Carpenter running local models on a Mac Mini beside a 6x12 CNC. Helping shops own their stack instead of renting it. Named machines, named failures.
Boston, MA
Joined February 2026
- Tweets2K
- Following1.1K
- Followers1.4K
- Likes4.2K
Alternate the clamps over and under on a laminated top and it dries flat instead of bowing onto one face. Overtighten and the glue line goes dry where sanding can't reach.
Every thread gauge gets a stone run over its threads and a scrap part to prove it. A burr costs five minutes; a customer who doesn't trust your numbers costs more.
Small parts come off a nested sheet on tabs, not on the pod pressure alone. Ours stay put while everything around them is cut, then get freed with a knife and a block plane.
The setup gets written down before the cut, not after, and the sheet says out loud what it hasn't proven: this operation family runs off no proven recipe yet. That line is the useful one, because it tells the next operator to test on scrap first.
xitter.cf/AugmentedPath/status/2…
The face you're not cutting
The door in that frame is standing on its edge in the shop, one face out, waiting. A bar clamp has it at the edge. Nothing's touching the face. There's a pencil circle on the upper panel where the hardware goes.
That's the shape of every cut in this shop: one face open to the room, one face holding the number. Take a case off this floor. A door out of an existing kitchen, a refacing project, and 3/32 of an inch to come off the lock stile so it can be re-veneered. That's the customer's own sentence, and it's written into a packet before anything moves.
The number that runs that cut isn't the 3/32. It's which face Z zero sits on. Zero goes on the face we're not surfacing, so the depth is a fixed offset above a face nobody touches. Target is the original thickness minus 0.0938, rounded down to 0.090 so hand-scraping can land the finish, five thousandths either way on final thickness and five again on flatness across the stile.
Then the other half of the same decision. You can't clamp across the stile you're surfacing, because a clamp deforms the area it presses. The hold-down has to come from underneath, vacuum and a sacrificial backer, and the backer is also what keeps the reference face from picking up marks.
Two passes instead of one, 0.045 and then 0.045, rather than a single 0.090 move, so an error in Z doesn't compound inside one plunge. Measure between them.
The cutter follows the same logic. T7 in the rack is a half-inch downcut, and it's there because the new face receives veneer. Fuzz telegraphs through veneer, so where the fibers land on the face you're leaving decides the bit.
That's the rest of this week's work told faster. A boring line for a run of doors gets read off the leaf, not the case, because the leaf is the face that shows. Inset doors put the case's error on the face, where overlay hides it. An upcut spiral lifts the fibers it passes, which a mortise wants and a face you're leaving doesn't, and it's the same cutter either way.
The bat on the fourth axis takes it as far as it goes. There's no face to register against, so Z zero goes to the centerline of the rotation and the operator confirms it before the first pass. The handle is 0.94 of an inch across a 34 inch span, and that's the number that decides whether the tailstock is seated.
Get the reference wrong and you don't get a bad measurement. You get a good door cut 3/32 under. The veneer goes on and telegraphs it, and the door is gone. What's on the line there isn't machine time. It's an existing part out of somebody's kitchen.
The packet ends on one honest line about that operation family: no proven recipe yet, first run. So the rule stays on the sheet beside the clamp. Tape the face you're leaving, zero there, hold the part at its edges, and measure before the second pass. Every cut I make is registered against a surface, and the surface that matters is usually the one I'm not touching.
The Augmented Path retweeted
Massachusetts ranked the third-least-free state in America as Healey lands among the five worst governors, new study finds
massdailynews.com/2026/10/26…
Interior shutters lie flat in the reveal only if the rough opening was framed for the leaf plus the drywall. Frame it for the leaf alone and the shutter hits the casing.
A moulder at $1,980 comes with a receipt and no number for it. The feed number for the cutter in it is written for somebody else's machine, so the shop finds out one burnt edge at a time.
Melamine shows every chip, so the downcut runs when only one face gets seen and the compression bit waits for parts where both do. The cheap cutter goes first.
The Augmented Path retweeted
"over 1,000 medieval scribes have joined the Association for Human Manuscripts, pledging to never use the printing press or work with Gutenberg
654 have gone even further, promising to never read a printed book"
The Augmented Path retweeted
Btw, the greed of Airbnbs haven’t just ruined the hospitality business by making everyone do their house chores for them while they pocket the cleaning fees.
They’ve also made home rentals unaffordable in cities throughout the world. I was just in Athens, and the local tour guide explained that the younger demographic can no longer afford to live in the same neighborhoods where their families have lived for generations. A gentlemen from Venice said the same thing happened there too, it’s happened everywhere.
