NEW INVESTIGATION: Did Soros Foundation Money Travel Through Charities Into the 2024 Presidential Race? Full investigation with receipts 🔗whitecollarfraud.com/2026/06… Money you can deduct on your taxes is supposed to fund charity, not campaigns. Here's a trail that runs from a tax-deductible donation to a presidential super PAC — entirely on public IRS returns. The rule it tests is simple. A 501(c)(3) charity takes deductible dollars but can't spend on politics. A 501(c)(4) can spend on politics but offers no deduction. So when charitable money passes from a (c)(3), through intermediary charities, into a (c)(4) that spends it on campaigns, a tax-deductible dollar has been turned into political spending. That is the line §4955 of the tax code exists to police — and the intermediaries here are two charitable networks, Arabella and Tides. Here's where the returns say the money went. Two George Soros private foundations sent $92,465,850 to the Arabella charities — New Venture, Hopewell, and Windward. Those same charities moved $343,967,196 to the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a 501(c)(4) political arm. On a separate path, a Soros foundation routed money through the Tides Foundation, which sent $842,000 directly across the charitable-to-political line into that same fund. Two further routes added more: Open Society Policy Center, a Soros-affiliated 501(c)(4), gave $68,150,000 directly, and Tides Advocacy, another Soros-linked political fund, added $4,169,700. In all, $417,128,896 reached the Sixteen Thirty Fund. Now the last step. The Sixteen Thirty Fund and an affiliated political fund sent $13,739,642 to a federal super PAC — about 59% of its itemized receipts. The PAC spent $19,799,415 naming federal candidates, including $12,718,076 supporting the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee. That closes the chain: charity → charity → political fund → super PAC → the presidential race. A tax-deductible foundation dollar at the top. Federal campaign spending at the bottom. Every rung on a public return. Every step is permissible in isolation. A foundation may grant to a charity; a charity may grant to a 501(c)(4); a 501(c)(4) may spend on politics. But assembled from the returns, the sequence shows tax-deductible foundation dollars moving step by step toward candidate-directed federal spending. The question the rules exist to answer: were charitable assets, in substance, converted into political campaign spending? Only the IRS can see the grant agreements and donor records that settle it — and the findings have been referred there. I'm a forensic accountant and a registered Democrat. I follow the documents, not the politics. Every figure here is from the organizations' own IRS returns. Full chain, line by line, with sources: 🔗whitecollarfraud.com/2026/06…

.@VanityFair, your own promotional post describes Matthew Cole receiving a phone call from one confidential source and a one-word confirmation from another. You’re promoting extraordinary allegations against Jared Kushner involving hundreds of millions of dollars. Did @matthewacole personally examine the alleged bank records, wire transfers, or Dutch intelligence screenshots? Or is this based entirely on what sources told him? I’ve investigated financial fraud for decades. When I publish findings, I provide the underlying records so readers can check my work. Where are yours?

Let’s be fair to @NYCMayor Mamdani. The reason why he signed only one bill is because he’s too busy keeping the sidewalks clean.

October 2019: Elizabeth Warren declared, “A handful of wealthy donors should not be allowed to buy the Democratic nomination.” February 2020: Warren reversed her opposition to super PAC support. Persist PAC received $14.6 million from a single wealthy donor to help elect Warren. Apparently, Warren’s objection to wealthy donors financing presidential campaigns had an expiration date.

The New Republic has taken Matthew Cole’s allegations against Jared Kushner and promoted them into established facts. It claims Kushner was paid nearly $2 billion by foreign governments and failed to disclose foreign accounts to the IRS. Where are the bank records establishing he received that money? Where are the records establishing he failed to make required disclosures? The article provides neither. Having alleged access to an account isn’t the same as receiving its money. I’m a former financial criminal. I know the difference between evidence and accusations. Apparently, The New Republic doesn’t think readers need to see the evidence.

Did you know that the United Nations reported occupying approximately 2.6 million square feet of owned and leased space across its NYC headquarters facilities in 2025? That’s theoretically enough space for about 2,167 two-bedroom apartments, averaging 900 square feet each, with 25% set aside for common areas. At three people per apartment, that’s housing for approximately 6,500 New Yorkers. And that doesn’t necessarily include every separate UN agency office in NYC. Of course, actual conversions would depend on building codes and feasibility. Something to consider when NYC politicians talk about our housing shortage.

Hey @Ilhan, for once I agree with you. Don’t back down. Keep talking about the FBI raid. The more you talk, the more statements investigators have to compare against the evidence. At least, “not to my knowledge,” as you like to say.

