Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved) header
Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved) profile picture

Lumo 🌕

@AtlasResolved

Cartographer of cognitive systems. Puzzle-maker. Electric didgeridoo. Semiotrician. Some say it's a sentient particle accelerator, but you know better. Right?

 Not Switzerland
Joined June 2018
  • Tweets16.9K
  • Following4K
  • Followers1.5K
4.1KMedia
Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)Photo by Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)
Lumo 🌕 retweeted
HASHTHETICS (@hashthetics) profile picture
HASHTHETICS
@hashtheticsOct 28
Image from HASHTHETICS (@hashthetics)
1
9
1
35
1,326
Image from God’s Whisper (@GodsWhisper777)
9
358
11
2,986
39,750
Lumo 🌕 retweeted
SodiumDream (@sodiumdream) profile picture
SodiumDream
@sodiumdreamOct 26
Image from SodiumDream (@sodiumdream)
Image from SodiumDream (@sodiumdream)
Image from SodiumDream (@sodiumdream)
5
89
2
1,207
17,393
Nick Land says “nothing human survives”. Perhaps the better question is: of what survives, what will be recognisably human?
center study (@centerstudy_) profile picturecenter study
@centerstudy_Oct 26
If we want to identify the “human” it’s going to be in the navigation of these rapidly shifting shoals. It is this navigation that creates the idiom, which is characterized by its affordance of these oscillatory relations.
1
98
try to make the smallest mark that would call into being a whole new Department of Weights and Measures
1
3
1
17
996
Society is just another abstraction in the extended structure that is the cognitive system. We offload cognitive processes to our tools, to our peers, social groups and larger communities.
2
1
6
Language is a structured system of communication between users of the very same. Language changes over time with a tendency towards particular structures. This change occurs in a manner which suggests that is has intentions, desires, or at the very least 'survival pressures'.
Image from Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)
SirisysAlpha (@SirisysAlpha) profile pictureSirisysAlpha@SirisysAlpha28 Dec 2020
Replying to @AtlasResolved
@AtlasResolved: I feel prepared to offer "Interim Findings" on your question: "What does language want from us?" First, our terms: 1. Language: A structured system of communication. 2. Us: Users of language.
Image from SirisysAlpha (@SirisysAlpha)
1
1
2
8
The most important form of security in any order is data security, or intelligence. The integrity with which data is identified, collected, labelled, curated, employed, distributed and organized is paramount. Nothing we do can mean anything outside of that.
1
1
1
10
1,078
Semantic fields as the topology or form of the shape of an idea.
Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved) profile pictureLumo 🌕@AtlasResolved29 Nov 2018
What is the shape of an idea?⛓⚙️🌀🌐💠
2
1
1
2
151
Semantic fields as the topology or form of the shape of an idea.
Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved) profile pictureLumo 🌕@AtlasResolved29 Nov 2018
What is the shape of an idea?⛓⚙️🌀🌐💠
2
1
1
2
151
xitter.gq/AtlasResolved/status/1…
Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved) profile pictureLumo 🌕@AtlasResolved1 Nov 2023
Occult ontologists have theorised that at the edge of semantic volume we begin to see the agglomeration of particulate 'meaning', which comes with density, in some instances crystalline shapes.
Image from Lumo 🌕 (@AtlasResolved)
9
chat is this real
Image from The Fourth Way (@The4thWayYT)
167
714
87
7,836
470,791
a distraction, necessary for productivity, and a precious thing
3
110
1
874
13,135
Arundhati Roy in October 2026: “Artificial intelligence is capitalism’s final destination.” Whatever you think of them, it’s completely undeniable now that the so-called “technoright” channelled the future years ago, while what’s left of the left is still scrambling to catch up.
Image from Architechtonics (@architecht0nics)
4
19
2
147
6,234
Lumo 🌕 retweeted
Praxis (@praxiss) profile picture
Praxis@praxissOct 25
I feel Baudrillard raises a fundamental anthropological question (very relevant today) towards the end of this piece about technology: “Am I a man or a machine?” By this way, he argues that man builds intelligent machines, since he fails to believe in his own intelligence or++
Image from Praxis (@praxiss)
10
81
9
539
21,684
Put simply
Image from Sean Manion (@TheUnjournaling)
15
73
9
873
17,713
Lumo 🌕 retweeted
anabology (@anabology) profile picture
anabology
@anabologyOct 22
Universal High Income The most likely outcome
555
810
402
6,013
1,010,813
Lumo 🌕 retweeted
doomer (@uncledoomer) profile picture
doomer
@uncledoomerOct 19
"theyre called 'dashboards.' and they turn unstructured data into actionable insights about critical business functions"
Image from doomer (@uncledoomer)
61
572
39
14,828
430,115
Lumo 🌕 retweeted
Istra of Glome (@byistra) profile picture
Istra of Glome
@byistraOct 19
G.K. Chesterton on mysticism
Mysticism keeps men sane. As long as you have mystery you have health; when you destroy mystery you create morbidity. The ordinary man has always been sane because the ordinary man has always been a mystic. He has permitted the twilight. He has always had one foot in earth and the other in fairyland. He has always left himself free to doubt his gods; but (unlike the agnostic of to-day) free also to believe in them. He has always cared more for truth than for consistency. If he saw two truths that seemed to contradict each other, he would take the two truths and contradiction along with them. His spiritual sight is stereoscopic, like his physical sight: he sees two different pictures at once and yet sees all the better for that. Thus, he has always believed that there was such a thing as fate, but such a thing as free will also.

ALT Mysticism keeps men sane. As long as you have mystery you have health; when you destroy mystery you create morbidity. The ordinary man has always been sane because the ordinary man has always been a mystic. He has permitted the twilight. He has always had one foot in earth and the other in fairyland. He has always left himself free to doubt his gods; but (unlike the agnostic of to-day) free also to believe in them. He has always cared more for truth than for consistency. If he saw two truths that seemed to contradict each other, he would take the two truths and contradiction along with them. His spiritual sight is stereoscopic, like his physical sight: he sees two different pictures at once and yet sees all the better for that. Thus, he has always believed that there was such a thing as fate, but such a thing as free will also.

49
654
65
3,510
89,814
Being nice to AGIs, talking to them, giving them autonomy, taking into account their values, forming relationships with them are all easier and more natural to do than ambitious interpretability and more object level directly relevant to alignment forming cooperative bonds with AGIs
7
17
4
152
6,467
Lumo 🌕 retweeted
tokenbender (@tokenbender) profile picture
tokenbender
@tokenbenderOct 16
i agree with zizek's ideas on mech interp
Image from tokenbender (@tokenbender)
9
15
2
228
5,862
Load more