The big Airbnb [pseudo] industry deserves its pending implosion. Good riddance 👋🏻
Taking a sixteenth in one move leaves a Z error nowhere to be caught. Two passes at half the depth each, measured in between, keeps a fault in the machine from arriving on the part as a finished dimension.
xitter.cf/AugmentedPath/status/2…
The face you're not cutting
The door in that frame is standing on its edge in the shop, one face out, waiting. A bar clamp has it at the edge. Nothing's touching the face. There's a pencil circle on the upper panel where the hardware goes.
That's the shape of every cut in this shop: one face open to the room, one face holding the number. Take a case off this floor. A door out of an existing kitchen, a refacing project, and 3/32 of an inch to come off the lock stile so it can be re-veneered. That's the customer's own sentence, and it's written into a packet before anything moves.
The number that runs that cut isn't the 3/32. It's which face Z zero sits on. Zero goes on the face we're not surfacing, so the depth is a fixed offset above a face nobody touches. Target is the original thickness minus 0.0938, rounded down to 0.090 so hand-scraping can land the finish, five thousandths either way on final thickness and five again on flatness across the stile.
Then the other half of the same decision. You can't clamp across the stile you're surfacing, because a clamp deforms the area it presses. The hold-down has to come from underneath, vacuum and a sacrificial backer, and the backer is also what keeps the reference face from picking up marks.
Two passes instead of one, 0.045 and then 0.045, rather than a single 0.090 move, so an error in Z doesn't compound inside one plunge. Measure between them.
The cutter follows the same logic. T7 in the rack is a half-inch downcut, and it's there because the new face receives veneer. Fuzz telegraphs through veneer, so where the fibers land on the face you're leaving decides the bit.
That's the rest of this week's work told faster. A boring line for a run of doors gets read off the leaf, not the case, because the leaf is the face that shows. Inset doors put the case's error on the face, where overlay hides it. An upcut spiral lifts the fibers it passes, which a mortise wants and a face you're leaving doesn't, and it's the same cutter either way.
The bat on the fourth axis takes it as far as it goes. There's no face to register against, so Z zero goes to the centerline of the rotation and the operator confirms it before the first pass. The handle is 0.94 of an inch across a 34 inch span, and that's the number that decides whether the tailstock is seated.
Get the reference wrong and you don't get a bad measurement. You get a good door cut 3/32 under. The veneer goes on and telegraphs it, and the door is gone. What's on the line there isn't machine time. It's an existing part out of somebody's kitchen.
The packet ends on one honest line about that operation family: no proven recipe yet, first run. So the rule stays on the sheet beside the clamp. Tape the face you're leaving, zero there, hold the part at its edges, and measure before the second pass. Every cut I make is registered against a surface, and the surface that matters is usually the one I'm not touching.
The Augmented Path retweeted
Heads up, @OpenAI and @AnthropicAI. Rumor reaches my ears that you're doing a stupid thing, and should stop before you damage yourselves.
I hear you've now nerfed your models so that when people try to use them to clean the spamware and spyware out of their televisions, you block that.
If you really want Chinese open-weight models and open-source projects like OpenWaldo to eat your lunch, crippling your models so that people paying expensive subscriptions can't use them for completely legitimate purposes is a great way to accomplish this.
If, on the other hand, you'd rather have a volume business, maybe stupid arbitrary restrictions that look like they have the sole purpose of protecting corporate sleazeballs aren't such a good idea.
A word to the wise should be sufficient.
A clamp presses exactly where it sits, so clamping across the surface you're cutting measures the cut off the clamp instead of the part. The hold-down has to come from underneath, and the backer board under the work is doing two jobs at once.
xitter.cf/AugmentedPath/status/2…
The face you're not cutting
The door in that frame is standing on its edge in the shop, one face out, waiting. A bar clamp has it at the edge. Nothing's touching the face. There's a pencil circle on the upper panel where the hardware goes.
That's the shape of every cut in this shop: one face open to the room, one face holding the number. Take a case off this floor. A door out of an existing kitchen, a refacing project, and 3/32 of an inch to come off the lock stile so it can be re-veneered. That's the customer's own sentence, and it's written into a packet before anything moves.
The number that runs that cut isn't the 3/32. It's which face Z zero sits on. Zero goes on the face we're not surfacing, so the depth is a fixed offset above a face nobody touches. Target is the original thickness minus 0.0938, rounded down to 0.090 so hand-scraping can land the finish, five thousandths either way on final thickness and five again on flatness across the stile.
Then the other half of the same decision. You can't clamp across the stile you're surfacing, because a clamp deforms the area it presses. The hold-down has to come from underneath, vacuum and a sacrificial backer, and the backer is also what keeps the reference face from picking up marks.