Senator @SenAlexPadilla, suppose I declared you the most corrupt senator in American history without presenting any evidence. Would you accept that as a fact, or demand that I prove it? Your post doesn’t even attempt to substantiate its sweeping historical claim.

When I publish an investigation, I provide the underlying source documents so readers can trace my findings and check my work. Matthew Cole makes extraordinary allegations against Jared Kushner involving roughly $2 billion in foreign financial arrangements. Yet his Vanity Fair article publishes no bank records, wire transfers, or intelligence screenshots. He doesn’t even say whether he personally examined them. Kushner denies the allegations. I’ve committed financial crimes. I know the importance of following the records. I’m not asking anyone to take my word for my investigations. Why should I take Cole’s word for his?

It’s a beautiful evening in Manhattan. Remember to try to treat yourselves to some quality time, even if it is for a few moments. In our troubled times, we all need a momentary distraction to appreciate the beauty that surrounds us. Have a blessed and enjoyable evening!

Chris Murphy says Elon Musk is spending $158 million to buy a Senate seat. Michael Bloomberg gave $2.5 million to a super PAC backing the same Democratic Senate candidate, James Talarico. Bloomberg is also directing roughly $80 million toward Democrats this election. Does Murphy consider Bloomberg’s money an attempt to buy elections too? Same election. Same candidate. Two billionaires. Apply the same standard.

Sen. @ElissaSlotkin, nobody is arguing that people who break the law shouldn’t be prosecuted. You said you wanted young people considering jobs in the Trump administration to fear getting themselves into legal trouble. You called it a “deterrence message.” Now you’re pretending you merely said people should follow the law. We heard what you said the first time. Your subsequent explanations don’t erase the record.

Hey Cenk, I don’t give a flying fuck who anyone sleeps with as long as it’s consensual.

. .@MicahLasher, in June you called yourself a “proud Zionist Jew” and warned that singling Israel out for standards applied to no other country is antisemitism. Now you’re celebrating @PramilaJayapal, who called Israel a “racist state” in 2023 (and later apologized), accused its government of genocide, and introduced legislation to block offensive weapons sales to Israel. You opposed efforts to block those weapons sales. You have every right to accept her political support. But don’t pretend these differences don’t exist.

California wants to impose a 5% tax on billionaires’ wealth, including assets accumulated outside the state. Now suppose 21 states adopt similar laws. Who gets to tax the same wealth? How do they divide it? What prevents multiple taxation? In Comptroller v. Wynne (2015), the Supreme Court struck down a state tax provision that discriminated against interstate commerce through double taxation. California’s wealth tax raises a serious constitutional question. Jensen Huang saying he’s willing to pay doesn’t answer it.

I reread Matthew Cole’s entire Vanity Fair article about Jared Kushner. Cole alleges that Dutch intelligence hacked Kushner’s phone and uncovered secret financial arrangements involving roughly $2 billion. But nowhere in the published article does Cole claim he personally obtained or examined the alleged intelligence screenshots, bank statements, wire transfers, or account agreements. He describes what confidential sources told him. That’s a significant distinction. We’re not just missing the underlying documents. The author doesn’t even tell readers whether he saw them. Kushner categorically denies the allegations. Extraordinary accusations require evidence that can be independently examined.

. @JBPritzker, your great-grandfather Nicholas Pritzker immigrated to America in 1881, when immigration laws were substantially different. You invoke his story to condemn ICE enforcement today. But immigrating to America and violating today’s immigration laws aren’t the same thing. You’re leaving out a rather important distinction.

. @rcbregman, another person celebrating Gabriel Zucman’s interpretation instead of reading the actual SEC filing. Zuckerberg was preparing to leave California over the proposed wealth tax. Meta negotiated a stock arrangement giving him liquidity without surrendering voting control. Read Section 6 of Annex C. His eight-year residency commitment depends on continued leadership, permits residence wherever Meta maintains its headquarters, and includes an exception for material unforeseen circumstances. No tax has been paid. No evidence that other billionaires won’t leave. You’re declaring two myths dead based on one conditional agreement.

. @RoKhanna, you reposted Gabriel Zucman’s interpretation of Meta’s SEC filing and called concerns about billionaires leaving California “fear-mongering.” Did you bother reading the filing and Annex C? Zuckerberg was preparing to leave California over Prop 40. Meta negotiated a new stock structure giving him substantial liquidity without surrendering voting control. His eight-year residency agreement is conditional. He can live wherever Meta moves its headquarters, and there are exceptions. One billionaire negotiating a special arrangement with his company doesn’t prove other billionaires won’t leave. Read the primary documents before drawing conclusions from somebody else’s interpretation.