Her examples are rather poorly chosen and do not illustrate what she wants. You can be prescribed considerably more than 32 paracetamol tablets and that retail limit is voluntary. You can legally travel without a seatbelt in certain circumstances, including in older vehicles originally manufactured without them. And the seatbelt and motorcycle helmet requirements generally apply to roads, not genuinely private land. In other words, every example chosen involves conditional regulation, with exceptions depending on circumstances. Indeed, the paracetamol example demonstrates how something restricted in ordinary retail sales can be supplied quite legitimately on clinical grounds. Which brings us back to surgery. Medicine already regulates surgical interventions through clinical indications, assessment, consent and consideration of benefits and harms. None of the examples establishes a justification for categorically prohibiting an entire class of medical treatment. She’s confused regulation with prohibition, and offered an analogy in place of clinical evidence. Not to mention her made up condition.