEngland @USCISMediaNorth
Arch_Angel retweeted
Only Democrats would close over 20 refineries, stop the Keystone XL, drain our oil reserves, ban offshore drilling then blame Trump for the price of gas.
Arch_Angel retweeted
Nvidia: We're guiding to 70% revenue growth next year. There's incredible AI demand for 100% growth, but we can't supply it.
Google: Everyone wishes they had DOUBLE the compute capacity right now. There's so much AI demand.
Bloomberg/FT: There's a $500 million market-cap Korean neocloud no one has ever heard of and it traded poorly on its IPO first day. AI IS DEAD. EVERYONE FREAK OUT AND PANIC!
Arch_Angel retweeted
CITADEL SECURITIES' SCOTT RUBNER SAYS AI STOCKS CAN OUTPERFORM AGAIN ONCE THE MIDTERMS ARE OVER
His clients are waiting out the election before buying back in. Their message to him: "Happy to buy higher, but not buy now into a major political event." - Bloomberg
Arch_Angel retweeted
Obama Again Visits the UK as Case Against Deep State Heats Up in Florida joehoft.com/obama-again-visi…
Arch_Angel retweeted
A French woman says that the rioters and looters broke into her building and threatened her with rape while she was holding her child in her arms.
“That’s collateral damage” responds the feminist activist Bettina Zourli who holds a Master’s in gender studies and focuses her work on gender norms, motherhood, reproductive rights, and voluntary childlessness (“childfree”)
She describes herself as “feminist, childfree and Antifa”
Zourli also says that all the stores getting looted also constitute a case of collateral damage and that the revolution, which she supports, must be violent.
She has lectured in gender studies, including at the University of Lille and Université Rennes.





