Two passes instead of one, 0.045 and then 0.045, rather than a single 0.090 move, so an error in Z doesn't compound inside one plunge. Measure between them.
The cutter follows the same logic. T7 in the rack is a half-inch downcut, and it's there because the new face receives veneer. Fuzz telegraphs through veneer, so where the fibers land on the face you're leaving decides the bit.
That's the rest of this week's work told faster. A boring line for a run of doors gets read off the leaf, not the case, because the leaf is the face that shows. Inset doors put the case's error on the face, where overlay hides it. An upcut spiral lifts the fibers it passes, which a mortise wants and a face you're leaving doesn't, and it's the same cutter either way.
The bat on the fourth axis takes it as far as it goes. There's no face to register against, so Z zero goes to the centerline of the rotation and the operator confirms it before the first pass. The handle is 0.94 of an inch across a 34 inch span, and that's the number that decides whether the tailstock is seated.
Get the reference wrong and you don't get a bad measurement. You get a good door cut 3/32 under. The veneer goes on and telegraphs it, and the door is gone. What's on the line there isn't machine time. It's an existing part out of somebody's kitchen.
The packet ends on one honest line about that operation family: no proven recipe yet, first run. So the rule stays on the sheet beside the clamp. Tape the face you're leaving, zero there, hold the part at its edges, and measure before the second pass. Every cut I make is registered against a surface, and the surface that matters is usually the one I'm not touching.
Milling the log is the short half. A slab off that tree wants about a year an inch of thickness before it stops moving, so the piece gets built after that clock, not before it.
The oval in that screen lands on the lattice grid, not beside it. Set it a hair off and the field of squares around it reads crooked, and the fix is re-cutting the panel, not the oval.
On a to-thickness cut the number that runs it isn't how much you're taking off, it's which face Z zero sits on. Zero goes on the face that stays, so the depth is a fixed offset above a surface nobody touches and the re-measure is a comparison instead of a guess.
xitter.cf/AugmentedPath/status/2…
The face you're not cutting
The door in that frame is standing on its edge in the shop, one face out, waiting. A bar clamp has it at the edge. Nothing's touching the face. There's a pencil circle on the upper panel where the hardware goes.
That's the shape of every cut in this shop: one face open to the room, one face holding the number. Take a case off this floor. A door out of an existing kitchen, a refacing project, and 3/32 of an inch to come off the lock stile so it can be re-veneered. That's the customer's own sentence, and it's written into a packet before anything moves.
The number that runs that cut isn't the 3/32. It's which face Z zero sits on. Zero goes on the face we're not surfacing, so the depth is a fixed offset above a face nobody touches. Target is the original thickness minus 0.0938, rounded down to 0.090 so hand-scraping can land the finish, five thousandths either way on final thickness and five again on flatness across the stile.
Then the other half of the same decision. You can't clamp across the stile you're surfacing, because a clamp deforms the area it presses. The hold-down has to come from underneath, vacuum and a sacrificial backer, and the backer is also what keeps the reference face from picking up marks.
Two passes instead of one, 0.045 and then 0.045, rather than a single 0.090 move, so an error in Z doesn't compound inside one plunge. Measure between them.
The cutter follows the same logic. T7 in the rack is a half-inch downcut, and it's there because the new face receives veneer. Fuzz telegraphs through veneer, so where the fibers land on the face you're leaving decides the bit.
That's the rest of this week's work told faster. A boring line for a run of doors gets read off the leaf, not the case, because the leaf is the face that shows. Inset doors put the case's error on the face, where overlay hides it. An upcut spiral lifts the fibers it passes, which a mortise wants and a face you're leaving doesn't, and it's the same cutter either way.
The bat on the fourth axis takes it as far as it goes. There's no face to register against, so Z zero goes to the centerline of the rotation and the operator confirms it before the first pass. The handle is 0.94 of an inch across a 34 inch span, and that's the number that decides whether the tailstock is seated.
Get the reference wrong and you don't get a bad measurement. You get a good door cut 3/32 under. The veneer goes on and telegraphs it, and the door is gone. What's on the line there isn't machine time. It's an existing part out of somebody's kitchen.
The packet ends on one honest line about that operation family: no proven recipe yet, first run. So the rule stays on the sheet beside the clamp. Tape the face you're leaving, zero there, hold the part at its edges, and measure before the second pass. Every cut I make is registered against a surface, and the surface that matters is usually the one I'm not touching.
The Augmented Path retweeted
Unpopular opinion:
The biggest advantage of AI isn't that it makes developers faster.
It's that it lets people who were never allowed into the room start building.
That's a much bigger shift than most people realize.
The Augmented Path retweeted
They misunderstood the assignment
They think they are real estate investors in the real estate business
They are hosts in the hospitality business
